2,808
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Effects of Message Framing on Influenza Vaccination: Understanding the Role of Risk Disclosure, Perceived Vaccine Efficacy, and Felt Ambivalence

, &

References

  • Abhyankar, P., O’connor, D. B., & Lawton, R. (2008). The role of message framing in promoting MMR vaccination: Evidence of a loss-frame advantage. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 13, 1–16. doi:10.1080/13548500701235732
  • Bargh, J. A., Chaiken, S., Govender, R., & Pratto, F. (1992). The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 893–912.
  • Bassili, J. N. (1996). Meta-judgmental versus operative indexes of psychological attributes: The case of measures of attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 637–653. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.4.637
  • Casiday, R., Cresswell, T., Wilson, D., & Panter-Brick, C. (2006). A survey of UK parental attitudes to the MMR vaccine and trust in medical authority. Vaccine, 24, 177–184. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.07.063
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2010). Estimates of deaths associated with seasonal influenza-United States, 1976–2007. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 59, 1057–1062.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2013). Prevention and control of seasonal influenza with vaccines: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices—United States, 2013–2014. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 62, 1–43.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016a). Flu vaccination coverage, United States, 2015–16 influenza season. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/flu/fluvaxview/coverage-1516estimates.htm
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016b). Healthy people 2020. Topics & objectives – immunization and infectious diseases. Retrieved from https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/immunization-and-infectious-diseases
  • Chapman, G. B., & Coups, E. J. (1999). Predictors of influenza vaccine acceptance among healthy adults. Preventive Medicine, 29, 249–262.
  • Chatterjee, A., & O’Keefe, C. (2010). Current controversies in the USA regarding vaccine safety. Expert Review of Vaccines, 9, 497–502. doi:10.1586/erv.10.36
  • Conner, M., & Armitage, C. J. (2008). Attitudinal ambivalence. In W. D. Crano & R. Prislin (Eds.), Attitudes and attitude change (pp. 261–286). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Conner, M., Sparks, P., Povey, R., James, R., Shepherd, R., & Armitage, C. J. (2002). Moderator effects of attitudinal ambivalence on attitude–behaviour relationships. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 705–718. doi:10.1002/ejsp.117
  • Costarelli, S., & Colloca, P. (2004). The effects of attitudinal ambivalence on pro-environmental behavioural intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 279–288. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.06.001
  • Cox, A. D., Cox, D., & Mantel, S. P. (2010). Consumer response to drug risk information: The role of positive affect. Journal of Marketing, 74(4), 31–44. doi:10.1509/jmkg.74.4.31
  • Cox, A. D., Cox, D., & Zimet, G. (2006). Understanding consumer responses to product risk information. Journal of Marketing, 70(1), 79–91. doi:10.1509/jmkg.2006.70.1.79
  • Cummings, K. M., Jette, A. M., Brock, B. M., & Haefner, D. P. (1979). Psychosocial determinants of immunization behavior in a swine influenza campaign. Medical Care, 17, 639–649.
  • Davis, J. J. (2000). Riskier than we think? The relationship between risk statement completeness and perceptions of direct to consumer advertised prescription drugs. Journal of Health Communication, 5, 349–369. doi:10.1080/10810730050199141
  • Deshpande, A., Menon, A., Perri, M. I., & Zinkhan, G. (2004). Direct-to-consumer advertising and its utility in health care decision making: A consumer perspective. Journal of Health Communication, 9, 499–513. doi:10.1080/10810730490523197
  • Dormandy, E., Hankins, M., & Marteau, T. M. (2006). Attitudes and uptake of a screening test: The moderating role of ambivalence. Psychology & Health, 21, 499–511. doi:10.1080/14768320500380956
  • Dubé, E., Laberge, C., Guay, M., Bramadat, P., Roy, R., & Bettinger, J. A. (2013). Vaccine hesitancy. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 9, 1763–1773. doi:10.4161/hv.24657
  • Duclos, P., & Hatcher, J. (1993). Epidemiology of influenza vaccination in Canada. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 84, 311–315.
  • Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
  • Fabry, P., Gagneur, A., & Pasquier, J.-C. (2011). Determinants of A (H1N1) vaccination: Cross-sectional study in a population of pregnant women in Quebec. Vaccine, 29, 1824–1829. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.12.109
  • Ferguson, E., & Gallagher, L. (2007). Message framing with respect to decisions about vaccination: The roles of frame valence, frame method and perceived risk. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 667–680. doi:10.1348/000712607X190692
  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Gallagher, K. M., & Updegraff, J. A. (2012). Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A meta-analytic review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 43, 101–116. doi:10.1007/s12160-011-9308-7
  • Gaygısız, Ü., Gaygısız, E., Özkan, T., & Lajunen, T. (2010). Why were Turks unwilling to accept the A/H1N1 influenza-pandemic vaccination? People’s beliefs and perceptions about the swine flu outbreak and vaccine in the later stage of the epidemic. Vaccine, 29, 329–333. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.10.030
  • Gené, J., Espínola, A., Cabezas, C., Boix, C., Comin, E., Martin, A., & Sanz, E. (1992). Do knowledge and attitudes about influenza and its immunization affect the likelihood of obtaining immunization? Family Practice Research Journal, 12, 61–73.
  • Gerend, M. A., & Shepherd, J. E. (2007). Using message framing to promote acceptance of the Human Papillomavirus vaccine. Health Psychology, 26, 745–752. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.26.6.745
  • Hänze, M. (2001). Ambivalence, conflict, and decision making: Attitudes and feelings in Germany towards NATO’s military intervention in the Kosovo war. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 693–706. doi:10.1002/ejsp.57
  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Jonas, K., Diehl, M., & Brömer, P. (1997). Effects of attitudinal ambivalence on information processing and attitude-intention consistency. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 190–210. doi:10.1006/jesp.1996.1317
  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–292. doi:10.2307/1914185
  • Kaplan, K. J. (1972). On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: A suggested modification of the semantic differential technique. Psychological Bulletin, 77, 361–372. doi:10.1037/h0032590
  • Keele, L., & Wolak, J. (2008). Contextual sources of ambivalence. Political Psychology, 29, 653–673.
  • Kennedy, A., LaVail, K., Nowak, G., Basket, M., & Landry, S. (2011). Confidence about vaccines in the United States: Understanding parents’ perceptions. Health Affairs, 30, 1151–1159. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0396
  • Krosnick, J. A., & Petty, R. E. (1995). Attitude strength: An overview. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 1–24). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Lipkus, I. M., Green, J. D., Feaganes, J. R., & Sedikides, C. (2001). The relationship between attitudinal ambivalence and desire to quit smoking among college smokers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 113–133. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb02485.x
  • Lipkus, I. M., Pollak, K. I., McBride, C. M., Schwartz-Bloom, R., Lyna, P., & Bloom, P. N. (2005). Assessing attitudinal ambivalence towards smoking and its association with desire to quit among teen smokers. Psychology & Health, 20, 373–387. doi:10.1080/08870440512331333988
  • Maio, G. R., Bell, D. W., & Esses, V. M. (1996). Ambivalence and persuasion: The processing of messages about immigrant groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 513–536.
  • Mason, M. J., Scammon, D. L., & Fang, X. (2007). The impact of warnings, disclaimers, and product experience on consumers’ perceptions of dietary supplements. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 41, 74–99. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6606.2006.00069.x
  • Mazur, D. J., & Hickam, D. H. (1997). Patients’ preferences for risk disclosure and role in decision making for invasive medical procedures. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 12, 114–117. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.00016.x
  • McCaul, K. D., Johnson, R. J., & Rothman, A. J. (2002). The effects of framing and action instructions on whether older adults obtain flu shots. Health Psychology, 21, 624–628. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.21.6.624
  • Menninga, K. M., Dijkstra, A., & Gebhardt, W. A. (2011). Mixed feelings: Ambivalence as a predictor of relapse in ex-smokers. British Journal of Health Psychology, 16, 580–591. doi:10.1348/135910710X533219
  • Menon, A. M., Deshpande, A. D., Zinkhan, G. M., & Perri, M. I. (2004). A model assessing the effectiveness of direct-to-consumer advertising: Integration of concepts and measures from marketing and healthcare. International Journal of Advertising, 23, 91–118.
  • Molinari, N.-A. M., Ortega-Sanchez, I. R., Messonnier, M. L., Thompson, W. W., Wortley, P. M., Weintraub, E., & Bridges, C. B. (2007). The annual impact of seasonal influenza in the US: Measuring disease burden and costs. Vaccine, 25, 5086–5096. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.03.046
  • Morris, L. A., Mazis, M. B., & Brinberg, D. (1989). Risk disclosures in televised prescription drug advertising to consumers. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 8, 64–80.
  • Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nan, X., Xie, B., & Madden, K. (2012). Acceptability of the H1N1 vaccine among older adults: The interplay of message framing and perceived vaccine safety and efficacy. Health Communication, 27, 559–568. doi:10.1080/10410236.2011.617243
  • Newby-Clark, I. R., McGregor, I., & Zanna, M. P. (2002). Thinking and caring about cognitive inconsistency: When and for whom does attitudinal ambivalence feel uncomfortable? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 157–166. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.2.157
  • Nichol, K. L., & Hauge, M. (1997). Influenza vaccination of healthcare workers. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 18, 189–194. doi:10.2307/30141980
  • Palache, A. (2011). Seasonal influenza vaccine provision in 157 countries (2004–2009) and the potential influence of national public health policies. Vaccine, 29, 9459–9466. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.10.030
  • Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., & DeMarree, K. G. (2007). The Meta-Cognitive Model (MCM) of attitudes: Implications for attitude measurement, change, and strength. Social Cognition, 25, 657–686.
  • Priester, J. R. (2002). Sex, drugs, and attitudinal ambivalence: How feelings of evaluative tension influence alcohol use and safe sex behaviors. In W. D. Crano & M. Burgoon (Eds.), Mass media and drug prevention: Classic and contemporary theories and research (pp. 145–162). Mahwah, NJ: Psychology Press.
  • Priester, J. R., & Petty, R. E. (1996). The gradual threshold model of ambivalence: Relating the positive and negative bases of attitudes to subjective ambivalence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 431–449.
  • Priester, J. R., & Petty, R. E. (2001). Extending the bases of subjective attitudinal ambivalence: Interpersonal and intrapersonal antecedents of evaluative tension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 19–34.
  • Ran, W., & Yamamoto, M. (2015). Attitudinal ambivalence as a protective factor against junk food advertisements: A moderated mediation model of behavioral intention. Journal of Health Communication, 20, 893–902. doi:10.1080/10810730.2015.1018598
  • Rothman, A. J., Bartels, R. D., Wlaschin, J., & Salovey, P. (2006). The strategic use of gain- and loss-framed messages to promote healthy behavior: How theory can inform practice. Journal of Communication, 56, S202–S220. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00290.x
  • Rothman, A. J., Kelly, K. M., Hertel, A. W., & Salovey, P. (2003). Message frames and illness representations: Implications for interventions to promote and sustain healthy behavior. In L. D. Cameron & H. Leventhal (Eds.), The self-regulation of health and illness behaviour (pp. 278–296). New York, NY, US: Routledge.
  • Rothman, A. J., & Salovey, P. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 3–19.
  • Singh, T., & Smith, D. (2005). Direct‐to‐consumer prescription drug advertising: A study of consumer attitudes and behavioral intentions. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 22, 369–378. doi:10.1108/07363760510631101
  • Stewart, D. W., & Martin, I. M. (2004). Advertising disclosures: Clear and conspicuous or understood and used? Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 23, 183–192. doi:10.1509/jppm.23.2.183.51405
  • Thompson, M. M., Zanna, M. P., & Griffin, D. W. (1995). Let’s not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 361–386). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Thompson, W. W., Shay, D. K., Weintraub, E., Brammer, L., Bridges, C. B., Cox, N. J., & Fukuda, K. (2004). Influenza-associated hospitalizations in the United States. Journal of the American Medical Association, 292, 1333–1340.
  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the rationality of choice. Science, 221, 453–458.
  • Van Harreveld, F., Van Der Pligt, J., & De Liver, Y. N. (2009). The agony of ambivalence and ways to resolve it: Introducing the MAID Model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 45–61.
  • Van’t Riet, J., Cox, A. D., Cox, D., Zimet, G. D., De Bruijn, G.-J., Van Den Putte, B., … Ruiter, R. A. C. (2016). Does perceived risk influence the effects of message framing? Revisiting the link between prospect theory and message framing. Health Psychology Review, 10, 447–459.
  • Witte, K., Meyer, G., & Martell, D. (2001). Effective health risk messages: A step-by-step guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Wong, L. P., & Sam, I.-C. (2010). Factors influencing the uptake of 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccine in a multiethnic Asian population. Vaccine, 28, 4499–4505. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.04.043
  • Wu, A. C., Wisler-Sher, D. J., Griswold, K., Colson, E., Shapiro, E. D., Holmboe, E. S., & Benin, A. L. (2007). Postpartum mothers’ attitudes, knowledge, and trust regarding vaccination. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 12, 766–773. doi:10.1007/s10995-007-0302-4
  • Zhao, X., & Cai, X. (2008). The role of ambivalence in college nonsmokers’ information seeking and information processing. Communication Research, 35, 298–318. doi:10.1177/0093650208315959
  • Zhao, X., & Cai, X. (2009). The role of risk, efficacy, and anxiety in smokers’ cancer information seeking. Health Communication, 24, 259–269. doi:10.1080/10410230902805932
  • Zhao, X., & Cappella, J. N. (2008). The influence of ambivalence on adolescents’ reactions to anti-drug messages. Communication Quarterly, 56, 131–148. doi:10.1080/01463370802026885

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.