An Application of the Reasoned Action Approach to Bystander Intervention for Sexual Assault

References

• Ahrens, C. E., Stansell, J., & Jennings, A. (2010). To tell or not to tell: The impact of disclosure on sexual assault survivors’ recovery. Violence and Victims, 25, 631–648. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.25.5.631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albarracín, D., Johnson, B. T., Fishbein, M., & Muellerleile, P. A. (2001). Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 142–161. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: A meta analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471–499. doi:10.1348/014466601164939
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Banyard, V. L., Plante, E. G., & Moynihan, M. M. (2004). Bystander education: Bringing a broader community perspective to sexual violence prevention. Journal of Community Psychology, 32, 61–79. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennet, S., Banyard, V. L., & Garnhart, L. (2014). To act or not to act, that is the question? Barriers and facilitators of bystander intervention. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, 476–496. doi:10.1177/0886260513505210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, A. D. (2004). The social norms approach: Theory, research and annotated bibliography. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, R. (2008). The psychological impact of rape victims. American Psychologist, 63, 702–717. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.63.8.702
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, A., & Rimal, R. N. (2016). Social norms: A review. Review of Communication Research, 4, 1–28. doi:10.12840/issn.2255-4165.2016.04.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015–1026. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huhman, M., Quick, B. L., & Payne, L. (2016). Community college students’ health insurance enrollment, maintenance, and talking with parents’ intentions: An application of the reasoned action approach. Journal of Health Communication, 21, 487–495. doi:10.1080/10810730.2015.1103327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, J. S., Gray, M. J., & Mayer, J. (2013). Addressing sexual assault within social systems: System justification as a barrier to college prevention efforts. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, & Trauma, 22, 493–509. doi:10.1080/10926771.2013.785460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, J., & Moore, J. (2013). Bystander education training for campus sexual assault prevention: An initial meta-analysis. Violence and Victims, 28, 1054–1067. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-12-00113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langton, L., & Truman, J. (2014). Special report: Socio-emotional impact of violent crime (Report No. NCJ 247076). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Lapinski, M. K., & Rimal, R. N. (2005). An explication of social norms. Communication Theory, 15, 127–147. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2005.tb00329.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawyer, S., Resnick, H., Bakanic, V., Burkett, T., & Kilpatrick, D. (2010). Forcible, drug-facilitated, and incapacitated rape and sexual assault among undergraduate women. Journal of American College Health, 58, 453–460. doi:10.1080/07448480903540515
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabry, A., & Turner, M. M. (2016). Do sexual assault bystander interventions change men’s intentions? Applying the theory of normative social behavior to predicting bystander outcomes. Journal of Health Communication, 21, 276–292. doi:10.1080/10810730.2015.1058437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEachan, R., Taylor, N., Harrison, R., Lawton, R., Gardner, P., & Conner, M. (2016). Meta-analysis of the reasoned action approach (RAA) to understanding health behaviors. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 50, 592–612. doi:10.1007/s12160-016-9798-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEachan, R. R. C., Conner, M., Taylor, N. J., & Lawton, R. J. (2011). Prospective prediction of health-related behaviours with the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 5, 97–144. doi:10.1080/17437199.2010.521684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon, S. (2015). Call for research on bystander intervention to prevent sexual violence: The role of campus environments. American Journal of Psychology, 55, 472–489. doi:10.1007/s10464-015-9724-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon, S., & Banyard, V. L. (2012). When can I help? A conceptual framework for preventing violence through bystander intervention. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 13, 3–14. doi:10.1177/1524838011426015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nejad, L. M., Wertheim, E. H., & Greenwood, K. M. (2004). Predicting dieting behavior by using, modifying, and extending the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 2099–2131. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02692.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Planty, M. (2002). Third-party involvement in violent crime, 1993–1999 (Report No. NCJ 189100). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Quick, B. L., Shen, L., & Dillard, J. P. (2013). Reactance theory and persuasion. In J. P. Dillard & L. Shen (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 167–183). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Randall, M. (2010). Sexual assault law, credibility, and “ideal victims”: Consent, resistance, and victim blaming. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 22, 397–433. doi:10.3138/cjwl.22.2.397
   Google Scholar
• Rape, Abuse, & Incest National Network. (2016). Statistics. Retrieved from https://rainn.org/statistics?gclid=CIXQksn3kKcCFRhzgwodMFUSbw
   Google Scholar
• Rimal, R. N., & Lapinski, M. K. (2015). A re-explication of social norms, ten years later. Communication Theory, 25, 393–409. doi:10.1111/comt.12080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimal, R. N., & Real, K. (2005). How behaviors are influenced by perceived norms: A test of the theory of normative social behavior. Communication Research, 32, 389–414. doi:10.1177/0093650205275385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivis, A., & Sheeran, P. (2003). Descriptive norms as an additional predictor in the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis. Current Psychology, 22, 218–233. doi:10.1007/s12144-003-1018-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, R., & Niederdeppe, J. (2015). Using the integrative model of behavioral prediction to identify promising message strategies to promote healthy sleep behavior among college students. Health Communication, 30, 26–38. doi:10.1080/10410236.2013.835215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheeran, P. (2002). Intention-behaviour relations: A conceptual and empirical review. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (pp. 1–36). London, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Sinozich, S., & Langton, L. (2014). Special report: Rape and sexual assault victimization among college-age females, 1995–2013 (Report No. NCJ 248471). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Women’s Health. (2015). Sexual Assault. Retrieved from http://www.womenshealth.gov/publications/our-publications/fact-sheet/sexual-assault.html
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. (2017). Sexual assault. Retrieved from https://www.justice.gov/ovw/sexual-assault
   Google Scholar
• The Washington Post. (n.d.). Sexual assault survivors tell their stories. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/local/sexual-assault/
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2012). Understand and addressing violence against women: Sexual violence. Retrieved from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/77434/1/WHO_RHR_12.37_eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yzer, M. (2012). Perceived behavioral control in reasoned action theory a dual-aspect interpretation. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 640, 101–117. doi:10.1177/0002716211423500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yzer, M. (2013). Reasoned action theory: Persuasion as belief-based behavior change. In J. Dillard & L. Shen (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 120–137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar