In₂O₃- and SnO₂-based Ozone Sensors: Design and Characterization

References

• G. M. Hansford, R. A. Freshwater, R. A. Bosch, R. A. Cox, R. L. Jones, K. F. E. Pratt, and D. E. Williams, A low cost instrument based on a solid state sensor for balloon–borne atmospheric O3 profile soundin, J. Environ. Monit. 7, 158–162 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov and B. K. Cho, Ozone measuring: What can limit the application of SnO2–based gas sensors? Sens. Actuat. B 161, 28–44 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, V. Brinzari, and B. K. Cho, In2O3 and SnO2–based thin film ozone sensors. Fundamentals, J. Sensors, Article ID 3816094 (2016)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Takada, K. Suzuki, and M. Nakane, Highly sensitive ozone sensor, Sens. Actuat. B 13–14, 404–407 (1993).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Sauter, U. Weimar, G. Noetzel, J. Mitrovics, and W. Gopel, Development of modular ozone sensor system for application in practical use, Sens. Actuat. B 69, 1–9 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. K. H. Starke and G. S. V. Coles, High sensitivity ozone sensors for environmental monitoring produced using laser ablated nanocrystalline metal oxides, IEEE Sensors J. 2(1), 12–19 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Union (EU). Directive 2002/3/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to ozone in ambient air, Official Journal of the European Communities 9.3.2002, L67/14–30 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• J. D. McClurkin and D. E. Maier, Half-life time of ozone as a function of air conditions and movement, In: Proceedings of 10th International Working Conference on Stored Product Protection, June 27–July 2, 2010, Estoril, Portugal, pp. 381–385.
   Google Scholar
• H. Chen, C. O. Stanier, M. A. Young, and V. H. Grassian, A kinetic study of ozone decomposition on illuminated oxide surfaces, J. Phys. Chem. A 115(43), 11979–11987 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Frank, M. Fleischer, M. Zimmer, and H. Meixner, Ozone sensing using In2O3–modified Ga2O3 thin films, IEEE Sensors J. 1(4), 318–321 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. A. Obvintseva, F.Kh. Chibirova, A. K. Avetisov, N. F. Elansky, A. I. Skorochod, and R. F. Shumskii, Possibility of using a semiconductor ozonometer for monitoring ozone in the atmosphere, Atmosph. Oceanic Optics 18(11), 910–913 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• D. M. Wilson, S. Hoyt, J. Janata, K. Booksh, and L. Oband, Chemical sensors for portable, handheld field instruments, IEEE Sensors J. 1(4), 256–274 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Gurlo, N. Bârsan, and U. Weimar, Gas sensors based on semiconducting metal oxides. In J. L. G. Fierro (ed.), Metal Oxides. Chemistry and Applications. Taylor and Francis, New York, 2006, pp. 683–738.
   Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, Metal oxides for solid state gas sensors. What determines our choice? Mater. Sci. Eng. B 139, 1–23 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Rock, N. Barsan, and U. Weimar, Electronic nose: Current status and future trends, Chem. Rev. 108, 705–725 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Spannhake, A. Helwig, O. Schulz, and G. Muller, Micro–fabrication of gas sensors, In E. Comini, G. Faglia, G. Sberveglieri (eds.), Solid State Gas Sensing. Springer, New York, 2009, pp. 1–46.
   Google Scholar
• J. W. Gardner, P. K. Guha, F. Udrea, and J. A. Covington, CMOS interfacing for integrated gas sensors: A review, IEEE Sensors J. 10(12), 1833–1848 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov and V. Sysoev, Conductometric metal oxide gas sensors. In G. Korotcenkov (ed.), Chemical Sensors: Comprehensive Sensor Technologies. Vol. 4. Solid State Devices, Momentum Press, New York, 2011, pp. 53–186.
   Google Scholar
• C. Wang, Metal organic chemical vapor deposition of indium oxide for ozone sensing. Ph.D. Thesis, Albert–Ludwigs–Universität Freiburg, Germany, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• G. Kenanakis, D. Vernardou, E. Koudoumas, G. Kiriakidis, and N. Katsarakis, Ozone sensing properties of ZnO nanostructures grown by the aqueous chemical growth technique, Sens. Actuat. B 124, 187–191 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Labidi, M. Gaidi, J. Guérin, A. Bejaoui, M. Maaref, and K. Aguir, Alternating current investigation and modeling of the temperature and ozone effects on the grains and the grain boundary contributions to the WO3 sensor responses, Thin Solid Films 518, 355–361 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F.S.–S. Chien, C.–R. Wang, Y.–L. Chan, H.–L. Lin, M.–H. Chen, and R.–J.g Wu, Fast–response ozone sensor with ZnO nanorods grown by chemical vapor deposition, Sens. Actuat. B 144, 120–125 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Ollitrault, N. Martin, J.–Y. Rauch, J.–B. Sanchez, and F. Berger, Improvement of ozone detection with GLAD WO3 films, Mater. Lett. 155, 1–3 (2015).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Gurlo, N. Barsan, M. Ivanovskaya, U. Weimar, and W. Gopel, In2O3 and MoO3–In2O3 thin film semiconductor sensors: interaction with NO2 and O3, Sens. Actuat. B 47, 92–99 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Ivanovskaya, A. Gurlo, and P. Bogdanov, Mechanism of O3 and NO2 detection and selectivity of In2O3 sensors, Sens. Actuat. B 77, 264–267 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Sharma, M. Tomar, and V. Gupta, Enhanced response characteristics of SnO2 thin film based NO2 gas sensor integrated with nanoscaled metal oxide clusters, Sens. Actuat. B 181, 735–742 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Takada and K. Komatsu, Ozone detection by In2O3 thin films gas sensor, In. Proceedings of the 4th Int. Conf. on Solid–State Sensors and Actuators, Tokyo, Japan, June 2–5, 1987, pp. 693–696.
   Google Scholar
• T. Takada, Ozone detection by In2O3 thin films gas sensor, In T. Seiyama (ed.), Chemical Sensor Technology. Kodansha, Tokyo–Elsevier, 1989, Vol. 2. pp. 59–70.
   Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, Handbook of Gas Sensor Materials, Vols. 1–2. Springer, New York, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, V. Brinzari, A. Cerneavschi, M. Ivanov, V. Golovanov, A. Cornet, J. Morante, A. Cabot, and J. Arbiol, The influence of film structure on In2O3 gas response, Thin Solid Films 460, 315–323 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, A. Cerneavschi, V. Brinzari, A. Vasiliev, A. Cornet, J. Morante, A. Cabot, and J. Arbiol, In2O3 films deposited by spray pyrolysis as a material for ozone gas sensors, Sens. Actuat. B 99(2–3), 304–310 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, I. Blinov, M. Ivanov, and J. R. Stetter, Ozone sensors on the base of SnO2 films deposited by spray pyrolysis, Sens. Actuat. B 120, 679–686 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, V. Brinzari, A. Cerneavschi, M. Ivanov, A. Cornet, J. Morante, A. Cabot, and J. Arbiol, In2O3 films deposited by spray pyrolysis: gas response to reducing (CO, H2) gases, Sens. Actuat. B 98(2–3), 236–243 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Gurlo, N. Barsan, U. Weimar, M. Ivanovskaya, A. Taurino, and P. Siciliano, Polycrystalline well–shaped blocks of indium oxide obtained by the sol–gel method and their gas–sensing properties, Chem. Mater. 15, 4377–4383 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Epifani, E. Comini, J. Arbiol, R. Diaz, N. Sergent, T. Pagnier, P. Siciliano, G. Faglia, and J. R. Morante, Chemical synthesis of In2O3 nanocrystals and their application in highly performing ozone-sensing devices, Sens. Actuat. B 130, 483–487 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Wagner, J. Hennemann, C.-D. Kohl, and M. Tiemann, Photocatalytic ozone sensors based on mesoporous indium oxide: influence of the relative humidity on the sensing performance, Thin Solid Films 520, 918–921 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Kohl, Surface processes in the detection of reducing gases with SnO2-based devices, Sens. Actuat. 18, 71–113 (1989).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Geistlinger, Electron theory of thin-film gas sensors, Sens. Actuat. B 17, 47–60 (1993).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Weisz, Effects of electronic charge transfer between absorbate and solid on chemisorption and catalysis, J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1531–1538 (1953).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. R. Morrison, Selectivity in semiconductor gas sensors, Sens. Actuat. 12, 425–440 (1987).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Romppainen, H. Torvela, J. Vaananen, and S. Leppavuori, Effect of CH4, SO2 and NO on the CO response of a SnO2–based thick film gas sensor in combustion gases, Sens. Actuat. 8, 271–279 (1985).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Tamaki, M. Nagaishi, Y. Teraoka, N. Miura, N. Yamazoe, Adsorption behaviour of CO and interfering gases on SnO2, Surf. Sci. 221, 183–196 (1989).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Torvela, J. Huusko, V. Lantto, Reduction of the interference caused by NO and SO2 in the CO response of Pd-catalysed SnO2 combustion gas sensors, Sens. Actuat. B 4, 479–484 (1991).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Marikutsa, M. Rumyantseva, and A. Gaskov, Selectivity of catalytically modified tin dioxide to CO and NH3 gas mixtures, Chemosens. 3, 241–252 (2015).
   Google Scholar
• Y. Hosoya, Y. Itagaki, H. Aono, and Y. Sadaoka, Ozone detection in air using SmFeO3 gas sensor, Sens. Actuat. B 108, 198–201 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Losch, M. Baumbach, and A. Schutze, Ozone detection in the ppb-range with improved stability and reduced cross sensitivity, Sens. Actuat. B 130, 367–373 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, V. Brinzari, and B. K. Cho, Interference effects between hydrogen and ozone in the response of SnO2-based gas sensors, Sens. Actuat. B 243, 507–515 (2017).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, I. Blinov, V. Brinzari, and J. R. Stetter, Effect of air humidity on gas response of SnO2 thin film- ozone sensors, Sens. Actuat. B 122, 519–526 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. U. Abideen, J.-H. Kim, and S. S. Kim, Optimization of metal nanoparticle amount on SnO2 nanowires to achieve superior gas sensing properties, Sens. Actuat. B 238, 374–380 (2017).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. A. Obvintseva, Metal oxide semiconductor sensors for determination of reactive gas impurities in air, Russ. J. General Chem. 78(12), 2545–2555 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov and J. R. Stetter, Chemical gas mixture analysis and the electronic nose: Current status, future trends. In G. Korotcenkov (ed.), Chemical Sensors: Comprehensive Sensor Technologies. Vol. 6. Chemical Sensors Applications, Momentum Press, New York, 2011, pp. 1–56.
   Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov and B. K. Cho, Engineering approaches to improvement operating characteristics of conductometric gas sensors. Part 1: Improvement of sensor sensitivity and selectivity, Sens. Actuat. B 188, 709–728 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Lee and J. Davidson, Evaluation of activated carbon filters for removal of ozone at the PPB level, Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 60(5), 589–600 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Seyffer, Ozone and air filters, ASHRAE J. 2012, 82–84 (2012). (www.ashrae.org)
   Google Scholar
• T. V. Belysheva, L. P. Bogovtseva, and E. E. Gutman, Application of metal oxide semiconducting heterosystems for gas analysis, Int. Sci. J. Altern. Energy Ecol., ISJAEE 2(10), 60–66 (2004) ( in Russian).
   Google Scholar
• L. F. da Silva, V. R. Mastelaro, A. C. Catto, C. A. Escanhoela Jr., S. Bernardini, S. C. Zilio, E. Longo, and K. Aguir, Ozone and nitrogen dioxide gas sensor based on a nanostructured SrTi0.85Fe0.15O3 thin film, J. Alloys Comp. 638, 374–379 (2015).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov and B. K. Cho, Instability of metal oxide–based conductometric gas sensors and approaches to stability improvement, Sens. Actuat. B 156, 527–538 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov and B. K. Cho, The role of grain size on the thermal stability of nanostructured metal oxides used in gas sensor applications and approaches for grain-size stabilization, Prog. Crystal. Growth. Character. Mater. 58, 167–208 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, V. Brinzari, M. Ivanov, A. Cerneavschi, J. Rodriguez, A. Cirera, A. Cornet, and J. Morante, Structural stability of indium oxide films deposited by spray pyrolysis during thermal annealing, Thin Solid Films 479(1–2), 38–51 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. R. Morrison, The Chemical Physics of Surfaces, Plenum Press, New York, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• M. Egashira, M. Nakashima, S. Kawasuma, and T. Selyama, Temperature programmed desorption study of water adsorbed on metal oxides. Part 2. Tin oxide surfaces, J. Phys. Chem. 85, 4125–4130 (1981).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov and B. K. Cho, Engineering approaches to improvement operating characteristics of conductometric gas sensors. Part 2: Decrease of dissipated (consumable) power and improvement stability and reliability, Sens. Actuat. B 198, 316–341 (2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Faglia, B. Allieri, E. Comini, L. E. Depero, L. Sangaletti, and G. Sberveglieri, Electrical and structural properties of RGTO–In2O3 sensors for ozone detection, Sens. Actuat. B 57, 188–191 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Epifani, S. Capone, R. Rella, P. Siciliano, and L. Vasanelli, In2O3 thin films obtained through a chemical complexation based sol-gel process and their application as gas sensor devices, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 26, 741–744 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. A. Obvintseva, K. V. Zhernikov, I. B. Belikov, V. L. Kuchaev, F.Kh. Chibirova, A. K. Avetisov, and N. F. Elansky, Semiconductor sensors and sensor containing gas analyzer for ozone monitoring in the atmosphere. In Proceedings of European Conference «Eurosensors XXII», September 7–10, 2008, Dresden, Germany, pp. 1594–1597.
   Google Scholar
• C.-C. Jeng, P. J. H. Chong, G.-J. Jiang, H.-J. Lin, R.-J. Wu, and C.-H. Wu, Dynamic equilibrium method for the SnO2-based ozone sensors using UV-LED continuous irradiation, Sens. Actuat. B 195, 702–706 (2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. V. Samsonov, The Oxide Handbook. IFI/Plenum, New York, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• V. Binas, I. Kortidis, E. Gagaoudakis, K. Moschovis, and G. Kiriakidis, Ageing resistant indium oxide ozone sensing films, Sensor Lett. 14(6), 563–566 (2016).
   Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, The role of morphology and crystallographic structure of metal oxides in response of conductometric–type gas sensors, Mater. Sci. Eng. R. 61, 1–39 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, S. D. Han, B. K. Cho, and V. Brinzari, Grain size effects in sensor response of nanostructured SnO2– and In2O3–based conductometric gas sensor, Crit. Rev. Sol. St. Mater. Sci. 34(1–2), 1–17 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov and B. K. Cho, The role of film thickness in sensor response of SnO2–based devices, Sensor Lett. 9(1), 364–368 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov and B. K. Cho, Thin film SnO2–based gas sensors: Film thickness influence, Sens. Actuat. B 142, 321–330 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Gurlo, M. Ivanovskaya, N. Barsan, U. Weimar, and W. Gopel, Grain size control in nanocrystalline In2O3 semiconductor gas sensors, Sens. Actuat. B 44, 327–333 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, V. Brinzari, and B. K. Cho, Thin film SnO2 and In2O3 ozone sensors design: Selection of film parameters, Appl. Mech. Mater. 799–800, 910–914 (2015).
   Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov and B. K. Cho, Synthesis and deposition of sensor materials. In G. Korotcenkov (ed.), Chemical Sensors: Fundamentals of Sensing Materials. Vol. 1: General Approaches, Momentum Press, New York, 2010, pp. 215–304.
   Google Scholar
• T. V. Belysheva, G. N. Gerasimov, V. F. Gromov, and L. I. Trachtenberg, Sensor properties of Fe2O3–In2O3 films: Ozone detection in air in the range of low concentration, Russ. J. Phys. Chem. 82(10), 1721–1725 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Th. Becker, L. Tomasi, Chr. Bosch–v. Braunmuhl, G. Muller, G. Sberveglieri, G. Faglia, and E. Comini, Ozone detection using low–power–consumption metal–oxide gas sensors, Sens. Actuat. B 74, 229–232 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• M. V. Kalinina, P. A. Tikhonov, and A. T. Nakusov, Preparation, electrical conductivity, and sensory properties of oxide films in the In2O3–SnO2 and In2O3–ZrO2 systems, Glass Phys. Chem. 29(6), 626–631 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Baratto, M. Ferroni, G. Faglia, and G. Sberveglieri, Iron–doped indium oxide by modified RGTO deposition for ozone sensing, Sens. Actuat. B 118, 221–225 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Doll, A. Fuchs, I. Eisele, G. Faglia, S. Groppelli, and G. Sberveglieri, Conductivity and work function ozone sensors based on indium oxide, Sens. Actuat. B 49, 63–67 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.Z Atashbar, B. Gong, H.T Sun, W. Wlodarski, and R. Lamb, Investigation on ozone–sensitive In2O3 thin films, Thin Solid Films 354, 222–226 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.-H. Wu, G.-J. Jiang, C.-C. Chiu, P. Chong, C.-C. Jeng, R.-J. Wu, and J.-H. Chen, Fast gas concentration sensing by analyzing the rate of resistance change, Sens. Actuat. B 209, 906–910 (2015).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Korostynska, K. Arshak, G. Hickey, and E. Forde, Ozone and gamma radiation sensing properties of In2O3:ZnO:SnO2 thin films, Microsyst. Technol. 14, 557–566 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, V. Macsanov, V. Tolstoy, V. Brinzari, J. Schwank, and G. Faglia, Structural and gas response characterization of nano–size SnO2 films deposited by SILD method, Sens. Actuat. B 96, 602–609 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, B. K. Cho, L. Gulina, and V. Tolstoy, Ozone sensors based on SnO2 films modified by SnO2–Au nanocomposites synthesized by the SILD method, Sens. Actuat. B 138, 512–517 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Mills, M. Lim, B. Lee, and V. Misra, Atomic layer deposition of SnO2 for selective room temperature low ppb level O3 sensing, ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 4(10), S3059–S3061 (2015).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Rombach, O. Bierwagen, A. Papadogianni, M. Mischo, V. Cimalla, T. Bertholdc, S. Krischok, and M. Himmerlich, Electrical conductivity and gas–sensing properties of Mg–doped and undoped single–crystalline In2O3 thin films: bulk vs. surface, Procedia Eng. 120, 79–82 (2015).
   Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, V. Brinzari, J. Schwank, and A. Cerneavschi, Possibilities of aerosol technology for deposition of SnO2–based films with improved gas sensing characteristics, J. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 19(1–2), 73–77 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, V. Brinzari, M. DiBattista, J. Schwank, and A. Vasiliev, Peculiarities of SnO2 thin film deposition by spray pyrolysis for gas sensor application, Sens. Actuat. B 77, 244–252 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, V. Brinzari, and S. Dmitriev, Processes development for low cost and low power consuming SnO2 thin film gas sensors (TFGS), Sens. Actuat. B 54, 202–209 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. George, Preparation of Thin Films, M. Dekker, New York, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• H. Yu and W. Liao, Evaporation of solution droplets in spray pyrolysis, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 41, 993–1001 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. S. Patil, Versatility of chemical spray pyrolysis technique, Mater. Chem. Phys. 59, 185–198 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, B. K. Cho, and V. Brinzari, Spray pyrolysis of metal oxides SnO2 and In2O3 as an example of thin film technology: Advantages and limitations for application in conductometric gas sensors, Adv. Mater. Res. 748, 22–27 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, M. DiBattista, J. Schwank, and V. Brinzari, Structural characterization of SnO2 gas sensing films deposited by spray pyrolysis, J. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 77, 33–39 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, A. Cerneavschi, V. Brinzari, A. Cornet, J. Morante, A. Cabot, and J. Arbiol, Crystallographic characterization of In2O3 films deposited by spray pyrolysis, Sens. Actuat. B 84, 37–42 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Brinzari, G. Korotcenkov, J. Schwank, V. Lantto, S. Saukko, and V. Golovanov, Morphological rank of nano–scale tin dioxide films deposited by spray pyrolysis from SnCl4·5H2O water solution, Thin Solid Films 408, 51–58 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, A. Cornet, E. Rossinyol, J. Arbiol, V. Brinzari, and Y. Blinov, Faceting characterization of tin dioxide nanocrystals deposited by spray pyrolysis from stannic chloride water solution, Thin Solid Films 471(1–2), 310–319 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, V. Brinzari, and I. Boris, (Cu, Fe, Co or Ni)–doped tin dioxide films deposited by spray pyrolysis: Doping influence on film morphology, J. Mater. Sci. 43(8), 2761–2770 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov and S. D. Han, (Cu, Fe, Co and Ni)–doped tin dioxide films deposited by spray pyrolysis: Doping influence on thermal stability of the film structure, Mater. Chem. Phys. 113, 756–763 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov and B. K. Cho, Spray pyrolysis deposition of undoped SnO2 and In2O3 films and their structural properties, Prog. Cryst. Growth. Charact. Mater. (2017) ( in press).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. L. Choy, Chemical vapour deposition of coatings, Prog. Mater. Sci. 48(2), 57–170 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ch.Y. Wang, V. Cimalla, Th. Kups, C.–C. Röhlig, H. Romanus, V Lebedev, J. Pezoldt, Th. Stauden, and O. Ambacher, Photoreduction and oxidation behavior of In2O3 nanoparticles by metal organic chemical vapor deposition, J. Appl. Phys. 102, 044310 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Walsh and C. R. A. Catlow, Structure, stability and work functions of the low index surfaces of pure indium oxide and Sn–doped indium oxide (ITO) from density functional theory, J. Mater. Chem. 20, 10438–10444 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Agoston and K. Albe, Thermodynamic stability, stoichiometry, and electronic structure of bcc–In2O3 surfaces, Phys. Rev. B 84, 045311 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Li, D. Zhang, S. Han, X. Liu, T. Tang, B. Lei, Z. Liu, and C. Zhou, Synthesis, electronic properties, and applications of indium oxide vanowires, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1006, 104–121 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Sahm, A. Gurlo, N. Bârsan, and U. Weimar, Properties of indium oxide semiconducting sensors deposited by different techniques, Partic. Sci. Technol. 24(4), 441–452 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Epifani, E. Comini, J. Arbiol, E. Pellicer, P. Siciliano, G. Faglia, and J. R. Morante, Nanocrystals as very active interfaces: Ultrasensitive room–temperature ozone sensors with In2O3 nanocrystals prepared by a low–temperature sol–gel process in a coordinating environment, J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 13967–13971 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Gaddari, F. Berger, M. Amjoud, J. B. Sanchez, M. Lahcini, B. Rhouta, D. Mezzane, C. Mavon, E. Beche, and V. Flaud, A novel way for the synthesis of tin dioxide sol–gel derived thin films: Application to O3 detection at ambient temperature, Sens. Actuat. B 176, 811–817 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Dieguez, A. Romano–Rodriguez, J. R. Morante, J. Kappler, N. Barsan, and W. Gopel, Nanoparticle engineering for gas sensor optimisation: improved sol–gel fabricated nanocrystalline SnO2 thick film gas sensor for NO2 detection by calcination, catalytic metal introduction and grinding treatments, Sens. Actuat. B 60, 125–137 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Dieguez, A. Romano–Rodriguez, J. L. Alay, J. R. Morante, N. Barsan, J. Kappler, U. Weimar, and W. Gopel, Parameter optimization in SnO2 gas sensors for NO2 detection with low cross–sensitivity to CO: sol–gel preparation, film preparation. Powder calcination, doping and grinding, Sens. Actuat. B 65, 166–168 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Gurlo, Nanosensors: towards morphological control of gas sensing activity. SnO2, In2O3, ZnO and WO3 case studies, Nanoscale 3, 154–165 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Shi, F. Xu, K. Yu, Z. Zhu, and J. Fang, Controllable synthesis of In2O3 nanocubes, truncated nanocubes, and symmetric multipods, J. Phys. Chem. Chem. C 111, 16267–16271 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Ivanovskaya, Ceramic and film metaloxide sensors obtained by sol–gel method: structural features and gas–sensitive properties, Electron. Technol. 33(1/2), 108–112 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• L. Sangaletti, L. E. Depero, B. Allieri, F. Pioselli, R. Angelucci, A. Poggi, T. Tagliani, and S. Nicoletti, Microstructural development in pure and V–doped SnO2 nanopowders, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 19, 2073–2077 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Cabot, A. Dieguez, A. Romano–Rodriguez, J. Morante, and N. Barsan, Influence of the catalytic introduction procedure on the nano– SnO2 gas sensor performance. Where and how stay the catalytic atoms? Sens. Actuat. B 79, 98–106 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. T. Weber, R. Andrade, E. R. Leite, and E. Longo, A study of the SnO2–Nb2O5 system for an ethanol vapour sensor: a correlation between microstructure and sensor performance, Sens. Actuat. B 72, 180–183 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. H. Aragón, J. A. H. Coaquira, D. S. Candela, E. Baggio Saitovitch, P. Hidalgo, D. Gouvêa, and P. C. Morais, Structural and hyperfine properties of Cr–doped SnO2 nanoparticles, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 217, 012079 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Z. Zhan, J. Chen, S. Guan, L. Si, and P. Zhang, Highly sensitive and thermal stable CO gas sensor based on SnO2 modified by SiO2, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 13(2), 1507–1510 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Elimelech, J. Gregory, X. Jia, R. A. Williams, J. Gregory, X. Jia, and R.A Williams, Particle Deposition and Aggregation: Measurement, Modelling and Simulation, Butterworth–Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• C. Kaya, J. Y. He, X. Gu, and E. G. Butler, Nanostructured ceramic powders by hydrothermal synthesis and their applications, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 54, 37–49 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Chabanis, I. Parkin, and D. E. Williams, A simple equivalent circuit model to represent microstructure effects on the response of semiconducting oxide–based gas sensors, Meas. Sci. Technol. 14, 76–86 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. C. Koch, Synthesis of nanostructured materials by mechanical milling: problems and opportunities, Nanostuct. Mater. 9, 13–22 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• V. Brynzari, G. Korotchenkov, and S. Dmitriev, Theoretical study of semiconductor thin film gas sensitivity: Attempt to consistent approach, J. Electron Technology 33, 225–235 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• N. Barsan and U. Weimar, Conduction model of metal oxide gas sensors, J. Electroceram. 7(3), 143–167 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Slater, C. R. A. Catlow, D. E. William, and A. M. Stoneham, Dissociation of O2 on the reduced SnO2(110) surface, Chem. Commun. 123, 1235–1236 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Y. Yamaguchi, Y. Nagasawa, S. Shimomura, K. Tabata, and E. Suzuki, A density functional theory study of the interaction of oxygen with a reduced SnO2(110) surface, Chem. Phys. Lett. 316(5–6), 477–482 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• M. Belaqziz, M. Amjoud, A. Gaddari, B. Rhouta, and D. Mezzane, Enhanced room temperature ozone response of SnO2 thin film sensor, Superlatt. Microstructur. 71, 185–189 (2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.–R. Kim, H.–K. Hong, C. H. Kwon, D. H. Yun, K. Lee, and Y. K. Sung, Ozone sensing properties of In2O3–based semiconductor thick films, Sens. Actuat. B 66, 59–62 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Klaus, D. Klawinski, S. Amrehn, M. Tiemann, and T. Wagner, Light–activated resistive ozone sensing at room temperature utilizingnanoporous In2O3 particles: Influence of particle size, Sens. Actuat. B 217, 181–185 (2015).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Xu, J. Tamaki, N. Miura, and N. Yamazoe, Grain size effects on gas sensitivity of porous SnO2-based elements, Sens. Actuat. B 3, 147–155 (1991).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Wang, S. S. Yee, and W. P. Carey, Transition between neck controlled and grain-boundary-controlled sensitivity of metal oxide gas sensors, Sens. Actuat. B 25, 454–457 (1995).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Rothschild and Y. Komem, The effect of grain size on the sensitivity of nanocrystalline metal-oxide gas sensors, J. Appl. Phys. 95, 6374–6380 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. A. Kozhushner, L. I. Trakhtenberg, V. L. Bodneva, T. V. Belisheva, and A. C. Landerville, I. I. Oleynik, Effect of temperature and nanoparticle size on sensor properties of nanostructured tin dioxide films, J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 11440–11444 (2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Vallejos, V. Khatko, K. Aguir, K. A. Ngo, J. Calderer, I. Gracia, C. Cane, E. Llobet, and X. Correig, Ozone monitoring by micro-machined sensors with WO3 sensing films, Sens. Actuat. B 126, 573–578 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Vallejos, V. Khatko, J. Calderer, I. Gracia, C. Cané, E. Llobet, and X. Correig, Micro-machined WO3-based sensors selective to oxidizing gases, Sens. Actuat. B 132, 209–215 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Kiriakidis, M. Bender, N. Katsarakis, E. Gagaoudakis, E. Hourdakis, E. Douloufakis, and V. Cimalla, Ozone sensing properties of polycrystalline indium oxide films at room temperature, Phys. Status Sol. (a) 185(1), 27–32 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Suchea, N. Katsarakis, S. Christoulakis, S. Nikolopoulou, and G. Kiriakidis, Low temperature indium oxide gas sensors, Sens. Actuat. B 118, 135–141 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Krivetskiy, M. Rumyantseva, and A. Gaskov, Design, synthesis and application of metal oxide based sensing elements: A chemical principles approach. In M. A. Carpenter, S. Mathur, and A. Kolmakov (eds.), Metal Oxide Nanomaterials for Chemical Sensors, Springer Science+Business Media, New York, 2013, pp. 69–118.
   Google Scholar
• A. Dieguez, A. Romano–Rodriguez, A. Vila, and J. R. Morante, The complete Raman spectrum of nanometric SnO2 particles, Appl. Phys. 90, 1550–1557 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Ch.Y. Wang, V. Cimalla, C.-C. Roehlig, Th. Stauden, F. Niebelschuetz, O. Ambacher, O. Kiesewetter, and S. Kittelmann, A new type of highly sensitive portable ozone sensor operating at room temperature. In Proceedings of IEEE SENSORS 2006, EXCO, Daegu, Korea, October 22–25, 2006, pp. 81–84.
   Google Scholar
• Th. Becker, S. Ahlers, C. Bosch–v. Braunmühl, G. Müller, and O. Kiesewetter, Gas sensing properties of thin– and thick–film tin–oxide materials, Sens. Actuat. B 77, 55–61 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, V. Brinzari, J. R. Stetter, I. Blinov, and V. Blaja, The nature of processes controlling the kinetics of indium oxide–based thin film gas sensor response, Sens. Actuat. B 128, 51–63 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. W. Gardner, A non–linear diffusion–reaction model of electrical conduction in semiconductor gas sensors, Sens. Actuat. B 1, 166–170 (1990).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. E. Williams, G. S. Henshaw, and K. F. E. Pratt, Reaction–diffusion effects and systematic design of gas–sensitive resistors based on semiconducting oxides, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 91(23), 4299–4307 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• D. E. Williams and K. F. E. Patt, Theory of self–diagnostic sensor array devices using gas–sensitive resistors, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 91(13), 1961–1966 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• D. E. Williams and K. F. E. Patt, Classification of reactive sites on the surface of polycrystalline tin dioxide, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 94, 3493–3500 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• K. Ihokura and J. Watson, The Stannic Oxide Gas Sensor, Principle and Applications, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• N. Yamazoe and K. Shimanoe, Overview of gas sensor technology. In D. K. Aswal and S. K. Gupta (eds.), Science and Technology of Chemiresistor Gas Sensors, Nova Science Publishers, New York, 2007, pp. 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• T. Kida, S. Fujiyama, K. Suematsu, M. Yuasa, and K. Shimanoe, Pore and particle size control of gas sensing films using SnO2 nanoparticles synthesized by seed-mediated growth: Design of highly sensitive gas sensors, J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 17574–17582 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Brovchenko and A. Oleinikova, Effect of pore size on the condensation/evaporation transition of confined water in equilibrium with saturated bulk water, J. Phys. Chem. B 115, 9990–10000 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. J. Gentry and P. T. Walsh, The theory of poisoning of catalytic flammable gas sensing elements. In P. T. Moseley and B. C. Tofield (eds.), Solid State Gas Sensors. Adam Hilger, Bristol, Philadelphia, 1987, pp. 32–50.
   Google Scholar
• G. E. de Souza Brito, C. V. Santilli, and S. H. Pulcenelli, Evolution of the fractal structure during sintering of SnO2 compacted sol-gel powder, Coloids Surf. A 97, 217–225 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• J. F. Mc Aleer, P. T. Moseley, J. O. Norris, and D. E. Williams, Tin dioxide gas sensors. Part 1.—Aspects of the surface chemistry revealed by electrical conductance variations, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. I 83, 1323–1346 (1987).
   Google Scholar
• Y. Liu, E. Koep, and M. Liu, A highly sensitive and fast–responding SnO2 sensor fabricated by combustion chemical vapor deposition, Chem. Mater. 17, 3997–4000 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. N. Rumyantseva, A. M. Gaskov, N. Rosman, T. Pagnier, and J. R. Morante, Raman surface vibration modes in nanocrystalline SnO2:  Correlation with gas sensor performances, Chem. Mater. 17, 893–901 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, Gas response control through structural and chemical modification of metal oxides: State of the art and approaches, Sens. Actuat. B 107, 209–232 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X.-G. Han, H.-Z. He, Q. Kuang, X. Zhou, X.-H. Zhang, T. Xu, Z.-X. Xie, and L.-S. Zheng, Controlling morphologies and tuning the related properties of nano/microstructured ZnO crystallites, J. Phys. Chem. C 113, 584–589 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Han, M. Jin, S. Xie, Q. Kuang, Z. Jiang, Y. Jiang, Z. Xie, and L. Zheng, Synthesis of tin dioxide octahedral nanoparticles with exposed high-energy {221} facets and enhanced gas-sensing properties, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 9180–9183 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Yamazoe and K. Shimanoe, Roles of shape and size of component crystals in semiconductor gas sensors: I. Response to oxygen, J. Electrochem. Soc. 155, J85–J92 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Y. Hao, G. Meng, C. Ye, and L. Zhang, Controlled synthesis of In2O3 octahedrons and nanowires, Crystal Growth Design 5(4), 1617–1621 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. H. L. Zhang, A. Walsh, C. R. A. Catlow, V. K. Lazarov, and R. G. Egdell, Surface energies control the self-organization of oriented In2O3 nanostructures on cubic zirconia, Nano Lett. 10(9), 3740–3746 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov and J. R. Stetter, Comparative study of SnO2– and In2O3–based ozone sensors, ECS Trans. 6(20), 29–41 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• J.–B. Sun, J. Xu, B. Wang, P. Sun, F.-M. Liu, and G.–Y. Lu, UV–enhanced room temperature ozone sensor based on hierarchical SnO2–In2O3, Chem. Res. Chinese Univer. 28(3), 483–487 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. J. Madou and S. R. Morrison, Chemical Sensing with Solid State Devices, Academic Press Inc., New York, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• P. Agoston, Point defect and surface properties of In2O3 and SnO2: A comparative study by first–principles methods. Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Germany, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• O. Bierwagen and J. S. Speck, High electron mobility In2O3(001) and (111) thin films with nondegenerate electron concentration, Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 072103 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Batzill and U. Diebold, The surface and materials science of tin oxide, Prog. Surf. Sci. 79, 47–154 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. A. Dulin, A. K. Avetisov, Yu.A. Mishchenko, and A. I. Gelbshtein, The isotopic exchange of oxygen on indium trioxide. In Proceedings of All–Union Seminar “Isotopic Methods in Studies of Mechanisms of Catalysis”, Novosibirsk, 1980, pp. 1–8 ( in Russian).
   Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, M. Ivanov, I. Blinov, and J. R. Stetter, Kinetics of In2O3–based thin film gas sensor response: The role of “redox” and adsorption/desorption processes in gas sensing effects, Thin Solid Films 515(7–8), 3987–3996 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. A. Maslova, E. A. Makeeva, M. N. Rumyantseva, and A. M. Gaskov, Kinetics of interaction between nanocrystalline SnO2[M] (M = In, Fe, Ru, Ce) and oxygen, Inorg. Mater. 45(10), 1153–1157 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Brinzari, G. Korotcenkov, M. Ivanov, V. Nehasil, V. Matolin, K. Mašek, and M. Kamei, Valence band and band gap photoemission study of (111) In2O3 epitaxial films under interactions with oxygen, water and carbon monoxide, Surf. Sci. 601, 5585–5594 (2007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Brinzari, B. K. Cho, M. Kamei, and G. Korotcenkov, Photoemission surface characterization of (001) In2O3 thin film through the interactions with oxygen, water and carbon monoxide: Comparison with (111) orientation, Appl. Surf. Sci. 324, 123–133 (2015).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. D. C. King, T. D. Veal, D. J. Payne, A. Bourlange, R. G. Egdell, C. F. McConville, Surface electron accumulation and the charge neutrality level in In2O3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 116808 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Bierwagen, J. S. Speck, T. Nagata, T. Chikyow, Y. Yamashita, H. Yoshikawa, and K. Kobayashi, Depletion of the In2O3(001) and (111) surface electron accumulation by an oxygen plasma surface treatment, Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 172101 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. R. Hagleitner, M. Menhart, P. Jacobson, S. Blomberg, K. Schulte, E. Lundgren, M. Kubicek, J. Fleig, F. Kubel, C. Puls, A. Limbeck, H. Hutter, L. A. Boatner, M. Schmid, and U. Diebold, Bulk and surface characterization of In2O3(001) single crystals, Phys. Rev. B 85, 115441 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. D. C. King, T. D. Veal, P. H. Jefferson, S. A. Hatfield, L. F. J. Piper, C. F. McConville, F. Fuchs, J. Furthmüller, F. Bechstedt, Hai Lu, W. J. Schaff, Determination of the branch–point energy of InN: Chemical trends in common–cation and common–anion semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B 77, 045316 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. H. Zhang, R. G. Egdell, F. Offi, S. Iacobucci, L. Petaccia, S. Gorovikov, and P. D. C. King, Microscopic origin of electron accumulation in In2O3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 056803 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, B. K. Cho, V. Brinzari, L. Gulina, and V. Tolstoy, Catalytically active filters deposited by SILD method for inhibitting sensitivity to ozone of SnO2–based conductometric gas sensors, Ferroelectrics 459(1), 46–51 (2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. X. Huang, J. W. Teng, T. X. Cai, and X. H. Bao, Silver as a promoter for the catalytic decomposition of NOx under oxygen–excess condition: Evidence for oxygen spillover from noble metals to silver, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 130, 1409–1414 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• B. Chwieroth, B. R. Patton, and Y. Wang, Conduction and gas–surface reaction modelling in metal oxide gas sensors, J. Electroceram. 6, 27–41 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. D. Papakonstantinou, J. M. Jaksic, D. Labou, A. Siokou, and M. M. Jaksic, Spillover phenomena and its striking impacts in electrocatalysis for hydrogen and oxygen electrode reactions, Adv. Phys. Chem. 2011, ID 412165 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, V. Tolstoy, and J. Schwank, Successive ionic layer deposition (SILD) as a new sensor technology: synthesis and modification of metal oxides, Meas. Sci. Techn. 17, 1861–1869 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, B. K. Cho, L. B. Gulina, V. P. Tolstoy, Gas sensor application of Ag nanoclusters synthesized by SILD method, Sens. Actuat. B 166–167, 402–410 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. C. Conner, Jr. and J. L. Falconer, Spillover in heterogeneous catalysis, Chem. Rev. 95, 759–788 (1995).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. N. Rumyantseva, O. V. Safonova, M. N. Boulova, L. I. Ryabova, and A. M. Gaskov, Dopants in nanocrystalline tin dioxide, Russ. Chem. Bull., Int. Ed. 52(6), 1217–1238 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, V. Macsanov, V. Brinzari, V. Tolstoy, J. Schwank, A. Cornet, and J. Morante, Influence of Cu, Fe, Co, and Mn oxide nanoclusters on sensing behavior of SnO2 films, Thin Solid Films 467(1–2), 209–214 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, V. Brinzari, L. Gulina, and B. K. Cho, The influence of gold nanoparticles on the conductivity response of SnO2–based thin film gas sensors, Appl. Surf. Sci. 353, 793–803 (2015).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, V. Brinzari, S. H. Han, L. B. Gulina, V. P. Tolstoy, and B. K. Cho, SnO2 films decorated by Au clusters and their gas sensing properties, Mater. Sci. Forum 827, 251–256 (2015).
   Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, V. Brinzari, S. H. Han, and B. K. Cho, Gas sensing properties of In2O3 films modified with gold nanoparticles, Mater. Chem. Phys. 175, 188–199 (2016).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, L. Gulina, B. K. Cho, S. H. Han, and V. Tolstoy, SnO2–Au nanocomposite synthesized by successive ionic layer deposition (SILD) method: characterization and application in gas sensors, Mater. Chem. Phys. 128(3), 433–441 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Labidi, E. Gillet, R. Delamare, M. Maaref, and K. Aguir, Ethanol and ozone sensing characteristics of WO3 based sensors activated by Au and Pd, Sens. Actuat. B 120, 338–345 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, L. B. Gulina, B. K. Cho, V. Brinzari, and V. P. Tolstoy, Au nanoclusters on the surface of SnO2 and In2O3 films: Synthesis by SILD method and characterization, Pure Appl. Chem. 86(5), 801–817 (2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Saliba, D. Parker, and B. Koela, Adsorption of oxygen on Au(111) by exposure to ozone, Surf. Sci. 410, 270–282 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Kim, E. Samano, and B. E. Koel, Oxygen adsorption and oxidation reactions on Au(211) surfaces: exposures using O2 at high pressures and ozone (O3) in UHV, Surf. Sci. 600, 4622–4632 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. G. Pavelko, H. Daly, C. Hardacre, A. A. Vasiliev, and E. Llobet, Interaction of water, hydrogen and their mixtures with SnO2 based materials: the role of surface hydroxyl groups in detection mechanisms, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 12, 2639–2647 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, V. Brinzari, Y. Boris, M. Ivanov, J. Schwank, and J. Morante, Surface Pd doping influence on gas sensing characteristics of SnO2 thin films deposited by spray pyrolysis, Thin Solid Films 436(1), 119–126 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. G. Pavelko, A. A. Vasiliev, E. Llobet, X. Vilanova, V. G. Sevastyanov, and N. T. Kuznetsov, Selectivity problem of SnO2 based materials in the presence of water vapors, Procedia Eng. 5, 111–114 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• M. Ivanovskaya, D. Kotsikau, G. Faglia, P. Nelli, and S. Irkaev, Gas–sensitive properties of thin film heterojunction structures based on Fe2O3–In2O3 nanocomposites, Sens. Actuat. B 93, 422–430 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. E. Gutman, T. V. Belysheva, and L. P. Bogovtseva, Heterostructure microsystems for ozone and chlorine sensor monitoring. In Proceeding of the 3rd NEXUSPAN Workshop on Microsystems in Environmental Monitoring, December 13–14, 1996, Moscow, Russia, pp. 65–68.
   Google Scholar
• S. F. Timashev, S. P. Perov, and E. E. Gutman, Problems of physicochemistry of earth ozone layer, Russ. J. Phys. Chem. 68, 1360–1372 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, I. Boris, V. Brinzari, Yu. Luchkovsky, G. Karkotsky, V. Golovanov, A. Cornet, E. Rossinyol, J. Rodriguez, and A. Cirera, Gas sensing characteristics of one–electrode gas sensors on the base of doped In2O3 ceramics, Sens. Actuat. B 103, 13–22 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, I. Boris, V. Brinzari, S. H. Han, and B. K. Cho, The role of doping effect on the response of SnO2-based thin film gas sensors: Analysis based on the results obtained for Co-doped SnO2 films deposited by spray pyrolysis, Sens. Actuat. B 182, 112–124 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Hattori, H. Tachibana, N. Yoshiike, and A. Yoshida, Ozone sensor made by dip coating method, Sens. Actuat.A 77, 120–125 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.–J. Wu and T.–M. Wu, High sensor response and short response time of ozone sensor using Au/TiO2–SnO2 material at room temperature, Sensor Lett. 8(4), 564–569 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, Iu. Boris, V. Brinzari, S. H. Han, B. K. Cho, and Yu.N. Lychkovsky, In2O3:Ga and In2O3:P–based one–electrode gas sensors: Comparative study, Ceram. Intern. 41, 7478–7488 (2015).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, I. Boris, A. Cornet, J. Rodriguez, A. Cirera, V. Golovanov, Yu. Lychkovsky, and G. Karkotsky, The influence of additives on gas sensing and structural properties of In2O3–based ceramics, Sens. Actuat. B 120, 657–664 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, B. K. Cho, I. Boris, S. H. Han, Yu. Lychkovsky, and G. Karkotsky, Indium oxide ceramics doped by selenium for one–electrode gas sensors, Sens. Actuat. B 174, 586–593 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. G. Pavelko, A. A. Vasiliev, E. Llobet, V. G. Sevastyanov, and N. T. Kuznetsov, Selectivity problem of SnO2 based materials in the presence of water vapors, Sens. Actuat. B 170, 51–59 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, I. Boris, and B. K. Cho, SnO2:Cu films doped during spray pyrolysis deposition: The reasons of gas sensing properties change, Mater. Chem. Phys. 142, 124–131 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov and B. K. Cho, Bulk doping influence on the response of conductometric SnO2 gas sensors: Understanding through cathodoluminescence study, Sens. Actuat. B 196, 80–98 (2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, B. K. Cho, M. Nazarov, D.-Y. Noh, and E. Kolesnikova, Cathodoluminescence studies of un-doped and (Cu, Fe, and Co)–doped tin dioxide films deposited by spray pyrolysis deposition, Curr. Appl. Phys. 10, 1123–1131 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.–X. Wang, J.–F. Wang, H.–C. Chen, W.–B. Su, and G.–Z. Zang, Electrical nonlinearity of (Cu, Ni, Nb)–doped SnO2 varistors system, Mater. Sci. Eng. B 99, 457–460 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• B. Kim, J. Jung, J. Lee, and J. Kim, Precipitate concentration of Co2SnO4 in CoO–doped SnO2 ceramics at different oxygen chemical potentials, Solid State Ionics 144, 321–327 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. E. Gutman, T. V. Belysheva, and F.Kh. Chibirova, Structure effects in gas sensing by metal oxides. In Proceedings of 11th Eur. Conf. Solid–State Transducers (Eurosensors XI), Warsaw, Poland, September 21–24, 1997, pp. 341–344.
   Google Scholar
• G. Brankovic, Z. Brankovic, M. R. Davolos, M. Cilense, and J. A. Varela, Influence of the common varistor dopants (CoO, Cr2O3 and Nb2O5) on the structural properties of SnO2 ceramics, Mater. Character. 52, 243–251 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Schimka, J. Harl, A. Stroppa, A. Grüneis, M. Marsman, F. Mittendorfer, and G. Kresse, Accurate surface and adsorption energies from many–body perturbation theory, Nat. Mater. 9, 741–744 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Oviedo and M. J. Gillan, First–principles study of the interaction of oxygen with the SnO2(110) surface, Surf. Sci. 490, 221–236 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Hays, A. Punnoose, R. Baldner, M. H. Engelhard, J. Peloquin, and K. M. Reddy, Relationship between the structural and magnetic properties of Co–doped SnO2 nanoparticles, Phys. Rev. B 72, 075203 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.–S. Lee, I.–S. Han, D.–W. Seo, and S.–K. Woo, Improvement of strength in porous ceramics by control of additives, Mater. Sci. Forum 439, 68–73 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• A. Ratko, O. Babushkin, A. Baran, and S. Baran, Sorption and gassensitive properties of In2O3 based ceramics doped with Ga2O3, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 18, 2227–2232 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Tricoli, M. Graf, and S. E. Pratsinis, Optimal doping for enhanced SnO2 sensitivity and thermal stability, Adv. Funct. Mater. 18, 1969–1976 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Kolmakov and M. Moskovits, Chemical sensing and catalysis by one-dimentioanl metal oxide nanostructures, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 34, 151–180 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Comini, C. Baratto, G. Faglia, M. Ferroni, A. Vomiero, and G. Sberveglieri, Quasi-one dimensional metal oxide semiconductors: Preparation, characterization and application as chemical sensors, Progress Mater. Sci. 54, 1–67 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. S. Devan, R. A. Patil, J.-H. Lin, and Y.-R. Ma, One-dimensional metal-oxide nanostructures: Recent developments in synthesis, characterization, and applications, Adv. Funct. Mater. 22(16), 3326–3370 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Li, X.-Y. Yang, Y. Feng, Z.-Y. Yuan, and B.-L. Su, One-dimensional metal oxide nanotubes, nanowires, nanoribbons, and nanorods: Synthesis, characterizations, properties and applications, Crit. Rev. Sol. St. Mater. Sci. 37, 1–74 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Hernandez-Ramirez, A. Tarancon, O. Casals, J. Arbiol, A. Romano- Rodriguez, and J. R. Morante, High response and stability in CO and humidity measures using a single SnO2 nanowire, Sens. Actuat. B 121, 3–17 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Law, H. Kind, B. Messer, F. Kim, and P. Yang, Photochemical sensing of NO2 with SnO2 nanoribbon nanosensors at room temperature, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41, 2405–2408 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Zhang, Z. Liu, C. Li, T. Tang, X. Liu, S. Han, B. Lei, and C. Zhou, Detection of NO2 down to ppb levels using individual and multiple In2O3 nanowire devices, Nano Lett. 4, 1919–1924 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. S. Rout, K. Ganesh, A. Govindaraj, and C. N. R. Rao, Sensors for the nitrogen oxides, NO2, NO, and N2O, based on In2O3 and WO3 nanowires, Appl. Phys. A 85, 241–246 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Vomiero, S. Bianchi, E. Comini, G. Faglia, M. Ferroni, and G. Sberveglieri, Controlled growth and sensing properties of In2O3 nanowires, Crystal Growth Des. 7, 2500–2504 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. C. Meier, S. Semancik, B. Button, E. Strelcov, and A. Kolmakov, Coupling nanowire chemiresistors with MEMS microhotplate gas sensing platforms, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 63118–63120 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Miao, D. Xu, J. Ouyang, G. Guo, X. Zhao, and Y. Tang, Electrochemically induced sol-gel preparation of single-crystalline TiO2 nanowires, Nano Lett. 2, 717–720 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Tiemann, Repeated templating, Chem. Mater. 20(3), 961–971 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Xie, D. Kocaefe, C. Chen, and Y. Kocaefe, Review of research on template methods in preparation of nanomaterials, J. Nanomater. 2016, 2302595 (2016).
   Google Scholar
• B. Ding, C. Kim, H. Kim, M. Seo, and S. Park, Titanium dioxide nanofibers prepared by using electrospinning method, Fiber. Polym. 5, 105–109 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Raible, M. Burghard, U. Schlecht, A. Yasuda, and T. Vossever, V2O5 nanofibers: Novel gas sensors with extremely high sensitivity and selectivity to amines, Sens. Actuat. B 106, 730–735 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Wang, Y. Ji, X. Huang, X. Yang, P. Gouma, and M. Dudley, Fabrication and characterization of polycrystalline WO3 nanofibers and their application for ammonia sensing, J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 23777–23782 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Zheng, X. Lu, W. Wang, Z. Li, H. Zhang, Y. Wang, Z. Wang, and C. Wang, A highly sensitive and fast-responding sensor based on electrospun In2O3 nanofibers, Sens. Actuat. B 142, 61–65 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. K. Lim, S. H. Hwang, D. Chang, and S. Kim, Preparation of mesoporous In2O3 nanofibers by electrospinning and their application as a CO gas sensor, Sens. Actuat. B 149, 28–33 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Wang, I. Ramos, and J. Santiago-Aviles, Detection of moisture and methanol gas using a single electrospun tin oxide nanofiber, IEEE Sensors J. 7, 1347–1348 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Zhang, X. He, J. Li, Z. Miao, and F. Huang, Fabrication and ethanol-sensing properties of micro gas sensor based on electrospun SnO2 nanofibers, Sens. Actuat. B 132, 67–73 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Yang, X. Tao, and R. Wang, Room temperature gas sensing properties of SnO2/multiwall-carbon nanotube composite nano fibers, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 133110 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Kim, A. Rothschild, B. Lee, D. Kim, S. Jo, and H. Tuller, Ultrasensitive chemiresistors based on electrospun TiO2 nanofibers, Nano Lett. 6, 2009–2013 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Landau, A. Rothschild, and E. Zussman, Processing-microstructure-properties correlation of ultrasensitive gas sensors produced by electrospinning, Chem. Mater. 21, 9–11 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.-H. Lee, Gas sensors using hierarchical and hollow oxide nanostructures: Overview, Sens. Actuat. B 140, 319–336 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Korotcenkov, S. H. Han, and B. K. Cho, Material design for metal oxide chemiresistive gas sensors, J. Sens. Sci. Technol. 22(1), 1–17 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• L. He, Y. Jia, F. Meng, M. Li, and J. Liu, Development of sensors based on CuO-doped SnO2 hollow spheres for ppb level H2S gas sensing, J. Mater. Sci. 44, 4326–4333 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Lin, W. Song, and H. Yang, Highly sensitive gas sensor based on coral-like SnO2 prepared with hydrothermal treatment, Sens. Actuat. B 173, 22–27 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Choi, H. R. Kim, and J. H. Lee, Enhanced CO sensing characteristics of hierarchical and hollow In2O3 microspheres, Sens. Actuat. B 138, 497–503 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Hyodo, Y. Shimizu, and M. Egashira, Gas-sensing properties of ordered mesoporous SnO2 and effects of coating thereof, Sens. Actuat. B 93, 590–600 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Kaushik, R. Kumar, S. K. Arya, M. Nair, B. D. Malhotra, and S. Bhansali, Organic−inorganic hybrid nanocomposite–based gas sensors for environmental monitoring, Chem. Rev. 115, 4571–4606 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F.-L. Meng, Z. Guo, and X.-J. Huang, Graphene–based hybrids for chemiresistive gas sensors, Trends Anal. Chem. 68, 37–47 (2015).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Kaniyoor and S. Ramaprabhu, Hybrid carbon nanostructured ensembles as chemiresistive hydrogen gas sensors, Carbon 49, 227–236 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. M. Aroutiounian, Metal oxide gas sensors decorated with carbon nanotubes, Lithuanian J. Phys. 55(4), 319–329 (2015).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U. Latif and F. L. Dickert, Graphene hybrid materials in gas sensing applications, Sensors 15, 30504–30524 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. L. Hawkins, Polymer Degradation and Stabilization, Springer–Verlag, Berlin, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• S. S. Varghese, S. Lonkar, K. K. Singh, S. Swaminathan, and A. Abdala, Recent advances in graphene based gas sensors, Sens. Actuat. B 218, 160–183 (2015).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Berger, B. Ghaddab, J. B. Sanchez, and C. Mavon, Development of an ozone high sensitive sensor working at ambient temperature, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 307, 012054 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• B. Ghaddab, J. B. Sanchez, C. Mavon, M. Paillet, R. Parret, A. A. Zahab, J. L. Bantignies, V. Flaud, E. Beche, and F. Berger, Detection of O3 and NH3 using hybrid tin dioxide/carbon nanotubes sensors: Influence of materials and processing on sensor's sensitivity, Sens. Actuat. B 170, 67–74 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. M. Simmons, B. M. Nichols, S. E. Baker, M. S. Marcus, O. Castellini, C. S. Lee, R. J. Hamers, and M. A. Eriksson, Effect of ozone oxidation on single–walled carbon nanotubes, J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 7113–7118 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Wongwiriyapan, S.–I. Honda, H. Konishi, T. Mizuta T., T. Ikuno, T. Ohmori, T. Ito, R. Shimazaki, T. Maekawa, K. Suzuki, H. Ishikawa, K. Oura, and M. Katayama, Ultrasensitive ozone detection using single walled carbon nanotube networks, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 45, 3669–3671 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Park, K. Y. Dong, J. Lee, J. Choi, G. M. Bae, and B. K. Ju, Development of an ozone gas sensor using single walled carbon nanotubes, Sens. Actuat. B 140, 407–411 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Toda, R. Furue, and S. Hayami, Recent progress in applications of graphene oxide for gas sensing: A review, Anal. Chim. Acta 878, 43–53 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Kuznetsova, J. T. Yates Jr., V. V. Simonyan, J. K. Johnson, C. B. Huffman, and R. E. Smalley, Optimization of Xe adsorption kinetics in single walled carbon nanotubes, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 6691–6698 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar