Clot activators and anticoagulant additives for blood collection. A critical review on behalf of COLABIOCLI WG-PRE-LATAM

References

• Cornes MP, Church S, van Dongen-Lases E, et al. The role of European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine working group for preanalytical phase in standardization and harmonization of the preanalytical phase in Europe. Ann Clin Biochem. 2016;53(Pt 5):539–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stonys R, Banys V, Vitkus D, et al. Can chewing gum be another source of preanalytical variability in fasting outpatients? eJIFCC. 2020;31(1):28–45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arredondo ME, Aranda E, Astorga R, et al. Breakfast can affect routine hematology and coagulation laboratory testing: an evaluation on behalf of COLABIOCLI WG-PRE-LATAM. TH Open. 2019;03(04):e367–e376.
   Google Scholar
• Bajaña W, Aranda E, Arredondo ME, et al. Impact of an Andean breakfast on biochemistry and immunochemistry laboratory tests: an evaluation on behalf COLABIOCLI WG-PRE-LATAM. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2019;19:020702.
   Google Scholar
• Lima-Oliveira G, Guidi GC, Salvagno GL, et al. Estimation of the imprecision on clinical chemistry testing due to fist clenching and maintenance during venipuncture. Clin Biochem. 2016;49(18):1364–1367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima-Oliveira G, Guidi GC, Salvagno GL, et al. The impact of fist clenching and its maintenance during venipuncture on routine hematology testing. J Clin Lab Anal. 2017;31(5):e22108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippi G, Lima-Oliveira G, Guidi GC. Does fist pumping/clenching during venipuncture activate blood coagulation? Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2016;27(3):357–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima-Oliveira G, Lippi G, Salvagno GL, et al. A new device to relieve venipuncture pain can affect haematology test results. Blood Transfus. 2014;12(1):S6–S10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lima-Oliveira G, Lippi G, Salvagno GL, et al. Quality impact on diagnostic blood specimen collection using a new device to relieve venipuncture pain. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2013;28(3):235–241.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bowen RA, Hortin GL, Csako G, et al. Impact of blood collection devices on clinical chemistry assays. Clin Biochem. 2010;43(1–2):4–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kricka LJ, Park JY, Senior MB, et al. Processing controls in blood collection tubes reveals interference. Clin Chem. 2005;51(12):2422–2423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima-Oliveira G, Cesare Guidi G, Guimaraes AVP, et al. Preanalytical nonconformity management regarding primary tube mixing in Brazil. J Med Biochem. 2017;36(1):39–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima-Oliveira G, Lippi G, Salvagno GL, et al. Processing of diagnostic blood specimens: is it really necessary to mix primary blood tubes after collection with evacuated tube system? Biopreserv Biobank. 2014;12(1):53–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima-Oliveira G, Lippi G, Salvagno GL, et al. Effects of vigorous mixing of blood vacuum tubes on laboratory test results. Clin Biochem. 2013;46(3):250–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima-Oliveira G, Adcock DM, Salvagno GL, et al. Mixing of thawed coagulation samples prior to testing: is any technique better than another? Clin Biochem. 2016;49(18):1399–1401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favaloro EJ, Oliver S, Mohammed S, et al. Potential misdiagnosis of von Willebrand disease and haemophilia caused by ineffective mixing of thawed plasma. Haemophilia. 2017;23(5):e436–e443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Danese E, et al. Inversion of lithium heparin gel tubes after centrifugation is a significant source of bias in clinical chemistry testing. Clin Chim Acta. 2014;436:183–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippi G, Lima-Oliveira G, Brocco G, et al. Estimating the intra- and inter-individual imprecision of manual pipetting. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017;55:962–966.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. Medical laboratories – REquirements for quality and competence. ISO document 15189. Geneva (Switzerland): International Organization for Standardization; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Lippi G, Cornes MP, Grankvist K, et al. EFLM WG-preanalytical phase opinion paper: local validation of blood collection tubes in clinical laboratories. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016;54(5):755–760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima-Oliveira G, Lippi G, Salvagno GL, et al. Sodium citrate vacuum tubes validation: preventing preanalytical variability in routine coagulation testing. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2013;24(3):252–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima-Oliveira G, Lippi G, Salvagno GL, et al. Brand of dipotassium EDTA vacuum tube as a new source of pre-analytical variability in routine haematology testing. Br J Biomed Sci. 2013;70(1):6–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima-Oliveira G, Lippi G, Salvagno GL, et al. K(3)EDTA vacuum tubes validation for routine hematological testing. ISRN Hematol. 2012;2012:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Lima-Oliveira G, Salvagno GL, Lippi G, et al. Quality management of preanalytical phase: impact of lithium heparin vacuum tubes changes on clinical chemistry tests. Accred Qual Assur. 2013;18(5):429–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima-Oliveira G, Lippi G, Salvagno GL, et al. Preanalytical management: serum vacuum tubes validation for routine clinical chemistry. Biochem Med. 2012;22:180–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima-Oliveira G, Lippi G, Salvagno GL, et al. Different manufacturers of syringes: a new source of variability in blood gas, acid-base balance and related laboratory test? Clin Biochem. 2012;45(9):683–687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen RA, Remaley AT. Interferences from blood collection tube components on clinical chemistry assays. Biochem Med. 2014;24(1):31–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima-Oliveira G, Volanski W, Lippi G, et al. Pre-analytical phase management: a review of the procedures from patient preparation to laboratory analysis. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2017;77(3):153–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. Single-use containers for human venous blood specimen collection. ISO document 6710. Geneva (Switzerland): International Organization for Standardization; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Grankvist K, Gomez R, Nybo M, et al. Preanalytical aspects on short- and long-term storage of serum and plasma. Diagnosis (Berl). 2019;6:51–56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lima-Oliveira G, Monneret D, Guerber F, et al. Sample management for clinical biochemistry assays: are serum and plasma interchangeable specimens? Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2018;55(7):480–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plebani M, Banfi G, Bernardini S, et al. Serum or plasma? An old question looking for new answers. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020;58(2):178–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima-Oliveira G, Lippi G, Salvagno GL, et al. Abnormal gel flotation caused by contrast media during adrenal vein sampling. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2016;26(3):444–450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh PN. Platelets and coagulation proteins. Fed Proc. 1981;40(7):2086–2091.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kalafatis M, Egan JO, van 't Veer C, et al. The regulation of clotting factors. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 1997;7(3):241–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter WE, Greene DN, Beal SG, et al. Clotting factors: clinical biochemistry and their roles as plasma enzymes. Adv Clin Chem. 2020;94:31–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubier A, O'Brien M. Endogenous anticoagulants. Top Companion Anim Med. 2012;27(2):81–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipe B, Ornstein DL. Deficiencies of natural anticoagulants, protein C, protein S, and antithrombin. Circulation. 2011;124(14):e365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castellino FJ, Ploplis VA. The protein C pathway and pathologic processes. J Thromb Haemost. 2009;7(Suppl 1):140–145.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strickland DK, Kessler CM. Biochemical and functional properties of protein C and protein S. Clin Chim Acta. 1987;170(1):1–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson KE, Stenflo J, Linse S, et al. Binding of calcium to anticoagulant protein S: role of the fourth EGF module. Biochemistry. 2006;45(35):10682–10689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorsey A, Pilli VS, Fried H, et al. Protein S: a multifunctional anticoagulant. Biomed Res Clin Prac. 2017;2(5). DOI:https://doi.org/10.15761/BRCP.1000151
   Google Scholar
• Franchi F, Biguzzi E, Martinelli I, et al. Normal reference ranges of antithrombin, protein C and protein S: effect of sex, age and hormonal status. Thromb Res. 2013;132(2):e152–e157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay R, Sengupta T, Majumder R. Inhibition of intrinsic Xase by protein S: a novel regulatory role of protein S independent of activated protein C. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2012;32(10):2387–2393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roemisch J, Gray E, Hoffmann JN, et al. Antithrombin: a new look at the actions of a serine protease inhibitor. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2002;13(8):657–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg JS, McKenna PW, Rosenberg RD. Inhibition of human factor IXa by human antithrombin. J Biol Chem. 1975;250(23):8883–8888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao LV, Nordfang O, Hoang AD, et al. Mechanism of antithrombin III inhibition of factor VIIa/tissue factor activity on cell surfaces. Comparison with tissue factor pathway inhibitor/factor Xa-induced inhibition of factor VIIa/tissue factor activity. Blood. 1995;85(1):121–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stead N, Kaplan AP, Rosenberg RD. Inhibition of activated factor XII by antithrombin-heparin cofactor. J Biol Chem. 1976;251(21):6481–6488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opal SM, Kessler CM, Roemisch J, et al. Antithrombin, heparin, and heparan sulfate. Crit Care Med. 2002;30(5 Suppl):S325–S31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisel JW. Fibrinogen and fibrin. Adv Protein Chem. 2005;70:247–299.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kataoka K, Yamada S, Toki N. Effects of cryoglobulin on fibrin clot formation and fibrinolysis. Acta Haematol. 1984;71(2):90–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etienne J, Sarmini H, Borgard JP, et al. Biochemical problems caused by some cryoglobulins. Biomedicine. 1978;29(4):117–120.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bowen RA, Chan Y, Ruddel ME, et al. Immunoassay interference by a commonly used blood collection tube additive, the organosilicone surfactant silwet L-720. Clin Chem. 2005;51(10):1874–1882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock PE, Srinivasan KR, Shore JD. Activation of intrinsic blood coagulation by ellagic acid: insoluble ellagic acid-metal ion complexes are the activating species. Biochemistry. 1981;20(25):7258–7266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanov I, Matafonov A, Sun MF, et al. Proteolytic properties of single-chain factor XII: a mechanism for triggering contact activation. Blood. 2017;129(11):1527–1537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott CF. Mechanism of the participation of the contact system in the Vroman effect. Review and summary. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 1991;2(3):173–181.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vogler EA, Siedlecki CA. Contact activation of blood-plasma coagulation. Biomaterials. 2009;30(10):1857–1869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries AJ, Lansink-Hartgring AO, Fernhout FJ, et al. The activated clotting time in cardiac surgery: should Celite or kaolin be used? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017;24:549–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogler EA, Graper JC, Harper GR. inventors; Becton, Dickinson and Company (Franklin Lakes, NJ), assignee. Tube having unitary blood coagulation activator and method for its preparation. US patent 5326535. 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Rapaport SI. Evidence that glass increases plasma PTA activity. J Lab Clin Med. 1958;52(4):624–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laessig RH, Hassemer DJ, Hoffman GL, et al. A comparison of hard and soft glass blood-drawing tubes. Am J Clin Pathol. 1979;72(6):952–955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preissner CM, Reilly WM, Cyr RC, et al. Plastic versus glass tubes: effects on analytical performance of selected serum and plasma hormone assays. Clin Chem. 2004;50(7):1245–1247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasai M, Yamazaki S, Miyake S, inventors; Terumo Corporation, assignee. Blood collecting tube. US patent US4985026A. 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Ernst DJ. Plastic collection tubes decrease risk of employee injury. MLO Med Lab Obs. 2001;33(48):44–46, 48, 50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hill BM, Laessig RH, Koch DD, et al. Comparison of plastic vs. glass evacuated serum-separator (SST) blood-drawing tubes for common clinical chemistry determinations. Clin Chem. 1992;38(8 Pt 1):1474–1478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush V. Effects of pre-analytical variables in therapeutic drug monitoring. Chapter 2. In: Dasgupta A, editor. Therapeutic drug monitoring. Cambridge (MA): Academic Press; 2012. p. 31–48.
   Google Scholar
• Kratz A, Stanganelli N, Van Cott EM. A comparison of glass and plastic blood collection tubes for routine and specialized coagulation assays: a comprehensive study. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006;130(1):39–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smets EM, Dijkstra-Lagemaat JE, Blankenstein MA. Influence of blood collection in plastic vs. glass evacuated serum-separator tubes on hormone and tumour marker levels. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2004;42:435–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarn D, Ashley CE, Xue M, et al. Mesoporous silica nanoparticle nanocarriers: biofunctionality and biocompatibility. Acc Chem Res. 2013;46(3):792–801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis J. The effect of colloidal silica on blood coagulation. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1961;39:249–258.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baker SE, Sawvel AM, Zheng N, et al. Controlling bioprocesses with inorganic surfaces: layered clay hemostatic agents. Chem Mater. 2007;19(18):4390–4392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soulier JP, Prou-Wartelle O. [Effects of various adsorbants on coagulation factors (author's transl)]. Nouv Rev Fr Hematol. 1975;15:195–211.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• National Center for Biotechnology Information. Kaolin, CID = 56841936. PubChem Database [cited 2020 Apr. 5]. Available from: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Kaolin
   Google Scholar
• Franco F, Pérez-Maqueda LA, Pérez-Rodríguez JL. The effect of ultrasound on the particle size and structural disorder of a well-ordered kaolinite. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2004;274(1):107–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi L, Salem A. The role of bentonite particle size distribution on kinetic of cation exchange capacity. J Ind Eng Chem. 2011;17(1):90–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray HH. Traditional and new applications for kaolin, smectite, and palygorskite: a general overview. Appl Clay Sci. 2000;17(5–6):207–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikoff DS, Bennett DC, Brorby GP. Evaluation of potential human health risk associated with consumption of edible products from livestock fed ration supplemented with Red Lake Diatomaceous Earth. Food Addit Contam Part A. 2020;37:804–814.
   Google Scholar
• Dubrowny NE, Harrop AJ, inventors; Becton, Dickinson & Company (Franklin Lakes, NJ), assignee. Collection device. United States patent 6686204B2. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Stubbs MT, Bode W. Coagulation factors and their inhibitors. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1994;4(6):823–832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimeski G, Masci PP, Trabi M, et al. Evaluation of the Becton-Dickinson rapid serum tube: does it provide a suitable alternative to lithium heparin plasma tubes? Clin Chem Lab Med. 2010;48(5):651–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimeski G, Johnston J, Masci PP, et al. Evaluation of the Greiner Bio-One serum separator BCA Fast Clot tube. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017;55(8):1135–1141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu E, Moosavi L. Biochemistry, Antithrombin III. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Matafonov A, Sarilla S, Sun MF, et al. Activation of factor XI by products of prothrombin activation. Blood. 2011;118(2):437–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore GW, Tugnait S, Savidge GF. A new-generation dilute Russell's viper venom time assay system for lupus anticoagulants: evaluation of detection utilising frozen reagents and controls. Br J Biomed Sci. 2005;62(3):127–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speijer H, Govers-Riemslag JW, Zwaal RF, et al. Platelet procoagulant properties studied with snake venom prothrombin activators. Thromb Haemost. 1987;57(3):349–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh N, Williams V. Practical applications of snake venom toxins in haemostasis. Toxicon. 2005;45(8):1171–1181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao KN, Dimeski G, de Jersey J, et al. Next-generation rapid serum tube technology using prothrombin activator coagulant: fast, high-quality serum from normal samples. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019;57(4):483–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Exner T, Rickard KA. Contact activation by ellagic acid - the concept of soluble activator disputed. Thromb Res. 1982;26(2):83–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyberg T, Nakstad B, Hetland O, et al. Procoagulant (thromboplastin) activity in human bronchoalveolar lavage fluids is derived from alveolar macrophages. Eur Respir J. 1990;3(1):61–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetland O, Brovold AB, Holme R, et al. Thromboplastin (tissue factor) in plasma membranes of human monocytes. Biochem J. 1985;228(3):735–743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez ML, Bruges G, Crespo G, et al. Thrombin selectively induces transcription of genes in human monocytes involved in inflammation and wound healing. Thromb Haemost. 2014;112(5):992–1001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick AJ, Stefanini M. The chemical state of the calcium reacting in the coagulation of blood. J Gen Physiol. 1948;32(2):191–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalaev EY, Johnson-Elton TD, Chang L, et al. Thermophysical properties of pharmaceutically compatible buffers at sub-zero temperatures: implications for freeze-drying. Pharm Res. 2002;19(2):195–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adcock DM, Kressin DC, Marlar RA. Minimum specimen volume requirements for routine coagulation testing: dependence on citrate concentration. Am J Clin Pathol. 1998;109(5):595–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, et al. Quality standards for sample collection in coagulation testing. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2012;38(6):565–575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ver Elst K, Vermeiren S, Schouwers S, et al. Validation of the minimal citrate tube fill volume for routine coagulation tests on ACL TOP 500 CTS®. Int J Lab Hematol. 2013;35(6):614–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reneke J, Etzell J, Leslie S, et al. Prolonged prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time due to underfilled specimen tubes with 109 mmol/L (3.2%) citrate anticoagulant. Am J Clin Pathol. 1998;109(6):754–757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caruso B, Bovo C, Guidi GC. Causes of preanalytical interferences on laboratory immunoassays. eJIFCC. 2020;31(1):70–84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rankin B. Humans by altitude; 2016 [cited 2020 Feb 10]. Available from: http://www.radicalcartography.net/index.html?howhigh.
   Google Scholar
• Marlar RA, Potts RM, Marlar AA. Effect on routine and special coagulation testing values of citrate anticoagulant adjustment in patients with high hematocrit values. Am J Clin Pathol. 2006;126(3):400–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jou JM, Lewis SM, Briggs C, et al. ICSH review of the measurement of the erythocyte sedimentation rate. Int J Lab Hematol. 2011;33(2):125–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adcock DM, Kressin DC, Marlar RA. Effect of 3.2% vs 3.8% sodium citrate concentration on routine coagulation testing. Am J Clin Pathol. 1997;107(1):105–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne S, MacKinnon K, Keeney M, et al. Effect of 3.2 vs. 3.8% sodium citrate concentration on anti-Xa levels for patients on therapeutic low molecular weight heparin. Clin Lab Haematol. 2003;25(5):317–319.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore GL. Additive solutions for better blood preservation. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 1987;25(3):211–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight JA, Searles DA, Clayton FC. The effect of desferrioxamine on stored erythrocytes: lipid peroxidation, deformability, and morphology. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 1996;26(4):283–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustard JF. Some in vitro effects of various concentrations of disodium ethylenediamine tetracetate, potassium oxalate, and sodium citrate on coagulation of blood. Am J Clin Pathol. 1958;30(6):498–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mel'nikov AF. Coagulation activity of the oxalate and citrate plasma. Lab Delo. 1976:246–247.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barkhan P. The effect of oxalate and citrate on the platelet count of whole blood and plasma. J Clin Pathol. 1957;10(1):26–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick AJ, Stefanini M. The concentration of the labile factor of the prothrombin complex in human, dog, and rabbit blood; its significance in the determination of prothrombin activity. J Lab Clin Med. 1948;33(7):819–826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buc HA, Demaugre F, Cepanec C, et al. The metabolic effects of oxalate on intact red blood cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1980;628(2):136–144.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eastham RD, Denson KW, Evans DA. The effects of sodium citrate and potassium ammonium oxalate on the erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Acta Med Scand. 1958;161(4):277–288.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pal GK, Pal P. Collection of blood samples. In: Textbook of practical physiology. 2nd ed. Hyderabad, India: Orient Longman; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Von Burg R. Oxalic acid and sodium oxalate. J Appl Toxicol. 1994;14(3):233–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiter J. CFD analysis of EDTA-CaCl2 reaction in a microfluidic channel to aid in design of novel calorimeter device [master's thesis]. Boston (MA): Northeastern University; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Narayanan S. Effect of anticoagulants used for blood collection on laboratory tests. Jpn J Clin Pathol. 1996;103:73–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goossens W, Van Duppen V, Verwilghen RL. K2- or K3-EDTA: the anticoagulant of choice in routine haematology? Clin Lab Haematol. 1991;13(3):291–295.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Narayanan S. The preanalytic phase. An important component of laboratory medicine. Am J Clin Pathol. 2000;113(3):429–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Recommendations of the International Council for Standardization in haematology for ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid anticoagulation of blood for blood cell counting and sizing. International Council for Standardization in Haematology: Expert Panel on Cytometry. Am J Clin Pathol. 1993;100:371–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesesve JF, Haristoy X, Thouvenin M, et al. Pseudoleucopenia due to in vitro leukocyte agglutination polynuclear neutrophils: experience of a laboratory, review of the literature and future management. Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2000;58(4):417–424.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoneyama A, Nakahara K. [EDTA-dependent pseudothrombocytopenia–differentiation from true thrombocytopenia]. Nihon Rinsho. 2003;61(4):569–574.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abal CC, Calviño LR, Manso LR, et al. Pseudothrombocytopenia by ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid can jeopardize patient safety – a case report. eJIFCC. 2020;31(1):65–69.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bartels PC, Schoorl M, Lombarts AJ. Screening for EDTA-dependent deviations in platelet counts and abnormalities in platelet distribution histograms in pseudothrombocytopenia. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1997;57(7):629–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovacs F, Varga M, Pataki Z, et al. Pseudothrombocytopenia with multiple anticoagulant sample collection tubes. Interv Med Appl Sci. 2016;8(4):181–183.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robier C, Neubauer M, Sternad H, et al. Hirudin-induced pseudothrombocytopenia in a patient with EDTA-dependent platelet aggregation: report of a new laboratory artefact. Int J Lab Hematol. 2010;32:452–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuff-Werner P, Steiner M, Fenger S, et al. Effective estimation of correct platelet counts in pseudothrombocytopenia using an alternative anticoagulant based on magnesium salt. Br J Haematol. 2013;162(5):684–692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannuß S, Schuff-Werner P, Dreißiger K, et al. Magnesium sulfate as an alternative in vitro anticoagulant for the measurement of platelet parameters? Am J Clin Pathol. 2016;145(6):806–814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannuß S, Schuff-Werner P, Dreißiger K, et al. Inhibition of agonist-induced platelet aggregation by magnesium sulfate warrants its use as an alternative in vitro anticoagulant in pseudothrombocytopenia. Platelets. 2020;31(5):680–685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollnes TE, Garred P, Bergseth G. Effect of time, temperature and anticoagulants on in vitro complement activation: consequences for collection and preservation of samples to be examined for complement activation. Clin Exp Immunol. 1988;73(3):484–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins J, Wild G, Smith S. Nafamostat to stabilise plasma samples taken for complement measurements. Lancet. 1989;1(8643):896–897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergseth G, Ludviksen JK, Kirschfink M, et al. An international serum standard for application in assays to detect human complement activation products. Mol Immunol. 2013;56(3):232–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeifer PH, Kawahara MS, Hugli TE. Possible mechanism for in vitro complement activation in blood and plasma samples: futhan/EDTA controls in vitro complement activation. Clin Chem. 1999;45(8 Pt 1):1190–1199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein BN, Wesler J, Nowacki AS, et al. Investigations of blood ammonia analysis: Test matrices, storage, and stability. Clin Biochem. 2017;50(9):537–539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong JP, Aggarwal A, Krieger D, et al. Correlation between ammonia levels and the severity of hepatic encephalopathy. Am J Med. 2003;114(3):188–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima-Oliveira G, Salvagno GL, Danese E, et al. Sodium citrate blood contamination by K2 -ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA): impact on routine coagulation testing. Int J Lab Hematol. 2015;37(3):403–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabenstein DL, Robert JM, Peng J. Multinuclear magnetic resonance studies of the interaction of inorganic cations with heparin. Carbohydr Res. 1995;278(2):239–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spadarella G, Di Minno A, Donati MB, et al. From unfractionated heparin to pentasaccharide: Paradigm of rigorous science growing in the understanding of the in vivo thrombin generation. Blood Rev. 2020;39:100613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray E, Hogwood J, Mulloy B. The anticoagulant and antithrombotic mechanisms of heparin. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2012;207:43–61.
   Google Scholar
• Narayanan S, Hamasaki N. Current concepts of coagulation and fibrinolysis. Adv Clin Chem. 1998;33:133–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landt M, Hortin GL, Smith CH, et al. Interference in ionized calcium measurements by heparin salts. Clin Chem. 1994;40(4):565–570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toffaletti JG, Wildermann RF. The effects of heparin anticoagulants and fill volume in blood gas syringes on ionized calcium and magnesium measurements. Clin Chim Acta. 2001;304(1–2):147–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toffaletti J, Thompson T. Effects of blended lithium-zinc heparin on ionized calcium and general clinical chemistry tests. Clin Chem. 1995;41(2):328–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toffaletti J. Use of novel preparations of heparin to eliminate interference in ionized calcium measurements: have all the problems been solved? Clin Chem. 1994;40(4):508–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhite TR, Smith CH, Landt M. Interference of zinc heparin anticoagulant in determination of plasma magnesium. Clin Chem. 1994;40(5):848–849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remko M, Broer R, Remková A, et al. How strong are Ca2+–heparin and Zn2+–heparin interactions? Chem Phys Lett. 2015;621:12–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toffaletti J, Ernst P, Hunt P, et al. Dry electrolyte-balanced heparinized syringes evaluated for determining ionized calcium and other electrolytes in whole blood. Clin Chem. 1991;37(10 Pt 1):1730–1733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Berkel M, Scharnhorst V. Electrolyte-balanced heparin in blood gas syringes can introduce a significant bias in the measurement of positively charged electrolytes. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011;49(2):249–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippi G, Nybo M, Cadamuro J, et al. Blood glucose determination: effect of tube additives. Adv Clin Chem. 2018;84:101–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan AY, Swaminathan R, Cockram CS. Effectiveness of sodium fluoride as a preservative of glucose in blood. Clin Chem. 1989;35(2):315–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meites S, Saniel-Banrey K. Preservation, distribution, and assay of glucose in blood, with special reference to the newborn. Clin Chem. 1979;25(4):531–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhys NH, Bruni F, Imberti S, et al. Glucose and mannose: a link between hydration and sweetness. J Phys Chem B. 2017;121(33):7771–7776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liss E, Bechtel S. Improvement of glucose preservation in blood samples. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1990;28(10):689–690.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chapman BE, Kuchel PW. Fluoride transmembrane exchange in human erythrocytes measured with 19F NMR magnetization transfer. Eur Biophys J. 1990;19(1):41–45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shi RZ, Seeley ES, Bowen R, et al. Rapid blood separation is superior to fluoride for preventing in vitro reductions in measured blood glucose concentration. J Clin Pathol. 2009;62(8):752–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueding E, Goldfarb W. The effect of sodium fluoride and sodium iodoacetate on glycolysis in human blood. J Biol Chem. 1941;14:539–544.
   Google Scholar
• Silveira MC, Carvajal E, Bon EP. Assay for in vivo yeast invertase activity using NaF. Anal Biochem. 1996;238(1):26–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Sayed SM, El-Magd RM, Shishido Y, et al. 3-Bromopyruvate antagonizes effects of lactate and pyruvate, synergizes with citrate and exerts novel anti-glioma effects. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 2012;44(1):61–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikesh LM, Bruns DE. Stabilization of glucose in blood specimens: mechanism of delay in fluoride inhibition of glycolysis. Clin Chem. 2008;54(5):930–932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez L, Jee P, Klein MJ, et al. A comparison of glucose concentration in paired specimens collected in serum separator and fluoride/potassium oxalate blood collection tubes under survey 'field' conditions. Clin Biochem. 2013;46(4–5):285–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt MM, Dringen R. Differential effects of iodoacetamide and iodoacetate on glycolysis and glutathione metabolism of cultured astrocytes. Front Neuroenergetics. 2009;1:1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williamson JR. Glycolytic control mechanisms. 3. Effects of iodoacetamide and fluoroacetate on glucose metabolism in the perfused rat heart. J Biol Chem. 1967;242(19):4476–4485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beutler E, Blume KG, Kaplan JC, et al. International Committee for Standardization in Haematology: recommended methods for red-cell enzyme analysis. Br J Haematol. 1977;35(2):331–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchida K, Matuse R, Toyoda E, et al. A new method of inhibiting glycolysis in blood samples. Clin Chim Acta. 1988;172(1):101–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchida K, Okuda S, Tanaka K. inventors; TERUMO CORPORATION, assignee. Method of inhibiting glycolysis in blood samples. European. 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Bonetti G, Carta M, Montagnana M, et al. Effectiveness of citrate buffer-fluoride mixture in Terumo tubes as an inhibitor of in vitro glycolysis. Biochem Med. 2016;26:68–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fobker M. Stability of glucose in plasma with different anticoagulants. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2014;52:1057–1060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saracevic A, Dukic L, Juricic G, et al. Various glycolysis inhibitor-containing tubes for glucose measurement cannot be used interchangeably due to clinically unacceptable biases between them. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018;56(2):236–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller C, Lukas P, Bohmert M, et al. Hirudin or hirudin-like factor - that is the question: insights from the analyses of natural and synthetic HLF variants. FEBS Lett. 2020;594(5):841–850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng B, Liu F, Guo Q, et al. Identification and characterization of hirudin-HN, a new thrombin inhibitor, from the salivary glands of Hirudo nipponia. PeerJ. 2019;7:e7716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang JY. The functional domain of hirudin, a thrombin-specific inhibitor. FEBS Lett. 1983;164(2):307–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bexborn F, Engberg AE, Sandholm K, et al. Hirudin versus heparin for use in whole blood in vitro biocompatibility models. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009;89(4):951–959.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lima-Oliveira G, Lippi G, Salvagno GL, et al. Venous stasis and whole blood platelet aggregometry: a question of data reliability and patient safety. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2015;26(6):665–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman K, Favaloro EJ. Time dependent reduction in platelet aggregation using the multiplate analyser and hirudin blood due to platelet clumping. Platelets. 2018;29(3):305–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calam RR, Cooper MH. Recommended "order of draw" for collecting blood specimens into additive-containing tubes. Clin Chem. 1982;28(6):1399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima-Oliveira G, Salvagno GL, Danese E, et al. Contamination of lithium heparin blood by K2-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA): an experimental evaluation. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2014;24(3):359–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston MB, Bernard Jr AJ, Flaschka HA. EDTA and complex formation. J Chem Educ. 1958;35(12):601–606.
   Google Scholar
• Sharratt CL, Gilbert CJ, Cornes MC, et al. EDTA sample contamination is common and often undetected, putting patients at unnecessary risk of harm. Int J Clin Pract. 2009;63(8):1259–1262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson DF. EDTA analysis on the Roche MODULAR analyser. Ann Clin Biochem. 2007;44(3):294–296.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chadwick K, Whitehead SJ, Ford C, et al. KEDTA sample contamination: a reappraisal. J Appl Lab Med. 2019;3(6):925–935.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barbato L, Campelo MD, Pigozzo S, et al. Rejection of hemolyzed sample can jeopardize patient safety. eJIFCC. 2020;31(1):15–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salvagno G, Lima-Oliveira G, Brocco G, et al. The order of draw: myth or science? Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013;51(12):2281–2285.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sulaiman RA, Cornes MP, Whitehead SJ, et al. Effect of order of draw of blood samples during phlebotomy on routine biochemistry results. J Clin Pathol. 2011;64(11):1019–1020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornes MR, Sulaiman RA, Whitehead SJ, et al. Incorrect order of draw of blood samples does not cause potassium EDTA sample contamination. Br J Biomed Sci. 2012;69(3):136–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indevuyst C, Schuermans W, Bailleul E, et al. The order of draw: much ado about nothing? Int J Lab Hematol. 2015;37(1):50–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima-Oliveira G, Lippi G, Salvagno GL, et al. Incorrect order of draw could be mitigate the patient safety: a phlebotomy management case report. Biochem Med (Zagreb)). 2013;23(2):218–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornes MP, Davidson F, Darwin L, et al. Multi-centre observational study of spurious hyperkalaemia due to EDTA contamination. Clin Lab. 2010;56(11–12):597–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornes MP, Ford C, Gama R. Spurious hyperkalaemia due to EDTA contamination: common and not always easy to identify. Ann Clin Biochem. 2008;45(Pt 6):601–603.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cornes MP, Ford C, Gama R. Undetected spurious hypernatraemia wastes health-care resources. Ann Clin Biochem. 2011;48(Pt 1):87–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cadamuro J, Felder TK, Oberkofler H, et al. Relevance of EDTA carryover during blood collection. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53(8):1271–1278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CLSI. Procedures for collection of diagnostic blood specimens by venipuncture. CLSI GP41. 7th ed. Wayne, PA: Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Simundic AM, Bolenius K, Cadamuro J, et al. Joint EFLM-COLABIOCLI recommendation for venous blood sampling. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018;56(12):2015–2038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar