Respected as a Client, Cared for as a Patient: Evidence of Heuristic Decision-Making from Yelp Reviews of Obstetrician-Gynecologists

References

• Chaiken, S., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and. Unintended Thought, 212, 212–252.
   Google Scholar
• Dhami, M. K. (2003). Psychological models of professional decision making. Psychological Science, 14(2), 175–180. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.01438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, C., Lennox, L., & Bell, D. (2013). A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness. BMJ Open, 3(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engstrom, S., & Madlon-Kay, D. J. (1998). Choosing a family physician. What do patients want to know? Minnesota Medicine, 81(12), 22–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fischer, S., Pelka, S., & Riedl, R. (2015). Understanding patients’ decision-making strategies in hospital choice: Literature review and a call for experimental research. Cogent Psychology, 2(1), 1116758. doi:10.1080/23311908.2015.1116758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freelon, D. (2013). Recal OIR: Ordinal, interval, and ratio intercoder reliability as a web service. International Journal of Internet Science, 8(1), 10–16.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, G. G., McCullough, J. S., Agarwal, R., & Jha, A. K. (2012). A changing landscape of physician quality reporting: Analysis of patients’ online ratings of their physicians over a 5-year period. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14(1), e38. doi:10.2196/jmir.2003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 451–482. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gretzel, U., & Yoo, K. H. (2008). What motivates consumers to write online travel reviews? Information Technology & Tourism, 10(4), 283–295.
   Google Scholar
• Guile, M. W., Schnatz, P. F., & O‘Sullivan, D. M. (2007). Relative importance of gender in patients‘ selection of an obstetrics and gynecology provider. Connecticut Medicine, 71(6), 325–332.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hanauer, D. A., Zheng, K., Singer, D. C., Gebremariam, A., & Davis, M. M. (2014). Public awareness, perception, and use of online physician rating sites. JAMA, 311(7), 734–735. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.283194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38–52. doi:10.1002/dir.10073
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, A., Comp, S., Horovitz, J., Hovarter, M., Miki, M., & Bevan, J. L. (2012). Why people use Yelp. com: An exploration of uses and gratifications. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2274–2279. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, E., & Gardiner, B. (2002). Concato J: Do women prefer female obstetricians? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 99, 1031–1035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. M., Schnatz, P. F., Kelsey, A. M., & Ohannessian, C. M. (2005). Do women prefer care from female or male obstetrician-gynecologists? A study of patient gender preference. The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, 105(8), 369–379.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kadry, B., Chu, L. F., Kadry, B., Gammas, D., & Macario, A. (2011). Analysis of 4999 online physician ratings indicates that most patients give physicians a favorable rating. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(4). doi:10.2196/jmir.1658
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinast, R. M., Barker, G. T., Day, S. H., Gardiner, S. K., & Mansberger, S. L. (2014). Factors related to online patient satisfaction with ophthalmologists. Ophthalmology, 121(9), 1843–1845. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.04.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagu, T., Hannon, N. S., Rothberg, M. B., & Lindenauer, P. K. (2010). Patients’ evaluations of health care providers in the era of social networking: An analysis of physician-rating websites. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25(9), 942–946. doi:10.1007/s11606-010-1383-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López, A., Detz, A., Ratanawongsa, N., & Sarkar, U. (2012). What patients say about their doctors online: A qualitative content analysis. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 27(6), 685–692. doi:10.1007/s11606-011-1956-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubalin, J. S., & Harris-Kojetin, L. D. (1999). What do consumers want and need to know in making health care choices? Medical Care Research and Review, 56(1_suppl), 67–102. doi:10.1177/1077558799056001S04
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marewski, J. N., & Gigerenzer, G. (2012). Heuristic decision making in medicine. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 14(1), 77.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perrault, E. K., Silk, K. J., Totzkay, D., Sheff, S., Ahn, J., & Hoffman, A. (2015). Reasons behind students’ choices of primary care physicians: Finding ways to improve information about physicians online. Journal of Communication in Healthcare, 8(1), 67–75. doi:10.1179/1753807615Y.0000000003
   Google Scholar
• Perrault, E. K., & Smreker, K. C. (2013). What can we learn from physicians‘ online biographies to help in choosing a doctor? Not much. A content analysis of primary care physician biographies. Journal of Communication in Healthcare, 6(2), 122–127. doi:10.1179/1753807612Y.0000000027
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Socialpsychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123–205). New York: Academic Press..
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2016). Online shopping and e-commerce. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/12/19/online-reviews/
   Google Scholar
• Ranard, B. L., Werner, R. M., Antanavicius, T., Schwartz, H. A., Smith, R. J., Meisel, Z. F., … Merchant, R. M. (2016). Yelp reviews of hospital care can supplement and inform traditional surveys of the patient experience of care. Health Affairs, 35(4), 697–705. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riemer, C., Doctor, M., & Dellavalle, R. P. (2016). Analysis of online ratings of dermatologists. JAMA dermatology, 152(2), 218–219. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.2344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothenfluh, F., & Schulz, P. J. (2017). Physician rating websites: What aspects are important to identify a good doctor, and are patients capable of assessing them? A mixed-methods approach including physicians’ and health care consumers’ perspectives. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(5), e127. doi:10.2196/jmir.6875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, N., & Loberg, K. (2018). Hype: A doctor‘s guide to medical myths, exaggerated claims, and bad advice-how to tell what‘s real and what‘s not. New York, NY: St. Martin‘s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sofaer, S., & Firminger, K. (2005). Patient perceptions of the quality of health services. Annual Review of Public Health, 26, 513–559. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.25.050503.153958
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran, N. N., & Lee, J. (2017). Online reviews as health data: Examining the association between availability of health care services and patient star ratings exemplified by the yelp academic dataset. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 3(3). doi:10.2196/publichealth.8312
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. doi:10.1126/science.185.4148.340-a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yelp. (2018). About us. Retrieved from https://www.yelp.com/about
   Google Scholar