Development of a Lagrangian–Eulerian approach-based five-equation two-fluid model for simulation of multiphase reactive flows

References

• F. Xiao, Z. Wang, M. Sun, J. Liang, and N. Liu, “Large eddy simulation of liquid jet primary breakup in supersonic air crossflow,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, vol. 87, pp. 229–240, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2016.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. D. Reitz and R. Diwakar, “Effect of drop breakup on fuel sprays,” SAE Trans., pp. 218–227, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• P. J. O'Rourke and A. A. Amsden, “The TAB method for numerical calculation of spray droplet breakup,” SAE Tech. Paper, pp. 0148–7191, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• M. A. Patterson and R. D. Reitz, “Modeling the effects of fuel spray characteristics on diesel engine combustion and emission,” SAE Trans., pp. 27–43, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• A. B. Liu, D. Mather, and R. D. Reitz, “Modeling the effects of drop drag and breakup on fuel sprays,” SAE Trans., pp. 83–95, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• P. Li, Z. Wang, M. Sun, and H. Wang, “Numerical simulation of the gas-liquid interaction of a liquid jet in supersonic crossflow,” Acta Astronaut., vol. 134, pp. 333–344, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.12.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.-Y. Niu, C.-H. Wu, Y.-H. Huang, Y.-J. Chou, and S.-C. Kong, “Evaluation of breakup models for liquid side jets in supersonic cross flows,” Numer. Heat Transf. A: Appl., vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 353–369, 2021. DOI: 10.1080/10407782.2020.1847513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.-S. Im, K.-C. Lin, and M.-C. Lai, “Spray atomization of liquid jet in supersonic cross flows,” presented at the 43rd AIAA Aerosp. Sci. Meet. and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 2005, p. 732.
   Google Scholar
• X. Fan, J. Wang, F. Zhao, J. Li, and T. Yang, “Eulerian–Lagrangian method for liquid jet atomization in supersonic crossflow using statistical injection model,” Adv. Mech. Eng., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 168781401876129, 2018. DOI: 10.1177/1687814018761295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Viti, R. Neel, and J. A. Schetz, “Detailed flow physics of the supersonic jet interaction flow field,” Phys. Fluids, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 046101, 2009. DOI: 10.1063/1.3112736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Arunajatesan, “Evaluation of two-equations RANS models for simulation of jet-in-crossflow problems,” presented at the 50th AIAA Aerosp. Sci. Meet. Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Nashville, Tennessee, 2012. DOI: 10.2514/6.2012-1199.
   Google Scholar
• S. Arunajatesan and M. A. McWherter-Payne, “Unsteady modeling of jet-in-crossflow problems,” presented at the 43rd AIAA Fluid Dyn. Conf., San Diego, CA, 2013, p. 3099. DOI: 10.2514/6.2013-3099.
   Google Scholar
• S. Kawai and S. Lele, “Large-eddy simulation of jet mixing in a supersonic turbulent crossflow,” presented at the 19th AIAA Comput. Fluid Dyn., San Antonio, Texas, 2009. p. 3795. DOI: 10.2514/6.2009-3795.
   Google Scholar
• S. Kawai and S. Lele, “Mechanisms of jet mixing in a supersonic crossflow: A study using large-eddy simulation,” presented at the 44th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Hartford, CT, 2008, p. 4575. DOI: 10.2514/6.2008-4575.
   Google Scholar
• S. Kawai and S. K. Lele, “Large-eddy simulation of jet mixing in supersonic crossflows,” AIAA J., vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 2063–2083, 2010. DOI: 10.2514/1.J050282.
   Google Scholar
• J. Boles, J. Edwards, and R. Baurle, “Hybrid LES/RANS simulation of transverse sonic injection into a Mach 2 flow,” presented at the 46th AIAA Aerosp. Sci. Meet. and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 2008, p. 622. DOI: 10.2514/6.2008-622.
   Google Scholar
• J. A. Boles, J. R. Edwards, and R. A. Baurle, “Large-eddy/Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulations of sonic injection into Mach 2 crossflow,” AIAA J., vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 1444–1456, 2010. DOI: 10.2514/1.J050066.
   Google Scholar
• E. Hassan, H. Aono, J. Boles, D. Davis, and W. Shyy, “Multi-scale turbulence model in simulation of supersonic crossflow,” presented at the 49th AIAA Aerosp. Sci. Meet. Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, Florida, 2011, p. 478. DOI: 10.2514/6.2011-478.
   Google Scholar
• E. Hassan, H. Aono, J. Boles, D. Davis, and W. Shyy, “Multi-scale turbulence model in simulation of supersonic crossflow part 2: Inclined Injection,” presented at the50th AIAA Aerosp. Sci. Meet. Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, 2012, p. 566, Nashville, Tennessee. DOI: 10.2514/6.2012-566.
   Google Scholar
• E. Hassan, H. Aono, W. Shyy, J. Boles, and D. Davis, “Adaptive turbulent Schmidt Number approach for multi-scale simulation of supersonic crossflow,” presented at the 20th AIAA Comput. Fluid Dyn. Conf., Honolulu, Hawaii, 2011, p. 3702. DOI: 10.2514/6.2011-3702.
   Google Scholar
• E. Hassan, J. Boles, H. Aono, D. Davis, and W. Shyy, “Supersonic jet and crossflow interaction: Computational modeling,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci., vol. 57, pp. 1–24, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2012.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Brinckman, A. Hosangadi, V. Ahuja, S. Dash, and G. Feldman, “A CFD methodology for liquid jet breakup and vaporization predictions of compressible flows,” presented at the 46th AIAA Aerosp. Sci. Meet. and Exhibit, Seattle, Washington, 2008, p. 1023. DOI: 10.2514/6.2008-1023.
   Google Scholar
• F. Xiao, M. Dianat, and J. J. McGuirk, “Large eddy simulation of liquid-jet primary breakup in air crossflow,” AIAA J., vol. 51, no. 12, pp. 2878–2893, 2013. DOI: 10.2514/1.J052509.
   Google Scholar
• J. Waters, D. B. Carrington, and M. M. Francois, “Modeling multiphase flow: Spray breakup using volume of fluids in a dynamics LES FEM method,” Numer. Heat Transf. B: Fund., vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 285–299, 2017. DOI: 10.1080/10407790.2017.1400307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Ishii, “Thermo-fluid dynamic theory of two-phase flow,” STIA., vol. 75, pp. 29657, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• M. Baer and J. Nunziato, “A two-phase mixture theory for the deflagration-to-detonation transition (DDT) in reactive granular materials,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 861–889, 1986. DOI: 10.1016/0301-9322(86)90033-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Zein, M. Hantke, and G. Warnecke, “Modeling phase transition for compressible two-phase flows applied to metastable liquids,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 229, no. 8, pp. 2964–2998, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2009.12.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Saurel, F. Petitpas, and R. Abgrall, “Modelling phase transition in metastable liquids: Application to cavitating and flashing flows,” Phys. Fluids, vol. 607, pp. 313–350, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• R. Saurel, F. Petitpas, and R. A. Berry, “Simple and efficient relaxation methods for interfaces separating compressible fluids, cavitating flows and shocks in multiphase mixtures,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 228, no. 5, pp. 1678–1712, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2008.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Kapila, R. Menikoff, J. Bdzil, S. Son, and D. S. Stewart, “Two-phase modeling of deflagration-to-detonation transition in granular materials: Reduced equations,” Phys. Fluids, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 3002–3024, 2001. DOI: 10.1063/1.1398042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Pelanti and K.-M. Shyue, “A mixture-energy-consistent six-equation two-phase numerical model for fluids with interfaces, cavitation and evaporation waves,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 259, pp. 331–357, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2013.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.-Y. Niu, “Computations of two-fluid models based on a simple and robust hybrid primitive variable Riemann solver with AUSMD,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 308, pp. 389–410, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2015.12.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Allaire, S. Clerc, and S. Kokh, “A five-equation model for the simulation of interfaces between compressible fluids,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 181, no. 2, pp. 577–616, 2002. DOI: 10.1006/jcph.2002.7143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Murrone and H. Guillard, “A five equation reduced model for compressible two phase flow problems,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 202, no. 2, pp. 664–698, 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2004.07.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.-Y. Niu, Y.-C. Chen, T.-Y. Yang, and F. Xiao, “Development of a less-dissipative hybrid AUSMD scheme for multi-component flow simulations,” Shock Waves, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 691–704, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s00193-018-0872-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.-S. Yeom and K.-S. Chang, “Flux-based wave decomposition scheme for an isentropic hyperbolic two-fluid model,” Numer. Heat Transf. B: Fund., vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 288–318, 2011. DOI: 10.1080/10407790.2011.572715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Jouguet, “On the propagation of chemical reactions in gases,” J. Math. Pures Appl., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 347–425, 1905.
   Google Scholar
• D. L. Chapman, “VI. On the rate of explosion in gases,” The London, Edinburgh, Dublin Philosoph. Mag. J. Sci., vol. 47, no. 284, pp. 90–104, 1899. DOI: 10.1080/14786449908621243.
   Google Scholar
• F. Ma, J.-Y. Choi, and V. Yang, “Thrust chamber dynamics and propulsive performance of single-tube pulse detonation engines,” J. Propuls. Power, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 512–526, 2005. DOI: 10.2514/1.7393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Oran et al., “Numerical simulations of detonations in hydrogen-air and methane-air mixtures,” Symp. (Int.) Combustion, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1641–1649, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• V. N. Gamezo, D. Desbordes, and E. S. Oran, “Formation and evolution of two-dimensional cellular detonations,” Combust. Flame, vol. 116, no. 1–2, pp. 154–165, 1999. DOI: 10.1016/S0010-2180(98)00031-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Choi, F. Ma, and V. Yang, “Some numerical issues on simulation of detonation cell structures,” Combust. Explos. Shock Waves, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 560–578, 2008. DOI: 10.1007/s10573-008-0086-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Han and R. D. Reitz, “Turbulence modeling of internal combustion engines using RNG κ-ε models,” Combust. Sci. Technol., vol. 106, no. 4–6, pp. 267–295, 1995. DOI: 10.1080/00102209508907782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Siikonen, “An application of Roe’s flux‐difference splitting for k‐ϵ turbulence model,” Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 1017–1039, 1995. DOI: 10.1002/fld.1650211102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. F. Toro, Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics: A Practical Introduction. New York, USA: Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• E. F. Toro, M. Spruce, and W. Speares, “Restoration of the contact surface in the HLL-Riemann solver,” Shock Waves, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 25–34, 1994. DOI: 10.1007/BF01414629.
   Google Scholar
• S. Davis, “Simplified second-order Godunov-type methods,” SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 445–473, 1988. DOI: 10.1137/0909030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. A. Cassidy, J. R. Edwards, and M. Tian, “An investigation of interface-sharpening schemes for multi-phase mixture flows,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 228, no. 16, pp. 5628–5649, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2009.02.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. T. Crowe, M. P. Sharma, and D. E. Stock, “The particle-source-in cell (PSI-CELL) model for gas-droplet flows,” J. Fluids Eng., vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 325–332, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• S. R. Turns, Introduction to Combustion. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill Companies, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• K.-C. Lin, A. L. Kastengren, S. Hammack, and C. Carter, “Exploration of water jets in supersonic crossflow using X-ray diagnostics,” Atomiz Spr., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 331–350, 2020. DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.2020034448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.-C. Lin, P. Kennedy, and T. Jackson, “Penetration heights of liquid jets in high-speed crossflows,” presented at the 40th AIAA Aerosp. Sci. Meet. & Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA, 2002, p. 873. DOI: 10.2514/6.2002-873.
   Google Scholar
• S. Tambe, S.-M. Jeng, H. Mongia, and G. Hsiao, “Liquid jets in subsonic crossflow,” presented at the 43rd AIAA Aerosp. Sci. Meet. and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 2005, p, 731. DOI: 10.2514/6.2005-731.
   Google Scholar
• K.-C. Lin and P. Kennedy, “Spray penetration heights of angle-injected aerated-liquid jets in supersonic crossflows,” presented at the 38th Aerosp. Sci. Meet. and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA, 2000, p. 194. DOI: 10.2514/6.2000-194.
   Google Scholar
• J. Austin, F. Pintgen, and J. Shepherd, “Reaction zones in highly unstable detonations,” Proc. Combust. Inst., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 1849–1857, 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2004.08.157.
   Google Scholar
• W. Waidmann et al., “Experimental investigation of the combustion process in a supersonic combustion ramjet (scramjet),” DGLR Jahrbuch, 1994, pp. 629–638.
   Google Scholar
• M. Oevermann, “Numerical investigation of turbulent hydrogen combustion in a SCRAMJET using flamelet modeling,” Aerosp. Sci. Technol., vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 463–480, 2000. DOI: 10.1016/S1270-9638(00)01070-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Génin and S. Menon, “Simulation of turbulent mixing behind a strut injector in supersonic flow,” AIAA J., vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 526–539, 2010. DOI: 10.2514/1.43647.
   Google Scholar
• C. Gong, M. Jangi, X.-S. Bai, J.-H. Liang, and M.-B. Sun, “Large eddy simulation of hydrogen combustion in supersonic flows using an Eulerian stochastic fields method,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 1264–1275, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.09.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Huang, M. Zhao, and H. Zhang, “Modelling n-heptane dilute spray flames in a model supersonic combustor fueled by hydrogen,” Fuel, vol. 264, pp. 116809, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar