“Are You In or Are You Out?!” Moral Appeals to the Public in Organ Donation Poster Campaigns: A Multimodal and Ethical Analysis

References

• Ab Projekt-PR. Gesellschaft für Öffentlichkeitsarbeit MBH. (2004). Organspende schenkt Leben. Retrieved from http://www.projekt-pr.de/content.php?bereich=projekte&seite=8
   Google Scholar
• Adloff, F., & Mau, S. (2006). Giving social ties, reciprocity in modern society. European Journal of Sociology, 47, 93–123. doi:10.1017/S000397560600004X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almassi, B. (2014). Trust and the duty of organ donation. Bioethics, 28, 275–283. doi:10.1111/bioe.12096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvaro, E. M., & Siegel, J. T. (2010). Where have we been and where to next. A review and synthesis of organ donation media campaigns. In J. T. Siegel & E. M. Alvaro (Eds.), Understanding organ donation. Applied behavioral science perspectives (pp. 43–63). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. (2009). The Nicomachean ethics. In D. Ross & L. Brown Eds., Oxford world’s classics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press (Originally translated 1925).
   Google Scholar
• Atkin, C. K., & Rice, R. E. (2012). Theory and principles of public communication campaigns. In R. E. Rice & C. K. Atkin (Eds.), Public communication campaigns (4th ed., pp. 3–19). London, UK/Thousand Oaks, CA/New Delhi, India: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2013). Principles of biomedical ethics (7th ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• BMG (2013). Plakatmotive der Organspendekampagne. Retrieved from https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/themen/praevention/organspende/plakatmotive-der-organspendekampagne-2013.html
   Google Scholar
• Bramhall, S. (2011). Presumed consent for organ donation: A case against. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 93, 268–272. doi:10.1308/147870811X571136b
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brett, M., Wentzel, D., & Tomczak, T. (2008). Effects of susceptibility to normative influence and type of testimonial on attitudes toward print advertising. Journal of Advertising, 37(1), 29–43. doi:10.2753/JOA0091-3367370103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BZgA. (2013). Organspende Plakatmotiv “Das ist meine Entscheidung.” Retrieved from http://www.bzga.de/bigpix.php?id=0e4300798ec7180dc79158086c911c1f&w=524&h=700
   Google Scholar
• Cattani, A. (2011). Argumentative mechanisms in advertising. Forum Artis Rhetoricae. 1, 85–105. Retrieved from http://www.retoryka.edu.pl/files/far_nr1_art5.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chien, Y. H. (2014). Organ donation posters: Developing persuasive messages. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 4(4), 119–135. Retrieved from http://www.ojcmt.net/articles/44/448.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Coppen, R., Friele, R. D., Gevers, S. K., & Van Der Zee, J. (2010). Donor education campaigns since the introduction of the Dutch organ donation act: Increased cohesion between campaigns has paid off. Transplant International, 23, 1239–1246. doi:10.1111/j.1432-2277.2010.01139.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cribb, A. (2005). Health and the good society. Setting healthcare ethics in social context. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Detlef D! Soost.( nd). Pro mit Detlef D! Soost. Retrieved from http://www.deesworldwide.de/detlef-dee-soost/pro-mit-detlef-d-soost/
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher Bundestag. (2003). Schriftliche Fragen mit den in der Woche vom 3. November eingegangenen Antworten der Bundesregierung. Berlin, Germany: Drucksache 15/1949.
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher Bundestag. (2014). Unterrichtung durch die Bundesregierung: Zweiter Bericht der Bundesregierung über den Fortgang der eingeleiteten Reformprozesse, mögliche Missstände und sonstige aktuelle Entwicklungen in der Transplantationsmedizin. Berlin, Germany: Drucksache 18/7269.
   Google Scholar
• DHZB. (2009). Presse. Das kannst du auch. Retrieved from https://www.dhzb.de/fileadmin/user_upload/deutsche_Seite/aktuell/presse/CLP.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DSO. (2009). Presseinformation. “Fürs Leben. Für Organspende.” wird eigenständige Stiftung. Akzeptanz und Ansehen der Organspende weiter steigern. Retrieved from http://www.fuers-leben.de/fileadmin/user_upload/fuers-leben.de/Presse/Archiv_2009/stiftungsgruendung.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DSO. (2014). Wartekampagne. Retrieved from http://www.fuers-leben.de/informieren/downloads/wartekampagne-2014.html
   Google Scholar
• Ebbesen, M., Andersen, S., & Pedersen, B. D. (2012). Further development of Beauchamp and Childress’ theory based on empirical ethics. Journal of Clinical Research & Bioethics, 3 (1), S6–e001. doi:10.4172/2155-9627.S6-e001
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, R. B. (1989). The principle of utility and Mill’s minimizing utilitarianism. Journal of Value Inquiry, 20, 125–136. doi:10.1007/BF00144539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falomir-Pichastor, J. M., Berent, J. A., & Pereira, A. (2013). Social psychological factors of post-mortem organ donation: A theoretical review of determinants and promotion strategies. Health Psychology Review, 7, 202–247. doi:10.1080/17437199.2011.570516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foot, P. (2001). Natural goodness. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gert, B. (2004). Common morality: Deciding what to do. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2009). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick, London: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Guttman, N. (2000). Public health communication interventions: Values and ethical dilemmas. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Guttman, N., & Ressler, W. H. (2001). On being responsible: Ethical issues in appeals to personal responsibility in health campaigns. Journal of Health Communication, 6, 117–136. doi:10.1080/10810730116864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guttman, N., & Salmon, C. T. (2004). Guilt, fear, stigma and knowledge gaps: Ethical issues in public health communication interventions. Bioethics, 18, 531–552. doi:10.1080/108107301750254466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guttman, N., Siegal, G., Appel, N., & Bar-On, G. (2016). Should altruism, solidarity, or reciprocity be used as prosocial appeals? Contrasting conceptions of members of the general public and medical professionals regarding promoting organ donation. Journal of Communication, 66, 909–936. doi:10.1111/jcom.12267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyllström Krekula, L., Malenicka, S., Linder, M., & Tibell, A. (2009). From words to action: Influence of two organ donation campaigns on knowledge and formal decision making. Clinical Transplantation, 23, 343–350. doi:10.1111/j.1399-0012.2008.00919.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, T., Morgan, S. E., & Chewning, L. V. (2008). The challenges of social marketing of organ donation: News and entertainment coverage of donation and transplantation. Health Marketing Quarterly, 25, 33–65. doi:10.1080/07359680802126079
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heyd, D. (1982). Supererogation: Its status in ethical theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoeyer, K., Jensen, A. M. B., & Olejaz, M. (2015). Transplantation as an abstract good: Practising deliberate ignorance in deceased organ donation in Denmark. Sociology of Health and Illness, 37, 578–593. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.12211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IRODaT (2017). Open data resource. Retrieved from http://www.irodat.org/?p=database
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C., & Oyama, R. (2001). Visual meaning: A social semiotic approach. In T. Van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of visual analysis (pp. 134–156). London, UK/Thousand Oaks, CA/New Delhi, India: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• King, A. J., Williams, E. A., Harrison, T. R., Morgan, S. E., & Havermahl, T. (2012). The “Tell Us Now” campaign for organ donation: Using message immediacy to increase donor registration rates. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 40, 229–246. doi:10.1080/00909882.2012.670258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleindienst, A., Haupt, W. F., & Hildebrandt, G. (1999). Brain death and organ donation in Germany: Analysis of procurement in a neurosurgical unit and review of press reports. Acta Neurochirurgica, 141, 641–645. doi:10.1007/s007010050354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohlberg, L. (1982). Moral development. In J. M. Broughton & D. J. Freeman-Moir (Eds.), The cognitive developmental psychology of James Mark Baldwin: Current theory and research in genetic epistemology (pp. 277–325). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kotler, P., & Zaltman, G. (1971). Social marketing: An approach to planned social change. Journal of Marketing, 35 (3), 3–12. doi:10.2307/1249783
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality. A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images. The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, M. W. (2001). Responsibility for health and blaming victims. Journal of Medical Humanities, 22, 95–114. doi:10.1023/A:1009074811781
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, S. E., & Miller, J. K. (2009). Beyond the organ donor card: The effect of knowledge, attitudes, and values on willingness to communicate about organ donation to family members. Health Communication, 14, 121–134. doi:10.1207/S15327027HC1401_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nashan, B., Hugo, C., Strassburg, C. P., Arbogast, H., Rahmel, A., & Lilie, H. (2017). Transplantation in Germany. Transplantation, 101, 213–218. doi:10.1097/TP.0000000000001554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. (2006). Frontiers of justice. Disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Page (2010). PRO Organspende: Du bekommst alles von mir. Retrieved from http://page-online.de/kreation/pro_organspende_du_bekommst_alles_von_mir/
   Google Scholar
• Rady, M. Y., McGregor, J. L., & Verheijde, J. L. (2012). Mass media campaigns and organ donation: Managing conflicting messages and interests. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 15, 229–241. doi:10.1007/s11019-011-9359-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randhawa, G., & Neuberger, J. (2016). Role of religion in organ donation: Development of the United Kingdom faith and organ donation action plan. Transplantation Proceedings, 48, 689–694. doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.10.074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Arias, D., & Morgan, M. (2016). Nudging deceased donation through an opt-out system: A libertarian approach or manipulation? American Journal of Bioethics, 16 (1), 26–28. doi:10.1080/15265161.2016.1222022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, J., & Yudell, M. (2012). The use of persuasion in public health communication: An ethical critique. Public Health Ethics, 5, 192–205. doi:10.1093/phe/phs019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rychetnik, L., Frommer, M., Hawe, P., & Shiell, A. (2002). Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 56, 119–127. doi:10.1136/jech.56.2.119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schicktanz, S., Pfaller, L., Hansen, S. L., & Boos. (2017). Attitudes towards brain death and conceptions of the body in relation to willingness or reluctance to donate: Results of a student survey before and after the German transplantation scandals and legal changes. Journal of Public Health, 25, 249–256. doi:10.1007/s10389-017-0786-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schicktanz, S., & Wöhlke, S. (2017). The utterable and unutterable anthropological meaning of the body in the context of organ transplantation. Dilemata, 9 (23), 107–127.
   Google Scholar
• Schweda, M., & Schicktanz, S. (2009). Public ideas and values concerning the commercialization of organ donation in four European countries. Social Science and Medicine, 69, 1129–1136. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.12.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweda, M., & Schicktanz, S. (2012). The diversity of responsibility: The value of explication and pluralization. Medicine Studies, 3, 131–145. doi:10.1007/s12376-011-0070-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schweda, M., Schicktanz, S., & Wöhlke, S. (2009). Understanding public skepticism toward organ donation and its commercialization: The important role of reciprocity. Transplantation Proceedings, 41, 2509–2511. doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.06.109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, R. M. (2015). Expanding the conceptual toolkit of organ gifting. Sociology of Health and Illness, 37, 952–966. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.12258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stöckl, H. (2009). The language-image-text. Theoretical and analytical inroads into semiotic complexity. Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 34, 203–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorson, E., & Beaudoin, C. E. (2004). The impact of a health campaign on health social capital. Journal of Health Communication, 9, 167–194. doi:10.1080/10810730490447020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, Y. (2010). Organ donation on Web 2.0: Content and audience analysis of organ donation videos on YouTube. Health Communication, 25, 238–246. doi:10.1080/10410231003698911
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing social semiotics. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesemann, C. (2006). The contribution of medical history to medical ethics. The case of brain death. In C. Rehmann-Sutter, M. Düwell, & D. Mieth (Eds.), Bioethics in cultural contexts (pp. 187–196). Heidelberg, Germany/New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar