Drawing Attention to the Measurement Uncertainty Arising from Sampling in Chemical and Physicochemical Analyses: An Overview

References

• Thompson, M. Uncertainty of Sampling in Chemical Analysis. Accredit. Qual. Assur. 1998, 3, 117–121. DOI: 10.1007/s007690050202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guigues, N.; Desenfant, M.; Lalere, B.; Vaslin-Reimann, S.; Eyl, D.; Mansuit, P.; Hance, E. Estimating Sampling and Analysis Uncertainties to Assess the Fitness for Purpose of a Water Quality Monitoring Network. Accred. Qual. Assur. 2016, 21, 101–112. DOI: 10.1007/S00769-015-1186-4/TABLES/7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Zorzi, P.; Belli, M.; Barbizzi, S.; et al. 2002 A Practical Approach to Assessment of Sampling Uncertainty. Accreditation and Qual. Assur. 7(5), 182–188. DOI: 10.1007/s00769-002-0447-1.
   Google Scholar
• Steinborn, L. International Standard ISO/IEC 17025 General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories. In GMP/ISO Quality Audit Manual for Healthcare Manufacturers and Their Suppliers, (Volume 2 Regulations, Standards, and Guidelines), 2021, vol. 2; pp. 433–467.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, J. B.; Grøn, C.; Lund, U.; Magnusson, B.; Nordbotten, A.; Oberender, A.; Ramsey, M. H. Uncertainty from Sampling: Workshop to Launch a Nordtest Handbook on Sampling Uncertainty Estimation and Control. Accred. Qual. Assur. 2007, 12, 377–381. DOI: 10.1007/s00769-007-0298-x.
   Google Scholar
• JCGM. Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement–Part 6: Developing and using measurement models JCGM 100:2008 (GUM 1995 with minor corrections), 2008. http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCGM_100_2008_E.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey, M. H.; Ellison, S. L. R. Measurement Uncertainty Arising from Sampling: a Guide to Methods and Approaches. EURACHEM/CITAC Guide First Edition, 2007. https://eurachem.org/images/stories/Guides/pdf/UfS_2007.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Analytical Methods Committee AMC. What is Uncertainty from Sampling, and Why is It Important? AMC Tech Briefs 2004, 16A, 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• O’Riordan, M. J.; Wilkinson, M. G. A Survey of the Incidence and Level of Aflatoxin Contamination in a Range of Imported Spice Preparations on the Irish Retail Market. Food Chem. 2008, 107, 1429–1435. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.09.073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleeman, A. W. Sampling Error in the Chemical Analysis of Rocks. J. Geol. Soc. Aust. 1967, 14, 43–47. DOI: 10.1080/00167616708728644.
   Google Scholar
• Agterberg, F. P. Sampling and Analysis of Chemical Element Concentration Distribution in Rock Units and Orebodies. Nonlin. Processes Geophys. 2012, 19, 23–44. DOI: 10.5194/npg-19-23-2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsey, M. H. Sampling and Analytical Quality Control (SAX) for Improved Error Estimation in the Measurement of Pb in the Environment Using Robust Analysis of Variance. Appl Geochem. 1993, 8, 149–153. DOI: 10.1016/S0883-2927(09)80027-9.
   Google Scholar
• Glavič-Cindro, D.; Hazou, E.; Korun, M.; Krištof, R.; Osterman, P.; Petrovič, T.; Vodenik, B.; Zorko, B. Measurement Uncertainty Arising from Sampling of Environmental Samples. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2020, 156, 108978. DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2019.108978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsukakoshi, Y. Sampling Variability and Uncertainty in Total Diet Studies. Analyst 2011, 136, 533–539. DOI: 10.1039/c0an00397b.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsey, M. H.; Thompson, M. Uncertainty from Sampling, in the Context of Fitness for Purpose. Accred. Qual. Assur. 2007, 12, 503–513. DOI: 10.1007/S00769-007-0279-0/FIGURES/16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winefordner, J. D.; Kateman, G.; Buydens, L. Quality Control in Analytical Chemistry. 1993. 2nd Edition, Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Galas, C.; Sansone, U.; Belli, M.; et al. Intercomparison of Suspended Particles Sampling Methodologies. Accred. Qual. Assur. 2002, 7, 202–208. DOI: 10.1007/s00769-002-0469-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Separovic, L.; Simabukuro, R. S.; Couto, A. R.; Bertanha, M. L. G.; Dias, F. R. S.; Sano, A. Y.; Caffaro, A. M.; Lourenço, F. R. Measurement Uncertainty and Conformity Assessment Applied to Drug and Medicine Analyses–a Review. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2021, 1–16. DOI: 10.1080/10408347.2021.1940086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Oliveira, E. C.; De Aguiar, P. F. Comparison of Different Approaches to Evaluate the Uncertainty of Gas Chromatography for Natural Gas. Quím. Nova 2009, 32, 1655–1660. DOI: 10.1590/S0100-40422009000600051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbert, D. B.; Korte, E. H.; Örnemark, U. Metrological and Quality Concepts in Analytical Chemistry (IUPAC Recommendations 2021). Pure Appl. Chem. 2021, 93, 997–1048. DOI: 10.1515/pac-2019-0819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggieri, F.; Alimonti, A.; Bocca, B. Full Validation and Accreditation of a Method to Support Human Biomonitoring Studies for Trace and Ultra-Trace Elements. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2016, 80, 471–485. DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2016.03.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehotay, S. J.; Han, L.; Sapozhnikova, Y. Use of a Quality Control Approach to Assess Measurement Uncertainty in the Comparison of Sample Processing Techniques in the Analysis of Pesticide Residues in Fruits and Vegetables. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2018, 410, 5465–5479. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-018-0905-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saviano, A. M.; Francisco, F. L.; Ostronoff, C. S.; Lourenço, F. R. Development, Optimization, and Validation of a Microplate Bioassay for Relative Potency Determination of Linezolid Using a Design Space Concept, and Its Measurement Uncertainty. J. AOAC Int. 2015, 98, 1267–1275. DOI: 10.5740/jaoacint.15-074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clough, R.; Floor, G. H.; Quétel, C. R.; Milne, A.; Lohan, M. C.; Worsfold, P. J. Measurement Uncertainty Associated with Shipboard Sample Collection and Filtration for the Determination of the Concentration of Iron in Seawater. Anal. Methods 2016, 8, 6711–6719. DOI: 10.1039/C6AY01551D.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biazon, C. L.; Jesus, V. C. B. M.; De Oliveira, E. C. Metrological Analysis by Measurement Uncertainty of Water and Sediment in Crude Oil. Pet Sci. Technol. 2015, 33, 344–352. DOI: 10.1080/10916466.2014.980000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxham, M.; P.; Thomas, C. L. Sampling Procedures for Intrinsically Valid Volatileorganic Compound Measurements. Analyst 2000, 125, 825–832. DOI: 10.1039/a910233g.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damgaard, C. On the Problems of Not Accounting for Measurement- and Sampling Uncertainty in Ecological and Environmental Models. bioRxiv 2020, 2020.03.16.993477. DOI: 10.1101/2020.03.16.993477.
   Google Scholar
• Wielopolski, L.; Johnsen, K.; Zhang, Y. Soil Analysis Based on Saples Withdrawn from Different Volumes: correlation versus Calibration. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2010, 74, 812–819. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2009.0205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toombs, R. W.; Connor, D. A. Proficiency Test Sample Media for Single and Mixed Pure Cultures of Water Pollution Indicator Bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1980, 40, 883–887. DOI: 10.1128/aem.40.5.883-887.1980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadam, P.; Bhalerao, S. Sample Size Calculation. Int. J. Ayurveda Res. 2010, 1, 55–57. DOI: 10.4103/0974-7788.59946.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martínez-Mesa, J.; González-Chica, D. A.; Bastos, J. L.; Bonamigo, R. R.; Duquia, R. P. Sample Size: How Many Participants Do I Need in my Research? An. Bras. Dermatol. 2014, 89, 609–615. DOI: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20143705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wichitaksorn, N.; Choy, S. T. B.; Gerlach, R. A Generalized Class of Skew Distributions and Associated Robust Quantile Regression Models. Can. J. Statistics 2014, 44, n/a–n/a. DOI: 10.1002/cjs.
   Google Scholar
• Israel, G. D. Determining Sample Size Degree of Variability. 2018. Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences - IFAS, University of Florida. Available in:https://www.tarleton.edu/academicassessment/documents/Samplesize.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Faber, J.; Fonseca, L. M. How Sample Size Influences Research Outcomes. Dental Press J. Orthod. 2014, 19, 27–29. DOI: 10.1590/2176-9451.19.4.027-029.ebo.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valcárcel, M. Principles of Analytical Chemistry; Springer: Berlin Heidelberg, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Vasileiou, K.; Barnett, J.; Thorpe, S.; Young, T. Characterising and Justifying Sample Size Sufficiency in Interview-Based Studies: systematic Analysis of Qualitative Health Research over a 15-Year Period. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2018, 18, 148. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-018-0594-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, B.; Hedges, A. J. The Effect of the Number of Sample Units Tested on the Precision of Microbial Colony Counts. Food Microbiol. 2011, 28, 1211–1219. DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2011.04.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briefs AMCT. Estimating Sampling Uncertainty-How Many Duplicate Samples Are Needed? Anal Methods 2014, 6, 24–26. DOI: 10.1039/c3ay90095a.
   Google Scholar
• Lyn, J. A.; Ramsey, M. H.; Coad, D. S.; Damant, A. P.; Wood, R.; Boon, K. A. The Duplicate Method of Uncertainty Estimation: Are Eight Targets Enough? Analyst 2007, 132, 1147–1152. DOI: 10.1039/b702691a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsey, M. H.; Ellison, S. L. R.; Rostron, P. Measurement Uncertainty Arising from Sampling. A Guide to Methods and Approaches. 2nd ed.; EURACHEM/CITAC Guide, 2019. https://www.eurachem.org/images/stories/Guides/pdf/UfS_2019_EN_P2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Heidaryan, E. A Note on Model Selection Based on the Percentage of Accuracy-Precision. J. Energy Resour. Technol. Trans. ASME 2019, 141, 045501. DOI: 10.1115/1.4041844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsey, M. H.; Argyraki, A. Estimation of Measurement Uncertainty from Field Sampling: Implications for the Classification of Contaminated Land. Sci. Total Environ. 1997, 198, 243–257. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-9697(97)05456-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Zorzi, P.; Barbizzi, S.; Belli, M.; Barbina, M.; Fajgelj, A.; Jacimovic, R.; Jeran, Z.; Menegon, S.; Pati, A.; Petruzzelli, G.; et al. Estimation of Uncertainty Arising from Different Soil Sampling Devices: The Use of Variogram Parameters. Chemosphere 2008, 70, 745–752. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.07.068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson, B.; Krysell, M.; Eskil Sahlin; Näykki, T. Uncertainty from Sampling – a Nordtest Handbook for Sampling Planners on Sampling Quality Assurance and Uncertainty Estimation. 2020. Available in: NT_TR_604ed2_Nordtest_Handbook_for_sampling.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Boiero, A.; Hoef, J. V.; Al-Abdullah, M. S. Introduction to Geostatistics and Variogram Analysis. Academia, Accelerating the world's research. C&PE 940, 17 October 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Lark, R. M. Two Robust Estimators of the Cross-Variogram for Multivariate Geostatistical Analysis of Soil Properties. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2003, 54, 187–202. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.00506.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchant, B. P.; Lark, R. M. Estimating Variogram Uncertainty. Math Geol. 2004, 36, 867–898. DOI: 10.1023/B:MATG.0000048797.08986.a7.
   Google Scholar
• Julián Ortiz, C.; Deutsch, C. V. Calculation of Uncertainty in the Variogram. Math Geol. 2002, 34, 169–183. DOI: 10.1023/A:1014412218427.
   Google Scholar
• Borges, C.; Palma, C.; Da Silva, R. B. Optimization of River Sampling: Application to Nutrients Distribution in Tagus River Estuary. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 5698–5705. DOI: 10.1021/ACS.ANALCHEM.8B05781/SUPPL_FILE/AC8B05781_SI_002.ZIP.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borges, C.; Bettencourt da Silva, R. J. N.; Palma, C. Determination of River Water Composition Trends with Uncertainty: Seasonal Variation of Nutrients Concentration in Tagus River Estuary in the Dry 2017 year. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2020, 158, 111371. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borges, C.; Palma, C.; Dadamos, T.; Bettencourt da Silva, R. J. N. Evaluation of Seawater Composition in a Vast Area from the Monte Carlo Simulation of Georeferenced Information in a Bayesian framework. Chemosphere 2021, 263, 128036. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, C. E.; Yeung, H. Uncertainty Estimation and Monte Carlo Simulation Method. Flow Meas Instrum. 2001, 12, 291–298. DOI: 10.1016/S0955-5986(01)00015-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, M. G.; Dainton, M. P.; Forbes, A. B.; et al. Use of Monte Carlo Simulation for Uncertainty Evaluation in Metrology. 2001, 93–105. DOI: 10.1142/9789812811684_0011.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, M.; Harris, P.; Siebert, B. R. L. Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty Based on the Propagation of Distributions Using Monte Carlo Simulation. Meas. Tech. 2003, 46, 824–833. DOI: 10.1023/B:METE.0000008439.82231.ad.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberto, P.; Couto, G.; Damasceno, J. C.; P.; De Oliveira, S. Monte Carlo Simulations Applied to Uncertainty in Measurement. In Theory Appl. Monte Carlo Simulations, Wai Kin (Victor) Chan, Ed. IntechOpen, 2013. DOI: 10.5772/53014.
   Google Scholar
• Farrance, I.; Frenkel, R. Uncertainty in Measurement: A Review of Monte Carlo Simulation Using Microsoft Excel for the Calculation of Uncertainties through Functional Relationships, Including Uncertainties in Empirically Derived Constants. Clin. Biochem. Rev. 2014, 35, 37–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Albert, D. R. Monte Carlo Uncertainty Propagation with the NIST Uncertainty Machine. J. Chem. Educ. 2020, 97, 1491–1494. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurray, A.; Pearson, T.; Casarim, F. Guidance on Applying the Monte Carlo Approach to Uncertainty Analyses in Forestry and Greenhouse Gas Accounting. WINROCK Internacional, 2017; p 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Nakagawa, S.; De Villemereuil, P. A General Method for Simultaneously Accounting for Phylogenetic and Species Sampling Uncertainty via Rubin's Rules in Comparative Analysis. Syst. Biol. 2019, 68, 632–641. DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syy089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofman, S. C. K.; Brus, D. J. How Many Sampling Points Are Needed to Estimate the Mean nitrate-N Content of Agricultural Fields? A Geostatistical Simulation Approach with Uncertain Variograms. Geoderma 2021, 385, 114816. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garijo, C.; Mediero, L. Assessment of Changes in Annual Maximum Precipitations in the Iberian Peninsula under Climate Change. Water (Switzerland) 2019, 11, 2375. DOI: 10.3390/w11112375.
   Google Scholar
• Mahjabin, T.; Mejia, A.; Grady, C. Virtual Nitrogen and Virtual Water Transfers Embedded in Food Trade Networks across the US. Environ. Res. Lett. 2021, 16, 045015. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/abe06f.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouvier, J. L.; Bontemps, S.; Mora, L. Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analyses Applied to a Dynamic Simulation of the Carbon Dioxide Concentration in a Detached House. Int. J. Energy Environ. Eng. 2019, 10, 47–65. DOI: 10.1007/s40095-018-0291-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J.; Kroll, C. N.; Nowak, D. J. An Uncertainty Framework for i-Tree Eco: A Comparative Study of 15 Cities across the United States. Urban for Urban Green 2021, 60, 127062. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilbers, A. P.; Brayshaw, D. J.; Gandy, A. Efficient Quantification of the Impact of Demand and Weather Uncertainty in Power System Models. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2021, 36, 1771–1779. DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2020.3031187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsey, M. H. Measurement Uncertainty Arising from Sampling: Implications for the Objectives of Geoanalysis†. Analyst 1997, 122, 1255–1260. DOI: 10.1039/a704995a.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsey, M. H.; Ellison, S. L. R. Reply to Comments on EURACHEM/CITAC Guide “Measurement Uncertainty Arising from Sampling. Accred. Qual. Assur. 2010, 15, 533–535. DOI: 10.1007/s00769-010-0684-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsey, M. H. H. Sampling as a Source of Measurement Uncertainty: techniques for Quantification and Comparison with Analytical Sources. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 1998, 13, 97–104. DOI: 10.1039/a706815h.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsey, M. H.; Thompson, M.; Hale, M. Objective Evaluation of Precision Requirements for Geochemical Analysis Using Robust Analysis of Variance. J. Geochemical. Explor. 1992, 44, 23–36. DOI: 10.1016/0375-6742(92)90046-B.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, M.; Ramsey, M. H. Quality Concepts and Practices Applied to Sampling-an Exploratory Study. Analyst 1995, 120, 261–270. DOI: 10.1039/AN9952000261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esbensen, K. H.; Wagner, C. Theory of Sampling (TOS) versus Measurement Uncertainty (MU) - a Call for Integration. TrAC - Trends Anal. Chem. 2014, 57, 93–106. DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2014.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soc Bauer, E. L.; Craven, C. V.; et al. The Determination of Sampling and Analytical Errors in Exploration Geochemistry. Econ. Geol. 1969, 64, 568–569. DOI: 10.2113/GSECONGEO.64.5.568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiber, M. P.; Komppa, V.; Wahlström, M.; Laine-Ylijoki, J. Chemical and Environmental Sampling: Quality through Accreditation, Certification and Industrial Standards. Accred. Qual. Assur. 2006, 10, 510–514. DOI: 10.1007/S00769-005-0045-0/TABLES/1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilonick, R. A.; Gy, P. M. Sampling of Particulate Materials: Theory and Practice. Technometrics 1984, 26, 293–294. DOI: 10.2307/1267561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, S. L. R.; Williams, A.; EURACHEM/CITAC Guide Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement Composition of the Working Group; et al. Eurachem Guid 2009, 141.
   Google Scholar
• Jager, J.; Putnick, D. L.; Bornstein, M. H. II. More than Just Convenient: The Scientific Merits of Homogeneous Convenience Samples. Monogr. Soc. Res. Child. Dev. 2017, 82, 13–30. DOI: 10.1111/mono.12296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gy, P. M. Sampling of Heterogeneous and Dynamic Material Systems. Process Control Qual. 1993, 5, 67.
   Google Scholar
• Riboldi, J.; Barbian, M. H.; Kolowski, A. B. S.; et al. Accuracy and Power of Parametric and Nonparametric Homocedasticy Tests Assessed for Simulation. Rev. Bras Biom. 2014, 32, 334–344.
   Google Scholar
• Ohenoja, M. MMEA WP2: Measurement and Sampling Uncertainty–a Literature Review. Cleen Ltd. Research Report D2.1.13, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseeuw, P. J.; Hubert, M. Anomaly Detection by Robust Statistics. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov 2018, 8, 1–14. DOI: 10.1002/widm.1236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal Society of Chemistry. Analytical Methods Committee, 2020. https://www.rsc.org/Membership/Networking/InterestGroups/Analytical/AMC/Software/.
   Google Scholar
• de Jesus Leite, V.; de Oliveira, E. C.; Aucélio, R. Q. Impact of the Sampling Process on the Measurement Uncertainty, a Case Study: Physicochemical Parameters in Diesel. Accred. Qual. Assur. 2021, 26, 1–9. DOI: 10.1007/s00769-020-01452-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rede Metrologica, R. S. Rm 68 – Incerteza De Medição: Guia Prático Do Avaliador De Laboratórios. Rede Metrol Do Rio Gd Do Sul 2013, 1–32. https://redemetrologica.com.br/wp-content/uploads/arquivos_download/rm68rev05-incerteza-de-medicao-guia-pratico-do-avaliador-de-laboratorios-pdf_0a808c72de.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Reiter, E. V.; Dutton, M. F.; Agus, A.; Nordkvist, E.; Mwanza, M. F.; Njobeh, P. B.; Prawano, D.; Häggblom, P.; Razzazi-Fazeli, E.; Zentek, J.; et al. Uncertainty from Sampling in Measurements of Aflatoxins in Animal Feedingstuffs: Application of the Eurachem/CITAC Guidelines. Analyst 2011, 136, 4059–4069. DOI: 10.1039/c1an15124j.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, M. G.; Reiter, E. V.; Lindqvist, P.-A.; Razzazi-Fazeli, E.; Häggblom, P. Comparison of Manual and Automatic Sampling for Monitoring Ochratoxin a in Barley Grain. Food Addit. Contam. Part A. Chem. Anal. Control Expo. Risk Assess 2011, 28, 1066–1075. DOI: 10.1080/19440049.2011.576438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyn, J. A.; Ramsey, M. H.; Fussell, R. J.; Wood, R. Measurement Uncertainty from Physical Sample Preparation: Estimation Including Systematic Error. Analyst 2003, 128, 1391–1398. DOI: 10.1039/b307581h.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maroto, A.; Riu, J.; Boqué, R.; Xavier Rius, F. Estimating Uncertainties of Analytical Results Using Information from the Validation Process. Anal. Chim. Acta 1999, 391, 173–185. DOI: 10.1016/S0003-2670(99)00111-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyn, J. A.; Ramsey, M. H.; Damant, A. P.; Wood, R. Empirical versus Modelling Approaches to the Estimation of Measurement Uncertainty Caused by Primary Sampling. Analyst 2007, 132, 1231–1237. DOI: 10.1039/b709539m.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rostron, P. D.; Ramsey, M. H. Cost Effective, Robust Estimation of Measurement Uncertainty from Sampling Using Unbalanced ANOVA. Accred. Qual. Assur. 2012, 17, 7–14. DOI: 10.1007/S00769-011-0846-2/FIGURES/5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsey, M. H.; Geelhoed, B.; Wood, R.; Damant, A. P. Improved Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty from Sampling by Inclusion of between-Sampler Bias Using Sampling Proficiency Testing. Analyst 2011, 136, 1313–1321. DOI: 10.1039/c0an00705f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsey, M. H.; Squire, S.; Gardner, M. J. Synthetic Reference Sampling Target for the Estimation of Measurement Uncertainty. Analyst 1999, 124, 1701–1706. DOI: 10.1039/a905299b.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lequy, E.; Sauvage, S.; Laffray, X.; Gombert-Courvoisier, S.; Pascaud, A.; Galsomiès, L.; Leblond, S. Assessment of the Uncertainty of Trace Metal and Nitrogen Concentrations in Mosses Due to Sampling, Sample Preparation and Chemical Analysis Based on the French Contribution to ICP-Vegetation. Ecol Indic 2016, 71, 20–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.06.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omeroglu, P. Y.; Boyacioglu, D.; Ambrus, Á.; Karaali, A.; Saner, S. An Overview on Steps of Pesticide Residue Analysis and Contribution of the Individual Steps to the Measurement Uncertainty. Food Anal. Methods 2012, 5, 1469–1480. DOI: 10.1007/S12161-012-9396-4/FIGURES/1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demetriades, A. Use of Measurement Uncertainty in a Probabilistic Scheme to Assess Compliance of Bottled Water with Drinking Water Standards. J. Geochemical. Explor. 2010, 107, 410–422. DOI: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2010.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niu, J.; Rasmussen, P. E.; Wheeler, A.; Williams, R.; Chénier, M. Evaluation of Airborne Particulate Matter and Metals Data in Personal, Indoor and Outdoor Environments Using ED-XRF and ICP-MS and co-Located Duplicate Samples. Atmos. Environ. 2010, 44, 235–245. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.10.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galas, C.; Sansone, U.; Belli, M.; Barbizzi, S.; Fanzutti, G. P.; Kanivets, V.; Pati, A.; Piani, R.; Repetti, M.; Terzoni, C.; et al. Freshwater Suspended Particles: An Intercomparison of Long-Term Integrating Sampling Systems Used for Environmental Radioactivity Monitoring. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2006, 267, 623–629. DOI: 10.1007/s10967-006-0111-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. C.; Ramsey, M. H. Modelling Measurement Uncertainty as a Function of Concentration: An Example from a Contaminated Land Investigation. Analyst 2001, 126, 1784–1791. DOI: 10.1039/b104946c.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saari, E.; Perämäki, P.; Jalonen, J. Measurement Uncertainty in the Determination of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) in Soil by GC-FID. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2008, 92, 3–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2007.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 78 AMCAN. Proficiency Testing of Sampling. Anal. Methods 2017, 9, 4110–4111. DOI: 10.1039/c7ay90092a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsey, M. H.; Argyraki, A.; Thompson, M. On the Collaborative Trial in Sampling. Analyst 1995, 120, 2309–2312. DOI: 10.1039/an9952002309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minkkinen, P. Practical Applications of Sampling Theory. In: Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems; Elsevier, 2004, Vol. 74; pp. 85–94. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2004.03.013.
   Google Scholar
• Farrington, D.; Jervis, A.; Shelley, S.; Damant, A.; Wood, R.; Thompson, M. A Pilot Study of Routine Quality Control of Sampling by the SAD Method, Applied to Packaged and Bulk Foods. Analyst 2004, 129, 359–363. DOI: 10.1039/b315644n.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boon, K. A.; Ramsey, M. H. Judging the Fitness of on-Site Measurements by Their Uncertainty, Including the Contribution from Sampling. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 419, 196–207. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.12.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rostron, P. D.; Heathcote, J. A.; Ramsey, M. H. Evaluation of Uncertainties in in Situ and Ex Situ Gamma Measurements on Land Areas with Low Contamination Levels. J. Radiol. Prot. 2015, 35, 391–399. DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/35/2/391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsey, M. H.; Taylor, P. D.; Lee, J. C. Optimized Contaminated Land Investigation at Minimum Overall Cost to Achieve Fitness-for-Purpose. J. Environ. Monit. 2002, 4, 809–814. DOI: 10.1039/b203096a.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lyn, J. A.; Ramsey, M. H.; Damant, A. P.; Wood, R. Two-Stage Application of the Optimised Uncertainty Method: A Practical Assessment. Analyst 2005, 130, 1271–1279. DOI: 10.1039/b506274h.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, A.; Magnusson, B. Eurachem/CITAC Guide: Use of Uncertainty Information in Compliance Assessment, 2021. https://www.eurachem.org/images/stories/Guides/pdf/MUC2021_P1_EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Carolina Hermógenes de Matos, A.; Cruz de Oliveira, E. Risk Assessment and Optimisation of Sulfur in Marketing Fuels. Fuel 2022, 313, 122705. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Almeida, F. C.; Biazon, C. L.; de Oliveira, E. C. Uncertainty Evaluation and Validation of the Test Specimen Size Reduction in the Determination of Water Content in Crude Oils by Coulometric Karl Fischer Titration. Pet. Sci. Technol. 2017, 35, 1135–1140. DOI: 10.1080/10916466.2017.1310885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar