609
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Effects of Valenced Media Frames of Cancer Diagnoses and Therapies: Quantifying the Transformation and Establishing of Evaluative Schemas

, , , &

REFERENCES

  • American Cancer Society. (2013). Cancer facts and figures 2013. Retrieved from http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@epidemiologysurveilance/documents/document/acspc-036845.pdf
  • Atkin, C. K., Smith, S. W., McFeters, C., & Ferguson, V. (2008). A comprehensive content analysis of breast cancer news coverage in leading media outlets focusing on environmental risks and prevention. Journal of Health Communication, 13, 1–16. doi:10.1080/10810730701806912
  • Borah, P. (2011). Seeking more information and conversations: Influence on competitive frames and motivated processing. Communication Research, 38, 303–325. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01539
  • Clarke, J. N., & Everest, M. (2006). Cancer in the mass print media: Fear, uncertainty and the medical model. Social Science & Medicine, 62, 2591–2600. doi:10.1016/jsocsimed.2005.11.021
  • Cohen, E. L., Caburnay, C. A., Luke, D. A., Rodgers, S., Cameron, G. T., & Kreuter, M. W. (2008). Cancer coverage in general-audience and black newspapers. Health Communication, 23, 427–435. doi:10.1080/10410230802342176
  • De Vreese, C. H., Bloomgaarden, H. G., & Semetko, H. A. (2011). (In)direct framing effects: The effects of news media framing on public support for Turkish membership in the European Union. Communication Research, 38, 179–205. doi:10.1177/0093650210384934
  • Donk, A., Metag, J., Kohring, M., & Marcinkowski, F. (2012). Framing emerging technologies. Risk perceptions of nanotechnology in the German press. Science Communication, 34, 5–29. doi:10.1177/1075547011417892
  • Donovan, R., & Jalleh, G. (2000). Positive versus negative framing of a hypothetical infant immunization: The influence of involvement. Health Education & Behavior, 27, 82–95. doi:10.1177/109019810002700108
  • Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51–58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00336.x
  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Hoffner, C., & Ye, J. (2009). Young adults’ response to news about sunscreen and skin cancer: The role of framing and social comparison. Health Communication, 24, 189–198. doi:10.1080/10410230902804067
  • Jensen, J. D., Moriarty, C. M., Hurley, R. J., & Stryker, J. E. (2010). Making sense of cancer news coverage trends: A comparison of three comprehensive content analyses. Journal of Health Communication, 15, 136–151. doi:10.1080/10810730903528025
  • Johnson, N., & Dickson-Swift, V. (2008). It usually happens in older women: Young women’s perceptions about breast cancer. Health Education Journal, 67, 243–257. doi:10.1177/0027896908097068
  • Keeney, S., McKenna, H., Fleming, P., & McIlfatrick, S. (2010). Attitudes to cancer and cancer prevention: What do people aged 35–54 years think? European Journal of Cancer Care, 19, 769–777. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2354.2009.01137.x
  • Kessler, S. H. & Guenther, L. (2013). Depicted epistemological dimensions in science coverage: How science television programs represent knowledge of molecular medicine. Journal of International Scientific Publications, Media and Mass Communication, 2, 272–290.
  • Lecheler, S., & De Vreese, C, H. (2011). Getting real: The duration of framing effects. Journal of Communication, 61, 959–983. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01580.x
  • Moriarty, C., & Stryker, J. E. (2008). Prevention and screening efficacy messages in newspaper accounts of cancer. Health Education Research, 23, 487–498. doi:10.1093/her/cyl163
  • Niederdeppe, J., Frosch, D. L., & Hornik, R. C. (2008). Cancer news coverage and information seeking. Journal of Health Communication, 13, 181–199. doi:10.1080/10810730701854110
  • O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. (2007). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Health Communication, 12, 623–644. doi:10.1080/10810730701615198
  • O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. (2008). Do loss-framed persuasive messages engender greater message processing than do gain-framed messages? A meta-analytic review. Communication Studies, 59, 51–67. doi:10.1080/10510970701849388
  • O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. (2009). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease detection behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Communication, 59, 296–316. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01417.x
  • O’Keefe, D. J., & Wu, D. (2012). Gain-framed messages do not motivate sun protection: A meta-analytic review of randomized trials comparing gain-framed and loss-framed appeals for promoting skin cancer prevention. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 9, 2121–2133. doi:10.3390/ijerph9062121
  • Price, V., Tewksbury, D., & Powers, E. (1997). Switching trains of thoughts. The impact of news frames on readers’ cognitive responses. Communication Research, 24, 481–506. doi:10.1177/009365097024005002
  • Rivers, S. E., Salovey, P., Pizarro, D. A., Pizarro, J., & Schneider, T. R. (2005). Message framing and Pap test utilization among women attending a community health clinic. Journal of Health Psychology, 10, 65–77. doi:10.1177/135910530504556
  • Rössler, P. (2005). Inhaltsanalyse [Content analysis]. Konstanz, Germany: UVK.
  • Rothman, A. J., Bartels, R. D., Wlaschin, J., & Salovey, P. (2006). The strategic use of gain- and loss-framed messages to promote healthy behavior: How they can inform practice. Journal of Communication, 56, 202–220. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00290.x
  • Ruhrmann, G., Guenther, L., Kessler, S. H., & Milde, J. (2013). Frames of scientific evidence: How journalists represent (un)certainty of molecular medicine in science magazine programs. Public Understanding of Science. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0963662513510643
  • Scheufele, B. (2004). Framing-effects approach: A theoretical and methodological critique. Communications—European Journal of Communication Research, 29, 401–428. doi:10.1515/comm.2004.29.4.401
  • Scheufele, B., & Scheufele, D. (2010). Of spreading activation, applicability, and schemas: Conceptual distinctions and their operational implications for measuring frames and framing effects. In P. D’Angelo & J. A. Kuypers (Eds.), Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 110–134). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Scheufele, D., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda-setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57, 9–20. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00326.x
  • Shen, L. (2010). The effect of message frame in anti-smoking public service announcements on cognitive response and attitude toward smoking. Health Communication, 25, 11–21. doi:10.1080/10410230903473490
  • Slater, M. D., Long, M., Bettinghaus, E. P., & Reineke, J. B. (2008). News coverage of cancer in the US: A national sample of newspapers, television and magazines. Journal of Health Communication, 13, 523–537. doi:10.1080/10810730802279571
  • Statistisches Bundesamt. (2013). Anstieg der Todesfälle im Vergleich zum Vorjahr um 2% [Two percent increase in deaths as compared to the previous year]. Retrieved from https://www.destatis.de/DE/PresseService/Presse/Pressemitteilungen/2013/12/PD13_422_232pdf.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
  • Stryker, J. E., Moriatry, C. M., & Jensen, J. D. (2008). Effects of newspaper coverage on public knowledge about modifiable cancer risks. Health Communication, 23, 380–390. doi:10.1080/10410230802229894
  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–548.
  • Van Gorp, B., Vettehen, P.H., & Beentjes, J. W. J. (2009). Challenging the frame in the news: The role of issue involvement, attitude, and competing frames. Journal of Media Psychology, 21, 161–170. doi:10.1027/1864-1105.21.4.161
  • Winer, B. J., Brown, D. R., & Michels, K. M. (1991). Statistical principles in experimental design (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.