Perceived Message Effectiveness and Campaign-Targeted Beliefs: Evidence of Reciprocal Effects in Youth Tobacco Prevention

References

• Allison, P. D., Williams, R., & Moral-Benito, E. (2017). Maximum likelihood for cross-lagged panel models with fixed effects. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 3, 2378023117710578. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023117710578
   Google Scholar
• Baig, S. A., Noar, S. M., Gottfredson, N. C., Boynton, M. H., Ribisl, K. M., & Brewer, N. T. (2019). UNC perceived message effectiveness: Validation of a brief scale. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 53(8), 732–742. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kay080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigsby, E., Cappella, J. N., & Seitz, H. H. (2013). Efficiently and effectively evaluating public service announcements: Additional evidence for the utility of perceived effectiveness. Communication Monographs, 80(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2012.739706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. P., & Stayman, D. M. (1992). Antecedents and consequences of attitude toward the ad: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(1), 34–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2489186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappella, J. N. (2018). Perceived message effectiveness meets the requirements of a reliable, valid, and efficient measure of persuasiveness. Journal of Communication, 68(5), 994–997. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CDC. (2018). Best practices user guide: Health communications in tobacco prevention and control.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, J., Shah, D. V., McLeod, J. M., McLeod, D. M., Scholl, R. M., & Gotlieb, M. R. (2009). Campaigns, reflection, and deliberation: Advancing an O-S-R-O-R model of communication effects. Communication Theory, 19(1), 66–88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.01333.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby, K. (2019). How the food and drug administration convinced teens to rethink their relationship with cigarettes. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 56(2), S1–S4. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.10.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, K. C., Duke, J., Shafer, P., Patel, D., Rodes, R., & Beistle, D. (2017). Perceived effectiveness of antismoking ads and association with quit attempts among smokers: Evidence from the tips from former smokers campaign. Health Communication, 32(8), 931–938. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1196413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, K. C., & Duke, J. C. (2018). Evidence of the real-world effectiveness of public health media campaigns reinforces the value of perceived message effectiveness in campaign planning. Journal of Communication, 68(5), 998–1000. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, K. C., Nonnemaker, J., Duke, J., & Farrelly, M. C. (2013). Perceived effectiveness of cessation advertisements: The importance of audience reactions and practical implications for media campaign planning. Health Communication, 28(5), 461–472. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2012.696535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, K. C., Uhrig, J., Bann, C., Rupert, D., & Fraze, J. (2011). Exploring African American women’s perceptions of a social marketing campaign to promote HIV testing. Social Marketing Quarterly, 17(3), 39–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15245004.2011.595536
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., Shen, L., & Vail, R. G. (2007). Does perceived message effectiveness cause persuasion or vice versa? 17 consistent answers. Human Communication Research, 33(4), 467–488. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00308.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., Weber, K. M., & Vail, R. G. (2007). The relationship between the perceived and actual effectiveness of persuasive messages: A meta-analysis with implications for formative campaign research. Journal of Communication, 57(4), 613–631. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00360.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., & Ye, S. (2008). The perceived effectiveness of persuasive messages: Questions of structure, referent, and bias. Journal of Health Communication, 13(2), 149–168. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730701854060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke, J. C., Alexander, T. N., Zhao, X., Delahanty, J. C., Allen, J. A., MacMonegle, A. J., & Farrelly, M. C. (2015). Youth’s awareness of and reactions to the real cost national tobacco public education campaign. PLoS ONE, 10(12), e0144827. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke, J. C., Farrelly, M. C., Alexander, T. N., MacMonegle, A. J., Zhao, X., Allen, J. A., Delahanty, J. C., Rao, P., & Nonnemaker, J. (2018). Effect of a national tobacco public education campaign on youth’s risk perceptions and beliefs about smoking. American Journal of Health Promotion, 32(5), 1248–1256. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117117720745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke, J. C., MacMonegle, A. J., Nonnemaker, J. M., Farrelly, M. C., Delahanty, J. C., Zhao, X., Smith, A. A., Rao, P., & Allen, J. A. (2019). Impact of the real cost media campaign on youth smoking initiation. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 57(5), 645–651. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2019.06.011
   Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P. (2001). The cognitive mediation model of learning from the news: Evidence from nonelection, off-year election, and presidential election contexts. Communication Research, 28(5), 571–601. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/009365001028005001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P. (2002). News information processing as mediator of the relationship between motivations and political knowledge. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79(1), 26–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900207900103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P., Shah, D. V., & Kwak, N. (2003). Assessing causality in the cognitive mediation model: A panel study of motivations, information processing, and learning during campaign 2000. Communication Research, 30(4), 359–386. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650203253369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrelly, M. C., Duke, J. C., Nonnemaker, J., MacMonegle, A. J., Alexander, T. N., Zhao, X., Delahanty, J. C., Rao, P., & Allen, J. A. (2017). Association between the real cost media campaign and smoking initiation among youths—United States, 2014–2016. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 66(2), 47–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6602a2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., Hall-Jamieson, K., Zimmer, E., von Haeften, I., & Nabi, R. (2002). Avoiding the boomerang: Testing the relative effectiveness of antidrug public service announcements before a national campaign. American Journal of Public Health, 92(2), 238–245. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.92.2.238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G. (1968). Cognitive learning, cognitive response to persuasion, and attitude change. In T. C. Brock, T. M. Ostrom, & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitudes (pp. 147–170). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamaker, E. L., Kuiper, R. M., & Grasman, R. P. P. P. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornik, R. C. (Ed.). (2002). Public health communication: Evidence for behavior change. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, Fourth Edition (Fourth ed.). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leszczensky, L., & Wolbring, T. (2019). How to deal with reverse causality using panel data? Recommendations for researchers based on a simulation study. Sociological Methods & Research, 004912411988247. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124119882473
   Google Scholar
• Liberman, A., & Chaiken, S. (1992). Defensive processing of personally relevant health messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(6), 669–679. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292186002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(11), 2098. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noar, S. M., Barker, J., Bell, T., & Yzer, M. (2020). Does perceived message effectiveness predict the actual effectiveness of tobacco education messages? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Communication, 35(2), 148–157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1547675
   Google Scholar
• Noar, S. M., Barker, J., & Yzer, M. (2018). Measurement and design heterogeneity in perceived message effectiveness studies: A call for research. Journal of Communication, 68(5), 990–993. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noar, S. M., Bell, T., Kelley, D., Barker, J., & Yzer, M. (2018). Perceived message effectiveness measures in tobacco education campaigns: A systematic review. Communication Methods and Measures, 12(4), 295–313. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2018.1483017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J. (2018a). Message pretesting using assessments of expected or perceived persuasiveness: Evidence about diagnosticity of relative actual persuasiveness. Journal of Communication, 68(1), 120–142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J. (2018b). Whistling past the graveyard: Response to commentaries. Journal of Communication, 68(5), 1001–1005. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J. (2020). Message pretesting using perceived persuasiveness measures: Reconsidering the correlational evidence. Communication Methods and Measures, 14(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2019.1620711
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R., Ostrom, T. M., & Brock, T. C. (Eds.). (1981). Cognitive responses in persuasion (1st ed.). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315803012
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, J. P., Choi, W. S., Gilpin, E. A., Farkas, A. J., & Merritt, R. K. (1996). Validation of susceptibility as a predictor of which adolescents take up smoking in the United States. Health Psychology, 15(5), 355–361. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.15.5.355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rath, J. M., Green, M. P., Vallone, D. M., Briggs, J., Palmerini, M., Geraci, J., Pitzer, L., & Hair, E. C. (2019). The role of emotions and perceived Ad effectiveness: Evidence from the truth finishit campaign. American Journal of Health Promotion, 33(8), 1152–1158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117119864919
   Google Scholar
• Shah, D. V., McLeod, D. M., Rojas, H., Cho, J., Wagner, M. W., & Friedland, L. A. (2017). Revising the communication mediation model for a new political communication ecology. Human Communication Research, 43(4), 491–504. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherif, C. W., Sherif, M., & Nebergall, R. E. (1982). Attitude and attitude change: The social judgment-involvement approach. Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Shimp, T. A. (1981). Attitude toward the Ad as a mediator of consumer brand choice. Journal of Advertising, 10(2), 9–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/4188344
   Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D. (2007). Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Communication Theory, 17(3), 281–303. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00296.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D. (2015). Reinforcing spirals model: Conceptualizing the relationship between media content exposure and the development and maintenance of attitudes. Media Psychology, 18(3), 370–395. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2014.897236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. DHHS. (2014) . The health consequences of smoking—50 years of progress: A report of the surgeon general. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• Yzer, M., LoRusso, S., & Nagler, R. H. (2015). On the conceptual ambiguity surrounding perceived message effectiveness. Health Communication, 30(2), 125–134. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.974131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., Alexander, T. N., Hoffman, L., Jones, C., Delahanty, J., Walker, M., Berger, A. T., & Talbert, E. (2016). Youth receptivity to FDA’s the real cost tobacco prevention campaign: Evidence from message pretesting. Journal of Health Communication, 21(11), 1153–1160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2016.1233307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., Roditis, M. L., & Alexander, T. N. (2019). Fear and humor appeals in “The Real Cost” campaign: Evidence of potential effectiveness in message pretesting. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 56(2,Suppl. 1), S31–S39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.07.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., Strasser, A., Cappella, J. N., Lerman, C., & Fishbein, M. (2011). A measure of perceived argument strength: Reliability and validity. Communication Methods and Measures, 5(1), 48–75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2010.547822
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zyphur, M. J., Allison, P. D., Tay, L., Voelkle, M. C., Preacher, K. J., Zhang, Z., Hamaker, E. L., Shamsollahi, A., Pierides, D. C., Koval, P., & Diener, E. (2019). From data to causes I: Building a general cross-lagged panel model (GCLM). Organizational Research Methods, 23(4), 651–687. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428119847278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zyphur, M. J., Voelkle, M. C., Tay, L., Allison, P. D., Preacher, K. J., Zhang, Z., Hamaker, E. L., Shamsollahi, A., Pierides, D. C., Koval, P., & Diener, E. (2019). From data to causes II: Comparing approaches to panel data analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 23(4), 688–716. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428119847280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar