The “Trust” Heuristic: Arguments from Authority in Public Health

REFERENCES

• Allum, N. (2007). An empirical test of competing theories of hazard-related trust: The case of GM food. Risk Analysis, 27(4), 935–946.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, D. (2004). Risk, communication and health psychology. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, D. M., Boyd, E. A., Grossmann, C., & Bero, L. A. (2007). Reporting science and conflicts of interest in the lay press. PLoS ONE, 2(12), e1266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, L. (2002). Reasoning under uncertainty: The role of two informal fallacies in an emerging scientific inquiry. Informal Logic, 22(2), 113–136.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, L. (2004). Analogical reasoning as a tool of epidemiological investigation. Argumentation, 18, 427–444.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, L. (2005). Giving science a bad name: Politically and commercially motivated fallacies in BSE inquiry. Argumentation, 19(2), 123–143.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, L. (2009). Emerging infectious diseases: Coping with uncertainty. Argumentation, 23(2), 171–188.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, L. (2010). Rethinking the BSE crisis: A study of scientific reasoning under uncertainty. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, L. (2011). Considering risk assessment up close: The case of bovine spongiform encephalopathy. Health, Risk & Society, 13, 255–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, L. (2012a). Scaring the public: Fear appeal arguments in public health reasoning. Informal Logic, 32(1), 25–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, L. (2012b). The contribution of informal logic to public health. Perspectives in Public Health, 132(2), 66–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, L. (2012c). The public health scientist as informal logician. International Journal of Public Health, 57, 649–650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, L. (2014). Informal fallacies as cognitive heuristics in public health reasoning. Informal Logic, in press.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Business, Innovation & Skills. (2011). Public attitudes to science 2011. London, UK: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Deurenberg-Yap, M., Foo, L. L., Law, Y. Y., Chan, S. P., Vijaya, K., & Lee, M. (2005). The Singaporean response to the SARS outbreak: Knowledge sufficiency versus public trust. Health Promotion International, 20, 320–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eiser, R. J., Stafford, T., Henneberry, J., & Catney, P. (2009). “Trust me, I’m a scientist (not a developer)”: Perceived expertise and motives as predictors of trust in assessment of risk from contaminated land. Risk Analysis, 29, 288–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frewer, L.J., Howard, C., Hedderley, D., & Shepherd, R. (1996). What determines trust in information about food-related risks? Underlying psychological constructs. Risk Analysis, 16, 473–486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frewer, L.J., Scholderer, J., & Bredahl, L. (2003). Communicating about the risks and benefits of genetically modified foods: The mediating role of trust. Risk Analysis, 23, 1117–1133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. M., Draper, A. K., Dowler, E. A., Fele, G., Hagenhoff, V., Rusanen, M., & Rusanen, T. (2005). Public understanding of food risks in four European countries: A qualitative study. European Journal of Public Health, 15, 523–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackett, A. J. (2008). Risk, its perception and the media: The MMR controversy. Community Practice, 81(7), 22–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haas, J. (2008). Commentary: Epidemiology and the pharmaceutical industry: An inside perspective. International Journal of Epidemiology, 37(1), 53–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilton, S., & Hunt, K. (2011). UK newspapers representations of the 2009–2010 outbreak of swine flu: One health scare not over-hyped by the media? Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 65, 941–946.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. B. (2005). Testing and expanding a model of cognitive processing of risk information. Risk Analysis, 25, 631–650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koplan, J. P., Butler-Jones, D., Tsang, T., & Yu, W. (2013). Public health lessons from severe acute respiratory syndrome a decade later. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 19(6).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, J. T., & Hallman, W. K. (2005). Who does the public trust? The case of genetically modified food in the United States. Risk Analysis, 25, 1241–1252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, G., Cappella, J. N., & Southwell, B. (2003). The effects of news and entertainment on interpersonal trust: Political talk radio, newspapers and television. Mass Communication and Society, 6, 413–434.
   Google Scholar
• López-Navarro, M. Á., Llorens-Monzonis, J., & Tortosa-Edo, V. (2013). The effect of social trust on citizens’ health risk perception in the context of a petrochemical industrial complex. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10, 399–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, A., & Edwards, I. R. (1999). The combined oral contraceptive pill—are poor communication systems responsible for loss of confidence in this contraceptive method?, Human Reproduction, 14(1), 7–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, A. K., & Whalen, M. D. (2009). Public perceptions of the pharmaceutical industry and drug safety: Implications for the pharmacovigilance professional and the culture of safety. Drug Safety, 32, 805–810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paxton, P. (2005). Trust in decline? Contexts, 4, 40–46.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, N. (2008). Corporate influences on epidemiology. International Journal of Epidemiology, 37(1), 46–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, R. G., Covello, V. T., & McCallum, D. B. (1997). The determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication: An empirical study. Risk Analysis, 17(1), 43–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2003). Exploring the dimensionality of trust in risk regulation. Risk Analysis, 23, 961–972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2004). Trust, the asymmetry principle, and the role of prior beliefs. Risk Analysis, 24, 1475–1486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2005). Trust in risk regulation: Cause or consequence of the acceptability of GM food?. Risk Analysis, 25, 199–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimal, R. N., & Lapinski, M. K. (2009). Why health communication is important to public health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 87, 247–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, R., & Calnan, M. (2006). Trust relations in health care—the new agenda. European Journal of Public Health, 16(1), 4–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, L. M., & Steven, W. (2003). On the prevention and treatment of exaggeration. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 18(2), 153–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M., & Cvetkovich, G. (2000). Perception of hazards: The role of social trust and knowledge. Risk Analysis, 20, 713–720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, L. (2001). Limits of knowledge and the limited importance of trust. Risk Analysis, 21 189–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. (1993). Perceived risk, trust and democracy. Risk Analysis, 13, 675–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thirlaway, K. J., & Heggs, D. A. (2005). Interpreting risk messages: Women’s responses to a health story. Health, Risk & Society, 7(2), 107–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todd, P. M., & Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Simple heuristics that make us smart. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 727–741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trumbo, C. W. (2002). Information processing and risk perception: An adaptation of the heuristic–systematic model. Journal of Communication, 52, 367–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (2004). Belief in the law of small numbers. In E. Shafir ( Ed.), Preference, belief and similarity: Selected writings by Amos Tversky ( pp. 193–202). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Viklund, M. J. (2003). Trust and risk perception in Western Europe: A cross-national study. Risk Analysis, 23, 727–738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakefield, A. J., Murch, S. H., Anthony, A., Linnell, J., Casson, D. M., Malik, M., … Walker-Smith, J. A. (1998). Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. Lancet, 351(9103), 637–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton, D. N. (1985). Are circular arguments necessarily vicious?, American Philosophical Quarterly, 22(4), 263–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton, D. N. (1992). Nonfallacious arguments from ignorance. American Philosophical Quarterly, 29(4), 381–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton, D. N. (1997). Appeal to expert opinion: Arguments from authority. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, D. N. (2010). Why fallacies appear to be better arguments than they are. Informal Logic, 30, 159–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M. P., & Eiser, J. R. (2005). Information specificity and hazard risk potential as moderators of trust asymmetry. Risk Analysis, 25, 1187–1198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M. P., & Eiser, J. R. (2006). Marginal trust in risk managers: Building and losing trust following decisions under uncertainty. Risk Analysis, 26, 1187–1203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M. P., Pahl, S., Buehner, M., & Haye, A. (2003). Trust in risky messages: The role of prior attitudes. Risk Analysis, 23, 717–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willard, C. A. (1990). Authority. Informal Logic, 12, 11–22.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, C., Evans, G., Leppard, P., & Syrette, J. (2004). Reactions to genetically modified food crops and how perception of risks and benefits influences consumers’ information gathering. Risk Analysis, 24, 1311–1321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, J. (1995). Appeal to force. In H. V. Hansen & R. C. Pinto ( Eds.), Fallacies: Classical and contemporary readings ( pp. 240–250). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, J. (2004). The death of argument: Fallacies in agent-based reasoning, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Wynia, M. K. (2007). Public health, public trust and lobbying. American Journal of Bioethics, 7(6), 4–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar