Not Just Asking Questions: Effects of Implicit and Explicit Conspiracy Information About Vaccines and Genetic Modification

References

• APPC. (2016). Annenberg science knowledge survey. Annenberg Public Policy Center. Retrieved from www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/wp-content/uploads/ZikaWEEK2Appendix.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2018). See something, say something: Correction of global health misinformation on social media. Health Communication, 33(9), 1131–1140. doi:10.1080/10410236.2017.1331312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogart, L. M., Wagner, G., Galvan, F. H., & Banks, D. (2010). Conspiracy beliefs about HIV are related to antiretroviral treatment nonadherence among African American men with HIV. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes (1999), 53(5), 648. doi:10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181c57dbc
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brossard, D., & Nisbet, M. C. (2007). Deference to scientific authority among a low information public: Understanding us opinion on agricultural biotechnology. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19(1), 24–52. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edl003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byford, J. (2014). Beyond belief: the social psychology of conspiracy theories and the study of ideology. In C. Antaki & S. Condor (Eds.), Rhetoric, ideology and social psychology: Essays in honour of Michael Billig. Explorations in social psychology (pp. 83–94). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Del Vicario, M., Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Petroni, F., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2016). The spreading of misinformation online. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(3), 554–559. doi:10.1073/pnas.1517441113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, A. M., Smallpage, S. M., & Lupton, R. N. (2018). Are all ‘birthers’ conspiracy theorists? On the relationship between conspiratorial thinking and political orientations. British Journal of Political Science ( (Online First)), 1–18. doi:10.1017/S0007123417000837
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, D., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2017). The nature and origins of misperceptions: Understanding false and unsupported beliefs about politics. Political Psychology, 38(S1), 127–150. doi:10.1111/pops.12394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, R. K., & Weeks, B. E. (2017). Epistemic beliefs’ role in promoting misperceptions and conspiracist ideation. PloS One, 12(9), e0184733. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0184733
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imhoff, R., & Lamberty, P. K. (2017). Too special to be duped: Need for uniqueness motivates conspiracy beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(6), 724–734. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2014). The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions. PloS One, 9(2), e89177. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2017). Prevention is better than cure: Addressing anti-vaccine conspiracy theories. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47(8), 459–469. doi:10.1111/jasp.12453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeley, B. L. (1999). Of conspiracy theories. The Journal of Philosophy, 96(3), 109–126. doi:10.2307/2564659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, R. F. (2005, July). Deadly immunity. Rolling Stone. Retrieved from https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/deadly-immunity-180037/
   Google Scholar
• Khanna, K., & Sood, G. (2017). Motivated responding in studies of factual learning. Political Behavior, 40(79), 1–23. doi:10.1007/s11109-017-9395-7
   Google Scholar
• Lantian, A., Muller, D., Nurra, C., & Douglas, K. M. (2016). Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: Validation of a French and English single-item scale. International Review of Social Psychology, 29(1). doi:10.5334/irsp.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantian, A., Muller, D., Nurra, C., & Douglas, K. M. (2017). “I know things they don’t know!”: The role of need for uniqueness in belief in conspiracy theories. Social Psychology, 48(3), 160–173. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lind, F., Gruber, M., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2017). Content analysis by the crowd: Assessing the usability of crowdsourcing for coding latent constructs. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(3), 191–209. doi:10.1080/19312458.2017.1317338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lull, R. B., Akin, H., Hallman, W. K., Brossard, D., & Jamieson, K. H. (2018). Modeling risk perceptions, benefit perceptions, and approval of releasing genetically engineered mosquitoes as a response to Zika virus (Working paper). Philadelphia, PA: Annenberg Public Policy Center.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, M., & Harris, J. (1997). Individual differences in the pursuit of self-uniqueness through consumption. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(21), 1861–1883. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb01629.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, B. A. (2017). When readers believe journalists: Effects of adjudication in varied dispute contexts. International Journal of Public Opinion Research ( (Online First)), 1–24. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edx013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2017). Combatting misinformation requires recognizing its types and the factors that facilitate its spread and resonance. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(4), 389–396. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. M., Saunders, K. L., & Farhart, C. E. (2016). Conspiracy endorsement as motivated reasoning: The moderating roles of political knowledge and trust. American Journal of Political Science, 60(4), 824–844. doi:10.1111/ajps.12234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mummolo, J., & Peterson, E. (2018). Demand effects in survey experiments: An empirical assessment. Working paper. Retrieved from https://scholar.princeton.edu/jmummolo/publications/demand-effects-survey-experiments-empirical-assessment
   Google Scholar
• Novak, M. (2017, July). Fox News is ‘just asking questions’ about the safety of vaccines. Gizmodo. Retrieved from https://gizmodo.com/fox-news-is-just-asking-questions-about-the-safety-of-v-1796802398
   Google Scholar
• Nyhan, B., Dickinson, F., Dudding, S., Dylgjeri, E., Neiley, E., Pullerits, C., … Walmsley, C. (2016). Classified or coverup? The effect of redactions on conspiracy theory beliefs. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 3(2), 109–123. doi:10.1017/XPS.2015.21
   Google Scholar
• Nyhan, B., Porter, E., Reifler, J., & Wood, T. (n.d.). Taking corrections literally but not seriously? The effects of information on factual beliefs and candidate favorability. Working paper. Retrieved from https://www.dartmouth.edu/~nyhan/trump-corrections.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32(2), 303–330. doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., & Ubel, P. A. (2013). The hazards of correcting myths about health care reform. Medical Care, 51(2), 127–132. doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e318279486b
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J. (1997). Standpoint explicitness and persuasive effect: A meta-analytic review of the effects of varying conclusion articulation in persuasive messages. Argumentation and Advocacy, 34(1), 1–12. doi:10.1080/00028533.1997.11978023
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, J. E., & Wood, T. (2014b). Medical conspiracy theories and health behaviors in the United States. JAMA Internal Medicine, 174(5), 817–818. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, J. E., & Wood, T. J. (2014a). Conspiracy theories and the paranoid style (s) of mass opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 952–966. doi:10.1111/ajps.12084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswald, S. (2016). Conspiracy and bias: Argumentative features and persuasiveness of conspiracy theories. OSSA Conference Archive, 168, 1–16. Retrieved from https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA11/papersandcommentaries/168
   Google Scholar
• Patel, N. (2017). The cognitive reflection test: A measure of intuition/reflection, numeracy, and insight problem solving, and the implications for understanding real-world judgments and beliefs ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Missouri, Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2018). Who falls for fake news? The roles of analytic thinking, motivated reasoning, political ideology, and bullshit receptivity. Working paper. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3023545
   Google Scholar
• Pingree, R. J. (2011). Effects of unresolved factual disputes in the news on epistemic political efficacy. Journal of Communication, 61(1), 22–47. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01525.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prooijen, J.-W., Douglas, K. M., & De Inocencio, C. (2017). Connecting the dots: Illusory pattern perception predicts belief in conspiracies and the supernatural. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 320–335. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raab, M. H., Auer, N., Ortlieb, S. A., & Carbon, -C.-C. (2013). The Sarrazin effect: The presence of absurd statements in conspiracy theories makes canonical information less plausible. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 453–460. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rich, P. R., & Zaragoza, M. S. (2016). The continued influence of implied and explicitly stated misinformation in news reports. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(1), 62–74. doi:10.1037/xlm0000155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, K. L. (2017). The impact of elite frames and motivated reasoning on beliefs in a global warming conspiracy: The promise and limits of trust. Research & Politics, 4(3), 1–9. doi:10.1177/2053168017717602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuman, H., & Presser, S. (1980). Public opinion and public ignorance: The fine line between attitudes and nonattitudes. American Journal of Sociology, 85(5), 1214–1225. doi:10.1086/227131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seay, L. (2017, October). Liberals, do not try to turn Niger into Trump’s Benghazi. Slate Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/foreigners/2017/10/do_not_try_to_turn_niger_into_trump_s_benghazi.html
   Google Scholar
• Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420–428. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southwell, B. (2017). Promoting popular understanding of science and health through social networks. In K. H. Jamieson, D. Kahan, & D. A. Scheufele (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the science of science communication (pp. 223–230). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Southwell, B. G., Thorson, E. A., & Sheble, L. (2018). Misinformation and mass audiences. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Starbird, K. (2017). Examining the alternative media ecosystem through the production of alternative narratives of mass shooting events on Twitter. In ICWSM Proceedings (pp. 230–239). Retrieved from https://faculty.washington.edu/kstarbi/Alt_Narratives_ICWSM17-CameraReady.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Starbird, K., Spiro, E., Edwards, I., Zhou, K., Maddock, J., & Narasimhan, S. (2016). Could this be true? I think so! Expressed uncertainty in online rumoring. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 360–371). Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2858551
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, K. S., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2016). Investigating an alternate form of the cognitive reflection test. Judgment and Decision Making, 11(1), 99–113. Retrieved from http://journal.sjdm.org/15/151029/jdm151029.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uscinski, J. E., Klofstad, C., & Atkinson, M. D. (2016). What drives conspiratorial beliefs? The role of informational cues and predispositions. Political Research Quarterly, 69(1), 57–71. doi:10.1177/1065912915621621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151. doi:10.1126/science.aap9559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vraga, E. K., & Bode, L. (2017). Using expert sources to correct health misinformation in social media. Science Communication, 39(5), 621–645. doi:10.1177/1075547017731776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, M. J., & Douglas, K. M. (2013). “What about Building 7?” A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 409–418. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, M. J., Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2012). Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(6), 767–773. doi:10.1177/1948550611434786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, T., & Porter, E. (2018). The elusive backfire effect: Mass attitudes’ steadfast factual adherence. Political Behavior ( (Online First)), 1–29. doi:10.1007/s11109-018-9443-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar