Research progress of anti-environmental factor stress mechanism and anti-stress tolerance way of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during the brewing process

References

• Abbott, D. A., E. Suir, G. H. Duong, E. D. Hulster, J. T. Pronk, and A. V. Maris. 2009. Catalase overexpression reduces lactic acid-induced oxidative stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 75 (8):2320–5. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00009-09.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abe, F, and T. Hiraki. 2009. Mechanistic role of ergosterol in membrane rigidity and cycloheximide resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes 1788 (3):743–52. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2008.12.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auesukaree, C., A. Damnernsawad, M. Kruatrachue, P. Pokethitiyook, C. Boonchird, Y. Kaneko, and S. Harashima. 2009. Genome-wide identification of genes involved in tolerance to various environmental stresses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Applied Genetics 50 (3):301–10. doi: 10.1007/BF03195688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjaphokee, S., D. Hasegawa, D. Yokota, T. Asvarak, C. Auesukaree, M. Sugiyama, Y. Kaneko, C. Boonchird, and S. Harashima. 2012. Highly efficient bioethanol production by a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain with multiple stress tolerance to high temperature, acid and ethanol. New Biotechnology 29 (3):379–86. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2011.07.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, K., L. Weidenauer, T. M. Luengo, E. C. Pieters, R. C. Echeverria, L. Bernasconi, D. Wider, Y. Sadian, M. B. Koopman, M. Villemin, et al. 2020. The Hsp70-Hsp90 co-chaperone Hop/Stip1 shifts the proteostatic balance from folding towards degradation. Nature Communications 11 (1):5975. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19783-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binati, R. L., I. Larini, E. Salvetti, and S. Torriani. 2022. Glutathione production by non-Saccharomyces yeasts and its impact on winemaking: A review. Food Research International (Ottawa, Ont.) 156:111333. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, K., J. Vowinckel, M. A. Keller, and M. Ralser. 2016. Methionine metabolism alters oxidative stress resistance via the pentose phosphate pathway. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling 24 (10):543–7. doi: 10.1089/ars.2015.6516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardona, F., P. Carrasco, J. E. Pérez-Ortín, M. Olmo, and A. Aranda. 2007. A novel approach for the improvement of stress resistance in wine yeasts. International Journal of Food Microbiology 114 (1):83–91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.10.043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caspeta, L., Y. Chen, P. Ghiaci, A. Feizi, S. Buskov, B. M. Hallström, D. Petranovic, and J. Nielsen. 2014. Altered sterol composition renders yeast thermotolerant. Science (New York, N.Y.) 346 (6205):75–8. doi: 10.1126/science.1258137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., L. Feng, Y. Qin, and Y. L. Liu. 2019. Mutation breeding of low-yield volatile acid Saccharomyces cerevisiae by atmospheric and room temperature plasma. China Brewing 38 (11):43–8. doi: 10.11882/j.issn.0254-5071.2019.11.009.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y. F., Z. L. Du, H. Zhu, X. N. Guo, and H. X. Ping. 2016. Protective effects of arginine on Saccharomyces cerevisiae against ethanol stress. Scientific Reports 6:31311. doi: 10.1038/srep31311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. R., K. M. Li, T. Liu, R. Y. Li, G. M. Fu, Y. Wan, and F. P. Zheng. 2020. Analysis of difference in microbial community and physicochemical indices between surface and central parts of Chinese special-flavor Baijiu Daqu. Frontiers in Microbiology 11:592421–31. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.592421.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen, Y. Y., J. Y. Sheng, T. Jiang, J. Stevens, X. Y. Feng, and N. Wei. 2016. Transcriptional profiling reveals molecular basis and novel genetic targets for improved resistance to multiple fermentation inhibitors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnology for Biofuels 9:9–26. doi: 10.1186/s13068-015-0418-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S, and Y. Xu. 2014. Adaptive evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with enhanced ethanol tolerance for Chinese rice wine fermentation. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 173 (7):1940–54. doi: 10.1007/s12010-014-0978-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. F., Y. Xu, S. J. Zhang, X. Q. Wang, C. H. Guo, X. W. Guo, D, and G. Xiao. 2012. Development of Saccharomyces cerevisiae producing higher levels of sulfur dioxide and glutathione to improve beer flavor stability. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 166 (2):402–13. doi: 10.1007/s12010-011-9436-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z. J., X. C. Yang, J. Zhao, J. X. Hu, and W. M. Yuan. 2018. Breeding of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with high ethanol tolerance and its application in kiwi wine. Science and Technology of Food Industry 39 (2):141–5. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2018.02.027.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H. Q., X. S. Yu, M. M. Zhang, F. W. Bai, and X. Q. Zhao. 2017. Impact of zinc sulfate supplementation on global gene expression profiling of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to acetic acid stress. Microbiology China 44 (6):1312–21. doi: 10.13344/j.microbiol.china.160679.
   Google Scholar
• Comuzzo, P., F. Battistutta, M. Vendrame, M. S. Paez, G. Luisi, and R. Zironi. 2015. Antioxidant properties of different products and additives in white wine. Food Chemistry 168:107–14. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.07.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, Y. Q., Z. M. Wu, W. C. Su, and H. M. Zhang. 2019. Effect of fermentation environment change on yeast growth and beer product. China Brewing 38 (11):16–9. doi: 10.11882/j.issn.0254-5071.2019.11.004.
   Google Scholar
• Cunha, J. T., A. Romaní, C. E. Costa, I. Sá-Correia, and L. Domingues. 2019. Molecular and physiological basis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae tolerance to adverse lignocellulose-based process conditions. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 103 (1):159–75. doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-9478-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, H., H. Du, and Y. Xu. 2020. Cooperative response of Pichia kudriavzevii and Saccharomyces cerevisiae to lactic acid stress in Baijiu fermentation. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 68 (17):4903–11. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b08052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duskova, M., D. Borovikova, P. Herynkova, A. Rapoport, and H. Sychrova. 2015. The role of glycerol transporters in yeast cells in various physiological and stress conditions. FEMS Microbiology Letters 362 (3):1–8. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnu041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, T., H. Yan, G. Li, W. Chen, J. Liu, and L. Jiang. 2020. Chromatin remodeling complexes are involvesd in the regulation of ethanol production during static fermentation in budding yeast. Genomics 112 (2):1674–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2019.10.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furukawa, K., H. Obata, H. Kitano, H. Mizoguchi, and S. Hara. 2004. Effect of cellular inositol content on ethanol tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in sake brewing. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering 98 (2):107–13. doi: 10.1016/S1389-1723(04)70250-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Ríos, E., A. Querol, and J. M. Guillamón. 2016a. iTRAQ-based proteome profiling of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and cryotolerant species Saccharomyces uvarum and Saccharomyces kudriavzevii during low-temperature wine fermentation. Journal of Proteomics 146:70–114. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2016.06.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Ríos, E., L. Ramos-Alonso, and J. M. Guillamón. 2016b. Correlation between low temperature adaptation and oxidative stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Frontiers in Microbiology 7:1199–208. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, B. R., S. J. Lawrence, C. A. Boulton, W. G. Box, N. S. Graham, R. S. T. Linforth, and K. A. Smart. 2008. The oxidative stress response of a lager brewing yeast strain during industrial propagation and fermentation. FEMS Yeast Research 8 (4):574–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2008.00371.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, B. R., S. J. Lawrence, J. P. R. Leclaire, C. D. Powell, and K. A. Smart. 2007. Yeast responses to stresses associated with industrial brewery handling. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 31 (5):535–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2007.00076.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomar-alba, M., M. Á. Morcillo-Parra, and D. L. Del Olmo. 2015. Response of yeast cells to high glucose involves molecular and physiological differences when compared to other osmostress conditions. FEMS Yeast Research 15 (5):fov039–14. doi: 10.1093/femsyr/fov039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Ramos, D., A. R. G. De Vries, S. S. Grijseels, M. C. van Berkum, S. Swinnen, M. van den Broek, E. Nevoigt, J. M. G. Daran, J. T. Pronk, and A. J. A. van Maris. 2016. A new laboratory evolution approach to select for constitutive acetic acid tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and identification of causal mutations. Biotechnology for Biofuels 9 (1):173–84. doi: 10.1186/s13068-016-0583-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greetham, D., H. Takagi, and T. P. Phister. 2014. Presence of proline has a protective effect on weak acid stressed Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 105 (4):641–52. doi: 10.1007/s10482-014-0118-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, Z. P, and L. Olsson. 2014. Physiological response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to weak acids present in lignocellulosic hydrolysate. FEMS Yeast Research 14 (8):1234–48. doi: 10.1111/1567-1364.12221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilmann, C. J., A. G. Sorgo, S. Mohammadi, G. J. Sosinska, C. G. de Koster, S. Brul, L. J. de Koning, and F. M. Klis. 2013. Surface stress induces a conserved cell wall stress response in the pathogenic fungus Candida albicans. Eukaryotic Cell 12 (2):254–64. doi: 10.1128/EC.00278-12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hirasawa, T., K. Yoshikawa, Y. Nakakura, K. Nagahisa, C. Furusawa, Y. Katakura, H. Shimizu, and S. Shioya. 2007. Identification of target genes conferring ethanol stress tolerance to Saccharomyces cerevisiae based on DNA microarray data analysis. Journal of Biotechnology 131 (1):34–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2007.05.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, J., N. F. Lages, M. Oldiges, and G. N. Vemuri. 2009. Metabolic impact of redox cofactor perturbations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metabolic Engineering 11 (4-5):253–61. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2009.05.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jie, Y., M.-Z. Ding, B.-Z. Li, Z. L. Liu, X. Wang, and Y.-J. Yuan. 2012. Integrated phospholipidomics and transcriptomics analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with enhanced tolerance to a mixture of acetic acid, furfural, and phenol. Omics : a Journal of Integrative Biology 16 (7-8):374–86. doi: 10.1089/omi.2011.0127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Martí, E., A. Zuzuarregui, I. Ridaura, N. Lozano, and M. D. Olmo. 2009. Genetic manipulation of HSP26 and YHR087W stress genes may improve fermentative behaviour in wine yeasts under vinification conditions. International Journal of Food Microbiology 130 (2):122–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.01.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, Q., L. Chen, Z. Li, X. X. Li, and J. M. Li. 2015. Effect of diammonium phosphate supplementation on the amino acid metabolism during fermentation and sensory properties of fresh spine grape (Vitis davidii Foex) wine. Food Science and Biotechnology 24 (6):2051–7. doi: 10.1007/s10068-015-0273-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jing, H. J., H. H. Liu, L. Zhang, J. Gao, H. R. Song, and X. R. Tan. 2018. Ethanol induces autophagy regulated by mitochondrial ROS in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 28 (12):1982–91. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1806.06014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, X. F., H. R. Yang, T. E. Coldea, Y. C. Xu, and H. F. Zhao. 2021. Metabonomic analysis reveals enhanced growth and ethanol production of brewer’s yeast by wheat gluten hydrolysates and potassium supplementation. Lwt 145:111387. doi. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsunori, Y., T. Tadamasa, F. Chikara, N. Keisuke, H. Takashi, and S. Hiroshi. 2010. Comprehensive phenotypic analysis for identification of genes affecting growth under ethanol stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Research 1:32–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2008.00456.x.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S., M. Shin, W. Choi, and K. H. Kim. 2021. Comparative metabolite profiling of wild type and thermo-tolerant mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Process Biochemistry 111:62–8. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2021.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitichantaropas, Y., C. Boonchird, M. Sugiyama, Y. Kaneko, S. Harashima, and C. Auesukaree. 2016. Cellular mechanisms contributing to multiple stress tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains with potential use in high-temperature ethanol fermentation. AMB Express 6 (1):1–14. doi: 10.1186/s13568-016-0285-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koichi, T., I. Yukari, O. Jun, and S. Jun. 2012. Enhancement of acetic acid tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by overexpression of the HAA1 gene, encoding a transcriptional activator. Applied & Environmental Microbiology 78 (22):8161–3. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02356-12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontogianni, V. G., C. G. Tsiafoulis, I. G. Roussis, and I. P. Gerothanassis. 2017. Selective 1D TOCSY NMR method for the determination of glutathione in white wine. Analytical Methods 9 (30):4464–70. doi: 10.1039/C7AY01463E.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumari, R, and K. Pramanik. 2012. Improvement of multiple stress tolerance in yeast strain by sequential mutagenesis for enhanced bioethanol production. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering 114 (6):622–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2012.07.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, M. D, and L. E. Cowen. 2014. Membrane fluidity and temperature sensing are coupled via circuitry comprised of Ole1, Rsp5, and Hsf1 in Candida albicans. Eukaryotic Cell 13 (8):1077–84. doi: 10.1128/EC.00138-14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee, C. H, and H. S. Yu. 2016. Role of mitochondria, ROS, and DNA damage in arsenic induced carcinogenesis. Frontiers in Bioscience (Scholar Edition) 8 (2):312–20. doi: 10.2741/s465.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leger, A., M. Azouz, S. Lecomte, F. Dole, A. Hocquellet, S. Chaignepain, and C. Cabanne. 2021. PiP(2) favors an alpha-helical structure of non-recombinant Hsp12 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Protein Expression and Purification 181:105830. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2021.105830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei, J., X. Zhao, X. Ge, and F. Bai. 2007. Ethanol tolerance and the variation of plasma membrane composition of yeast floc populations with different size distribution. Journal of Biotechnology 131 (3):270–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2007.07.937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, J. B., H. J. Lei, H. Huang, T. Jiang, and H. D. Xu. 2020. Effect of alkaline and branched chain amino acids on fermentation performance of yeast during beer high gravity brewing. China Brewing 39 (5):44–8. doi: 10.11882/j.issn.0254-5071.2020.05.009.
   Google Scholar
• Li, K. M., Y. R. Chen, T. Liu, M. F. Deng, Z. W. Xu, G. M. Fu, Y. Wan, F. Chen, and F. P. Zheng. 2020. Analysis of spatial distribution of bacterial community associated with accumulation of volatile compounds in Jiupei during the brewing of special-flavor liquor. Lwt 130:109620–1. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J. Y., W. D. Huang, X. Q. Wang, T. Tan, Z. Z. Hua, and G. L. Yan. 2010. Improvement of alcoholic fermentation by calcium ions under enological conditions involves the increment of plasma membrane H+-ATPase activity. World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology 26 (7):1181–6. doi: 10.1007/s11274-009-0286-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, B., N. Liu, and X. D. Zhao. 2022. Response mechanisms of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to the stress factors present in lignocellulose hydrolysate and strategies for constructing robust strains. Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts 15 (1):28–38. doi: 10.1186/s13068-022-02127-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu, S. P., Q. L. Yang, J. Q. Mao, M. Bai, J. D. Zhou, X. Han, and J. Mao. 2020. Feedback inhibition of the prephenate dehydratase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its mutation in Huangjiu (Chinese rice wine) yeast. Lwt 133:110040–13. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Malo, M., A. Querol, and J. M. Guillamon. 2013. Metabolomic comparison of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the cryotolerant species S. bayanus var. uvarum and S. kudriavzevii during wine fermentation at low temperature. PLoS ONE. 8 (3):e60135–13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukienko, P. I., N. G. Mel’nichenko, I. V. Zverinskii, and S. V. Zabrodskaya. 2000. Antioxidant properties of thiamine. Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine 130 (9):874–6. doi: 10.1023/A:1015318413076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, J., Q. M. Shan, P. Tang, L. Wang, T. Y. Meng, and Q. S. Liang. 2019. Screening of acid-tolerant yeast strains and their application in the production of Jiangxiang Baijiu. Liquor-Making Science and Technology 10:106–11. doi: 10.13746/j.njkj.2019204.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, X. W., Q. Wu, and Y. Xu. 2015. Specific physiological characteristic of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in Chinese Maotai-flavor liquor making. Microbiology China 42 (11):2098–107. doi: 10.13344/j.microbiol.china.150026.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, M, and Z. L. Liu. 2010. Mechanisms of ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 87 (3):829–37. doi: 10.1007/s00253-010-2594-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mace, K., J. Krakowiak, H. El-Samad, and D. Pincus. 2020. Multi-kinase control of environmental stress responsive transcription. PloS One 15 (3):e0230246. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmud, S. A., T. Hirasawa, and H. Shimizu. 2010. Differential importance of trehalose accumulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to various environmental stresses. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering 109 (3):262–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2009.08.500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, V. D., S. J. H. Sui, D. Erasmus, G. K. V. D. Merwe, J. Brumm, W. W. Wasserman, J. Bryan, and H. J. J. van Vuuren. 2008. Dynamics of the yeast transcriptome during wine fermentation reveals a novel fermentation stress response. FEMS Yeast Research 8 (1):35–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2007.00338.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins, D., D. Nguyen, and A. M. English. 2019. Ctt1 catalase activity potentiates antifungal azoles in the emerging opportunistic pathogen Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Scientific Reports 9 (1):9185. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45070-w.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matheos, D. P., T. J. Kingsbury, U. S. Ahsan, and K. W. Cunningham. 1997. Tcn1p/Crz1p, a calcineurin-dependent transcription factor that differentially regulates gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes & Development 11 (24):3445–58. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.24.3445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejía-Barajas, A., R. Montoya-Pérez, R. Salgado-Garciglia, L. Aguilera-Aguirre, C. Cortés-Rojo, R. Mejía-Zepeda, M. Arellano-Plazas, and A. Saavedra-Molina. 2017. Oxidative stress and antioxidant response in a thermotolerant yeast. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology : [Publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] 48 (2):326–32. doi: 10.1016/j.bjm.2016.11.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamed, L. A., H. Tachikawa, X. D. Gao, and H. Nakanishi. 2015. Yeast cell-based analysis of human lactate dehydrogenase isoforms. Journal of Biochemistry 158 (6):467–76. doi: 10.1093/jb/mvv061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollapour, M., A. Shepherd, and P. W. Piper. 2009. Presence of the Fps1p aquaglyceroporin channel is essential for Hog1p activation, but suppresses Slt2p (Mpk1) activation, with acetic acid stress of yeast. Microbiology (Reading, England) 155 (Pt 10):3304–11. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.030502-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morano, K. A., C. M. Grant, and W. S. Moye-Rowley. 2012. The response to heat shock and oxidative stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 190 (4):1157–95. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.128033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noguchi, C., D. Watanabe, Y. Zhou, T. Akao, and H. Shimoi. 2012. Association of constitutive hyperphosphorylation of Hsflp with a defective ethanol stress response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae sake yeast strains. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 78 (2):385–95. doi: 10.1128/AEM.06341-11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noti, O., E. Vaudano, M. G. Giuffrida, C. Lamberti, L. Cavallarin, E. Garcia-Moruno, and E. Pessione. 2018. Enhanced arginine biosynthesis and lower proteolytic profile as indicators of Saccharomyces cerevisiae stress in stationary phase during fermentation of high sugar grape must: A proteomic evidence. Food Research International (Ottawa, Ont.) 105:1011–8. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.12.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nozawa, M., T. Takahashi, S. Hara, and H. Mizoguchi. 2002. A role of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fatty acid activation protein 4 in palmitoyl-coa pool for growth in the presence of ethanol. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering 93 (3):288–95. doi: 10.1016/S1389-1723(02)80030-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nugroho, R. H., K. Yoshikawa, F. Matsuda, and H. Shimizu. 2016. Positive effects of proline addition on the central metabolism of wild-type and lactic acid-producing Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering 39 (11):1711–6. doi: 10.1007/s00449-016-1646-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orij, R., S. Brul, and G. J. Smits. 2011. Intracelluar pH is a tightly controlled signal in yeast. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1810 (10):933–44. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2011.03.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, H. L., X. J. Li, L. H. Cao, S. X. Qiu, Y. K. Ou, and Y. T. Yao. 2020. Screening of high sugar tolerant yeast and its application in rice wine. Farm Products Processing 1:1–5. doi: 10.16693/j.cnki.1671-9646(X).2020.01.001.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, B. Z., F. L. Li, L. Cui, and Y. D. Guo. 2015. Effects of fermentation temperature on key aroma compounds and sensory properties of apple wine. Journal of Food Science 80 (12):S2937–S43. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.13111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu, Z., Z. Deng, H. Tan, S. Zhou, and L. Cao. 2015. Engineering the robustness of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by introducing bifunctional glutathione synthase gene. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology 42 (4):537–42. doi: 10.1007/s10295-014-1573-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, G. F., M. Côrte-Real, and B. Johansson. 2006. Characterization of DNA damage in yeast apoptosis induced by hydrogen peroxide, acetic acid, and hyperosmotic shock. Molecular Biology of the Cell 17 (10):4584–91. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E06-05-0475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rikhvanov, E., I. Fedoseeva, N. Varakina, T. Rusaleva, and A. Fedyaeva. 2014. Mechanism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast cell death induced by heat shock. Effect of cycloheximide on thermotolerance. Biochemistry. Biokhimiia 79 (1):16–24. doi: 10.1134/S0006297914010039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rios, G., A. Ferrando, and R. Serrano. 1997. Mechanisms of salt tolerance conferred by overexpression of the HAL1 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 13 (6):515–28. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199705)13:63.0.CO;2-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Naranjo, M. I., M. J. Torija, A. Mas, E. Cantos-Villar, and M. C. Garcia-Parrilla. 2012. Production of melatonin by Saccharomyces strains under growth and fermentation conditions. Journal of Pineal Research 53 (3):219–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-079X.2012.00990.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, C. M., D. Veatch, A. Covey, C. Staton, and M. L. Bochman. 2016. Terminal acidic shock inhibits sour beer bottle conditioning by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Food Microbiology 57:151–8. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2016.02.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saini, P., A. Beniwal, A. Kokkiligadda, and S. Vij. 2018. Response and tolerance of yeast to changing environmental stress during ethanol fermentation. Process Biochemistry 72 (9):1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2018.07.001.
   Google Scholar
• Salvadó, Z., L. Ramos-Alonso, J. Tronchoni, V. Penacho, E. García-Ríos, P. Morales, R. Gonzalez, and J. M. Guillamon. 2016. Genome-wide identification of genes involved in growth and fermentation activity at low temperature in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. International Journal of Food Microbiology 236:38–46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.07.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schade, B., G. Jansen, M. Whiteway, K. D. Entian, and D. Y. Thomas. 2004. Cold adaptation in budding yeast. Molecular Biology of the Cell 15 (12):5492–502. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E04-03-0167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiradhone, A. B., S. S. Ingle, and G. B. Zore. 2018. Microenvironment responsive modulations in the fatty acid content, cell surface hydrophobicity, and adhesion of Candida albicans cells. Journal of Fungi 4 (2):47–23. doi: 10.3390/jof4020047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snoek, T., K. V. Verstrepen, and K. Voordeckers. 2016. How do yeast cells become tolerant to high ethanol concentrations? Current Genetics 62 (3):475–80. doi: 10.1007/s00294-015-0561-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, D., A. Bandara, S. Fraser, P. J. Chambers, and G. A. Stanley. 2010. The ethanol stress response and ethanol tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Applied Microbiology 109 (1):13–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-5072.2009.04657.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Z., B. Zhou, M. Wang, Y. Wang, S. Xing, X. Guo, and D. Xiao. 2019. Construction of industrial brewing yeast for fermentation under high temperature and high gravity condition. Sheng wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao = Chinese Journal of Biotechnology 35 (3):522–34. doi: 10.13345/j.cjb.180310.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swinnen, S., A. Goovaerts, K. Schaerlaekens, F. Dumortier, P. Verdyck, K. Souvereyns, G. Van Zeebroeck, M. R. Foulquié-Moreno, and J. M. Thevelein. 2015. Auxotrophic mutations reduce tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to very high levels of ethanol stress. Eukaryotic Cell 14 (9):884–97. doi: 10.1128/EC.00053-15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Takagi, H., M. Takaoka, A. Kawaguchi, and Y. Kubo. 2005. Effect of L-Proline on sake brewing and ethanol stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 71 (12):8656–62. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.12.8656-8662.2005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira, M. C., L. R. Raposo, N. P. Mira, A. B. Lourenco, and I. Sa-Correia. 2009. Genome-wide identification of Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes required for maximal tolerance to ethanol. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 75 (18):5761–72. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00845-09.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, T. T., D. H. Wu, C. T. Ng, H. Yang, J. Y. Sun, J. M. Liu, and J. Lu. 2020. A multiple-step strategy for screening Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains with improved acid tolerance and aroma profiles. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 104 (7):3097–107. doi: 10.1007/s00253-020-10451-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrellas, M., N. Rozes, A. Aranda, and E. Matallana. 2020. Basal catalase activity and high glutathione levels influence the performance of non-Saccharomyces active dry wine yeasts. Food Microbiology 92:103589. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2020.103589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unrean, P., J. Gätgens, B. Klein, S. Noack, and V. Champreda. 2018. Elucidating cellular mechanisms of Saccharomyces cerevisiae tolerant to combined lignocellulosic-derived inhibitors using high-throughput phenotyping and multiomics analyses. FEMS Yeast Research 18 (8):23–41. doi: 10.1093/femsyr/foy106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilela-Moura, A., D. Schuller, A. Mendes-Faia, D. S. Rui, S. R. Chaves, M. J. Sousa, and M. Corte-Real. 2011. The impact of acetate metabolism on yeast fermentative performance and wine quality: Reduction of volatile acidity of grape musts and wines. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 89 (2):271–80. doi: 10.1007/s00253-010-2898-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan, C., M. Zhang, Q. Fang, L. Xiong, X. Zhao, T. Hasunuma, F. W. Bai, and A. Kondo. 2015. The impact of zinc sulfate addition on the dynamic metabolic profiling of Saccharomyces cerevisiae subjected to long term acetic acid stress treatment and identification of key metabolites involved in the antioxidant effect of zinc. Metallomics: Integrated Biometal Science 7 (2):322–32. doi: 10.1039/c4mt00275j.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S. Q., T. Wang, J. F. Liu, L. Deng, and F. Wang. 2018a. Overexpression of Ecm22 improves ergosterol biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiaee. Letters in Applied Microbiology 67 (5):484–90. doi: 10.1111/lam.13061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z. M., J. J. Wang, L. Li, Y. F. Zheng, and Q. Li. 2020. Protective effects of exogenous trehalose on brewer′s yeast under heat stress. Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology 39 (8):43–50. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1689.2020.08.006.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, M. Y., W. W. Yu, L. Zhang, X. L. Liang, and Y. D. Li. 2018b. The Identification of a novel gene and its effect on stress tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Chinese rice wine strain. Chinese Journal of Cell Biology 40 (8):34–1342. doi: 10.11844/cjcb.2018.08.0063.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, G., T. Zhang, W. Sun, H. Wang, F. Yin, Z. Wang, D. Zuo, M. Sun, Z. Zhou, B. Lin, et al. 2017. Arsenic sulfide induces apoptosis and autophagy through the activation of ROS/JNK and suppression of Akt/mTOR signaling pathways in osteosarcoma. Free Radical Biology & Medicine 106:24–37. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2017.02.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, P.-M., D.-Q. Zheng, X.-Q. Chi, O. Li, C.-D. Qian, T.-Z. Liu, X.-Y. Zhang, F.-G. Du, P.-Y. Sun, A.-M. Qu, et al. 2014. Relationship of trehalose accumulation with ethanol fermentation in industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast strains. Bioresource Technology 152 (1):371–6. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.11.033.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watanabe, M., K. Tamura, J. P. Magbanua, K. Takano, K. Kitamoto, H. Kitagaki, T. Akao, and H. Shimoi. 2007. Elevated expression of genes under the control of stress response element (STRE) and Msn2p in an ethanol-tolerance sake yeast Kyokai no. 11. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering 104 (3):163–70. doi: 10.1263/jbb.104.163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe, M., D. Watanabe, T. Akao, and H. Shimoi. 2009. Overexpression of MSN2 in a sake yeast strain promotes ethanol tolerance and increases ethanol production in sake brewing. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering 107 (5):516–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2009.01.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, C. M., Y. P. Ching, Y. Zhou, H. F. Kung, and D. Y. Jin. 2003. Transcriptional regulation of yeast peroxiredoxin gene TSA2 through Hap1p, Rox1p, and Hap2/3/5p. Free Radical Biology & Medicine 34 (5):585–97. doi: 10.1016/S0891-5849(02)01354-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, S. S., L. Bai, Z. L. Zheng, L. L. Zhang, Q. Liu, and H. Zhao. 2015b. Effects of low-temperature adaptation on fermentation characteristics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. China Brewing 34 (5):56–9. doi: 10.11882/j.issn.0254-5071.2015.05.013.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, J., X. Chen, L. Cai, L. Tang, and L. Liu. 2015a. Transcription factors Asg1p and Hal1p regulated pH homeostasis in Candida glabrata. Frontiers in Microbiology 6:843–54. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Z. F., J. J. Wang, C. T. Niu, C. F. Liu, F. Y. Zheng, and Q. Li. 2022. Transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis reveals genes related to stress tolerance in high gravity brewing. World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology 38 (4):59–66. doi: 10.1007/s11274-021-03115-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, X., L. Zhang, X. Jin, Y. Fang, K. Zhang, L. Qi, and D. Q. Zheng. 2016. Deletion of JJJ1 improves acetic acid tolerance and bioethanol fermentation performance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Biotechnology Letters 38 (7):1097–106. doi: 10.1007/s10529-016-2085-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C. J., J. L. Zhang, G. X. Zhu, R. Yao, X. L. Chen, and L. M. Liu. 2019. CgHog1-mediated CgRds2 phosphorylation alters glycerophospholipid composition to coordinate osmotic stress in Candida glabrata. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 85 (6):22–8. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02822-18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xin, Y., M. Yang, H. Yin, and J. Yang. 2020. Improvement of ethanol tolerance by inactive protoplast fusion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BioMed Research International 2020:1–10. doi: 10.1155/2020/1979318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, K., X. J. Dai, M. T. Fan, and G. Q. Zhang. 2021. Influences of acid and ethanol stresses on Oenococcus oeni SD‐2a and its proteomic and transcriptional responses. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 101 (7):2892–900. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.10921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y. J., X. N. Lin, Y. J. Xia, G. Q. Wang, J. S. Yu, J. Hu, and L. Z. Ai. 2018a. Effects of different nutrition additives on ethanol tolerance and fermentation performance of Chinese rice wine yeast. Food and Fermentation Industries 44 (1):37–43. doi: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.015331.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, G., J. J. Wang, J. Li, Y. F. Zheng, C. F. Liu, Y. X. Li, C. T. Niu, and Q. Li. 2019. Effects of FKS family genes on the ability of Saccharomyces cerevisiae stress resistance. Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology 38 (10):126–34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1689.2019.10.018.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., Y. Xia, X. Lin, G. Wang, H. Zhang, Z. Xiong, H. Y. Yu, J. S. Yu, and L. Z. Ai. 2018b. Improvement of flavor profiles in Chinese rice wine by creating fermenting yeast with superior ethanol tolerance and fermentation activity. Food Research International 108:83–13. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.03.036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, D., X. Lin, Y. Qi, H. Liu, X. Chen, L. Liu, and J. Chen. 2016. Crz1p regulates pH homeostasis in Candida glabrata by altering membrane lipid composition. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 82 (23):6920–9. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02186-16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, J., L. Z. Zhang, X. Y. Xiong, H. K. Gong, and L. L. Chen. 2020. Microbial protoplast fusion breeding technology and its application in fermented food production. Journal of Food Safety and Quality 11 (22):8455–62. doi: 10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.2020.22.055.
   Google Scholar
• Ye, M. Q., T. L. Yue, Y. H. Yuan, and L. Wang. 2013. Production of yeast hybrids for improvement of cider by protoplast electrofusion. Biochemical Engineering Journal 81:162–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2013.10.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Z. M., H. F. Zhao, M. M. Zhao, H. J. Lei, and H. P. Li. 2012. Metabolic flux and nodes control analysisof brewer’s yeasts under different fermentation temperature during beer brewing. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 168 (7):1938–52. doi: 10.1007/s12010-012-9909-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, M., L. Galdieri, and A. Vancura. 2013. The yeast AMPK homolog SNF1 regulates acetyl coenzyme, a homeostasis and histone acetylation. Molecular and Cellular Biology 33 (23):4701–17. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00198-13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H. D., X. W. Guo, and D. G. Xiao. 2020. Effect of acetic acid bacteria on alcohol fermentation and metabolism of high ester-producing Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Food and Fermentation Industries 46 (1):36–42. doi: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.022251.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, M., J. Shi, and L. Jiang. 2015. Modulation of mitochondrial membrane integrity and ROS formation by high temperature in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology 18 (3):202–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejbt.2015.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X. R., Y. X. Zhang, and H. Li. 2020. Regulation of trehalose, a typical stress protectant, on central metabolisms, cell growth and division of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CEN.PK113-7D. Food Microbiology 89:103459. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2020.103459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, D.-Q., X.-C. Wu, P.-M. Wang, X.-Q. Chi, X.-L. Tao, P. Li, X.-H. Jiang, and Y.-H. Zhao. 2011. Drug resistance marker-aided genome shuffling to improve acetic acid tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology 38 (3):415–22. doi: 10.1007/s10295-010-0784-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhuang, S. W., K. Smart, and C. Powell. 2017. Impact of extracellular osmolality on Saccharomyces yeast populations during brewing fermentations. Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists 75 (3):244–54. doi: 10.1094/ASBCJ-2017-3505-01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar