Waiting for a Match: Mitigating Reactance in Prosocial Health Behavior Using Psychological Distance

References

• Aknin, L. B., Van Boven, L., & Johnson-Graham, L. (2015). Abstract construals make the emotional rewards of prosocial behavior more salient. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(5), 458–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.967801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balliet, D., & Ferris, D. L. (2013). Ostracism and prosocial behavior: A social dilemma perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120(2), 298–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessarabova, E., Fink, E. L., & Turner, M. (2013). Reactance, restoration, and cognitive structure: Comparative statics. Human Communication Research, 39(3), 339–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessarabova, E., Miller, C. H., & Russell, J. (2017). A further exploration of the effects of restoration postscripts on reactance. Western Journal of Communication, 81(3), 385–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2016.1254815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. R., Finney, S. J., & France, M. K. (2011). Using the bifactor model to assess the dimensionality of the Hong psychological reactance scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71(1), 170–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164410387378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, C., & Desmond, D. M. (2008). Intention to consent to living organ donation: An exploratory study. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 13(5), 605–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548500701842958
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Compton, J. (2013). Inoculation theory. In J. P. Dillard & L. Shen (Eds.), The handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 220–236). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Organ Recovery & Education. (2021, April). Center for organ recovery & education launches “LiVE: 8” to encourage organ donation awareness. Brochure. https://www.multivu.com/players/English/7253051-center-for-organ-recovery-and-education-launches-live-8/links/7253051-core-preprinted-insert.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Clayton, R. B., Lang, A., Leshner, G., & Quick, B. L. (2019). Who fights, who flees? An integration of the LC4MP and psychological reactance theory. Media Psychology, 22(4), 545–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2018.1476157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., & Shen, L. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72(2), 144–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750500111815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2006). Prosocial behavior. In W. Damon, R. M. Lerner (Series Eds.), & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp. 646–718). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2011). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Yzer, M. C. (2003). Using theory to design effective health behavior interventions. Communication Theory, 13(2), 164–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00287.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2000). Miswanting: Some problems in the forecasting of future affective states. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Studies in emotion and social interaction, second series. Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 178–197). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guttman, N., Siegal, G., Appel, N., & Bar-On, G. (2016). Should altruism, solidarity, or reciprocity be used as prosocial appeals? Contrasting conceptions of members of the general public and medical professionals regarding promoting organ donation. Journal of Communication, 66(6), 909–936. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health Resources & Services Administration. (2020). Organ donation statistics. The HRSA website. Retrieved December 2020, from https://www.organdonor.gov/statistics-stories/statistics.html
   Google Scholar
• Henrich, J., & Henrich, N. (2006). Culture, evolution and the puzzle of human cooperation. Cognitive Systems Research, 7(2–3), 220–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2005.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, S. M., & Faedda, S. (1996). Refinement of the Hong psychological reactance scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(1), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164496056001014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, S. M., & Page, S. (1989). A psychological reactance scale: Development, factor structure and reliability. Psychological Reports, 64(3_suppl), 1323–1326. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1989.64.3c.1323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HRSA. (2021a, April). One donor can save 8 lives. Images [Advertisement]. https://www.organdonor.gov/sites/default/files/awareness/images/01mainemailblasthrsalink.jpg
   Google Scholar
• HRSA. (2021b, April). We believe in giving life after life. We are registered organ donors. Join us. Sign up. Believe. [Advertisement]. https://www.organdonor.gov/sites/default/files/awareness/images/138-million-strong-ig-1080x1080.jpg
   Google Scholar
• Huang, N., Burtch, G., Hong, Y., & Polman, E. (2016). Effects of multiple psychological distances on construal and consumer evaluation: A field study of online reviews. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26(4), 474–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2016.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, S. J., Byrne, S., & Kent, A. I. (2017). Mitigating the perception of threat to freedom through abstraction and distance. Communication Research, 44(7), 1046–1069. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216647534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., Baek, T. H., Yoon, S., Oh, S., & Choi, Y. K. (2017). Assertive environmental advertising and reactance: Differences between South Koreans and Americans. Journal of Advertising, 46(4), 550–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2017.1361878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• LaVail, K. H., Anker, A. E., Reinhart, A., & Feeley, T. H. (2010). The persuasive effects of audiovisual PSAs to promote organ donation: The mediating role of psychological reactance. Communication Studies, 61(1), 46–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970903400337
   Google Scholar
• LaVoie, N. R., Quick, B. L., Riles, J. M., & Lambert, N. J. (2017). Are graphic cigarette warning labels an effective message strategy? A test of psychological reactance theory and source appraisal. Communication Research, 44(3), 416–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215609669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. J. (2019). The role of construal level in message effects research: A review and future directions. Communication Theory, 29(3), 319–338. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qty030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. J. (2020). The effect of temporal frames in anti-smoking messages on the extension of anti-smoking arguments to smokers. Journal of Health Communication, 25(5), 421–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2020.1778820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lentine, K. L., Lam, N. N., & Segev, D. L. (2019). Risks of living kidney donation: Current state of knowledge on outcomes important to donors. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 14(4), 597–608. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.11220918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. Guilford press.
   Google Scholar
• Loewenstein, G., & Thaler, R. H. (1989). Anomalies: Intertemporal choice. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(4), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.3.4.181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loupy, A., Aubert, O., Reese, P. P., Bastien, O., Bayer, F., & Jacquelinet, C. (2020). Organ procurement and transplantation during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Lancet, 395(10237), e95–e96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31040-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merz, E., Van den Hurk, K., & De Kort, W. (2017) Organ donation registration among current blood donors in The Netherlands. Personal, cultural and network determinants. Progress in Transplantation, 27(3), 266–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/1526924817715470
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. H., Lane, L. T., Deatrick, L. M., Young, A. M., & Potts, K. A. (2007). Psychological reactance and promotional health messages: The effects of controlling language, lexical concreteness, and the restoration of freedom. Human Communication Research, 33(2), 219–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00297.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, R. L. (1976). Mere exposure, psychological reactance and attitude change. Public Opinion Quarterly, 40(2), 229–233. https://doi.org/10.1086/268290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miron, A. M., & Brehm, J. W. (2006). Reactance theory-40 years later. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 37(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1024/0044-3514.37.1.9
   Google Scholar
• Moorlock, G., & Draper, H. (2018). Empathy, social media, and directed altruistic living organ donation. Bioethics, 32(5), 289–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nan, X. (2007). Social distance, framing, and judgment: A construal level perspective. Human Communication Research, 33(4), 489–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00309.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NHS Blood and Transplant. (2021, April). Living organ donation social media graphics. Advertisement. https://www.nhsbt.nhs.uk/how-you-can-help/get-involved/download-digital-materials/living-organ-donation-social-media/
   Google Scholar
• NJ Sharing Network. (2021, February). National donor day. Advertisement. https://www.facebook.com/NJSharingNetwork/photos/4981941475180561
   Google Scholar
• Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2014). Inside the turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(3), 184–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414531598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick, B. L. (2012). What is the best measure of psychological reactance? An empirical test of two measures. Health Communication, 27(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.567446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick, B. L., Anker, A. E., Feeley, T. H., & Morgan, S. E. (2016). An examination of three theoretical models to explain the organ donation attitude–registration discrepancy among mature adults. Health Communication, 31(3), 265–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.947468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick, B. L., Kam, J. A., Morgan, S. E., Montero Liberona, C. A., & Smith, R. A. (2015a). Prospect theory, discrete emotions, and freedom threats: An extension of psychological reactance theory. Journal of Communication, 65(1), 40–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick, B. L., & Kim, D. K. (2009). Examining reactance and reactance restoration with South Korean adolescents: A test of psychological reactance within a collectivist culture. Communication Research, 36(6), 765–782. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650290346797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick, B. L., LaVoie, N. R., Morgan, S. E., & Bosch, D. (2015b). You’ve got mail! An examination of a statewide direct-mail marketing campaign to promote deceased organ donor registrations. Clinical Transplantation, 29(11), 997–1003. https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.12620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick, B. L., Scott, A. M., & Ledbetter, A. M. (2011). A close examination of trait reactance and issue involvement as moderators of psychological reactance theory. Journal of Health Communication, 16(6), 660–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2011.551989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick, B. L., Shen, L., & Dillard, J. P. (2013). Reactance theory and persuasion. In J. P. Dillard & L. J. Shen (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 167-183). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rains, S. A. (2013). The nature of psychological reactance revisited: A meta-analytic review. Human Communication Research, 39(1), 47–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01443.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds-Tylus, T. (2019). Psychological reactance and persuasive health communication: A review of the literature. Frontiers in Communication, 4, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00056
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds-Tylus, T., Bigsby, B., & Quick, B. L. (2020). A comparison of three approaches for measuring negative cognitions for psychological reactance. Communication Methods and Measures, 15(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1810647
   Google Scholar
• Richards, A. S., Banas, J. A., & Magid, Y. (2017). More on inoculating against reactance to persuasive health messages: The paradox of threat. Health Communication, 32(7), 890–902. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1196410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segev, D. L., Muzaale, A. D., Caffo, B. S., Mehta, S. H., Singer, A. L., Taranto, S. E., McBride, M. A., & Montgomery, R. A. (2010). Perioperative mortality and long-term survival following live kidney donation. JAMA, 303(10), 959–966. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Septianto, F., & Pratiwi, L. (2016). The moderating role of construal level on the evaluation of emotional appeal vs. cognitive appeal advertisements. Marketing Letters, 27(1), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-014-9324-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheeran, P., Norman, P., & Orbell, S. (1999). Evidence that intentions based on attitudes better predict behaviour than intentions based on subjective norms. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(2–3), 403–406. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0992(199903/05)29:2/3<403::aid-ejsp942>3.0.co;2-a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, L. (2014). Antecedents to psychological reactance: The impact of threat, message frame, and choice. Health Communication, 30(10), 975–985. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.910882
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, L., & Dillard, J. P. (2005). Psychometric properties of the Hong psychological reactance scale. Journal of personality assessment,85(1), 74–81. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8501_07
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, H. C., Felmlee, D., Sprecher, S., & Wright, B. L. (2015). Don’t tell me who I can’t love: A multimethod investigation of social network and reactance effects on romantic relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 78(1), 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272514565253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, S., & Teoh, V. Y. (2014). Enhancing prosocial behavior among college students: Exploring the role of abstract mindset. Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 3(2), 154–157. https://doi.org/10.5176/2251-2853_3.2.154
   Google Scholar
• Stamolampros, P., & Korfiatis, N. (2018). Exploring the behavioral drivers of review valence: The direct and indirect effects of multiple psychological distances. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(10), 3083–3099. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-04-2017-0239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steindl, C., Jonas, E., Sittenthaler, S., Traut-Mattausch, E., & Greenberg, J. (2015). Understanding psychological reactance. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 223(4), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan, E., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2011). The effects of time perspective and level of construal on social distance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(2), 397–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sukalla, F., Wagner, A. J. M., & Rackow, I. (2017). Dispelling fears and myths of organ donation: How narratives that include information reduce ambivalence and reactance. International Journal of Communication, 11, 5027–5047. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/6662/2210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, M. M. (2007). Using emotion in risk communication: The anger activism model. Public Relations Review, 33(2), 114–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.11.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Boven, L., Kane, J., McGraw, A. P., & Dale, J. (2010). Feeling close: Emotional intensity reduces perceived psychological distance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(6), 872–885. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargas, P. T., Duff, B. R. L., & Faber, R. J. (2017). A practical guide to experimental advertising research. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2017.1281779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., & Zhao, X. (2018). The mediating role of temporal considerations on the effects of self-affirmation on responses to organ donation messages. Health Communication, 33(2), 148–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1250190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicklund, R. A. (1974). Freedom and reactance. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, W., & Quinn, J. M. (2003). Forewarned and forearmed? Two meta-analysis syntheses of forewarnings of influence appeals. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 119. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, D. (2014). Future events are far away: Exploring the distance-on-distance effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(4), 514–525. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yost, A. B., & Finney, S. J. (2018). Assessing the unidimensionality of trait reactance using a multifaceted model assessment approach. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(2), 186–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1280044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youn, S., & Kim, S. (2019). Understanding ad avoidance on Facebook: Antecedents and outcomes of psychological reactance. Computers in Human Behavior, 98, 232–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar