Effects of Exposure to Conflicting Information About Mammography on Cancer Information Overload, Perceived Scientists’ Credibility, and Perceived Journalists’ Credibility

References

• American Cancer Society. (n.d.). American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer. https://www.cancer.org/healthy/find-cancer-early/cancer-screening-guidelines/american-cancer-society-guidelines-for-the-early-detection-of-cancer.html
   Google Scholar
• Arora, R., & Arora, A. (2006). Effectiveness of message sidedness and credibility on healthy eating to prevent cancer. Services Marketing Quarterly, 27(3), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1300/J396v27n03_03
   Google Scholar
• Bawden, D., & Robinson, L. (2009). The dark side of information: Overload, anxiety and other paradoxes and pathologies. Journal of Information Science, 35(2), 180–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551508095781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonney, R., Phillips, T. B., Ballard, H. L., & Enck, J. W. (2016). Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? Public Understanding of Science, 25(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515607406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, D. M., Geryk, L. L., Chen, A. T., Nagler, R. H., Dieckmann, N. F., & Han, P. K. (2016). Conflicting health information: A critical research need. Health Expectations, 19(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chae, J., Lee, C. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2016). Correlates of cancer information overload: Focusing on individual ability and motivation. Health Communication, 31(5), 626–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.986026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chae, J. (2016). Who avoids cancer information? Examining a psychological process leading to cancer information avoidance. Journal of Health Communication, 21(7), 837–844. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2016.1177144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C. (2015). Motivated processing: How people perceive news covering novel or contradictory health research findings. Science Communication, 37(5), 602–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547015597914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, G. (2020). Undermining credibility: The limited influence of online comments to vaccine-related news stories. Journal of Health Communication, 25(12), 943–950. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2020.1865485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunwoody, S., Hendriks, F., Massarani, L., & Peters, H. P. (2018, April 3–6). How journalists deal with scientific uncertainty and what that means for the audience [ Panel discussion]. International Public Communication of Science and Technology Conference (PCST 2018). https://pcst.co/archive/conference/paper/225
   Google Scholar
• Gollust, S. E., Fowler, E. F., & Nagler, R. H. (2021). Prevalence and potential consequences of exposure to conflicting information about mammography: Results from nationally-representative survey of US adults. Health Communication, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1951958
   Google Scholar
• Gustafson, A., & Rice, R. E. (2019). The effects of uncertainty frames in three science communication topics. Science Communication, 41(6), 679–706. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547019870811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafson, A., & Rice, R. E. (2020). A review of the effects of uncertainty in public science communication. Public Understanding of Science, 29(6), 614–633. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520942122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2016). Disclose your flaws! Admission positively affects the perceived trustworthiness of an expert science blogger. Studies in Communication Sciences, 16(2), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scoms.2016.10.003
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, F., & Jucks, R. (2020). Does scientific uncertainty in news articles affect readers’ trust and decision-making? Media and Communication, 8(2), 401–412. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.2824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, J. D., & Hurley, R. J. (2012). Conflicting stories about public scientific controversies: Effects of news convergence and divergence on scientists’ credibility. Public Understanding of Science, 21(6), 689–704. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510387759
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, J. D., Krakow, M., John, K. K., & Liu, M. (2013). Against conventional wisdom: When the public, the media, and medical practice collide. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 13(Suppl 3), S4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-13-S3-S4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jensen, J. D., Carcioppolo, N., King, A. J., Scherr, C. L., Jones, C. L., & Niederdeppe, J. (2014). The cancer information overload (CIO) scale: Establishing predictive and discriminant validity. Patient Education and Counseling, 94(1), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.09.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K., Lustria, M. L. A., Burke, D., & Kwon, N. (2007). Predictors of cancer information overload: Findings from a national survey. Information Research, 12(4), Article 326. http://InformationR.net/ir/12-4/paper326.html
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. J., Nagler, R. H., & Wang, N. (2018). Source-Specific exposure to contradictory nutrition information: Documenting prevalence and effects on adverse cognitive and behavioral outcomes. Health Communication, 33(4), 453–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1278495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, B. A., Merola, V., & Reifler, J. (2020). Shifting medical guidelines: Compliance and spillover effects for revised antibiotic recommendations. Social Science & Medicine, 255, 112943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112943
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, L. H., & Comello, M. L. (2019). Stymied by a wealth of health information: How viewing conflicting information online diminishes cancer screening. Journal of Communication in Healthcare, 12(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2019.1580064
   Google Scholar
• Maschke, A., Paasche-Orlow, M. K., Kressin, N. R., Schonberg, M. A., Battaglia, T. A., & Gunn, C. M. (2021). Discussions of potential mammography benefits and harms among patients with limited health literacy and providers: “Oh, there are harms? Journal of Health Communication, 25(12), 951–961. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2020.1845256
   Google Scholar
• McCloud, R. F., Jung, M., Gray, S. W., & Viswanath, K. (2013). Class, race and ethnicity and information avoidance among cancer survivors. British Journal of Cancer, 108(10), 1949–1956. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.182
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., & Teven, J. J. (1999). Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement. Communication Monographs, 66(1), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759909376464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrill, A. (2017). Curvilinear relationship. In M. Allen (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of communication research methods (Vol. 1, pp. 323–325). SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. D. (1998). The measurement of civic scientific literacy. Public Understanding of Science, 7(3), 203–224. h ttps://d oi/pdf/1 0.1088/0963-6625/7/3/001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misra, S., & Stokols, D. (2012). Psychological and health outcomes of perceived information overload. Environment and Behavior, 44(6), 737–759. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511404408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monticciolo, D. L., Newell, M. S., Hendrick, R. E., Helvie, M. A., Moy, L., Monsees, B., Kopans, D. B., Eby, P. R., & Sickles, E. A. (2017). Breast cancer screening for average-risk women: Recommendations from the ACR commission on breast imaging. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 14(9), 1137–1143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2017.06.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Myers, T. A., Kotcher, J., Stenhouse, N., Anderson, A. A., Maibach, E., Beall, L., & Leiserowitz, A. (2017). Predictors of trust in the general science and climate science research of US federal agencies. Public Understanding of Science, 26(7), 843–860. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516636040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagler, R. H. (2010). Steady diet of confusion: Contradictory nutrition messages in the public information environment [ Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Nagler, R. H. (2014). Adverse outcomes associated with media exposure to contradictory nutrition messages. Journal of Health Communication, 19(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2013.798384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagler, R. H., Yzer, M. C., & Rothman, A. J. (2019). Effects of media exposure to conflicting information about mammography: Results from a population-based survey experiment. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 53(10), 896–908. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kay098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagler, R. H., Fowler, E. F., Marino, N. M., Mentzer, K. M., & Gollust, S. E. (2019). The evolution of mammography controversy in the news media: A content analysis of four publicized screening recommendations, 2009 to 2016. Women’s Health Issues, 29(1), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2018.09.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagler, R. H., Vogel, R. I., Gollust, S. E., Yzer, M. C., & Rothman, A. J. (2021). Effects of prior exposure to conflicting health information on responses to subsequent unrelated health messages: Results from a population-based longitudinal experiment. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 56(5), 498–511. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaab069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Science Board. (2018). Science and engineering indicators 2018. National Science Foundation. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/indicators/
   Google Scholar
• Niederdeppe, J., Lee, T., Robbins, R., Kim, H. K., Kresovich, A., Kirshenblat, D., Standridge, K., Clarke, C. E., Jensen, J., & Fowler, E. F. (2014). Content and effects of news stories about uncertain cancer causes and preventive behaviors. Health Communication, 29(4), 332–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2012.755603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, M. C., Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J., Moy, P., Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2002). Knowledge, reservations, or promise? A media effects model for public perceptions of science and technology. Communication Research, 29(5), 584–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365002236196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, M. C., & Myers, T. (2007). The polls—trends: Twenty years of public opinion about global warming. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(3), 444–470. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfm031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, W., Carcioppolo, N., Occa, A., Ali, K., Yang, Q., & Yang, F. (2019). Feel worried, overloaded, or fatalistic? The determinants of cancer uncertainty management preferences. Health Communication, 36(3), 347–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1692489
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramírez, A. S., & Carmona, K. A. (2018). Beyond fatalism: Information overload as a mechanism to understand health disparities. Social Science & Medicine, 219, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutten, L. J. F., Squiers, L., & Hesse, B. (2006). Cancer-Related information seeking: Hints from the 2003 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). Journal of Health Communication, 11(s1), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730600637574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, J. B., Debbelt, C. A., & Schneider, F. M. (2018). Too much information? Predictors of information overload in the context of online news exposure. Information, Communication & Society, 21(8), 1151–1167. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1305427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, L. M., & Woloshin, S. (2002). News media coverage of screening mammography for women in their 40s and tamoxifen for primary prevention of breast cancer. Jama, 287(23), 3136–3142. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.23.3136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, W., Nagler, R. H., Fowler, E. F., & Gollust, S. E. (2021). Predictors of women’s awareness of the benefits and harms of mammography screening and associations with confusion, ambivalence, and information seeking. Health Communication, 36(3), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1687129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, L. B., Hamilton, M. A., Mitchell, E. W., Kiwanuka-Tondo, J., Fleming-Milici, F., & Proctor, D. (2004). A meta-analysis of the effect of mediated health communication campaigns on behavior change in the United States. Journal of Health Communication, 9(S1), 71–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730490271548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi, B., & Tandoc, E. C., Jr. (2016). Media sources, credibility, and perceptions of science: Learning about how people learn about science. Public Understanding of Science, 25(6), 674–690. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515574986
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, A. S., Lee, C. J., Nagler, R. H., & Bigman, C. A. (2017). To vape or not to vape? Effects of exposure to conflicting news headlines on beliefs about harms and benefits of electronic cigarette use: Results from a randomized controlled experiment. Preventive Medicine, 105, 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.08.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. (2016, January). Breast cancer: Screening. https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/UpdateSummaryFinal/breast-cancer-screening
   Google Scholar
• Viswanath, K., & Emmons, K. M. (2006). Message effects and social determinants of health: Its application to cancer disparities. The Journal of Communication, 56(suppl_1), S238–S264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00292.x
   Google Scholar
• Webb, T., Joseph, J., Yardley, L., & Michie, S. (2010). Using the internet to promote health behavior change: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 12(1), e1376. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Q., Herbert, N., Yang, S., Alber, J., Ophir, Y., & Cappella, J. N. (2020). The role of information avoidance in managing uncertainty from conflicting recommendations about electronic cigarettes. Communication Monographs, 88(3), 263–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2020.1809685
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Young Lin, L. L., & Rosenkrantz, A. B. (2017). The US online news coverage of mammography based on a Google news search. Academic Radiology, 24(12), 1612–1615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2017.05.011
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., Couper, M. P., & Fagerlin, A. (2012). Disparities in patient reports of communications to inform decision making in the DECISIONS survey. Patient Education and Counseling, 87(2), 198–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2011.08.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar