References
- Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665–694. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250951
- Beuckels, E., & Hudders, L. (2016). An experimental study to investigate the impact of image interactivity on the perception of luxury in an online shopping context. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 33, 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.08.014
- Blondé, J., & Girandola, F. (2018). Self-relevant threatening messages promote vigilance toward coping information: Evidence of positive processing at attentional level. Social Cognition, 36(4), 411–441. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2018.36.4.411
- Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2006). Fundamental processes leading to attitude change: Implications for cancer prevention communications. Journal of Communication, 56(1), S81–S104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00284.x
- Cano, M. B., Perry, P., Ashman, R., & Waite, K. (2017). The influence of image interactivity upon user engagement when using mobile touch screens. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 406–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.042
- Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 752. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752
- Chan, T. K., Zheng, X., Cheung, C. M., Lee, M. K., & Lee, Z. W. (2014). Antecedents and consequences of customer engagement in online brand communities. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 2(2), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1057/jma.2014.9
- Corona, F., Cozzarelli, C., Palumbo, C., & Sibilio, M. (2013). Information technology and edutainment: Education and entertainment in the age of interactivity. International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence (IJDLDC), 4(1), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.4018/jdldc.2013010102
- Dinoff, B. L., & Kowalski, R. M. (1999). Reducing AIDS risk behavior: The combined efficacy of protection motivation theory and the elaboration likelihood model. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18(2), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1999.18.2.223
- Fischhoff, B. (2012). Risk perception and communication. In B. Fischhoff (Eds.), Risk Analysis and Human Behavior (pp. 3 – 32). Earthscan. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203140710
- Fischhoff, B. (2013). Risk perception and communication. In Risk analysis and human behavior. Routledge.
- Hales, C. M., Carroll M. D., Fryar C. D., & Ogden C. L. (2020). Prevalence of obesity and severe obesity among adults: United States, 2017–2018. NCHS Data Brief. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db360.htm
- Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression‐based approach. Guilford Press.
- Herman, L., & Stachoň, Z. (2018). Controlling 3D geovisualizations on touch screen—The role of users age and gestures intuitiveness. In T. Bandrova & M. Konecný (Eds.), 7th International Conference on Cartography and GIS (pp. 473–480).
- Jia, H. (2014). Big data or small stories? Exemplification and interactivity effects on shaping perception and attitude of social issues. Doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University. The Pennsylvania State University library. https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/files/final_submissions/10319
- Juszczyk, D., Gillison, F. B., & Dean, S. (2014). Can media images of obese people undermine health messages? An experimental study of visual representation and risk perception. European Journal of Public Health, 24(6), 930–935. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cku064
- Lee, E. J., & Kim, Y. W. (2016). Effects of infographics on news elaboration, acquisition, and evaluation: Prior knowledge and issue involvement as moderators. New Media & Society, 18(8), 1579–1598. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814567982
- Léger, P. M., Davis, F. D., Cronan, T. P., & Perret, J. (2014). Neurophysiological correlates of cognitive absorption in an enactive training context. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.011
- Leong, P. (2011). Role of social presence and cognitive absorption in online learning environments. Distance Education, 32(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2011.565495
- Liu, Y., & Shrum, L. J. (2009). A dual-process model of interactivity effects. Journal of Advertising, 38(2), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367380204
- Lu, H. P., Lin, J. C. C., Hsiao, K. L., & Cheng, L. T. (2010). Information sharing behaviour on blogs in Taiwan: Effects of interactivities and gender differences. Journal of Information Science, 36(3), 401–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551510363631
- Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Medders, R. B. (2010). Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 413–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01488.x
- O’Brien, H. L., Cairns, P., & Hall, M. (2018). A practical approach to measuring user engagement with the refined user engagement scale (UES) and new UES short form. International Journal of Human-computer Studies, 112, 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.01.004
- O’Brien, H. L., & Toms, E. G. (2010). The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(1), 50–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20801
- Oh, J., Ahn, J., & Lim, H. S. (2019). Interactivity as a double-edged sword: Parsing out the effects of modality interactivity on anti-smoking message processing and persuasion. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(4), 1099–1119. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699019835911
- Oh, J., Bellur, S., & Sundar, S. S. (2018). Clicking, assessing, immersing, and sharing: An empirical model of user engagement with interactive media. Communication Research, 45(5), 737–763. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215600493
- Oh, J., & Sundar, S. S. (2015). How does interactivity persuade? An experimental test of interactivity on cognitive absorption, elaboration, and attitudes. Journal of Communication, 65(2), 213–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12147
- Oh, J., Lim, H. S., Copple, J. G., & Chadraba, E. K (2018). Harnessing the persuasive potential of data: The combinatory effects of data visualization and interactive narratives on obesity perceptions and policy attitudes. Telematics and Informatics, 35(6), 1755–1769.
- Petty, R.E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1
- Petty, R. E., Barden, J., & Wheeler, S. C. (2002). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion: Health promotions that yield sustained behavioral change. In R. J. DiClemente, R. A. Crosby, & M. C. Kegler (Eds.), Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research: Strategies for improving the public health (pp. 71–99). Jossey-Bass.
- Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1979). Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(10), 1915–1926. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1915
- Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Goldman, R. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(5), 847. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.5.847
- Quintero Johnson, J. M., Harrison, K., & Quick, B. L. (2013). Understanding the effectiveness of the entertainment-education strategy: An investigation of how audience involvement, message processing, and message design influence health information recall. Journal of Health Communication, 18(2), 160–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2012.688244
- Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (2000). Perceptual user interfaces: Perceptual bandwidth. Communications of the ACM, 43(3), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1145/330534.330542
- Reychav, I., & Wu, D. (2015). Are your users actively involved? A cognitive absorption perspective in mobile training. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.021
- Rimal, R. N., & Real, K. (2003). Perceived risk and efficacy beliefs as motivators of change: Use of the risk perception attitude (RPA) framework to understand health behaviors. Human Communication Research, 29(3), 370–399. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/29.3.370
- Rimer, B. K., & Kreuter, M. W. (2006). Advancing tailored health communication: A persuasion and message effects perspective. Journal of Communication, 56(1), S184–S201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00289.x
- Saadé, R., & Bahli, B. (2005). The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 42(2), 317–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.12.013
- Saket, B., Srinivasan, A., Ragan, E., & Endert, A. (2018). Evaluating interactive graphical encodings for data visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 24(3), 1316–1330. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2017.2680452
- Segel, E., & Heer, J. (2010). Narrative visualization: Telling stories with data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 16(6), 1139–1148. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2010.179
- Singer, N. (2011, April 2). When the data struts its stuff. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/03/business/03stream.html
- Sundar, S. S., Jia, H., Waddell, T. F., & Huang, Y. (2015). Toward a theory of interactive media effects (TIME): Four models for explaining how interface features affect user psychology. In S. S. Sundar (Ed.), The handbook of the psychology of communication technology (pp. 47–86). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118426456.ch3
- Sundar, S. S., Bellur, S., Oh, J., Xu, Q., & Jia, H. (2014). User experience of on-screen interaction techniques: An experimental investigation of clicking, sliding, zooming, hovering, dragging, and flipping. Human–Computer Interaction, 29(2), 109–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2013.789347
- Van Noort, G., Voorveld, H. A., & Van Reijmersdal, E. A. (2012). Interactivity in brand web sites: Cognitive, affective, and behavioral responses explained by consumers’ online flow experience. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(4), 223–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2011.11.002
- Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
- Wang, R., & Sundar, S. S. (2018). How does parallax scrolling influence user experience? A test of TIME (theory of interactive media effects). International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34(6), 533–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1373457
- Ward, M. O., Grinstein, G., & Keim, D. (2010). Interactive data visualization: Foundations, techniques, and applications. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b10683
- Wong, N. C., & Cappella, J. N. (2009). Antismoking threat and efficacy appeals: Effects on smoking cessation intentions for smokers with low and high readiness to quit. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880802593928
- Yang, F., & Shen, F. (2018). Effects of web interactivity: A meta-analysis. Communication Research, 45(5), 635–658. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650217700748
- Young, M. L., Hermida, A., & Fulda, J. (2018). What makes for great data journalism? A content analysis of data journalism awards finalists 2012–2015. Journalism Practice, 12(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2016.1270171
- Young, R., Subramanian, R., & Hinnant, A. (2016). Stigmatizing images in obesity health campaign messages and healthy behavioral intentions. Health Education & Behavior, 43(4), 412–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198115604624