The Influence of Statistical versus Exemplar Appeals on Indian Adults’ Health Intentions: An Investigation of Direct Effects and Intervening Persuasion Processes

References

• Allen, M., & Preiss, R. W. (1997). Comparing the persuasiveness of narrative and statistical evidence using meta‐analysis. Communication Research Reports, 14, 125–131. doi:10.1080/08824099709388654
   Google Scholar
• Baesler, E. J., & Burgoon, J. K. (1994). The temporal effects of story and statistical evidence on belief change. Communication Research, 21, 582–602. doi:10.1177/009365094021005002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, S. M., Salovey, P., Greener, S., Rothman, A. J., Moyer, A., Beauvais, J., & Epel, E. (1995). The effects of message framing on mammography utilization. Health Psychology, 14, 178–184. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.14.2.178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braverman, J. (2008). Testimonials versus informational persuasive messages: The moderating effect of delivery mode and personal involvement. Communication Research, 35, 666–694. doi:10.1177/0093650208321785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosius, H. B., & Bathelt, A. (1994). The utility of exemplars in persuasive communications. Communication Research, 21, 48–78. doi:10.1177/009365094021001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752–766. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, D., & Cox, A. D. (2001). Communicating the consequences of early detection: The role of evidence and framing. Journal of Marketing, 65, 91–103. doi:10.1509/jmkg.65.3.91.18336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper Row.
   Google Scholar
• de Wit, J. B., Das, E., & Vet, R. (2008). What works best: Objective statistics or a personal testimonial? An assessment of the persuasive effects of different formats of message evidence on risk perception. Health Psychology, 27, 110–115. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.27.1.110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., & Peck, E. (2000). Affect and persuasion: Emotional responses to public service announcements. Communication Research, 27, 461–495. doi:10.1177/009365000027004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., Plotnick, C. A., Godbold, L. C., Freimuth, V. S., & Edgar, T. (1996). The multiple affective outcomes of AIDS PSAs: Fear appeals do more than scare people. Communication Research, 23, 44–72. doi:10.1177/009365096023001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., Shen, L., & Vail, R. G. (2007). Does perceived message effectiveness cause persuasion or vice versa? 17 consistent answers. Human Communication Research, 33, 467–488. doi:10.1111/hcre.2007.33.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., Dikshit, R., Eser, S., Mathers, C., Rebelo, M., & Bray, F. (2015). Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. International Journal of Cancer, 136, E359–E386. doi:10.1002/ijc.29210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., Hall-Jamieson, K., Zimmer, E., Von Haeften, I., & Nabi, R. (2002). Avoiding the boomerang: Testing the relative effectiveness of antidrug public service announcements before a national campaign. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 238–245. doi:10.2105/AJPH.92.2.238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, K. M., Updegraff, J. A., Rothman, A. J., & Sims, L. (2011). Perceived susceptibility to breast cancer moderates the effect of gain- and loss-framed messages on use of screening mammography. Health Psychology, 30, 145–152. doi:10.1037/a0022264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, J. B., & Harrington, N. G. (2011). Narrative and framing: A test of an integrated message strategy in the exercise context. Journal of Health Communication, 16, 264–281. doi:10.1080/10810730.2010.529490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701–721. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, K., & Brinn, L. S. (2003). Messages influencing college women’s tanning bed use: Statistical versus narrative evidence format and a self-assessment to increase perceived susceptibility. Journal of Health Communication, 8, 443–461. doi:10.1080/713852118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastall, M. R., & Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2013). Severity, efficacy, and evidence format as determinants of health message exposure. Health Communication, 28, 378–388. doi:10.1080/10410236.2012.690175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public=process2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kazoleas, D. C. (1993). A comparison of the persuasive effectiveness of qualitative versus quantitative evidence: A test of explanatory hypotheses. Communication Quarterly, 41, 40–50. doi:10.1080/01463379309369866
   Google Scholar
• Kopfman, J. E., Smith, S. K., Ah Yun, J., & Hodges, A. (1998). Affective and cognitive reactions to narrative versus statistical organ donation messages. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 26, 279–300. doi:10.1080/00909889809365508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limon, M. S., & Kazoleas, D. C. (2004). A comparison of exemplar and statistical evidence in reducing counter‐arguments and responses to a message. Communication Research Reports, 21, 291–298. doi:10.1080/08824090409359991
   Google Scholar
• Ng, M., Freeman, M. K., Fleming, T. D., Robinson, M., Dwyer-Lindgren, L., Thomson, B., & Gakidou, E. (2014). Smoking prevalence and cigarette consumption in 187 countries, 1980–2012. Jama, 311, 183–192. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.284692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Reinard, J. C. (1988). The empirical study of the persuasive effects of evidence: The status after fifty years of research. Human Communication Research, 15, 3–59. doi:10.1111/hcre.1988.15.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart, A. M., Marshall, H. M., Feeley, T. H., & Tutzauer, F. (2007). The persuasive effects of message framing in organ donation: The mediating role of psychological reactance. Communication Monographs, 74, 229–255. doi:10.1080/03637750701397098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D. (2002). Entertainment education and the persuasive impact of narratives. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 157–181). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D., Buller, D. B., Waters, E., Archibeque, M., & LeBlanc, M. (2003). A test of conversational and testimonial messages versus didactic presentations of nutrition information. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 35, 255–259. doi:10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60056-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D. (1996). Value-affirmative and value-protective processing of alcohol education messages that include statistical evidence or anecdotes. Communication Research, 23, 210–235. doi:10.1177/009365096023002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, M., & Palmgreen, P. (2001). Sensation seeking, perceived message sensation value, personal involvement, and processing of anti-marijuana PSAs. Communication Monographs, 68, 49–71. doi:10.1080/03637750128051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. E., & Thompson, S. C. (1982). Stalking the elusive” vividness” effect. Psychological Review, 89, 155–181. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.89.2.155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project. (2013, September). TCP India project report: Findings from the wave 1 survey (2010–2011). Retrieved from http://www.itcproject.org/countries/india
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs/Population Division. (2014). World Population Prospects: The 2012 Revision Methodology of the United Nations Population Estimates and Projections. Retrieved from http://esa.un.org/wpp/Documentation/pdf/WPP2012_Methodology.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yu, N., Ahern, L. A., Connolly-Ahern, C., & Shen, F. (2010). Communicating the risks of fetal alcohol spectrum disorder: Effects of message framing and exemplification. Health Communication, 25, 692–699. doi:10.1080/10410236.2010.521910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zillmann, D. (2006). Exemplification effects in the promotion of safety and health. Journal of Communication, 56, S221–237. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00291.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar