U-Shaped Dose Response in Behavioral Pharmacology: Historical Foundations

REFERENCES

• Ahmed S. H., Koob G. F. Transition to drug addiction: A negative reinforcement model based on an allostatic decrease in reward function. Psychopharmacology 2005; 180: 473–490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed S. H., Koob G. F. Transition from moderate to excessive drug intake: Change in hedonic set point. Science 1998; 282: 298–300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett J. E. Behavioral determinants of drug action: The contributions of Peter B. Dews. J. Exper. Analysis Behav. 2006; 86: 359–370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett J. E. The emergence of behavioral pharmacology. Mol. Intervent. 2002; 2: 470–475
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barrett J. E., Stanley J. A. Effects of chlorpromazine and d-amphetamine on schedule-controlled and schedule-related behavior of rabbits. Psychopharmacology 1982; 78: 197–203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen S. E., Balster R. L. Effects of inhaled 1,1,1-trichloroethane on locomotor activity in mice. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 1996; 18: 77–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen S. E., Balster R. L. A direct comparison of inhalant effects on locomotor activity and schedule-controlled behavior in mice. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 1998; 6: 235–247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branch M. N. Roger T. Kelleher, behavior analyst. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 2006; 86: 371–384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady L. S., Barrett J. E. Effects of serotonin receptor antagonists on punished responding maintained by stimulus-shock termination or food presentation in squirrel monkeys. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1985; 234: 106–112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrd L. D. Effects of d-amphetamine on schedule-controlled key pressing and drinking in the chimpanzee. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1973; 185: 633–641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrd L. D. The behavioral effects of cocaine: Rate dependency or rate constancy. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1979; 56: 355–362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrd L. D. Quantitation in behavioral pharmacology. Advances in Behavioral Pharmacology, T. Thompson, P. B. Dews, W. A. McKim. Academic Press, New York 1981; 3: 75
   Google Scholar
• Byrd L. D., Howell L. L. An historical overview of behavioral pharmacology. Emory Univ. J. Med. 1988; 2: 287–295
   Google Scholar
• Calabrese E. J. Hormesis: Why it is important to toxicology and toxicologists. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2008; 27: 1451–1474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese E. J. Paradigm lost, paradigm found: The re-emergence of hormesis as a fundamental dose response model in the toxicological sciences. Environ. Poll. 2005; 138: 378–411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese E. J., Baldwin L. A. The dose determines the stimulation (and poison): Development of a chemical hormesis database. Int. J. Toxicol. 1997; 16: 545–559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese E. J., Baldwin L. A. Defining hormesis. Hum. Exper. Toxicol. 2002; 21: 91–97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese E. J., Baldwin L. A. Toxicology rethinks its central belief. Nature 2003; 421: 691–692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese E. J., Bachmann K. A., Bailer A. J., Bolger P. M., Borak J., Cai L., Cedergreen N., Cherian M. G., Chiueh C. C., Clarkson T. W., et al. Biological stress response terminology: Integrating the concepts of adaptive response and preconditioning stress within a hormetic dose-response framework. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2007; 222: 122–128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese E. J., Blain R. The occurrence of hormetic dose responses in the toxicological literature, the hormesis database: an overview. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol 2005; 202: 289–301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark F. C., Steele B. J. Effects of d-amphetamine on performance under a multiple schedule in the rat. Psychopharmacologia 1966; 9: 157
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cone E. J., Risner M. E., Neidert G. L. Concentrations of phenethylamine in dog following single doses and during intravenous self-administration. Res. Commun. Chem. Pathol. Pharmacol. 1978; 22: 211–232
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crofton K. M., Boncek V. M., Reiter L. W. Hyperactivity induced by triadimefon, a triazole fungicide. Fundam. Appl. Toxicool. 1988; 10: 459–465
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dews P. B. Studies on behavior. I. Differential sensitivity to pentobarbital of pecking performance in pigeons depending on the schedule of reward. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1955; 113: 393–401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dews P. B., Morse W. H. Some observations on an operant in human subjects and its modification by dextro amphetamine. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 1958; 4: 359–364
   Google Scholar
• Dews P. B., Wenger G. R. Rate-dependency of the behavioral effects of amphetamine. Adv. Behav. Pharmacol. 1977; 1: 167
   Google Scholar
• Geller I., Seifter J. The effects of meprobamate, barbiturates, d-amphetamine and promazine on experimentally induced conflict in the rat. Psychopharmacologia 1960; 1: 482–492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glowa J. R., Dews P. B. Behavioral toxicology of volatile organic solvents. IV. Comparisons of the rate-decreasing effects of acetone, ethyl acetate, methyl ethyl ketone, toluene, and carbon disulfide on schedule-controlled behavior in mice. J. Am. Coll. Toxicol. 1987; 6: 461–469
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg S. T., Kelleher R. T. Behavior controlled by scheduled injections of cocaine in squirrel and rhesus monkeys. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 1976; 25: 91–104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson H. M., Witoslawski J. J., Campbell E. H. Drug effects in squirrel monkeys trained on a multiple schedule with a punishment contingency. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 1967; 10: 565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell L. L., Byrd L. D., Marr M. J. Similarities in the rate-altering effects of white noise and cocaine. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 1986; 46: 381–394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell L. L., Byrd L. D., Marr M. J. Differential effects of cocaine and pentobarbital on fixed-interval and random-interval performance. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 1988; 49: 411–428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johanson C. E. Effects of intravenous cocaine, diethylpropion, d-amphetamine and perphenazine on responding maintained by food delivery and shock avoidance in rhesus monkeys. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1978; 204: 118–129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz J. L. Drugs as reinforcers: Pharmacological and behavioral factors. The Neuropharmacological Basis of Reward, J. M. Liebman, S. J. Cooper. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1989; 164–223
   Google Scholar
• Kelleher R. T., Fry W., Deegan J., Cook L. Effects of meprobamate on operant behavior in rats. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1961; 133: 271–280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch W. J., Carroll M. E. Regulation of drug intake. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2001a; 9: 131–143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch W. J., Carroll M. E. Regulation of drug intake: Reply to Killeen and Reilly (2001), Madden (2001), Norman and Tsibulsky (2001), Woods (2001), and Young (2001). Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2001b; 9: 160–162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch W. J., LaBounty L.P., Carroll M. E. A novel paradigm to investigate regulation of drug intake in rats self-administering cocaine or heroin intravenously. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 1998; 6: 22–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacPhail R. C. Psychomotor stimulant-like effects of triadimefon and triadimenol in mice. 1986, Presented at the Behavioral Toxicology Society meeting
   Google Scholar
• Marr M. J. A major trio. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 2006; 86: 355–357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKearney J. W. Effects of d-amphetamine, morphine and chlorpromazine on responding under fixed-interval schedules of food presentations or electric shock presentation. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1974; 190: 141–153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan D. E. Drugs and punished responding. 1. Rate-dependent effects under multiple schedules. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 1973; 19: 133–145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan D. E. Effects of d-amphetamine on performance under several parameters of multiple fixed-ratio, fixed-interval schedules. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1969; 167: 26–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mello N. K., Negus S. S. Preclinical evaluation of pharmacotherapies for treatment of cocaine and opioid abuse using self-administration procedures. Neuropsychopharmacology 1996; 14: 375–424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse W. H. Use of operant conditioning techniques for evaluating the effects of barbiturates on behavior. Psychosomatic Medicine: The First Hahneman Symposium, J. H. Nodine, J. H. Moyer. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia 1962; 275
   Google Scholar
• Moser V. C., Balster R. L. The effects of acute and repeated toluene exposure on operant behavior in mice. Neurobehav. Toxicol. Teratol. 1981; 3: 471–475
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moser V. C., MacPhail R.C. Comparative sensitivity of neurobehavioral tests for chemical screening. Neurotoxicology 1990; 11: 335–344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panlilio L. V., Katz J. L., Pickens R. W., Schindler C. W. Variability of drug self-administration in rats. Psychopharmacology 2003; 167: 9–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettit H. O., Justice J. B. Effect of dose on cocaine self-administration behavior and dopamine levels in the nucleus-accumbens. Brain Res. 1991; 539: 94–102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranaldi R., Pocock D., Zereik R., Wise R. A. Dopamine fluctuations in the nucleus accumbens during maintenance, extinction, and reinstatement of intravenous D-amphetamine self-administration. J. Neurosci. 1999; 19: 4102–4109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spealman R. D. Comparison of drug effects on responding punished by pressurized air or electric shock delivery in squirrel monkeys: Pentobarbital, chlordiazepoxide, d-amphetamine, and cocaine. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1979; 209: 309–315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spealman R. D., Goldberg S. R., Kelleher R. T., Morse W. H., Goldberg D. M., Hakansson C. G., Nieforth K. A., Lazer E. S. Effects of norcocaine and some norcocaine derivatives on schedule-controlled behavior of pigeons and squirrel monkeys. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1979; 210: 196–205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhave T. The effect of secobarbital on a multiple schedule in the monkey. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 1959; 2: 117–120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vichi P., Tritton T. R. Stimulation of growth in human and murine cells by adriamycin. Can. Res. 1989; 49: 2679–2682
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waller M. B., Morse W. H. Effects of pentobarbital on fixed-ratio reinforcement. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 1963; 6: 125–130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren D. A., Bowen S. E., Jennings W. B., Dallas C. E., Balster R. L. Biphasic effects of 1,1,1-trichloroethane on the locomotor activity of mice: Relationship to blood and brain solvent concentrations. Toxicol. Sci. 2000; 56: 365–373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley J. L., Fagalde R. E., Buhler K. G., LaVecchia K.L., Balster R. L. Evaluation of 1,1,1-trichloroethane and flurothyl locomotor effects following diazepam treatment in mice. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2002; 71: 163–169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise R. A., Leone P., Rivest R., Leeb K. Elevations of nucleus accumbens dopamine and DOPAC levels during intravenous heroin self-administration. Synapse 1995a; 21: 140–148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise R. A., Newton P., Leeb K., Burnette B., Pocock D., Justice J. B., Jr. Fluctuations in nucleus accumbens dopamine concentration during intravenous cocaine self-administration in rats. Psychopharmacology 1995b; 120: 10–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokel R. A., Pickens R. W. Self-administration of optical isomers of amphetamine and methylamphetamine by rats. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1973; 187: 27–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokel R. A., Pickens R. W. Drug level of d- and l-amphetamine during intravenous self-administration. Psychopharmacologia 1974; 34: 255–264
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zeiler M. D. An architect of the golden years. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 2006; 86: 385–391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar