REFERENCES
- Gilchrist, A. (2009). The well-connected community: A networking approach to community development. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
- Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.
- Granovetter, M. S. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201–233.
- Hampton, K. N. (2010). Internet use and the concentration of disadvantage: Glocalization and the urban underclass. American Behavioral Scientist, 53, 1111–1132.
- Kim, S., Southwell, B. G., & Slater, J. S. (2011 , May). Socioeconomic disparities in peer referral and information sharing about mammography. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Annual Conference, Boston, MA.
- Koch-Weser, S., Bradshaw, Y. S., Gualtieri, L., & Gallagher, S. S. (2010). The Internet as a health information source: Findings from the 2007 health information national trends survey and implications for health communication. Journal of Health Communication, 15, 279–293.
- Logan, R. A. (1991). Popularization versus secularization: Media coverage of health. In L. Wilkin & P. Patterson ( Eds.), Risky business: Communicating issues of science, risk, and public policy (pp. 43–59). New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
- Southwell, B. G., Slater, J. S., Nelson, C. L., & Rothman, A. J. (2012). Does it pay to pay people to share information? Using financial incentives to promote peer referral for mammography among the underinsured. American Journal of Health Promotion, 26, 348–351.