Overutilization in laboratory medicine: tackling the problem with quality improvement science

References

• Brownlee S, Chalkidou K, Doust J, et al. Evidence for overuse of medical services around the world. Lancet. 2017;390(10090):156–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chassin MR, Galvin RW. The urgent need to improve health care quality. Institute of Medicine National Roundtable on Health Care Quality. JAMA. 1998;280(11):1000–1005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naugler C, Wyonch R. What the doctor ordered: improving the use and value of laboratory testing. C.D. Howe Institute Commentary No. 533; 2019. Available from: https://www.cdhowe.org/public-policy-research/what-doctor-ordered-improving-use-and-value-laboratory-testing
   Google Scholar
• Unnecessary Care in Canada. Choosing Wisely Canada. Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2017. Available from: https://www.cihi.ca/en/unnecessary-care-in-canada
   Google Scholar
• Thomas RE, Croal BL, Ramsay C, et al. Effect of enhanced feedback and brief educational reminder messages on laboratory test requesting in primary care: a cluster randomised trial. Lancet. 2006;367(9527):1990–1996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadamuro J, Gaksch M, Wiedemann H, et al. Are laboratory tests always needed? Frequency and causes of laboratory overuse in a hospital setting. Clin Biochem. 2018;54:85–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health Industry Distributors Association, (HIDA). 2019 US laboratory market report; 2019. Available from: https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/4803970/2019-us-laboratory-market-report
   Google Scholar
• Global Clinical Laboratory Services Industry. Global industry analysts; 2020. Available from: https://www.reportlinker.com/p04707129/Global-Clinical-Laboratory-Services-Services.html?utm_source=GNW
   Google Scholar
• Bogavac-Stanojevic N, Jelic-Ivanovic Z. The cost-effective laboratory: implementation of economic evaluation of laboratory testing. J Med Biochem. 2017;36(3):238–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• About Choosing Wisely Canada. Choosing Wisely Canada. 2021. Available from: https://choosingwiselycanada.org/about/
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg J, Green JB. Over-testing: why more is not better. Am J Med. 2014;127(5):362–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Born K, Kool T, Levinson W. Reducing overuse in healthcare: advancing choosing wisely. BMJ. 2019;367:l6317.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore RE. An historical perspective on the clinical diagnostic laboratory. In: Coleman W, Tsongalis G, editors. Molecular diagnostics: for the clinical laboratorian. 2nd ed. Totowa (NJ): Humana Press; 2006. p. 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1984. The Nobel Prize; 1984. Available from: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/1984/summary/
   Google Scholar
• Neary NM, King KS, Pacak K. Drugs and pheochromocytoma–don't be fooled by every elevated metanephrine. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(23):2268–2270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favaloro EJ, Lippi GG. Preanalytical issues that may cause misdiagnosis in haemophilia and von Willebrand disease. Haemophilia. 2018;24(2):198–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippi G, Betsou F, Cadamuro J, et al. Preanalytical challenges - time for solutions. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019;57(7):974–981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naugler C, Chin A, Thomas R, et al. Implementation of an intervention to reduce population-based screening for vitamin D deficiency: a cross-sectional study. CMAJ Open. 2017;5(1):E36–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gilmour JA, Weisman A, Orlov S, et al. Promoting resource stewardship: reducing inappropriate free thyroid hormone testing. J Eval Clin Pract. 2017;23(3):670–675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taher J, Beriault DR, Yip D, et al. Reducing free thyroid hormone testing through multiple plan-do-study-act cycles. Clin Biochem. 2020;81:41–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Washington (DC): The National Academies Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Facts and Figures. Choosing Wisely. 2021. Available from: https://www.choosingwisely.org/our-mission/facts-and-figures/
   Google Scholar
• Recommendations. Choosing Wisely Canada. 2021. Available from: https://choosingwiselycanada.org/recommendations/
   Google Scholar
• Patient-centered Laboratory Utilization Guidance Services (PLUGS). Seattle Children's Hospital. 2021. Available from: https://www.schplugs.org/
   Google Scholar
• Haynes SL, Torella F. The role of hospital transfusion committees in blood product conservation. Transfus Med Rev. 2004;18(2):93–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren JS. Laboratory test utilization program: structure and impact in a large academic medical center. Am J Clin Pathol. 2013;139(3):289–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed E, Naugler C, Far B. Emerging business intelligence framework for a clinical laboratory through big data analytics. Chapter 32. In: Arabnia HR, Tran QN, editors. Emerging trends in computational biology, bioinformatics, and systems biology. New York (NY): Elsevier; 2015. p. 577.
   Google Scholar
• Naugler CT, Guo M. Mean abnormal result rate: proof of concept of a new metric for benchmarking selectivity in laboratory test ordering. Am J Clin Pathol. 2016;145(4):568–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brack AP, Guo M, Ma I, et al. Use of the mean abnormal result rate (MARR) to gauge changes in family physicians' selectivity of laboratory test ordering, 2010–2015. Am J Clin Pathol. 2017;148(5):436–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismail O, Chin-Yee I, Gob A, et al. Reducing red blood cell folate testing: a case study in utilisation management. BMJ Open Qual. 2019;8(1):e000531.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• National minimum retesting intervals in pathology: a final report detailing consensus recommendations for minimum retesting intervals for use in pathology. The Royal College of Pathologists, The Association for Clinical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine, and The Institute of Biomedical Science; 2018. Available from https://www.rcpath.org/uploads/assets/253e8950-3721-4aa2-8ddd4bd94f73040e/g147_minretestingintervalsinpathology_dec15.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chami N, Simons JE, Sweetman A, et al. Rates of inappropriate laboratory test utilization in Ontario. Clin Biochem. 2017;50(15):822–827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandalam V, Lau CK, Guo M, et al. Inappropriate repeat testing of complete blood count (CBC) and electrolyte panels in inpatients from Alberta, Canada. Clin Biochem. 2020;77:32–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 3, Silverstein W, Weinerman A, Wang R, et al. Use of routine bloodwork on general internal medicine inpatients: a retrospective cohort study. Blood. 2019;134(Supplement_1):56–56.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan R, Henry D, Moons KGM. Using evidence to combat overdiagnosis and overtreatment: evaluating treatments, tests, and disease definitions in the time of too much. PLoS Med. 2014;11(7):e1001655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch HG, Albertsen PC. Prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment after the introduction of prostate-specific antigen screening: 1986–2005. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(19):1325–1329.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Welch HG, Albertsen PC. Reconsidering prostate cancer mortality - the future of PSA screening. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(16):1557–1563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurian AW, Li Y, Hamilton AS, et al. Gaps in incorporating germline genetic testing into treatment decision-making for early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(20):2232–2239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li A, Hicks LK, Fan E. Things we do for no reason: HIT testing in low probability patients. J Hosp Med. 2019;14(6):374–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mold JW, Stein HF. The cascade effect in the clinical care of patients. N Engl J Med. 1986;314(8):512–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauzier S, Lauzier S, Maunsell E, et al. Psychological distress and physical health in the year after diagnosis of DCIS or invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;120(3):685–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkland KB. Taking off the gloves: toward a less dogmatic approach to the use of contact isolation. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48(6):766–771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson HD, Pappas M, Cantor A, et al. Harms of breast cancer screening: systematic review to update the 2009 U.S. preventive services task force recommendation. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164(4):256–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiting D, Croker R, Watson J, et al. Optimising laboratory monitoring of chronic conditions in primary care: a quality improvement framework. BMJ Open Qual. 2019;8(1):e000349.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vermeer NCA, Valk MJM, Snijders HS, et al. Psychological distress and quality of life following positive fecal occult blood testing in colorectal cancer screening. Psycho‐Oncology. 2020;29(6):1084–1091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan DR, Golden SE, Ganzini L, et al. 'I still don't know diddly': a longitudinal qualitative study of patients' knowledge and distress while undergoing evaluation of incidental pulmonary nodules. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2015;25(1):15028.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmidt CO, Hegenscheid K, Erdmann P, et al. Psychosocial consequences and severity of disclosed incidental findings from whole-body MRI in a general population study. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(5):1343–1351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bélisle-Pipon J, Vayena E, Green RC, et al. Genetic testing, insurance discrimination and medical research: what the United States can learn from peer countries. Nat Med. 2019;25(8):1198–1204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himmelstein DU, Thorne D, Warren E, et al. Medical bankruptcy in the united states, 2007: results of a national study. Am J Med. 2009;122(8):741–746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himmelstein DU, Lawless RM, Thorne D, et al. Medical bankruptcy: still common despite the affordable care act. Am J Public Health. 2019;109(3):431–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emanuel EJ, Fuchs VR. The perfect storm of overutilization. JAMA. 2008;299(23):2789–2791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyhani S, Falk R, Howell EA, et al. Overuse and systems of care: a systematic review. Med Care. 2013;51(6):503–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosden T, Forland F, Kristiansen I, et al. Capitation, salary, fee-for-service and mixed systems of payment: effects on the behaviour of primary care physicians. Cochrane Database System Rev. 2000;3(10):1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks LK. Reframing overuse in health care: time to focus on the harms. J Oncol Pract. 2015;11(3):168–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine. Best care at lower cost: the path to continuously learning health care in America. Washington (DC): The National Academies Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Vrijsen BEL, Naaktgeboren CA, Vos LM, et al. Inappropriate laboratory testing in internal medicine inpatients: prevalence, causes and interventions. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020;51:48–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenland P, Alpert JS, Beller GA, et al. 2010 ACCF/AHA guideline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults: executive summary: a report of the american college of cardiology foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2010;122(25):2748–2764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey SE, Curry CJ, Toriello HV. ACMG practice guideline: lack of evidence for MTHFR polymorphism testing. Genet Med. 2013;15(2):153–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkhurst E, Calonico E, Noh G. Medical decision support to reduce unwarranted methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) genetic testing. J Med Syst. 2020;44(9):152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st Century. Washington (DC): The National Academies Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Nolan TW. Execution of strategic improvement initiatives to produce system-level results. IHI Innovation Series white paper. Cambridge (MA): Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2007. Available from: http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/IHIWhitePapers/ExecutionofStrategicImprovementInitiativesWhitePaper.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Mukerji G, Halperin I, Segal P, et al. Beginning a diabetes quality improvement project. Can J Diabetes. 2019;43(4):234–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brugha R, Varvasovszky Z. Stakeholder analysis: a review. Health Policy Plan. 2000;15(3):239–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Science of improvement: forming the team. 2021. Available from: http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/HowtoImprove/ScienceofImprovementFormingtheTeam.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Trainees Improving Patient Safety through Quality Improvement (TIPSQI). Defining the problem - SMART aims. 2021. Available from: https://tipsqi.co.uk/guide-5c/
   Google Scholar
• Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Science of improvement: establishing measures [Internet]; 2020 [cited 2020 Nov 30]. Available from: http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/HowtoImprove/ScienceofImprovementEstablishingMeasures.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Cause and effect diagram. 2021. Available from: http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/Tools/CauseandEffectDiagram.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP). Medication error prevention “toolbox. ISMP Med Saf Alert. 1999;11(4):1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Bread P, Hoffman C, Ste-Marie M. Canadian incident analysis framework - key features of effective recommended actions. Incident analysis collaborating parties; 2012. Available from: https://www.patientsafetyinstitute.ca/en/toolsResources/PatientSafetyIncidentManagementToolkit/Documents/CIAF%20Key%20Features%20-%20Analysis%20Process.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Perla RJ, Provost LP, Murray SK. The run chart: a simple analytical tool for learning from variation in healthcare processes. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20(1):46–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thor J, Lundberg J, Ask J, et al. Application of statistical process control in healthcare improvement: systematic review. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007;16(5):387–399.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berwick DM. Disseminating innovations in health care. JAMA. 2003;289(15):1969–1975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron JM, Dighe AS. The role of informatics and decision support in utilization management. Clin Chim Acta. 2014;427:196–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JY, Dzik WH, Dighe AS, et al. Utilization management in a large urban academic medical center: a 10-year experience. Am J Clin Pathol. 2011;135(1):108–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash JS, Sittig DF, Campbell EM, et al. Some unintended consequences of clinical decision support systems. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2007;2007:26–30.
   Google Scholar
• Shojania KG, Jennings A, Mayhew A, et al. Effect of point-of-care computer reminders on physician behaviour: a systematic review. CMAJ. 2010;182(5):E216–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobewka DM, Ronksley PE, McKay JA, et al. Influence of educational, audit and feedback, system based, and incentive and penalty interventions to reduce laboratory test utilization: a systematic review. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53(2):157–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database System Rev. 2012;(6):CD000259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi O, Chan M, Bodley T, et al. Reducing repetitive and reflexive diagnostic phlebotomy in an intensive care unit: a quality improvement project. Blood. 2019;134:3406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fillée C, Beguin C, Habimana L, et al. How to optimize the prescription of laboratory tests? Success and failures in an academic hospital. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2018;78(3):197–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fralick M, Hicks LK, Chaudhry H, et al. REDucing unnecessary coagulation testing in the emergency department (REDUCED). BMJ Qual Improv Report. 2017;6(1):u221651.w8161.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leis B, Frost A, Bryce R, et al. Standard admission order sets promote ordering of unnecessary investigations: a quasi-randomised evaluation in a simulated setting. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017;26(11):938–940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crider KS, Bailey LB, Berry RJ. Folic acid food fortification-its history, effect, concerns, and future directions. Nutrients. 2011;3(3):370–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss R, Cressman A, Cheung M, et al. Major reductions in unnecessary aspartate aminotransferase and blood urea nitrogen tests with a quality improvement initiative. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019;28(10):809–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed-Ali Z, Brinc D, Kulasingam V, et al. Defining appropriate utilization of AST testing. Clin Biochem. 2020;79:75–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivica J, Hill S. The potential of reducing AST testing in hospital settings. Clin Biochem. 2019;64:57–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taher J, Brinc D, Gilmour JA, et al. Validating thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) reflexive testing cutpoints in a tertiary care institution. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019;58(1):11–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang G, Hu Z. Conjugated bilirubin as a reflex test for increased total bilirubin in apparently healthy population. J Clin Lab Anal. 2018;32(2):e22233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubio-Tapia A, Hill ID, Kelly CP, et al. ACG clinical guidelines: diagnosis and management of celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108(5):656–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husby S, Murray JA, Katzka DA. AGA clinical practice update on diagnosis and monitoring of celiac disease-changing utility of serology and histologic measures: expert review. Gastroenterology. 2019;156(4):885–889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sezgin G, Li L, Wilson R, et al. Laboratory test utilization and repeat testing for inpatients of age 80 and over in Australia: a retrospective observational study. J Appl Lab Med. 2019;4(2):143–151.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Janssens PMW, Wasser G. Managing laboratory test ordering through test frequency filtering. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013;51(6):1207–1215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar