Effects of Communicating Prevalence Information about Two Common Health Conditions

References

• Barnes, A. S. (2011). The epidemic of obesity and diabetes: Trends and treatments. Texas Heart Institute Journal, 38(2), 142–144. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3066828/
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, C. L., Brescoll, V. L., Brownell, K. D., & Schlesinger, M. (2009). Obesity metaphors: How beliefs about the causes of obesity affect support for public policy. The Milbank Quarterly, 87(1), 7–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00546.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, C. L., Brescoll, V. L., & Gollust, S. E. (2013). Framing childhood obesity: How individualizing the problem affects public support for prevention. Political Psychology, 34(3), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borsari, B., & Carey, K. B. (2003). Descriptive and injunctive norms in college drinking: A meta‐analytic integration. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 64(3), 331–341. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.2003.64.331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brase, G. L. (2002). Which statistical formats facilitate what decisions? The perception and influence of different statistical information formats. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15(5), 381–401. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, K. B., Borsari, B., Carey, M. P., & Maisto, S. A. (2006). Patterns and importance of self-other differences in college drinking norms. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 20(4), 385–393. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-164X.20.4.385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2019). September is National Childhood Obesity Month. https://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpao/features/childhood-obesity/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020). National diabetes statistics report 2020: Estimates of diabetes and its burden in the United States. https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pdfs/data/statistics/national-diabetes-statistics-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cho, H., & Kuang, K. (2014). Societal risk reduction motivation model. In H. Cho, T. O. Reimer, & K. A. McComas (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of risk communication (pp. 117–132). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing theory. In N. Polsby (Ed.), Annual Review of Political Science (Vol. 10, pp. 103–126). Annual Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054
   Google Scholar
• Clark, A., & Loheac, Y. (2007). It wasn’t me, it was them! Social influence in risky behavior by adolescents. Journal of Health Economics, 26(4), 763–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.11.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeJong, W. (2010). Social norms marketing campaigns to reduce campus alcohol problems. Health Communication, 25(6–7), 615–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2010.496845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N., & Bolsen, T. (2011). Framing, motivated reasoning, and opinions about emergent technologies. Journal of Communication, 61(4), 659–688. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01562.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrer, R., & Klein, W. M. (2015). Risk perceptions and health behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 5, 85–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.03.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gollust, S. E., Lantz, P. M., & Ubel, P. A. (2009). The polarizing effect of news media messages about the social determinants of health. American Journal of Public Health, 99(12), 2160–2167. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.161414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollust, S. E., Niederdeppe, J., & Barry, C. L. (2013). Framing the consequences of childhood obesity to increase public support for obesity prevention policy. American Journal of Public Health, 103(11), E96–E102. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Marks, G., & Hansen, W. (1991). Social influence processes affecting adolescent substance use. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 76(2), 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.2.291
   Google Scholar
• Hales, C. M., Carroll, M. D., Fryar, C. D., & Ogden, C. L. (2017). Prevalence of obesity among adults and youth: United States, 2015–2016. NCHS Data Brief, 288. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db288.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Methodology in the social sciences. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133–168). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S. (1996). Framing responsibility of political issues. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716296546001006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. J., Payne, J. W., & Bettman, J. R. (1988). Information displays and preference reversals. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 42(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(88)90017-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katapodi, M. C., Lee, K. A., Facione, N. C., & Dodd, M. J. (2004). Predictors of perceived breast cancer risk and the relation between perceived risk and breast cancer screening: A meta-analytic review. Preventive Medicine, 38(4), 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.11.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. H., & Willis, L. A. (2007). Talking about obesity: News framing of who is responsible for causing and fixing the problem. Journal of Health Communication, 12(4), 359–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730701326051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleck, G., Kovandzic, T., Saber, M., & Hauser, W. (2011). The effect of perceived risk and victimization on plans to purchase a gun for self-protection. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(4), 312–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, B. G., Liu, J., Choung, H., & McLeod, D. (2019). Framing risk with numbers: The framing effects of risk assertions and number formats on emotions and risk perceptions. Mass Communication and Society, 22(3), 344–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2018.1536790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, B. G., Liu, J., Choung, H., & McLeod, D. M. (2020). Beyond the notion of accessibility bias: Message content as the common source of agenda-setting and priming effects. Mass Communication and Society, 23(4), 554–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2019.1708403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., & Niederdeppe, J. (2020). Misperceptions of the prevalence of health conditions and behaviors. Journal of Health Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2020.1858461
   Google Scholar
• McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute of Health (2017a). Diabetes statistics. https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/health-statistics/diabetes-statistics
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Health (2017b). Overweight and obesity statistics. https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/health-statistics/overweight-obesity
   Google Scholar
• Niederdeppe, J., Shapiro, M. A., Kim, H. K., Bartolo, D., & Porticella, N. (2014). Narrative persuasion, causality, complex integration, and support for obesity policy. Health Communication, 29(5), 431–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2012.761805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niederdeppe, J., Shapiro, M. A., & Porticella, N. (2011). Attributions of responsibility for obesity: Narrative communication reduces reactive counterarguing among liberals. Human Communication Research, 37(3), 295–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2011.01409.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noar, S. M., & Zimmerman, R. S. (2005). Health Behavior Theory and cumulative knowledge regarding health behaviors: Are we moving in the right direction? Health Education Research, 20(3), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyg113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, H. W., & Craig, D. W. (2003). The imaginary lives of peers: Patterns of substance use and misperceptions of norms among secondary school students. In H. W. Perkins (Ed.), The social norms approach to preventing school and college age substance abuse: A handbook for educators, counselors, and clinicians (pp. 209–223). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, H. W., Haines, M. P., & Rice, R. (2005). Misperceiving the college drinking norm and related problems: A nationwide study of exposure to prevention information, perceived norms and student alcohol misuse. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 66(4), 470–478. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.2005.66.470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, E., Vastfjall, D., Slovic, P., Mertz, C. K., Mozzocco, K., & Dickert, S. (2006). Numeracy and decision making. Psychological Science, 17(5), 406–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01720.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prentice, D., & Miller, D. (1993). Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: Some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(2), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In G. A. Barett & F. J. Boster (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences: Advances in persuasion (pp. 173–212). Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Reimer, T., Jones, C., & Skubisz, C. (2014). Numeric communication of risk. In H. Cho, T. O. Reimer, & K. A. McComas (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of risk communication (pp. 166–179). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (2008). Numeracy, ratio bias, and denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(1), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyna, V. F., Nelson, W. L., Han, P. K., & Dieckmann, N. F. (2009). How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 135(6), 943–973. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimal, R. N., & Real, K. (2005). How behaviors are influenced by perceived norms: A test of the theory of normative social behavior. Communication Research, 32(3), 389–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650205275385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. (1972). From Shakespeare to Simon: Speculations—and some evidence—about man’s ability to process information. Research Bulletin, 12(2), 1–19. http://hdl.handle.net/1794/22179
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236(4799), 280–285. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3563507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2007). The affect heuristic. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(3), 1333–1352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strecher, V. J., & Rosenstock, I. M. (1997). The health belief model. In A. Baum, S. Newman, J. Weinman, R. West, & C. McManus (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of psychology, health and medicine (pp. 113–117). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., Krakow, M., John, K. K., Liu, M., & Weaver, J. (2016). Framing obesity: How news frames shape attributions and behavioral responses. Journal of Health Communication, 21(2), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2015.1039676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visschers, V. H., Meertens, R. M., Passchier, W. W., & De Vries, N. N. (2009). Probability information in risk communication: A review of the research literature. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 29(2), 267–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01137.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X. T., & Johnston, V. S. (1995). Perceived social context and risk preference: A re-examination of framing effects in a life-death decision problem. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 8(4), 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.3960080405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., & Beydoun, M. A. (2007). The obesity epidemic in the United States - gender, age, socioeconomic, racial/ ethnic,and geographic characteristics: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Epidemiologic Reviews, 29(1), 6–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxm007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2000). Obesity: Preventing and managing the global epidemic. World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar