Managing biological variation data: modern approaches for study design and clinical application

References

• Fraser CG. Biological variation: from principles to practice. Washington (DC): AACC Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Simundic A-M, Kackov S, Miler M, et al. Terms and symbols used in studies on biological variation: the need for harmonization. Clin Chem. 2015;61(2):438–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). EP33: use of delta checks in the medical laboratory. 1st ed. Wayne (PA): Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI); 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Davenport CB. Statistical methods with special reference to biological variation. 2nd ed. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 1904.
   Google Scholar
• Recent advances in statistical methods. Br Med J. 1907;2(2428):95–98.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Snedecor GW. Biological variation vs. errors in measurement. Science. 1934;80(2072):246–247.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sollberger A. A study of biological variation. Cells Tissues Organs. 1954;22(2-3):127–143.
   Google Scholar
• Williams GZ, Young DS, Stein MR, et al. Biological and analytic components of variation in long-term studies of serum constituents in normal subjects: I. Objectives, subject selection, laboratory procedures, and estimation of analytic deviation. Clin Chem. 1970;16(12):1016–1021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris EK, Kanofsky P, Shakarji G, et al. Biological and analytic components of variation in long-term studies of serum constituents in normal subjects. II. Estimating biological components of variation. Clin Chem. 1970;16(12):1022–1027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotlove E, Harris EK, Williams GZ. Biological and analytic components of variation in long-term studies of serum constituents in normal subjects. 3. Physiological and medical implications. Clin Chem. 1970;16(12):1028–1032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yalow RS, Berson SA. Immunoassay of endogenous plasma insulin in man. J Clin Invest. 1960;39:1157–1175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser GG, Harris EK. Generation and application of data on biological variation in clinical chemistry. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 1989;27(5):409–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricos C, Alvarez V, Cava F, et al. Current databases on biological variation: pros, cons and progress. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1999;59(7):491–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmen R, Virtudes Á, Carmen P, et al. Rationale for using data on biological variation. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53(6):863–870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minchinela J, Ricos C, Perich C, et al. Desirable biological variation database specifications; 2014 [cited 2020 Apr 29]. Available from: https://www.westgard.com/biodatabase1.htm
   Google Scholar
• Aarsand A, Fernandez-Calle P, Webster C, et al. The EFLM biological variation database; 2020 [cited 2020 Jul 8]. Available from: https://biologicalvariation.eu
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett WA, Braga F, Carobene A, Biological Variation Working Group, European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM), et al. A checklist for critical appraisal of studies of biological variation. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53(6):879–885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aarsand AK, Roraas T, Fernandez-Calle P, European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Working Group on Biological Variation and Task and Finish Group for the Biological Variation Database, et al. The biological variation data critical appraisal checklist: a standard for evaluating studies on biological variation. Clin Chem. 2018;64(3):501–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biomarkers Definitions Working Group. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001;69(3):89–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). EP05-A3: evaluation of precision of quantitative measurement procedures. 3rd ed. Wayne (PA): Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI); 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Kallner A. Laboratory statistics: methods in chemistry and health sciences. 2nd ed. Cambridge (MA): Elsevier; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Aarsand AK, Roraas T, Bartlett WA, et al. Harmonization initiatives in the generation, reporting and application of biological variation data. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018;56(10):1629–1636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NCBI MeSH. Biological variation, population and biological variation, individual. 2018 [cited 2020 Jul 7]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/?term=biological+variation.
   Google Scholar
• Lacher DA, Hughes JP, Carroll MD. Estimate of biological variation of laboratory analytes based on the third national health and nutrition examination survey. Clin Chem. 2005;51(2):450–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacher DA, Barletta J, Hughes JP. Biological variation of hematology tests based on the 1999–2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Natl Health Stat Report. 2012;(54):1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lacher DA, Hughes JP, Carroll MD. Biological variation of laboratory analytes based on the 1999–2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Natl Health Stat Report. 2010;(21):1–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller WG, Horowitz GL, Ceriotti F, et al. Reference intervals: strengths, weaknesses, and challenges. Clin Chem. 2016;62(7):916–923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris EK, Yasaka T. On the calculation of a "reference change" for comparing two consecutive measurements. Clin Chem. 1983;29(1):25–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones GRD. Effect of the reporting-interval size on critical difference estimation: beyond 2.77. Clin Chem. 2006;52(5):880–885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braga F, Ferraro S, Ieva F, et al. A new robust statistical model for interpretation of differences in serial test results from an individual. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53(5):815–822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fokkema MR, Herrmann Z, Muskiet FA, et al. Reference change values for brain natriuretic peptides revisited. Clin Chem. 2006;52(8):1602–1603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KDIGO Work Group. Kidney disease: improving global outcomes. Section 2: AKI definition. Kidney Int Suppl. 2012;2(1):19–36.
   Google Scholar
• Bruins S, Fokkema MR, RöMer JWP, et al. High intraindividual variation of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and amino-terminal proBNP in patients with stable chronic heart failure. Clin Chem. 2004;50(11):2052–2058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corte Z, Venta R. Biological variation of metabolic cardiovascular risk factors in haemodialysis patients and healthy individuals. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8(6):281–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clouet-Foraison N, Marcovina SM, Guerra E, et al. Analytical performance specifications for lipoprotein(a), apolipoprotein B-100, and apolipoprotein A-I using the biological variation model in the EuBIVAS population. Clin Chem. 2020;66(5):727–736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu AH, Lu QA, Todd J, et al. Short- and long-term biological variation in cardiac troponin I measured with a high-sensitivity assay: implications for clinical practice. Clin Chem. 2009;55(1):52–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ichihara K, Ozarda Y, Barth JH, Committee on Reference Intervals and Decision Limits, International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, et al. A global multicenter study on reference values: 1. Assessment of methods for derivation and comparison of reference intervals. Clin Chim Acta. 2017;467:70–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones GRD. Estimates of within-subject biological variation derived from pathology databases: an approach to allow assessment of the effects of age, sex, time between sample collections, and analyte concentration on reference change values. Clin Chem. 2019;65(4):579–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braga F, Ferraro S, Szöke D, et al. Estimate of intraindividual variability of C-reactive protein: a challenging issue. Clin Chim Acta. 2013;419:85–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund F, Petersen PH, Fraser CG, et al. Calculation of limits for significant bidirectional changes in two or more serial results of a biomarker based on a computer simulation model. Ann Clin Biochem. 2015;52(4):434–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund F, Petersen PH, Fraser CG, et al. Calculation of limits for significant unidirectional changes in two or more serial results of a biomarker based on a computer simulation model. Ann Clin Biochem. 2015;52(2):237–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko DH, Park HI, Hyun J, et al. Utility of reference change values for delta check limits. Am J Clin Pathol. 2017;148(4):323–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randell EW, Yenice S. Delta checks in the clinical laboratory. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2019;56(2):75–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monneret D, Mestari F, Atlan G, et al. Hemolysis indexes for biochemical tests and immunoassays on Roche analyzers: determination of allowable interference limits according to different calculation methods. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2015;75(2):162–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen PH, Fraser CG. Setting quality standards in clinical chemistry: can competing models based on analytical, biological, and clinical outcomes be harmonized? Clin Chem. 1994;40(10):1865–1868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA). Public Law 100-578, Section 353 Public Health Services Act (42 U.S.C. 263a) 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Electronic Code of Federal Regulations. Title 42, Chapter IV, Subchapter G, Part 493. [cited 2020 Dec 13]. Available from: https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=6b93593a14df9d2cd5de2c752c83c3f7&mc=true&node=pt42.5.493&rgn=div5
   Google Scholar
• Fraser CG, Hyltoft Petersen P, Libeer JC, et al. Proposals for setting generally applicable quality goals solely based on biology. Ann Clin Biochem. 1997;34(1):8–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandberg S, Fraser CG, Horvath AR, et al. Defining analytical performance specifications: consensus statement from the 1st Strategic Conference of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53(6):833–835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson P. Setting analytical quality goals with biological variation data: AACC, Pearls of Laboratory Medicine; 2019, Nov 15 [cited 2020 Apr 29]. Available from: https://www.aacc.org/clinical-chemistry-trainee-council/trainee-council-in-english/pearls-of-laboratory-medicine/2019/setting-analytical-quality-goals-with-biological-variation-data
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) proficiency testing regulations related to analytes and acceptable performance – a proposed rule by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; 2019 [cited 2020 Sep 23]. Available from: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/02/04/2018-28363/clinical-laboratory-improvement-amendments-of-1988-clia-proficiency-testing-regulations-related-to
   Google Scholar
• Miller WG, Myers GL, Ashwood ER, et al. State of the art in trueness and interlaboratory harmonization for 10 analytes in general clinical chemistry. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2008;132(5):838–846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor A. Quality assessment of measurement. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2011;25 (Suppl 1):S17–S21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haeckel R, Wosniok W, Kratochvila J, et al. A pragmatic proposal for permissible limits in external quality assessment schemes with a compromise between biological variation and the state of the art. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2012;50(5):833–839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orth M. Are regulation-driven performance criteria still acceptable? – the German point of view. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53(6):893–898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weykamp C, John G, Gillery P, IFCC Task Force on Implementation of HbA1c Standardization, et al. Investigation of 2 models to set and evaluate quality targets for hb a1c: biological variation and sigma-metrics. Clin Chem. 2015;61(5):752–759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge M, Zhao H, Yan Y, et al. Performance of electrolyte measurements assessed by a trueness verification program. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016;54(8):1319–1327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Praamsma ML, Arnaud J, Bisson D, Network of Organisers of External Quality Assurance Schemes in Occupational and Environmental Laboratory Medicine, et al. An assessment of clinical laboratory performance for the determination of manganese in blood and urine. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016;54(12):1921–1928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones GRD, Albarede S, Kesseler D, EFLM Task Finish Group – Analytical Performance Specifications for EQAS (TFG-APSEQA), et al. Analytical performance specifications for external quality assessment – definitions and descriptions. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017;55(7):949–955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). EP28-A3C: defining, establishing, and verifying reference intervals in the clinical laboratory. 3rd ed. Wayne (PA): Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI); 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Carobene A, Strollo M, Jonker N, et al. Sample collections from healthy volunteers for biological variation estimates' update: a new project undertaken by the Working Group on biological variation established by the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016;54(10):1599–1608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katayev A, Fleming JK, Luo D, et al. Reference intervals data mining: no longer a probability paper method. Am J Clin Pathol. 2015;143(1):134–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell CL, Nguyen L. Indirect reference intervals: harnessing the power of stored laboratory data. Clin Biochem Rev. 2019;40(2):99–111.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loh TP, Ranieri E, Metz MP. Derivation of pediatric within-individual biological variation by indirect sampling method: an LMS approach. Am J Clin Pathol. 2014;142(5):657–663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young DS, Harris EK, Cotlove E. Biological and analytic components of variation in long-term studies of serum constituents in normal subjects. IV. results of a study designed to eliminate long-term analytic deviations. Clin Chem. 1971;17(5):403–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EFLM Biological Variation Database. Alanine transaminase (ALT), from Young et al.; 1971 [cited 2020 Jul 7]. Available from: https://biologicalvariation.eu/bv_specifications/3252
   Google Scholar
• Gowans EM, Fraser CG. Longer-term biological variation of commonly analyzed serum constituents. Clin Chem. 1987;33(5):717–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roraas T, Petersen PH, Sandberg S. Confidence intervals and power calculations for within-person biological variation: effect of analytical imprecision, number of replicates, number of samples, and number of individuals. Clin Chem. 2012;58(9):1306–1313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotterdam EP, Katan MB, Knuiman JT. Importance of time interval between repeated measurements of total or high-density lipoprotein cholesterol when estimating an individual's baseline concentrations. Clin Chem. 1987;33(10):1913–1915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West JB. Human responses to extreme altitudes. Integr Comp Biol. 2006;46(1):25–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wacker M, Holick MF. Sunlight and vitamin D: a global perspective for health. Dermatoendocrinol. 2013;5(1):51–108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zierk J, Hirschmann J, Toddenroth D, et al. Next-generation reference intervals for pediatric hematology. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019;57(10):1595–1607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pineda-Tenor D, Laserna-Mendieta EJ, Timón-Zapata J, et al. Biological variation and reference change values of common clinical chemistry and haematologic laboratory analytes in the elderly population. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013;51(4):851–862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey D, Bevilacqua V, Colantonio DA, et al. Pediatric within-day biological variation and quality specifications for 38 biochemical markers in the CALIPER cohort. Clin Chem. 2014;60(3):518–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bokelund H, Winkel P, Statland BE. Factors contributing to intra-individual variation of serum constituents: 3. Use of randomized duplicate serum specimens to evaluate sources of analytical error. Clin Chem. 1974;20(12):1507–1512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braga F, Panteghini M. Generation of data on within-subject biological variation in laboratory medicine: an update. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2016;53(5):313–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roraas T, Stove B, Petersen PH, et al. Biological variation: the effect of different distributions on estimated within-person variation and reference change values. Clin Chem. 2016;62(5):725–736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adeli K, Higgins V, Trajcevski K, et al. The Canadian laboratory initiative on pediatric reference intervals: a CALIPER white paper. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2017;54(6):358–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EFLM Biological Variation Database. Alanine transaminase (ALT) from Bailey, et al.; 2014 [cited 2020 Jul 7]. Available from: https://biologicalvariation.eu/bv_specifications/866
   Google Scholar
• Kallner A. Analysis of variance. Laboratory statistics: methods in chemistry and health sciences. 2nd ed. Cambridge (MA): Elsevier; 2018. p. 77–86.
   Google Scholar
• Filliben JJ, Heckert A. NIST/SEMATECH e-Handbook of statistical methods. [cited 2020 Aug 5]. Available from: https://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/eda/section3/eda354.htm
   Google Scholar
• Zar JH. Confidence limits for the population variance. Biostatistical analysis. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1999.
   Google Scholar