An Examination of the Principles of Influence on Condom Use Decision Making During Casual Sex Encounters

REFERENCES

• American College Health Association. (2012). National college health assessment: Reference group report, Spring 2012. Baltimore, MD: American College Health Association.
   Google Scholar
• Ariely, D., & Lowenstein, G. (2006). The heat of the moment: The effect of sexual arousal on sexual decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 87–98. doi:10.1002/bdm.501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, A., & Hutter, I. (2006) Cultural heuristics in risk assessment of HIV/AIDs. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 8, 465–477. doi:10.1080/13691050600842209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogle, K. A. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating & relationships on campus. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bontempi, J. B., Mugno, R., Bulmer, S. M., Danvers, K., & Vancour, M. L. (2009). Exploring gender differences in the relationship between HIV/STD testing and condom use among undergraduate college students. American Journal of Health Education, 40, 97–105.
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control. (2012). Condoms and STDs: Fact sheet for public health personnel. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/condomeffectiveness/latex.htm
   Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752–760. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, J. A., McNair, L. D., Corbin, W. R., & Williams, M. (1999). Gender differences related to heterosexual condom use: The influence of negotiation styles. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 25, 217–225. doi:10.1080/00926239908403996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnigo, R., Noar, S. M., Garnett, C., Crosby, R., Palmgreen, P., & Zimmerman, R. S. (2013), Sensation seeking and impulsivity: Combined associations with risky sexual behavior in a large sample of young adults. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 480–488. doi:10.1080/00224499.2011.652264
   Google Scholar
• Choi, K., & Gregorich, S. (2009). Social networks influences on male and female condom use among women attending family planning clinics in the U.S. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 36, 757–762. doi:10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181afefc1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B. (1984). Influence: How and why people agree to things. New York, NY: William Morrow.
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B. (1987). Compliance principles of compliance professionals: Psychologists of necessity. In M. Zanna, J. Olson, & C. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario symposium (pp. 165–206). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B. (2007). Influence: The psychology of persuasion (rev. ed.), New York, NY: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitude and attitude change. Annual Review Psychology, 32, 357–404. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.002041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1, 37–46. doi:10.1177/001316446002000104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing-Matibag, T., & Geisinger, B. (2009). Hooking up and sexual risk taking among college student: A health belief model perspective. Qualitative Health Research, 19, 1196–1209. doi:10.1177/1049732309344206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). Process theories of attitude formation and change: The elaboration likelihood and heuristic-systematic models. In A. H. Eagly & S. Chaiken (Eds.), The psychology of attitudes (pp. 305–350). Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College.
   Google Scholar
• Elwood, W. N., Greene, K., & Carter, K. K. (2003). Gentlemen don’t speak: Communication norms and condom use in bathhouses. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 31, 277–297. doi:10.1080/1369681032000132564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmers-Sommer, T. M., Farrell, J., Gentry, A., Stevens, S., Eckstein, J., Battocletti, J., & Gardener, C. (2010). First date sexual expectations: The effects of who asked, who paid, date location, and gender. Communication Studies, 61, 339–355. doi:10.1080/10510971003752676
   Google Scholar
• Flannery, D., Ellingson, L., Votaw, K. S., & Schaefer, E. A. (2003). Anal intercourse and sexual risk factors among college women, 1993–2000. American Journal of Health Behavior, 27, 228–234. doi:10.5993/AJHB.27.3.4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuentes, C. (2011). Breaking the pathways between domestic violence and sexually transmitted infections: A test of two theories.Human Organization, 70, 128–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furman, W., & Shaffer, L. (2011). Romantic partners, friends, friends with benefits, and casual acquaintances as sexual partners. Journal of Sex Research, 48, 554–564. doi:10.1080/00224499.2010.535623
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, N. J., & Cialdini, R. B. (2007). Using social norms as a lever of social influence. In A. Pratkanis (Ed.), The science of social influence: Advantages and future progress (pp. 167–191). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161–178. doi:10.2307/2092623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grady, W., Klepinger, D., Billy, J., & Cubbins, L. (2010). The role of relationship power in couple decisions about contraception in the US. Journal of Biosocial Science, 42, 307–323. doi:10.1017/S0021932009990575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P., & Harper, M. S. (2006). No strings attached: The nature of casual sex in college students. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 255–267.doi:10.1080/00224490609552324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrickson, B., & Goei, R. (2009). Reciprocity and dating: Explaining the effects of favor and status on compliance with a date request. Communication Research, 36, 585–608. doi:10.1177/0093650209333036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennessy, M., Fishbein, M. Curtis, B., & Barrett, D. (2007). Evaluating the risk and attractiveness of romantic partners when confronted with contradictory cues. AIDS Behavior, 11, 479–490. doi:10.1007/s10461-006-9156-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, K., & French, S. (2011). Condom negotiation strategy use and effectiveness among college students. Journal of Sex Research, 48, 1–11. doi:10.1080/00224499.2011.568128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holman, A., & Sillars, A. (2012). Talk about “hooking up”: The influence of college student social networks on nonrelationship sex. Health Communication, 27, 205–216. doi:10.1080/10410236.2011.575540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, S. B., Nolen, S., Applewhite, J., Waiters, E., & Vanderhoff, J. (2007). Condom use behaviours among 18-24 year-old urban African American males: A qualitative study. AIDS Care, 19, 1032–1038. doi:10.1080/09540120701235610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2009). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lapinski, M. K., & Rimal, R. N. (2005). An explication of social norms. Communication Theory, 15, 127–147. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2005.tb00329.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, T. S., Fu, L., & Fleming, P. (2006). Using focus groups to investigate the educational needs of female injecting heroin users in Taiwan in relation to HIV/AIDS prevention. Health Education Research, 21, 55–65. doi:10.1093/her/cyh041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lescano, C. M., Vazquez, E. A., Brown, L. K., Litvin, E. B., Pugatch, D., & Project SHIELD Study Group. (2006). Condom use with “casual” and “main” partners: What’s in a name? Journal of Adolescent Health, 39, 443.e1–443.e7. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.01.003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lewis, M. A., Kaysen, D. L., Rees, M., & Woods, B. A. (2010). The relationship between condom-related protective behavioral strategies and condom use among college students global- and event-level evaluations. Journal of Sex Research, 47, 471–478. doi:10.1080/00224490903132069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2002). Qualitative communication research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Marston, C., & King, E. (2006). Factors that shape young people’s sexual behaviour: A systematic review. Lancet, 36, 1581–1586. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69662-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masaro, C., Dahinten, V., Johnson, J. Ogilvie, G., & Patrick, D. (2008). Perceptions of sexual partner safety. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 35, 566–571. doi:10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181660c43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misovich, S. J., Fisher, J. D., & Fisher, W. A. (1996). The perceived AIDS-preventive utility of knowing one’s partner well: A public health dictum and individuals’ risky sexual behavior. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 5, 83–90.
   Google Scholar
• Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 250–256. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.35.4.250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noar, S. M., Carlyle, K., & Cole, C. (2006) Why communication is crucial: Meta-analysis of the relationship between safer sexual communication and condom use. Journal of Health Communication, 11, 365–390. doi:10.1080/10810730600671862
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opt, S., & Loffredo, D. (2004). College students and HIV/AIDS: More insights on knowledge, testing, and sexual practices. Journal of Psychology, 138, 389–402. doi:10.3200/JRLP.138.5.389-403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, L., Udell, W., Montrose, V., Antoniello, P., & Hoffman, S. (2010). A cognitive analysis of college students’ explanations for engaging in unprotected sexual intercourse. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1121–1131. doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9493-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, E. L., McManus, B., & Hayes, A. (2000). “Hookups”: Characteristics and correlates of college students’ spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 76–88. doi:10.1080/00224490009552023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrick, M., Morgan, N., Maggs, J., & Lefkowitz, E. (2011). “I got your back”: Friends’ understandings regarding college student spring break behavior.Journal of Youth Adolescence, 40, 108–120. doi:10.1007/s10964-010-9515-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, E., Lipkus, I., & Diefenbach, M. A. (2006). The functions of affect in health communications and in the construction of health preferences. Journal of Communication, 56, S140–S162. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00287.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123–192). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scholly, K., Katz, A. R., Gascoigne, J., & Holck, P. S. (2005). Using social norms theory to explain perceptions and sexual health behaviors of undergraduate college students: An exploratory study. Journal of American College Health, 53, 159–166. doi:10.3200/JACH.53.4.159-166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silk, K, J., Parrott, R. L., & Dillow, M. R. (2003). Using theory to guide formative evaluation of “Who’s afraid of franken-food?”: Implications for health message design. Communication Studies, 54, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Sheeran, P., Abraham, C., & Orbell, S. (1999). Psychosocial correlates of heterosexual condom use: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 90–132. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.1.90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stulhofer, A., Bacak, V., Ajdukovic, D., & Graham, C. (2010). Understanding the association between condom use at first and most recent intercourse: An assessment of normative, calculative, and habitual explanations. Social Science Medicine, 70, 2080–2084. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.02.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svenson, G., Ostergren, P., Merlo, J., & Rastam, L. (2002). Action control and situation risks in the prevention of HIV and STIs: Individual, dyadic, and social influences on consistent condom use in a university population. AIDS Education and Prevention, 14, 515–531. doi:10.1521/aeap.14.8.515.24111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teitelman, A., Tennille, J., Bohinski, J., Jemmott, L, & Jemmott, J. (2011). Unwanted unprotected sex: Condom coercion by male partners and self-silencing of condom negotiation among adolescent girls. Advances in Nursing Science, 34, 243–259. doi:10.1097/ANS.0b013e31822723a3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorburn, S., Harvey, S. M., & Ryan, E. A. (2005). HIV prevention heuristics and condom use among African-Americans at risk for HIV. AIDS Care, 17, 335–344. doi:10.1080/09540120412331299762
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131. doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Empelen, P., & Kok, G. (2006). Condom use in steady and casual sexual relationships: Planning, preparation and willingness to take risks among adolescents. Psychology and Health, 21, 165–181. doi:10.1080/14768320500229898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, K., Brown, K., Shen, S., & Tucker, J. (2011). Social network-based interventions to promote condom use: A systematic review. AIDS and Behavior, 15, 1298–1308. doi:10.1007/s10461-011-0020-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstock, H., Berman, S., & Cates, W. (2004). Sexually transmitted diseases among American youth: Incidence and prevalence estimates, 2000. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 6, 6–10. doi:10.1363/3600604
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, R. S., Palmgreen, P., M., Noar, S. M., Lustria, M. L. A., Lu, H. Y., & Horosewski, M. L. (2007). Effects of a televised two-city safer sex mass media campaign targeting high-sensation-seeking and impulsive-decision-making young adults. Health Education & Behavior, 34, 810–826. doi:10.1177/1090198107299700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar