Preliminaries to Treatment Recommendations in UK Primary Care: A Vehicle for Shared Decision Making?

References

• Beach, W. A. (1995). Preserving and constraining options: “Okays” and “official” priorities in medical interviews. In B. Morris & R. Chenail (Eds.), Talk of the clinic (pp. 259–289). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, P., & Long, B. E. L. (1976). Physicians talking to patients: A study of the verbal behaviour of general practitioners consulting in their surgeries. Exeter, UK: Royal College of General Practitioners.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, W. B., Beach, L. R., Inui, T. S., Kirscht, J. P., & Prodzinsky, J. C. (1986). Developing and testing a decision model for predicting influenza vaccination compliance. Health Services Research, 20, 897–932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayman, S. E. (2002). Sequence and solidarity. In S. R. Thye & E. J. Lawler (Eds.), Group cohesion, trust and solidarity (Vol. 19, pp. 229–253). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Croskerry, P. (2003). The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them. Academic Medicine, 78, 775–780. doi:10.1097/00001888-200308000-00003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Digital, N. H. S. (2017) Prescription cost analysis, England: 2016. Retrieved from http://content.digital.nhs.uk/catalogue/PUB23631/pres-cost-anal-eng-2016-fact.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H. (1980). Processes of mutual monitoring implicated in the production of description sequences. Sociological Inquiry, 50, 303–317. doi:10.1111/soin.1980.50.issue-3-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2015). Well-prefaced turns in English conversation: A conversation analytic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 88, 88–104. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2015.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2012). Navigating epistemic landscapes: Acquiescence, agency and resistance in responses to polar questions. In J. P. De Ruiter (Ed.), Questions: Formal, functional and interactional perspectives (pp. 179–192). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., Robinson, J. D., Elliott, M., Beckett, M., & Wilkes, M. (2007). Reducing patients’ unmet concerns: The difference one word can make. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22, 1429–1433. doi:10.1007/s11606-007-0279-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jepson, M., Salisbury, C., Ridd, M. J., Metcalfe, C., Garside, L., & Barnes, R. K. (2017). The “one in a million” study: Creating a database of UK primary care consultations. British Journal of General Practice, 67 (658), e345–e351. doi:10.3399/bjgp17X690521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, G. H., Bolden, G., Mandelbaum, J., & Hepburn, A. (2012). Reference recalibration repairs: Adjusting the precision of formulations for the task at hand. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45, 191–212. doi:10.1080/08351813.2012.674190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (2012). Interrogative intimations: On a possible social economics of interrogatives. In J. P. De Ruiter (Ed.), Questions: Formal, functional and interactional perspectives (pp. 11–32). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindström, A. (1997). Designing social actions: Grammar, prosody and interaction in Swedish conversation. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Department of Sociology, University of California Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (2006). Cambridge grammar of English: A comprehensive guide to spoken and written English grammar and usage. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• NICE (2009). Medicines adherence: Involving patients in decisions about prescribed medicines and supporting adherence. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence clinical guideline 76. Retrieved from www.guidance.nice.org.uk/cg76
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, G. (2003). Grammar and social organisation: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review, 68, 939–967. doi:10.2307/1519752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. D. (2003). An interactional structure of medical activities during acute visits and its implications for patients’ participation. Health Communication, 15, 27–59. doi:10.1207/S15327027HC1501_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal Pharmaceutical Society (2013). Medicines optimisation: Helping patients to make the most of medicines. Good practice guidance for healthcare professionals in England. Retrieved from https://www.rpharms.com/Portals/0/RPS%20document%20library/Open%20access/Policy/helping-patients-make-the-most-of-their-medicines.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation (Vol. I). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1980). Preliminaries to preliminaries: “Can I ask you a question?” Sociological Inquiry, 50, 104–152. doi:10.1111/soin.1980.50.issue-3-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2010). Some other “umms.” Discourse Processes, 53(47), 130–174. doi:10.1080/01638530903223380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., & Lerner, G. H. (2009). Beginning to respond: “Well” prefaced responses to WH-questions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42, 91–115. doi:10.1080/08351810902864511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, J. (2005). Parent resistance to physicians’ treatment recommendations: One resource for initiating a negotiation of the treatment decision. Health Communication, 18, 41–74. doi:10.1207/s15327027hc1801_3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., & Barnes, R. K. (2017). Treatment recommendation actions, contingencies and responses: An introduction. Health Communication.
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., & Hayashi, M. (2010). Transformative answers: One way to resist a question’s constraints. Language in Society, 39, 1–25. doi:10.1017/S0047404509990637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., & Heritage, J. (2001). Breaking the sequential mold: Answering “more than the question” during medical history taking. Text, 21, 151–185. doi:10.1515/text.1.21.1-2.151
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., Heritage, J., Barnes, R. K., McCabe, R., Thompson, L., & Toerien, M. (2017). Treatment recommendations as actions. Health Communication.
   Google Scholar
• Tarn, D. M., Heritage, J., Paterniti, D. A., Hays, R. D., Kravitz, R. L., & Wenger, N. S. (2006). Physician communication when prescribing new medications. Archives of Internal Medicine, 25(166), 1855–1862. doi:10.1001/archinte.166.17.1855
   Google Scholar
• Terasaki, A. J. (2004). Pre-announcement sequences in conversation. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 171–224). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, S. A., Fox, B. A., & Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2015). Grammar in everyday talk: Building responsive actions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• West, C. (1990). Not just “physicians’ orders”: Directive-response sequences in patients’ visits to women and men physicians. Discourse & Society, 1, 85–112. doi:10.1177/0957926590001001005
   Google Scholar
• Wheat, H. C., Barnes, R. K., & Byng, R. (2015). Practices used for recommending sickness certification by general practitioners: A conversation analytic study of UK primary care consultations. Social Science & Medicine, 126, 48–58. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.12.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar