Implementation of patient-based real-time quality control

References

• Hoffmann RG, Waid ME. The “average of normals” method of quality control. Am J Clin Pathol. 1965;43(2):134–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller W, Erek A, Cunningham TD, et al. Commutability limitations influence quality control results with different reagent lots. Clin Chem. 2011;57(1):76–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badrick T, Cervinski M, Loh TP. A primer on patient-based quality control techniques. Clin Biochem. 2019;64:1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parvin CA, Gronowski AM. Effect of analytical run length on quality-control (QC) performance and the QC planning process. Clin Chem. 1997;43(11):2149–2154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badrick T, Bietenbeck A, Cervinski MA, et al., International Federation of Clinical Chemistry, and Laboratory Medicine Committee on Analytical Quality. Patient-based real-time quality control: review and recommendations. Clin Chem. 2019;65(8):962–971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Rossum HH, Kemperman H. Moving average for continuous quality control: time to move to implementation in daily practice? Clin Chem. 2017;63(5):1041–1043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loh TP, Bietenbeck A, Cervinski MA, et al. Recommendation for performance verification of patient-based real-time quality control. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020. DOI:10.1515/cclm-2019-1024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Wang J, Zhang W, et al. Failure of internal quality control in detecting significant reagent lot shift in serum creatinine measurement. J Clin Lab Anal. 2019;33(9):e22991. DOI:10.1002/jcla.22991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming JK, Katayev A. Changing the paradigm of laboratory quality control through implementation of real-time test results monitoring: For patients by patients. Clin Biochem. 2015;48(7–8):508–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng D, Polito FA, Cervinski MA. Optimization of a moving averages program using a simulated annealing algorithm: the goal is to monitor the process not the patients. Clin Chem. 2016;62(10):1361–1371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukić V, Lukić V, Ignjatović S, et al. Optimizing moving average control procedures for small-volume laboratories: can it be done? Biochem Med (Zagreb)). 2019;29(3):030710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossum H. H v, Kemperman H. Implementation and application of moving average as continuous analytical quality control instrument demonstrated for 24 routine chemistry assays. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017;55(8):1142–1151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann RG, Waid ME, Henry JB. Clinical specimens and reference samples for the quality control of laboratory accuracy. Am J Med Technol. 1961;27:309–317.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoffman RG, Waid ME. The number plus method of quality control of laboratory accuracy. Am J Clin Pathol. 1963;40:263–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amador E. Quality control by the reference sample method. Error detection as a function of the variability of the control data. Am J Clin Pathol. 1968;50(3):360–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilgariff M, Owen JA. An assessment of the “average of normals” quality control method. Clin Chim Acta. 1968;19(2):175–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen JA, Campbell DG, Fenwick D, et al. Laboratory quality control using patients’ results. Clin Chim Acta. 1968;20(2):327–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cembrowski GS, Chandler EP, Westgard JO. Assessment of “average of normals” quality control procedures and guidelines for implementation. Am J Clin Pathol. 1984;81(4):492–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howanitz PJ, Tetrault GA, Steindel SJ. Clinical laboratory quality control: a costly process now out of control. Clin Chim Acta. 1997;260(2):163–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amador E, Hsi BP, Massod MF. An evaluation of the “average of normals” and related methods of quality control. Am J Clin Pathol. 1968;50(3):369–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye JJ, Ingels SC, Parvin CA. Performance evaluation and planning for patient-based quality control procedures. Am J Clin Pathol. 2000;113(2):240–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis PW, Dixon K. Action limits for internal quality control. Clin Chim Acta. 1971;35(1):21–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begtrup H, Leroy S, Thyregod P, et al. 'Average of normals' used as control of accuracy, and a comparison with other controls. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1971;27(3):247–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed AH. Use of patient data for quality control of clinical laboratory tests. Clin Chem. 1970;16(2):129–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorsey DB. Quality control in hematology. Am J Clin Pathol. 1963;40:457–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull BS, Elashoff RM, Heilbron DC, et al. A study of various estimators for the derivation of quality control procedures from patient erythrocyte indices. Am J Clin Pathol. 1974;61(4):473–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews DF, Bickel PJ, Hampel FR, et al. Robust estimates of location: Survey and advances. Chapter 2: Estimates. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1972. p. 3–28.
   Google Scholar
• Bull BS, Korpman RA. Intralaboratory quality control using patient’s data. In Cavill I, editor. Methods in haematology. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1982. p. 121–150.
   Google Scholar
• Cembrowski GS, Westgard JO. Quality Control of multichannel hematology analyzers: Evaluation of Bull's algorithm. Am J Clin Pathol. 1985;83(3):337–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neubauer AS. The EWMA control chart: properties and comparison with other quality-control procedures by computer simulation. Clin Chem. 1997;43(4):594–601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnet K. The exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) rule compared with traditionally used quality control rules. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006;44(4):396–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith FA, Kroft SH. Exponentially Adjusted moving mean procedure for quality control. An optimized patient sample control procedure. Am J Clin Pathol. 1996;105(1):44–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith FA, Kroft SH. Optimal procedures for detecting analytic bias using patient samples. Am J Clin Pathol. 1997;108(3):254–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lott JA, Smith DA, Mitchell LC, et al. Use of medians and “average of normals” of patients’ data for assessment of long-term analytical stability. Clin Chem. 1996;42(6):888–892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson A, Roberts WL, Pavlov I, et al. Patient result median monitoring for clinical laboratory quality control. Clin Chim Acta. 2011;412(15–16):1441–1446.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen SI, Petersen PH, Lund F, et al. Separate patient serum sodium medians from males and females provide independent information on analytical bias. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017;55(12):1865–1872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen SI, Petersen PH, Lund F, et al. Gender-partitioned patient medians of serum albumin requested by general practitioners for the assessment of analytical stability. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018;56(5):843–850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen SI, Petersen PH, Lund F, et al. Plasma creatinine medians from patients partitioned by gender and age used as a tool for assessment of analytical stability at different concentrations. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019;58(1):69–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bietenbeck A, Thaler MA, Luppa PB, et al. Stronger together: Aggregated Z-values of Traditional quality control measurements and patient medians improve detection of biases. Clin Chem. 2017;63(8):1377–1387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Tan CH, Badrick T, et al. Moving standard deviation and moving sum of outliers as quality tools for monitoring analytical precision. Clin Biochem. 2018;52:112–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery DC. SPC research – current trends. Qual Reliab Engng Int. 2007;23(5):515–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koerbin G, Liu J, Eigenstetter A, et al. Missed detection of significant positive and negative shifts in gentamicin assay: implications for routine laboratory quality practices. Biochem Med (Zagreb)). 2018;28(1):010705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Tan CH, Badrick T, et al. Moving sum of number of positive patient result as a quality control tool. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017;55:1709–1714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Houcke SK, Stepman HCM, Thienpont LM, et al. Long-term stability of laboratory tests and practical implications for quality management. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013;51(6):1227–1231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stepman HC, Stöckl D, Stove V, et al. Long-term stability of clinical laboratory data: sodium as benchmark. Clin Chem. 2011;57(11):1616–1617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo J, Lefever D, Winkelman JW. Use of “average of normals” quality control procedure in the detection and resolution of assay discrepancies. Am J Clin Pathol. 1988;89(1):125–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goossens K, Brinkmann T, Thienpont LM. On-line flagging monitoring - a new quality management tool for the analytical phase. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53(10):e269–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Grande LAC, Goossens K, Van Uytfanghe K, et al. The Empower project - a new way of assessing and monitoring test comparability and stability. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53(8):1197–1204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goossens K, Van Uytfanghe K, Twomey PJ, et al.; Participating Laboratories. Monitoring laboratory data across manufacturers and laboratories-A prerequisite to make "Big Data" work“”. Clin Chim Acta. 2015;445:12–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones GR. Average of delta: a new quality control tool for clinical laboratories. Ann Clin Biochem. 2016;53(Pt 1):133–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Rossum HH, Kemperman H. Optimization and validation of moving average quality control procedures using bias detection curves and moving average validation charts. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017;55(2):218–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Rossum HH, Kemperman H. A method for optimization and validation of moving average as continuous analytical quality control instrument demonstrated for creatinine. Clin Chim Acta. 2016;457:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Rossum H, Van Den Broek D. Design and implementation of quality control plans that integrate moving average and internal quality control: incorporating the best of both worlds. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019;57(9):1329–1338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaacson E. Numerical recipes in C: the art of scientific computing (William H. Press, Brian P. Flannery, Saul A. Teukolsky, and William T. Vetterling); Numerical Recipes: example book (C) (William T. Vetterling, Saul A. Teukolsky, William H. Press, and Brian P. Flannery. SIAM Rev. 1989;31(1):142–142.
   Google Scholar
• Parvin CA. Using patient data for quality control. Chicago, IL; Workshop held at AACC Annual Scientific Meeting; July 27–31. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Liu J, Tan CH, Loh TP, et al. Verification of out-of-control situations detected by “average of normal” approach. Clin Biochem. 2016;49(16-17):1248–1253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan CH, Han G, Loh TP, et al. Bayesian approach to guide termination of retrospective retesting after detection of a systematic quality control failure. Clin Chim Acta. 2014;437:52–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loh TP, Badrick T. Using next generation electronic medical records for laboratory quality monitoring. J Lab Precis Med. 2017;2:61–61.
   Google Scholar
• Dimech W, Karakaltsas M, Vincini GA. Comparison of four methods of establishing control limits for monitoring quality controls in infectious disease serology testing. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018;56(11):1970–1978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum MW, Flood JG, Melanson SEF, et al. Quality control practices for chemistry and immunochemistry in a cohort of 21 large academic medical centers. Am J Clin Pathol. 2018;150(2):96–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 2011 Survey of UK IQC Practices - Westgard [Internet]. [cited 2020 Apr 20]. Available from: https://www.westgard.com/downloads/other-downloads/60-2011-survey-of-uk-iqc-practices.html
   Google Scholar