A multicomponent multitemperature model for simulating laminar deflagration waves in mixtures of air and hydrogen

References

• F. A. Williams, “Combustion theory: The fundamental theory of chemically reacting flow systems,” Tech. Rep., 1985.
   Google Scholar
• L. He and P. Clavin, “Premixed hydrogen-oxygen flames. Part I: Flame structure near the flammability limits,” Combust. Flame, vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 391–407, 1993. DOI: 10.1016/0010-2180(93)90140-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. He and P. Clavin, “Premixed hydrogen-oxygen flames. Part II: Quasi-isobaric ignition near the flammability limits,” Combust. Flame, vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 408–420, 1993. DOI: 10.1016/0010-2180(93)90141-O.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Clavin, “Dynamic behavior of premixed flame fronts in laminar and turbulent flows,” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–59, 1985. DOI: 10.1016/0360-1285(85)90012-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Barberon and P. Helluy, “Finite volume simulation of cavitating flows,” Comput. Fluids, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 832–858, 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2004.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Mathis, “A thermodynamically consistent model of a liquid-vapor fluid with a gas,” ESAIM: M2AN, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 63–84, 2019. DOI: 10.1051/m2an/2018044.
   Google Scholar
• O. Hurisse and L. Quibel, “Simulations of water-vapor two-phase flows with non-condensable gas using a noble-able-chemkin stiffened gas equation of state,” Comput. Fluids, vol. 239, pp. 105399, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2022.105399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Giovangigli, “Multicomponent flow modeling,” Sci. China Math., vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 285–308, 2012. DOI: 10.1007/s11425-011-4346-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Giovangigli, “Mathematics of thermochemistry,” in Multicomponent Flow Modeling. Modeling and Simulation in Science, Engineering and Technology. Boston, MA: Birkhäuser, 1999, pp. 119–156.
   Google Scholar
• A. Ern and V. Giovangigli, “Impact of detailed multicomponent transport on planar and counterflow hydrogen/air and methane/air flames,” Combust. Sci. Technol., vol. 149, no. 1–6, pp. 157–181, 1999. DOI: 10.1080/00102209908952104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Marinov, C. Westbrook, and W. Pitz, “Detailed and global chemical kinetics model for hydrogen,” Transport Phenomena Combust., vol. 1, pp. 118, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• A. A. Konnov, “Remaining uncertainties in the kinetic mechanism of hydrogen combustion,” Combust. Flame, vol. 152, no. 4, pp. 507–528, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2007.10.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. L. Sánchez and F. A. Williams, “Recent advances in understanding of flammability characteristics of hydrogen,” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., vol. 41, pp. 1–55, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.pecs.2013.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. G. Goodwin, H. K. Moffat, and R. L. Speth, Cantera: An Object-Oriented Software Toolkit for Chemical Kinetics, Thermodynamics, and Transport Processes, Tech. Rep. Pasadena, CA: Caltech, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• O. R. Hansen, J. Renoult, M. Sherman, and S. Tieszen, Validation of FLACS-Hydrogen CFD Consequence Prediction Model against Large Scale H2 Explosion Experiments in the FLAME Facility, Tech. Rep. Bergen: Hydrogen Knowledge Centre, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• GexCon, FLACS v10.4 User’s Manual. Bergen, Norway: GexCon AS, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• B. Gamal, L. Gastaldo, and D. Veynante, “The CALIF 3 S-P 2 REMICS software: Simulation of accelerated deflagrations using RANS and LES approaches,” presented at the 10th European Combustion Meeting, Napoli (virtual conference), Italy, Apr. 2021, pp. 1201–1206.
   Google Scholar
• S. Gavrilyuk, J.-M. Hérard, O. Hurisse, and A. Toufaili, “Theoretical and numerical analysis of a simple model derived from compressible turbulence,” J. Math. Fluid Mech., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 1–34, 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s00021-022-00676-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. T. Butler and P. J. O’Rourke, “A numerical method for two dimensional unsteady reacting flows,” presented at the Symposium (international) on combustion, vol. 16, no. 1. Elsevier, 1977, pp. 1503–1515.
   Google Scholar
• E. Vyazmina et al., “Vented explosion of hydrogen/air mixture: An intercomparison benchmark exercise,” Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, vol. 44, no. 17, pp. 8914–8926, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.07.195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Hurisse, “BGK source terms for out-of-equilibrium two-phase flow models,” Continuum Mech. Thermodyn., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 721–737, 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s00161-022-01085-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Godlewski and P.-A. Raviart, Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws. Ellipses, 1991, pp. 3–4.
   Google Scholar
• J. Smoller, Shock Waves and Reaction–Diffusion Equations, vol. 258. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• C. Chalons and J.-F. Coulombel, “Relaxation approximation of the Euler equations,” J. Math. Anal. Appl., vol. 348, no. 2, pp. 872–893, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.07.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Jin and Z. Xin, “The relaxation schemes for systems of conservation laws in arbitrary space dimensions,” Commun. Pure Appl. Math., vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 235–276, 1995. DOI: 10.1002/cpa.3160480303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Suliciu, “On the thermodynamics of fluids with relaxation and phase transitions. Fluids with relaxation,” Int. J. Eng. Sci., vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 921–947, 1998. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7225(98)00005-6.
   Google Scholar
• P. Helluy, O. Hurisse, and L. Quibel, “Assessment of numerical schemes for complex two-phase flows with real equations of state,” Comput. Fluids, vol. 196, pp. 104347, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2019.104347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Dellacherie, “Analysis of godunov type schemes applied to the compressible Euler system at low mach number,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 229, no. 4, pp. 978–1016, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2009.09.044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Gallouët, J.-M. Hérard, and N. Seguin, “Some recent finite volume schemes to compute Euler equations using real gas EOS,” Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids, vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 1073–1138, 2002. DOI: 10.1002/fld.346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Bruel, S. Delmas, J. Jung, and V. Perrier, “A low mach correction able to deal with low mach acoustics,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 378, pp. 723–759, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.11.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Perron, S. Boivin, and J.-M. Hérard, “A finite volume method to solve the 3D Navier–Stokes equations on unstructured collocated meshes,” Comput. Fluids, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 1305–1333, 2004. DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2003.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Dorofeev, V. Sidorov, M. Kuznetsov, I. Matsukov, and V. Alekseev, “Effect of scale on the onset of detonations,” Shock Waves, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 137–149, 2000. DOI: 10.1007/s001930050187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Kuo, Principles of Combustion, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• V. Schröder and K. Holtappels, Explosion Characteristics of Hydrogen-Air and Hydrogen-Oxygen Mixtures at Elevated Pressures, Tech. Rep. Hydrogen Knowledge Centre, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• G. Lacaze, “Simulation aux grandes echelles de l’allumage de moteurs fusées cryotechniques,” Ph.D. dissertation, Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse, France, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• P. Quillatre, “Simulation aux grandes échelles d’explosions en domaine semi-confiné,” Ph.D. dissertation, Université de Toulouse, France, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• V. Casulli and D. Greenspan, “Pressure method for the numerical solution of transient, compressible fluid flows,” Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 1001–1012, 1984. DOI: 10.1002/fld.1650041102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Colella and K. Pao, “A projection method for low speed flows,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 149, no. 2, pp. 245–269, 1999. DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1998.6152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. I. Issa, “Solution of the implicitly discretised fluid flow equations by operator-splitting,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 40–65, 1986. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(86)90099-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Karki and S. Patankar, “Pressure based calculation procedure for viscous flows at all speeds in arbitrary configurations,” AIAA J., vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1167–1174, 1989. DOI: 10.2514/3.10242.
   Google Scholar
• A. J. Chorin, “Numerical solution of the Navier-Stokes equations,” Math. Comput., vol. 22, no. 104, pp. 745–762, 1968. DOI: 10.1090/S0025-5718-1968-0242392-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Jung, “Schémas numériques adaptés aux accélérateurs multicoeurs pour les écoulements bifluides,” Ph.D. dissertation, Université de Strasbourg, France, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• A. Harten, P. D. Lax, and B. v Leer, “On upstream differencing and godunov-type schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws,” SIAM Rev., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 35–61, 1983. DOI: 10.1137/1025002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar