References
- Ahlers, J., Stock, F., and Werschkun, B. (2008). Integrated testing and intelligent assessment-new challenges under REACH. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 15, 565–572.
- Allanou, R., Hansen, B.G., and van der Bilt, Y. (1999). Public Availability of Data on EU High Production Volume Chemicals (Ispra, Italy, European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Health and Consumer Protection, European Chemicals Bureau ).
- Allio, L., Ballantine, B., and Meads, R. (2006). Enhancing the role of science in the decision-making of the European Union. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 44, 4–13.
- Anderson, C.A., Copestake, P.T., and Robinson, L. (2000). A specialist toxicity database (TRACE) is more effective than its larger, commercially available counterparts. Toxicology 151, 37–43.
- Assembly, U.N.G. (1992). Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, United Nations ).
- Auer, C. (2008). Chemical Assessment and Management Program (ChAMP) (Washington, DC, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, USEPA ).
- Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, and Sweden (2008). Dissenting views on the Guidance on requirements for substances in articles.
- Bal-Price, A.K., Sunol, C., Weiss, D.G., van Vliet, E., Westerink, R.H., and Costa, L.G. (2008). Application of in vitro neurotoxicity testing for regulatory purposes: Symposium III Summary and research needs. Neurotoxicology 29, 520–531.
- Becker, K., Conrad, A., Kirsch, N., Kolossa-Gehring, M., Schulz, C., Seiwert, M., and Seifert, B. (2007). German Environmental Survey (GerES): Human biomonitoring as a tool to identify exposure pathways. Int J Hyg Environ Health 210, 267–269.
- Bernauer, U., Heinemeyer, G., Heinrich-Hirsch, B., Ulbrich, B., and Gundert-Remy, U. (2008). Exposure-triggered reproductive toxicity testing under the REACH legislation: A proposal to define significant/relevant exposure. Toxicol Lett 176, 68–76.
- Birnbaum, L.S., and Staskal, D.F. (2004). Brominated flame retardants: cause for concern? Environ Health Perspect 112, 9–17.
- Blount, B.C., Valentin-Blasini, L., Osterloh, J.D., Mauldin, J.P., and Pirkle, J.L. (2007). Perchlorate exposure of the US Population, 2001-2002. J Expos Sci Environ Epidemiol 17, 400–407.
- Bodar, C.W., Berthault, F., de Bruijn, J.H., van Leeuwen, C.J., Pronk, M.E., and Vermeire, T.G. (2003). Evaluation of EU risk assessments existing chemicals (EC Regulation 793/93). Chemosphere 53, 1039–1047.
- Bodar, C.W., De Bruijn, J., Vermeire, T.G., and Van der Zandt, P. (2002). Trends in risk assessment of chemicals in the European Union. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 8, 1825–1843.
- Bodar, C.W., Pronk, M.E., and Sijm, D.T. (2005). The European Union risk assessment on zinc and zinc compounds: The process and the facts. Integrated Environ Assess Manage 1, 301–319.
- Bradbury, S.P., Feijtel, T.C., and Van Leeuwen, C.J. (2004). Meeting the scientific needs of ecological risk assessment in a regulatory context. Environ Sci Technol 38, 463A–470A.
- Breithaupt, H. (2006). The costs of REACH. REACH is largely welcomed, but the requirement to test existing chemicals for adverse effects is not good news for all. EMBO Rep 7, 968–971.
- Bridges, J.I. (2007). REACH epilogue. J Expos Sci Environ Epidemiol 17 Suppl 1, S101–104.
- Burton, G.A., Batley, G.E., Chapman, P.M., Forbes, V.E., Smith, E.P., Reynoldson, T., Schlekat, C.E., den Besten, P.J., Bailer, A.J., Green, A.S., et al. (2002). A weight-of-evidence framework for assessing sediment (or other) contamination: Improving certainty in the decision-making process. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 8, 1675–1696.
- CADTSC (2008). California Green Chemistry Inititative Final Report (Sacramento, California Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Toxic Substances Control ).
- Calabrese, E.J., Baldwin, L.A., Kostecki, P.T., and Potter, T.L. (1997). A toxicologically based weight-of-evidence methodology for the relative ranking of chemicals of endocrine disruption potential. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 26, 36–40.
- Calafat, A.M., Wong, L.Y., Kuklenyik, Z., Reidy, J.A., and Needham, L.L. (2007). Polyfluoroalkyl chemicals in the U.S. population: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003-2004 and comparisons with NHANES 1999-2000. Environ Health Perspectives 115, 1596–1602.
- Calafat, A.M., Ye, X., Wong, L.Y., Reidy, J.A., and Needham, L.L. (2008). Urinary concentrations of triclosan in the U.S. population: 2003-2004. Environ Health Perspect 116, 303–307.
- Chapman, A. (2006). Regulating chemicals—From risks to riskiness. Risk Anal 26, 603–616.
- CHEJ (2008). Volatile Vinyl: The New Shower Curtain’s Chemical Smell (Center for Health, Environment, and Justice). http://www.chej.org/showercurtainreport/
- ChemSec (2008). REACH SIN (Substitute It Now) List 1.0. http://www.chemsec.org/list/
- Combes, R., Grindon, C., Cronin, M.T., Roberts, D.W., and Garrod, J.F. (2008). Integrated decision-tree testing strategies for acute systemic toxicity and toxicokinetics with respect to the requirements of the EU REACH legislation. Altern Lab Anim 36, 45–63.
- Communities, Commission of the European Communities. (2001). White Paper: Strategy for a Future Chemicals Policy. http://www.sfc.fr/LivreBlancEU-REACH-01-2.pdf.
- Cranor, C.F. (2004). Some legal implications of the Precautionary Principle: improving information-generation and legal protections. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 17, 17–34.
- CSTEE (2004). Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Toxicity, Ecotoxicity, and The Environment (CSTEE) on the BUAV-ECEAE Report on ‘The Way Forward—Action to End Animal Testing’ (CSTEE).
- de Avila, C., and Sandberg, E.C. (2006). REACH: Better knowledge and better use of chemicals in the European Union. Chimia 60, 645–650.
- DHI (2005). The Impact of REACH on the Environment and Human Health (DG Environment). http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/reach/background/docs/impact_on_environment_report.pdf.
- EC (1967). Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labeling of dangerous substances. http://ecb.jrc.it/legislation/1967L0548EC.pdf.
- EC (1992). Council Directive 92/32/EEC of 30 April 1992 Amending for the Seventh Time Directive 67/548/EEC on the Approximation of the Laws, Regulations, and Labelling of Dangerous Substances, European Commission, ed.
- EC (1993). Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 of 23 March 1993 on the evaluation and control of the risks of existing substances. Official Journal L 084, 005/004/1993, pp. 0001–0075.
- EC (1998). Report on the Operation of Directive 67/548/EEC on the Approximation of the Laws, Regulations and Administrative Provisions Relating to the Classification, Packaging, and Labelling of Dangerous Substances, Directive 88/379/EEC on the Approximation of the Laws, Regulations, and Administrative Provisions Relating to the Classification, Packaging, Labelling of Dangerous Preparations, Regulation (EEC) 793/93 on the Evaluation and Control of the Risks of Existing Substances, and Directive 76/769/EEC on the Approximation of the Laws, Regulations, and Administrative Provisions of the Member States Relating to Restrictions on the Marketing and Use of Certain Dangerous Substances and Preparations (Commission of the European Communities). http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/pdf/report-4-instruments_en.pdf.
- EC (2000). Communication from the Commission on the Precautionary Principle (Brussels, Belgium ).
- EC (2003). Commission Staff Working Paper: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and Restrictions of Chemicals (REACH), Establishing a European Chemicals Agency and Amending Directive 1999/45/EC and Regulation (EC) {on Persistent Organic Pollutants} Extended Impact Assessment (Brussels, Belgium, European Commission ).
- EC (2006). Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2001/21/EC, The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Commission, ed. Official J Eur Union 30.12.2006. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=oj:l:2006:396:0001:0849:en:pdf.
- EC (2008a). Commission Regulation (EC) No 987/2008 of 8 October 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as regards Annexes IV and V, EC, ed. (European Commission). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:268:0014:0019:EN:PDF.
- EC (2008b). Council Regulation (EC) No. 440/2008 of 30 May 2008 Laying Down Test Methods Pursuant to Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH). European Commission, ed. Official J Eur Union. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32008R0440:EN:HTML.
- EC (2008c). Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliment and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EEC, and amending Regulation 1907/2006. European Commission, ed. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:353:0001:1355:EN:PDF.
- EChA (2004). Questions and Answers on REACH, Part II (EChA) 20 March 2009. (http://echa.europa.eu/reach/reach_faq_en.asp ).
- ECHA (2007a). Guidance for identification and naming of substances under REACH. http://guidance.echa.europa.eu/docs/guidance_document/substance_id_en.pdf.
- ECHA (2007b). Guidance on data sharing (ECHA). http://guidance.echa.europa.eu/docs/guidance_document/data_sharing_en.pdf.
- ECHA (2008a). Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment, Chapter R.4: Evaluation of available information (ECHA). http://guidance.echa.europa.eu/docs/guidance_document/information_requirements_r4_en.pdf?vers=20_08_08.
- ECHA (2008b). Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment, Chapter R.5: Adaptation of information requirements (ECHA). http://guidance.echa.europa.eu/docs/guidance_document/information_requirements_r5_en.pdf?vers=20_08_08.
- ECHA (2008c). Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment, Chapter R.6: QSARs and Grouping of Chemicals (ECHA). http://guidance.echa.europa.eu/docs/guidance_document/information_requirements_r6_en.pdf?vers=20_08_08.
- ECHA (2008d). Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment, Chapter R.7a: Endpoint specific guidance (ECHA). http://guidance.echa.europa.eu/docs/guidance_document/information_requirements_r7a_en.pdf?vers=20_08_08.
- ECHA (2008e). Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment, Chapter R.7b: Endpoint specific guidance. http://guidance.echa.europa.eu/docs/guidance_document/information_requirements_r7b_en.pdf?vers=20_08_08.
- ECHA (2008f). Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment, Chapter R.7c: Endpoint specific guidance. http://guidance.echa.europa.eu/docs/guidance_document/information_requirements_r7c_en.pdf?vers=20_08_08.
- ECHA (2008g). Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment, Chapter R.8: Characterization of Dose [Concentration]-Response for Human Health (ECHA). http://guidance.echa.europa.eu/docs/guidance_document/information_requirements_r8_en.pdf?vers=20_08_08.
- ECHA (2008h). Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment, Chapter R.9: Physico-chemical hazards (ECHA). http://guidance.echa.europa.eu/docs/guidance_document/information_requirements_r9_en.pdf?vers=20_08_08.
- ECHA (2008i). Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment, Chapter R.10: Characterization of Dose [Concentration]-Response for Environment (ECHA). http://guidance.echa.europa.eu/docs/guidance_document/information_requirements_r10_en.pdf?vers=20_08_08.
- ECHA (2008j). Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment, Chapter R.11: PBT Assessment (ECHA). http://guidance.echa.europa.eu/docs/guidance_document/information_requirements_r11_en.pdf?vers=20_08_08.
- ECHA (2008k). Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment, Chapter R.14: Occupational exposure estimation (ECHA). http://guidance.echa.europa.eu/docs/guidance_document/information_requirements_r14_en.pdf?vers=20_08_08.
- ECHA (2008l). Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment, Chapter R.15: Consumer exposure estimation (ECHA). http://guidance.echa.europa.eu/docs/guidance_document/information_requirements_r15_en.pdf?vers=20_08_08.
- ECHA (2008m). Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment, Chapter R.16: Environmental exposure estimation (ECHA). http://guidance.echa.europa.eu/docs/guidance_document/information_requirements_r16_en.pdf?vers=20_08_08.
- ECHA (2008n). Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment, Part B: Hazard Assessment (ECHA). http://guidance.echa.europa.eu/docs/guidance_document/information_requirements_part_b_en.pdf?vers=20_10_08.
- ECHA (2008o). Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment, Part C: PBT Assessment (ECHA). http://guidance.echa.europa.eu/docs/guidance_document/information_requirements_part_c_en.pdf?vers=20_08_08.
- ECHA (2008p). Guidance on information requirements and substances in articles, Chapter R.17: Estimation of exposure from articles (ECHA). http://guidance.echa.europa.eu/docs/guidance_document/information_requirements_r17_en.pdf?vers=20_08_08.
- ECHA (2008q). Guidance on monomers and polymers. http://guidance.echa.europa.eu/docs/guidance_document/polymers_en.pdf.
- ECHA (2008r). Guidance on registration (ECHA). http://guidance.echa.europa.eu/docs/guidance_document/registration_en.pdf?vers=26_11_08.
- ECHA (2008s). Guidance on requirements for substances in articles (ECHA). http://guidance.echa.europa.eu/docs/guidance_document/articles_en.pdf.
- ECHA (2009). Companies Submitted Over 2 Million Pre-Registrations by the Deadline (ECHA). http://echa.europa.eu/doc/press/pr_08_54_end_of_%20preregistration_20081202.pdf.
- ECVAM (2007). Statement on the Validity of In-Vitro Tests for Skin Irritation (European Centre for Validation of Alternative Methods, European Commission Joint Research Centre). http://ecvam.jrc.it/ft_doc/ESAC26_statement_SkinIrritation_20070525_C-SEC.pdf.
- ECVAM (2008). Statement on the Scientific Validity of In-Vitro Tests for Skin Irritation Testing (European Commission Joint Research Centre, European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods). http://ecvam.jrc.it/ft_doc/ESAC_Statement_SkinEthic+EpiDerm%20FINAL%200812-01%20SEC.pdf.
- EDF (1997). Toxic Ignorance: The Continuing Absence of Basic Health Testing for Top-Selling Chemicals in the United States (Environmental Defense Fund). http://www.edf.org/documents/243_toxicignorance.pdf.
- Epstein, S.S. (2005). REACH: An unprecedented European initiative for regulating industrial chemicals. Int J Health Serv 35, 1–38.
- Fenner, K., Canonica, S., Escher, B.I., Gasser, L., Spycher, S., and Tulp, H.C. (2006). Developing methods to predict chemical fate and effect endpoints for use within REACH. Chimia 60, 683–690.
- Fentem, J.H., Archer, G.E.B., Balls, M., Botham, P.A., Curren, R.D., Earl, L.K., Esdaile, D.J., Hozhutter, H.G., and Liebsch, M. (1998). The ECVAM international validation study on in vitro tests for skin corrosivity. 2. Results and evaluation by the management team. Toxicol In Vitro 12, 483–524.
- Ferriby, L.L., Knutsen, J.S., Harris, M., Unice, K.M., Scott, P., Nony, P., Haws, L.C., and Paustenbach, D. (2007). Evaluation of PCDD/F and dioxin-like PCB serum concentration data from the 2001-2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey of the United States population. J Expos Sci Environ Epidemiol 17, 358–371.
- Fjodorova, N., Novich, M., Vrachko, M., Kharchevnikova, N., Zholdakova, Z., Sinitsyna, O., and Benfenati, E. (2008). Regulatory assessment of chemicals within OECD member countries, EU and in Russia. J Environ Sci Health 26, 40–88.
- Foth, H., and Hayes, A. (2008). Concept of REACH and impact on evaluation of chemicals. Hum Exp Toxicol 27, 5–21.
- Fuhr, M., and Bizer, K. (2007). REACH as a paradigm shift in chemical policy—Response regulation and behavioural models. J Clean Prod 15, 327–334.
- Furlong, J. (1995). EC approach to environmental risk assessment of new substances. Sci Total Environ 171, 275–279.
- Gade, A.L., Ovrebo, S., and Hylland, K. (2008). Testing REACH draft technical guidance notes for conducting chemical safety assessments—The experience of a downstream user of a preparation. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 51, 168–180.
- Garrod, A.N., Evans, P.G., and Davy, C.W. (2007). Risk management measures for chemicals: the “COSHH essentials” approach. J Expos Sci Environ Epidemiol 17 Suppl 1, S48–54.
- Gerner, I., Schlegel, K., Walker, J.D., and Hulzebos, E. (2004). Use of physicochemical property limits to develop rules for identifying chemical substances with no skin irritation or corrosion potential. QSAR Comb Sci 23, 726–733.
- Girling, A.E., Tattersfield, L., Mitchell, G.C., Crossland, N.O., Pascoe, D., Blockwell, S.J., Maund, S.J., Taylor, E.J., Wenzel, A., Janssen, C.R., et al. (2000). Derivation of predicted No-effect concentrations for lindane, 3, 4-dichloroaniline, atrazine, and copper. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety 46, 148–162.
- Goldstein, B.D., and Carruth, R.S. (2004). Implications of the precautionary principle: Is it a threat to science? Int J Occup Med Environ Health 17, 153–161.
- Gray, G.M., Cohen, J.T., Cunha, G., Hughes, C., McConnell, E.E., Rhomberg, L., Sipes, I.G., and Mattison, D. (2004). Weight of the evidence evaluation of low-dose reproductive and developmental effects of bisphenol A. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 10, 875–921.
- Greim, H., Arand, M., Autrup, H., Bolt, H.M., Bridges, J., Dybing, E., Glomot, R., Foa, V., and Schulte-Hermann, R. (2006). Toxicological comments to the discussion about REACH. Arch Toxicol 80, 121–124.
- Grindon, C., Combes, R., Cronin, M.T., Roberts, D.W., and Garrod, J.F. (2007). An integrated decision-tree testing strategy for skin sensitisation with respect to the requirements of the EU REACH legislation. Altern Lab Anim 35, 683–697.
- Hanekamp, J.C., and Bast, A. (2007). Hormesis in precautionary regulatory culture: Models preferences and the advancement of science. Hum Exp Toxicol 26, 855–873.
- Hansen, S.F., Carlsen, L., and Tickner, J.A. (2007). Chemicals regulation and precaution: Does REACH really incorporate the precautionary principle. Environ Sci Policy 10, 395–404.
- Heiss, C., Hoffman, C., Schulte, C., Tietjen, L., and Frank, U. (2006). Authorities dealing with REACH. Chimia 60, 661–668.
- Hengstler, J.G., Foth, H., Kahl, R., Kramer, P.J., Lilienblum, W., Schulz, T., and Schweinfurth, H. (2006). The REACH concept and its impact on toxicological sciences. Toxicology 220, 232–239.
- Hofer, T., Gerner, I., Gundert-Remy, U., Liebsch, M., Schulte, A., Spielmann, H., Vogel, R., and Wettig, K. (2004). Animal testing and alternative approaches for the human health risk assessment under the proposed new European chemicals regulation. Arch Toxicol 78, 549–564.
- ILGRA (2008). The Precautionary Principle: Policy and Application (UKHSE). http://www.hse.gov.uk/aboutus/meetings/committees/ilgra/pppa.pdf.
- Jayjock, M.A., Chaisson, C.F., Arnold, S., and Dederick, E.J. (2007). Modeling framework for human exposure assessment. J Expos Sci Environ Epidemiol 17 Suppl 1, S81–89.
- Klimisch, H.J., Andreae, M., and Tillmann, U. (1997). A systematic approach for evaluating the quality of experimental toxicological and ecotoxicological data. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 25, 1–5.
- Koch, L., and Ashford, N.A. (2006). Rethinking the role of information in chemicals policy: Implications for TSCA and REACH. J Clean Prod 14, 31–46.
- KPMG (2005). REACH—Further Work on Impact Assessment, A Case Study Approach. http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/reach/docs/reach/kpmg_final_report_en.pdf.
- Kreider, M.L., and Williams, E.S. (2009). Determination of the derived no effect level for styrene: An exercise in interpreting REACH guidance. Toxicologist 2033. Toxicologist 108(1):422. http://www.toxicology.org/ai/pub/Tox/2009Tox.pdf.
- Kriebel, D., Tickner, J., Epstein, P., Lemons, J., Levins, R., Loechler, E.L., Quinn, M., Rudel, R., Schettler, T., and Stoto, M. (2001). The precautionary principle in environmental science. Environ Health Perspect 109, 871–876.
- Krimsky, S. (2005). The weight of scientific evidence in policy and law. Am J Public Health 95 Suppl 1, S129–136.
- Kroes, R., Kleiner, J., and Renwick, A. (2005). The threshold of toxicological concern concept in risk assessment. Toxicol Sci 86, 226–230.
- Kroes, R., Renwick, A.G., Cheeseman, M., Kleiner, J., Mangelsdorf, I., Piersma, A., Schilter, B., Schlatter, J., van Schothorst, F., Vos, J.G., et al. (2004). Structure-based thresholds of toxicological concern (TTC): Guidance for application to substances present at low levels in the diet. Food Chem Toxicol 42, 65–83.
- Kroes, R., Renwick, A.G., Feron, V., Galli, C.L., Gibney, M., Greim, H., Guy, R.H., Lhuguenot, J.C., and van de Sandt, J.J. (2007). Application of the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) to the safety evaluation of cosmetic ingredients. Food Chem Toxicol 45, 2533–2562.
- Lahl, U., and Hawxwell, K.A. (2006). REACH–the new European chemicals law. Environ Sci Technol 40, 7115–7121.
- Lau, C., Anitole, K., Hodes, C., Lai, D., Pfahles-Hutchens, A., and Seed, J. (2007). Perfluoroalkyl acids: A review of monitoring and toxicological findings. Toxicol Sci 99, 366–394.
- Lewis, A., Kazantzis, N., Fishtik, I., and Wilcox, J. (2007). Integrating process safety with molecular modeling-based risk assessment of chemicals within the REACH regulatory framework: benefits and future challenges. J Hazard Mater 142, 592–602.
- Liebsch, M., Traue, D., Barrabas, C., Spielmann, H., Uphill, P., Wilkins, S., Wiemann, C., Kaufmann, T., Remmele, M., and Holzhutter, H.G. (2000). The ECVAM prevalidation study on the use of EpiDerm for skin corrosivity testing. ALTA 28, 371–401.
- Lilienblum, W., Dekant, W., Foth, H., Gebel, T., Hengstler, J.G., Kahl, R., Kramer, P.J., Schweinfurth, H., and Wollin, K.M. (2008). Alternative methods to safety studies in experimental animals: Role in the risk assessment of chemicals under the new European Chemicals Legislation (REACH). Arch Toxicol 82, 211–236.
- Marquart, H., Northage, C., and Money, C. (2007). Exposure scenarios for workers. J Expos Sci Environ Epidemiol 17 Suppl 1, S16–25.
- McCutcheon, P. (1994). Implications of council regulation 793/93 on the evaluation and control of existing substances. Ann Ist Superiore Sanita 30, 367–372.
- Meek, M.E., Sonawane, B., and Becker, R.A. (2008). Foreword: Biomonitoring equivalents special issue. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 51, S3.
- Money, C.D., Jacobi, S., Penman, M.G., Rodriguez, C., De Rooij, C., and Veenstra, G. (2007). The ECETOC approach to targeted risk assessment; lessons and experiences relevant to REACH. J Expos Sci Environ Epidemiol 17 Suppl 1, S67–71.
- Munn, S.J., and Hansen, B.G. (2002). EU risk assessment: Science and policy. Toxicology 181-182, 281–285.
- Munro, I.C., Renwick, A.G., and Danielewska-Nikiel, B. (2008). The Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) in risk assessment. Toxicol Lett 180, 151–156.
- Nicol, A.M., Hurrell, A.C., Wahyuni, D., McDowall, W., and Chu, W. (2008). Accuracy, comprehensibility, and use of material safety data sheets: A review. Am J Ind Med 51, 861–876.
- Norden (2005). Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC), Literature review and applicability (Copenhagen, Denmark, Nordic Council of Ministers ).
- Northage, C. (2005). EASEing into the future. Ann Occup Hyg 49, 99–101.
- OECD (2005). OECD Series on Testing and Assessment Number 34, Guidance document on the validation and international acceptance of new or updated test methods for hazard assessment. D. ENV, ed. http://appli1.oecd.org/icons/flgengm.gif.
- OECD (2007). Report on the regulatory uses and applications in OECD member countries of (quantitative) structure-activity relationship [(Q)SAR] models in the assessment of new and existing chemicals. (Paris, France, OECD ).
- Paustenbach, D., and Galbraith, D. (2006). Biomonitoring and biomarkers: Exposure assessment will never be the same. Environ Health Perspect 114, 1143–1149.
- Pedersen, F., de Bruijn, J., Munn, S., and van Leeuwen, K. (2003). Assessment of additional testing needs under REACH. Effects of (Q)SARS, risk based testing and voluntary industry initiatives (Ispra, Italy, European Chemicals Bureau, Joint Research Centre, European Commission ).
- Peterson, M. (2007). The precautionary principle should not be used as a basis for decision-making. Talking point on the precautionary principle. EMBO Rep 8, 305–308.
- Petry, T., Knowles, R., and Meads, R. (2006). An analysis of the proposed REACH regulation. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 44, 24–32.
- Pratt, I.S. (2002). Global harmonisation of classification and labelling of hazardous chemicals. Toxicol Lett 128, 5–15.
- Renn, O. (2007). Precaution and analysis: Two sides of the same coin? Introduction to talking point on the precautionary principle. EMBO Rep 8, 303–304.
- Rogers, M.D. (2003). The European Commission’s White Paper “strategy for a future chemicals policy”: A review. Risk Anal 23, 381–388.
- RPA (2003). Revised Business Impact Assessment for the Consultation Document, Working Paper 4, Assessment of the Business Impacts of New Regulations in the Chemicals Sector Phase 2. http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/reach/docs/reach/rev_bia-2003_10_29_en.pdf.
- Risk and Policy Analysts (RPA), Sweden (2004). Assessment of the Business Impact of New Regulations in the Chemicals Sector (Prepared for DG Enterprise). http://www.cefic.be/files/Publications/rpa_report_summary.pdf.
- Ruden, C. (2006). What influences a health risk assessment? Toxicol Lett 167, 201–204.
- Ruden, C., and Hansson, S.O. (2006). Improving REACH. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 44, 33–42.
- Sadhra, S., Petts, J., McAlpine, S., Pattison, H., and MacRae, S. (2002). Workers’ understanding of chemical risks: Electroplating case study. Occup Environ Med 59, 689–695.
- Santillo, D., and Johnston, P. (2006). Effect thresholds and ‘adequate control’ of risks: The fatal flaws in the EU council’s position on authorisation within REACH. Environ Sci Pollution Res Int 13, 425–431.
- SCCNFP (2004). The report for establishing the timetable for phasing out animal testing for the purpose of the cosmetics directive issued by ECVAM (30/4/2004) (Brussels, Belgium, Scientific Committee on Cosmetic Products and Non-Food Products Intended for Consumers ).
- Schaafsma, G., Kroese, E.D., Tielemans, E.L., Van de Sandt J.J., and Van Leeuwen, C.J. (2009). REACH, non-testing approaches and the urgent need for a change in mind set. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 53, 70–80.
- Schechtman, L.M. (2007). Internationally harmonized processes for test method evaluation, validation, and regulatory acceptance: The role of OCED guidance document 34. AATEX 14, 475–482.
- Schulz, C., Conrad, A., Becker, K., Kolossa-Gehring, M., Seiwert, M., and Seifert, B. (2007). Twenty years of the German Environmental Survey (GerES): Human biomonitoring—Temporal and spatial (West Germany/East Germany) differences in population exposure. Int J Hyg Environ Health 210, 271–297.
- Scialli, A.R. (2008). The challenge of reproductive and developmental toxicology under REACH. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 51, 244–250.
- Tas, J.W., Balk, F., Ford, R.A., and van de Plassche, E.J. (1997). Environmental risk assessment of musk ketone and musk xylene in the Netherlands in accordance with the EU-TGD. Chemosphere 35, 2973–3002.
- Tickner, J.A., Geiser, K., and Coffin, M. (2005). The U.S. experience in promoting sustainable chemistry. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 12, 115–123.
- Tielemans, E., Warren, N., Schneider, T., Tischer, M., Ritchie, P., Goede, H., Kromhout, H., Van Hemmen, J., and Cherrie, J.W. (2007). Tools for regulatory assessment of occupational exposure: development and challenges. J Expos Sci Environ Epidemiol 17 Suppl 1, S72–80.
- U.S. Senate. (2008). S. 3040: Kid-Safe Chemicals Act of 2008, U.S. Senate, ed. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:S.3040
- USEPA (1998). Chemical Hazard Data Availability Study. What do we really know about the safety of high production volume chemicals?, OPPT, ed. (Washington,DC, USEPA ).
- USEPA (2004). Status and Future Directions of the High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program (Washington, DC, USEPA ).
- USEPA (2007). Statement of Intent on North American Chemicals Cooperation by the North American Ministers for the Environment, USEPA, ed. (Washington, DC, USEPA ).
- Van der Jagt, K., Munn, S., Torslov, J., and De Bruijn, J. (2004). Alternative Approaches Can Reduce the Use of of Test Animals Under REACH. Addendum to the Report “Assessment of Additional Testing Needs Under REACH. Effects of (Q)SARs, Risk Based Testing and Voluntary Industry Initiatives.” IHCP/JRC, ed. (European Commission Joint Research Centre). http://ecb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/documents/REACH/PUBLICATIONS/Reducing_the_use_of_test_animals_under_REACH_IHCP_report.pdf.
- Van der Wielen, A. (2007). REACH: Next step to a sound chemicals management. J Expos Sci Environ Epidemiol 17 Suppl 1, S2–6.
- van Hemmen, J.J., Auffarth, J., Evans, P.G., Rajan-Sithamparanadarajah, B., Marquart, H., and Oppl, R. (2003). RISKOFDERM: Risk assessment of occupational dermal exposure to chemicals. An introduction to a series of papers on the development of a toolkit. Ann Occup Hyg 47, 595–598.
- Verdonck, F.A., Van Sprang, P.A., and Vanrolleghem, P.A. (2005). Uncertainty and precaution in European environmental risk assessment of chemicals. Water Sci Technol 52, 227–234.
- Walker, J.D., Carlsen, L., Hulzebos, E., and Simon-Hettich, B. (2002). Global government applications of analogues, SARs and QSARs to predict aquatic toxicity, chemical or physical properties, environmental fate parameters and health effects of organic chemicals. SAR QSAR Environ Res 13, 607–616.
- Walker, J.D., Carlsen, L., and Jaworska, J. (2003). Improving opportunities for regulatory acceptance of QSARs: The importance of model domain, uncertainty, validity, and predictability. QSAR 22, 346–350.
- Warhurst, A.M. (2006). Assessing and managing the hazards and risks of chemicals in the real world—The role of the EU’s REACH proposal in future regulation of chemicals. Environ Int 32, 1033–1042.
- Watch, C. (2009). European trade unions launch Priority List of 306 chemicals. http://chemicalwatch.com/2006?q=european%20trade%20unions%20launch%20priority%20list%20of%20306%20chemicals.
- Weed, D.L. (2005). Weight of evidence: A review of concept and methods. Risk Anal 25, 1545–1557.
- Wells, M.Y., and Williams, E.S. (2009). The transgenic mouse assay as an alternative test method for regulatory carcinogenicity studies—Implications for REACH. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 53, 150–155.
- Wik, A., and Dave, G. (2009). Occurrence and effects of tire wear particles in the environment—A critical review and an initial risk assessment. Environ Pollut 157, 1–11.
- Winder, C., Azzi, R., and Wagner, D. (2005). The development of the globally harmonized system (GHS) of classification and labelling of hazardous chemicals. J Hazard Mater 125, 29–44.
- Worth, A.P., Bassan, A., De Bruijn, J., Gallegos Saliner, A., Netzeva, T., Patlewicz, G., Pavan, M., Tsakovska, I., and Eisenreich, S. (2007). The role of the European Chemicals Bureau in promoting the regulatory use of (Q)SAR methods. SAR QSAR Environ Res 18, 111–125.
- Wright, L.L. (2001). Searching fee and non-fee toxicology information resources: An overview of selected databases. Toxicology 157, 89–110.