The Effects of Attractiveness and Source Expertise on Online Health Sites

References

• Allport, C., & Pendley, J. (2010). The impact of website design on the perceived credibility of internet financial reporting. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, 17, 127–141. doi:10.1002/isaf.318
   Google Scholar
• Bates, B. R., Romina, S., Ahmed, R., & Hopson, D. (2006). The effect of source credibility on consumers’ perceptions of the quality of health information on the Internet. Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine, 31, 45–52. doi:10.1080/14639230600552601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britton, B. K., Glynn, S. M., Meyer, B. J., & Penland, M. J. (1982). Effects of text structure on use of cognitive capacity during reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 51–61. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.74.1.51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. (2011). Amazon’s mechanical turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K. (1993). Interpersonal expectations, expectancy violations and emotional communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12, 30–48. doi:10.1177/0261927X93121003
   Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K., Dunbar, N., & Sergin, C. (2002). Nonverbal influence. In J. P. Dillard & M. Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 445–473). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dutta-Bergman, M. (2003). Trusted online sources of health information: Differences in demographics, health beliefs, and health-information orientation. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 5, e21. doi:10.2196/jmir.5.3.e21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2007). The role of site features, user attributes, and information verification behaviors on the perceived credibility of web-based information. New Media & Society, 9, 319–342. doi:10.1177/1461444807075015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogg, B. J. (2003). Prominence-interpretation theory. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI, 03, 722–723. doi:10.1145/765948.765951
   Google Scholar
• Fogg, B. J., & Tseng, H. (1999). The elements of computer credibility. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI, 99, 80–87. doi:10.1145/302979.303001
   Google Scholar
• Hardey, M. (2001). ‘E-health’: The Internet and the transformation of patients into consumers and producers of health knowledge. Information Communication and Society, 4, 388–405. doi:10.1080/713768551
   Google Scholar
• Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion: Psychological studies of opinion change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, H. H., Torcivia, J. M., & Poprick, M. A. (1968). Effects of source credibility on the relationship between authoritarianism and attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2), 179–183.
   Google Scholar
• Jussim, L., Coleman, L., & Lerch, L. (1987). The nature of stereotypes: A comparison and integration of three theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 536–546. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinmuntz, D., & Schkade, D. (1993). Information displays and decision processes. Psychology Science, 4, 221–227. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00265.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunst, H., Groot, D., Latthe, P., Latthe, M., & Khan, K. (2002). Accuracy of information on apparently credible websites: Survey of five common health topics. British Medical Journal, 324, 581–582. doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7337.581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maheswaran, D., & Meyers-Levy, J. (1990). The influence of message framing and issue involvement. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 361–367. doi:10.2307/3172593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, W. (1985). Attitudes and attitudes change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 445–473). New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Metzger, M. (2007). Making sense of credibility on the Web: Modeling for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 2078–2091. doi:10.1002/asi.20672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, M., Flanagin, A., & Zwarun, L. (2003). College student Web use, perceptions of information credibility, and verification behavior. Computer & Education, 41, 271–290. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(03)00049-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. R., & Baseheart, J. (1969). Source trustworthiness, opinionated statements, and response to persuasive communication. Speech Monographs, 36, 1–7. doi:10.1080/03637756909375602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hara, B., Netemeyer, R., & Burton, S. (1991). An examination of the relative effects of source expertise, trustworthiness, and likability. Social Behavior and Personality, 19, 305–314. doi:10.2224/sbp.1991.19.4.305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers’ perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19, 38–52. doi:10.1080/00913367.1990.10673191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, G., Aslani, P., & Williams, K. (2003). How do consumers search for and appraise information on medicines on the Internet? A qualitative study using focus groups. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 5, e33. doi:10.2196/jmir.5.4.e33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R., Cacioppo, J., & Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 135–146. doi:10.1086/jcr.1983.10.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelps, C. (1992). Diffusion of information in medical care. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6, 23–42. doi:10.1257/jep.6.3.23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins, D., & Holmes, J. (2008). Aesthetics and credibility in web site design. Information Processing and Management, 44, 386–399. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2007.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Self, C. S. (1996). Credibility. In M. Salwen & D. Stacks (Eds.), An integrated approach to communication theory and research (pp. 421–441). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Shugan, S. (1980). The cost of thinking. Journal of Consumer Research, 7, 99–111. doi:10.1086/jcr.1980.7.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S. (2008). The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In M. J. Metzger & Andrew J. Flanagin (Eds.), Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility (pp. 73–100).Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press doi:10.1162/dmal.9780262562324.073
   Google Scholar
• Tseng, S., & Fogg, B. (1999). Credibility and computing technology. Communication of the ACM, 42, 39–44. doi:10.1145/301353.301402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wathen, C., & Burkell, J. (2002). Believe it or not: Factors influencing credibility of the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, 134–144. doi:10.1002/asi.10016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener, J., & Mowen, J. (1986). Source credibility, on the independent effects of trust and expertise. Advances in Consumer Research, 13, 306–310.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, K. (2002). Social support within an on-line cancer community: An assessment of emotional support perceptions of advantages and disadvantages, and motives for using the community from a communication perspective. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30, 195–209. doi:10.1080/00909880216586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaichkowsky, J. (1986). Conceptualizing involvement. Journal of Advertising, 15, 4–34. doi:10.1080/00913367.1986.10672999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar