Entropy-based artificial dissipation as a corrective mechanism for numerical stability in convective heat transfer

References

• O. B. Adeyinka and G. F. Naterer, “Apparent entropy production difference with heat and fluid flow irreversibilities,” Numer. Heat Transf. Part B, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 411–436, Nov. 2002. DOI: 10.1080/10407790190054012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. U. Ogban and G. F. Naterer, “Control volume finite element method for entropy generation minimization in mixed convection of nanofluids,” Numer. Heat Transf., Part B, vol. 75, no. 6, pp. 363–382, Jun. 2019. DOI: 10.1080/10407790.2019.1627797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. VonNeumann and R. D. Richtmyer, “A method for the numerical calculation of hydrodynamic shocks,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 232–237, Mar. 1950. DOI: 10.1063/1.1699639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. D. Richtmyer, “A proposed method for the calculation of shocks,” Los Alamos Nat. Lab., Los Alamos: NM, LAMS 671, 1948.
   Google Scholar
• M. L. Wilkins, Calculation of Elastic-Plastic Flow. California, NY: California University Livermore Radiation Lab, 1963.
   Google Scholar
• M. L. Wilkins, “Use of artificial viscosity in multidimensional fluid dynamic calculations,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 281–303, Jul. 1980. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(80)90161-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Smagorinsky, “The beginnings of numerical weather prediction and general circulation modeling: Early recollections,” Adv. Geophys., vol. 25, pp. 3–37, Jan. 1983. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2687(08)60170-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Smagorinsky, “General circulation experiments with the primitive equations: I, The basic experiment,” Mon. Wea. Rev., vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 99–164, Mar. 1963. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1963)091 < 0099:GCEWTP>2.3.CO;2.
   Google Scholar
• M. Nazarov and J. Hoffman, “Residual‐based artificial viscosity for simulation of turbulent compressible flow using adaptive finite element methods,” Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 339–357, 2013. DOI: 10.1002/fld.3663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Albright and M. Shashkov, “Locally adaptive artificial viscosity strategies for Lagrangian hydrodynamics,” Comput. Fluids, vol. 205, pp. 104580, Jun. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2020.104580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. E. Barter and D. L. Darmofal, “Shock capturing with PDE-based artificial viscosity for DGFEM: Part I, Formulation,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 229, no. 5, pp. 1810–1827, Mar. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2009.11.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Hartmann, “Adaptive discontinuous Galerkin methods with shock-capturing for the compressible Navier–Stokes equations,” Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids, vol. 51, no. 9–10, pp. 1131–1156, Jul. 2006. DOI: 10.1002/fld.1134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. V. Kolev and R. N. Rieben, “A tensor artificial viscosity using a finite element approach,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 228, no. 22, pp. 8336–8366, Dec. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2009.08.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P-O. Persson and J. Peraire, “Sub-cell shock capturing for discontinuous Galerkin methods,” presented at the 44th AIAA Aerosp. Sci. Meeting Exhibit, 2006, p. 112.
   Google Scholar
• H. Yucel, M. Stoll, and P. Benner, “Discontinuous Galerkin finite element methods with shock-capturing for nonlinear convection dominated models,” Comput. Chem. Eng., vol. 58, pp. 278–287, Nov. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2013.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Reisner, J. Serencsa, and S. Shkoller, “A space–time smooth artificial viscosity method for nonlinear conservation laws,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 235, pp. 912–933, Apr. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2012.08.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. A. E. Bouz, A. M. Ibrahim, M. M. Abdelsalam, and E. M. El-Said, “Entropy generation analysis and simulation of turbulent forced convection around tube with integral wake splitter using artificial neural network approach,” Alex. Eng. J., vol. 65, pp. 343–355, Oct. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.aej.2022.10.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. L. Guermond, R. Pasquetti, and B. Popov, “Entropy viscosity for conservation equations,” presented at the V European Conf. Computational Fluid Dyn. (Eccomas CFD), Lisbon, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• M. O. Delchini, J. C. Ragusa, and R. A. Berry, “Entropy viscosity method applied to euler equation,” Idaho Nat. Lab., ID, INL/CON-13-29941, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• A. Chaudhuri, G. B. Jacobs, W. S. Don, H. Abbassi, and F. Mashayek, “Explicit discontinuous spectral element method with entropy generation based artificial viscosity for shocked viscous flows,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 332, pp. 99–117, Mar. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2016.11.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Sheikholeslami, M. I. Khan, Y. M. Chu, S. Kadry, and W. A. Khan, “CVFEM based numerical investigation and mathematical modeling of surface dependent magnetized copper‐oxide nanofluid flow using new model of porous space,” Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Equ., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 1481–1494, Oct. 2021. DOI: 10.1002/num.22592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Q. Song et al., “Bioconvection analysis for Sutterby nanofluid over an axially stretched cylinder with melting heat transfer and variable thermal features: A Marangoni and solutal model,” Alex. Eng. J., vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 4663–4675, Oct. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.aej.2021.03.056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Ibrahim et al., “Two-phase analysis of heat transfer and entropy generation of water-based magnetite nanofluid flow in a circular microtube with twisted porous blocks under a uniform magnetic field,” Powder Technol., vol. 384, pp. 522–541, May 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2021.01.077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Y. Xiong et al., “Nanomaterial transportation and exergy loss modeling incorporating CVFEM,” J. Mol. Liq., vol. 330, pp. 115591, May 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2021.115591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. F. Naterer and J. A. Camberos, Entropy–Based Analysis and Design of Fluids Engineering Systems. Boca Raton, FL: CRC, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• R. A. Cox and B. M. Argrow, “Entropy production in finite-difference schemes,” AIAA J., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 210–211, Jan. 1993. DOI: 10.2514/3.11343.
   Google Scholar
• G. F. Naterer, “Constructing an entropy-stable upwind scheme for compressible fluid flow computations,” AIAA J., vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 303–312, Mar. 1999. DOI: 10.2514/2.731.
   Google Scholar
• P. U. Ogban and G. F. Naterer, “Apparent entropy production difference for error characterization in numerical heat transfer,” J. Thermophys. Heat Transf., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 659–668. Apr. 2020. DOI: 10.2514/1.t5894.
   Google Scholar
• A. Bejan, Convection Heat Transfer. Hoboken, NJ: JWS, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• G. F. Naterer, Advanced Heat Transfer, 3rd ed., Boca Raton, FL: CRC, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• S. Patankar, Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow. New York, NY: CRC, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• G. E. Schneider and M. J. Raw, “A skewed, positive influence coefficient upwinding procedure for control-volume-based finite element convection-diffusion computation,” Numer. Heat Transf., vol. 9, pp. 1–26, Jan. 2007. DOI: 10.1080/10407788608913462.
   Google Scholar
• C.-C. Cho, C.-L. Chen, and C.-K. Chen, “Natural convection heat transfer and entropy generation in wavy-wall enclosure containing water-based nanofluid,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 61, pp. 749–758, Jun. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2013.02.044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Khanafer, K. Vafai, and M. Lightstone, “Buoyancy-driven heat transfer enhancement in a two dimensional enclosure utilizing nanofluids,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 46, no. 19, pp. 3639–3653, Sept. 2003. DOI: 10.1016/S0017-9310(03)00156-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. S. Engelman, FIDAP theoretical manual-revision 4.0. Evanston, IL: Fluid Dynamics Inc., 1987.
   Google Scholar
• R. J. Krane and J. Jessee, “Some detailed field measurements for a natural convection flow in a vertical square enclosure,” presented at the Proc. 1983 First ASME-JSME Therm. Eng. Conf., Honolulu, 1983, pp. 323–329.
   Google Scholar