How Inter-Disciplinary Group Members Manage Communication Challenges When Providing Hospice Care: An Application of Problematic Integration Theory

References

• Aldridge, M., & Barton, E. (2007). Establishing terminal status in end-of-life discussions. Qualitative Health Research, 17, 908–918. doi:10.1177/1049732307299995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babrow, A., Hines, S. C., & Kasch, C. R. (2000). Managing uncertainty in illness explanation: An application of problematic integration theory. In B. B. Whaley (Ed.), Explaining illness: Research, theory, and strategies (pp. 41–67). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Babrow, A. S. (1992). Communication and problematic integration: Understanding diverging probability and value, ambiguity, ambivalence, and impossibility. Communication Theory, 2, 95–130. doi:10.1111/comt.1992.2.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Babrow, A. S. (2001). Uncertainty, value, communication, and problematic integration. Journal of Communication, 51, 553–573. doi:10.1093/joc/51.3.553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babrow, A. S. (2007). Problematic integration theory. In B. B. Whaley & W. Samter (Eds.), Explaining communication: Contemporary theories and exemplars (pp. 197–221). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Babrow, A. S., & Matthias, M. S. (2009). Generally unseen challenges in uncertainty management: An application of problematic integration theory. In T. D. Afifi & W. A. Afifi (Eds.), Uncertainty, information management, and disclosure decisions: Theories and applications (pp. 9–25). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Beauchamp, T., & Childress, J. (2009). Principles of biomedical ethics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Center for the Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2010). Medicare hospice benefits. Baltimore, Md: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, R., & Delia, J. (1979). TOPOI and rhetorical competence. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 65, 187–206. doi:10.1080/00335637909383470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. L. (2009). Naming and claiming cancer among African American women: An application of problematic integration theory. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37, 397–417. doi:10.1080/00909880903233176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13, 3–21. doi:10.1007/BF00988593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (Second ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, M. R., Kunkel, A., & Keyton, J. (2008). Problematic integration theory, appraisal theory, and the bosom buddies breast cancer support group. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36, 415–436. doi:10.1080/00909880802094315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figley, C. R. (2002). Compassion fatigue: Psychotherapists’ chronic lack of self care. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58(11), 1433–1441. doi:10.1002/jclp.10090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J. J., Johnston, M., Robertson, C., Glidewella, L., Entwistle, V., Eccles, M., & Grimshaw, J. (2010). What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychology and Health, 2(10), 1229–1245. doi:10.1080/08870440903194015
   Google Scholar
• Gill, E. A., & Babrow, A. S. (2007). To hope or to know: Coping with uncertainty and ambivalence in women’s magazine breast cancer articles. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 35, 133–155. doi:10.1080/00909880701263029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilstrap, C., & White, Z. (2015). Interactional communication challenges in end-of-life care: Dialectical tensions and management strategies experienced by home hospice nurses. Health Communication, 30, 525–535. doi:10.1080/10410236.2013.868966
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groopman, J. (2004). The anatomy of hope: How people prevail in the face of illness. New York, NY: Random House Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Hines, S. C., Babrow, A. S., Badzek, L., & Moss, A. (1997). Communication and problematic integration in end-of-life decisions: Dialysis decisions among the elderly. Health Communication, 9, 199–217. doi:10.1207/s15327027hc0903_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hines, S. C., Babrow, A. S., Badzek, L., & Moss, A. (2001). From coping with life to coping with death: Problematic integration for the seriously ill elderly. Health Communication, 13, 327–342. doi:10.1207/S15327027HC1303_6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkscey, R. (2017). Patient decision aids for prenatal genetic testing: Probability, embodiment, and problematic integration. Health Communication, 32, 568–577. doi:10.1080/10410236.2016.1140500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, D. G., & Tobin, D. R. (2000). End-of-life conversations: Evolving practice and theory. JAMA, 284(12), 1573–1578. doi:10.1001/jama.284.12.1573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfmark, R., Nilstun, T., & Ågren Bolmsjö, I. (2007). From cure to palliation: Concept, decision and acceptance. Journal of Medical Ethics, 33(12), 685–688. doi:10.1136/jme.2006.018895
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, H., Lin, M., & Castle, N. G. (2012). The correlates of nursing staff turnover in home and hospice agencies: 2007 National home and hospice care survey. Research on Aging, 35, 375–392. doi:10.1177/0164027512443072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melvin, C. S. (2012). Professional compassion fatigue: What is the true cost of nurses caring for the dying? International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 18, 606–611. doi:10.12968/ijpn.2012.18.12.606
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization. (2015). NHPCO’s facts and figures: Hospice care in America. Retrieved from http://www.nhpco.org/sites/default/files/public/Statistics_Research/2015_Facts_Figures.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization. (2018). NHPCO’s facts and figures: Hospice care in America. Retrieved from https://www.nhpco.org/press-room/press-releases/new-facts-figures-report-1
   Google Scholar
• Ohnsorge, K., Keller, H. R. G., Widdershoven, G. A. M., & Rehmann-Sutter, C. (2012). ‘Ambivalence’ at the end of life: How to understand patients’ wishes ethically. Nursing Ethics, 19(5), 629–641. doi:10.1177/0969733011436206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payer, L. (1996). Medicine & culture: Varieties of treatment in the United States, England, West Germany, and France. New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Pevey, C. (2005). Patient speaking: Hospice patients discuss their care. American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine, 22, 129–133. doi:10.1177/104990910502200209
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Planalp, S., & Trost, M. (2008). Communication issues at the end of life: Reports from hospice volunteers. Health Communication, 23, 222–233. doi:10.1080/10410230802055331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polk, D. M. (2005). Communication and family caregiving for Alzheimer’s dementia: Linking attributions and problematic integration. Health Communication, 18, 257–273. doi:10.1207/s15327027hc1803_4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, A. M., & Caughlin, J. P. (2012). Managing multiple goals in family discourse about end-of-life decisions. Research on Aging, 34(6), 670–691. doi:10.117/0164027512446942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, X., & Babrow, A. S. (2007). Challenges of adolescent and young adult Chinese American identity construction: An application of problematic integration theory. Western Journal of Communication, 316–335. doi:10.1080/10570310701672935
   Google Scholar
• Waldrop, D. P., & Rinfrette, E. S. (2009). Making the transition to hospice: Exploring hospice professionals’ perspectives. Death Studies, 33, 557–580. doi:10.1080/07481180902961187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, S. (2010). Memorandum report. Questionable billing for physician services for hospice beneficiaries (DHHS Publication No. OEI-02-06-00224). Washington DC: Office of inspector General.
   Google Scholar