1,167
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor regarding the review article by Yamada et al. (2021) titled “Critical evaluation of the human relevance of the mode of action for rodent liver tumor formation by activators of the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR)”

, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 397-398 | Received 20 May 2022, Accepted 07 Jul 2022, Published online: 14 Sep 2022

References

  • Godoy P, Hewitt NJ, Albrecht U, Andersen ME, Ansari N, Bhattacharya S, Bode JG, Bolleyn J, Borner C, Böttger J, et al. 2013. Recent advances in 2D and 3D in vitro systems using primary hepatocytes, alternative hepatocyte sources and non-parenchymal liver cells and their use in investigating mechanisms of hepatotoxicity, cell signaling and ADME. Arch Toxicol. 87(8):1315–1530.
  • Okuda Y, Kushida M, Kikumoto H, Nakamura Y, Higuchi H, Kawamura S, Cohen SM, Lake BG, Yamada T. 2017. Evaluation of the human relevance of the constitutive androstane receptor-mediated mode of action for rat hepatocellular tumor formation by the synthetic pyrethroid momfluorothrin. J Toxicol Sci. 42(6):773–788.
  • Yamada T, Okuda Y, Kushida M, Sumida K, Takeuchi H, Nagahori H, Fukuda T, Lake BG, Cohen SM, Kawamura S. 2014. Human hepatocytes support the hypertrophic but not the hyperplastic response to the murine nongenotoxic hepatocarcinogen sodium phenobarbital in an in vivo study using a chimeric mouse with humanized liver. Toxicol Sci. 142(1):137–157.
  • Yamada T, Ohara A, Ozawa N, Maeda K, Kondo M, Okuda Y, Abe J, Cohen SM, Lake BG. 2020. Comparison of the hepatic effects of phenobarbital in chimeric mice containing either rat or human hepatocytes with humanized constitutive androstane receptor and pregnane X receptor mice. Toxicol Sci. 177(2):362–376.
  • Yamada T, Cohen SM, Lake BG. 2021. Critical evaluation of the human relevance of the mode of action for rodent liver tumor formation by activators of the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR). Crit Rev Toxicol. 51(5):373–394.