“What Do You Do if They Say ‘No’?”: Agency, Materiality, and Justice in Pelvic Exams

References

• Adashi, E. Y. (2019). Teaching pelvic examination under anesthesia without patient consent. JAMA, 321(8), 732–733. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.0613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apker, J., & Eggly, S. (2004). Communicating professional identity in medical socialization: Considering the ideological discourse of morning report. Qualitative Health Research, 14(3), 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732303260577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, M. (2021). Misogynoir transformed: Black women’s digital resistance. New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of biomedical ethics (8th ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. (2009). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman, A. A., & Connaughton, S. L. (2013). What is patient-centered care really? Voices of Hispanic prenatal patients. Health Communication, 28(8), 789–799. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2012.725124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browder, M., & Harris, B. (2022, March 21). Michelle Browder, Mothers of Gynecology. Smarthistory. https://smarthistory.org/seeing-america-2/mothers-of-gynecology/.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, L. (2020). A pot ignored boils on: Sustained calls for explicit consent of intimate medical exams. HEC Forum : An Interdisciplinary Journal on Hospitals’ Ethical and Legal Issues, 32(2), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-020-09399-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coldicott, Y., Pope, C., & Roberts, C. (2003). The ethics of intimate examinations—Teaching tomorrow’s doctors. BMJ : British Medical Journal, 326(7380), 97–101. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7380.97
   Google Scholar
• Crear-Perry, J., Maybank, A., Keeys, M., Mitchell, N., & Godbolt, D. (2020). Moving towards anti-racist praxis in medicine. The Lancet, 396(10249), 451–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31543-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin, M. (2020). Anarcha, Betsey, Lucy, and the women whose names were not recorded: The legacy of J Marion Sims. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 48(3_suppl), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X20966606
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cundall, H. L., MacPhedran, S. E., & Shah Arora, K. (2019). Consent for pelvic examinations under anesthesia by medical students: Historical arguments and steps forward. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 134(6), 1298–1302. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cusanno, B. R. (2019). “It’s a broken system that’s designed to destroy”: A critical narrative analysis of healthcare providers’ stories about race, reproductive health, and policy [ Thesis]. University of South Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Cusanno, B. R., Davidson, L. G., & Ketheeswaran, N. (2022). Fostering vulnerability, making brave spaces, and transforming worlds in 55 words: Writing 55-word stories for healthcare teaching, research, and practice. In L. M. Harter & B. L. Peterson (Eds.), Brave space-making: The poetics & politics of storytelling (pp. 319–348). Kendall Hunt.
   Google Scholar
• de Souza, R. T. (2019). Feeding the other: Whiteness, privilege, and neoliberal stigma in food pantries. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11701.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Dodds, S. (2000). Choice and control in feminist bioethics. In C. Mackenzie & N. Stoljar (Eds.), Relational autonomy: Feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self (pp. 213–235). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Downey, M. M., & Gómez, A. M. (2018). Structural competency and reproductive health. AMA Journal of Ethics, 20(3), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1001/journalofethics.2018.20.3.peer1-1803
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ewalt, J. P. (2016). The agency of the spatial. Women’s Studies in Communication, 39(2), 137–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2016.1176788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friesen, P. (2018). Educational pelvic exams on anesthetized women: Why consent matters. Bioethics, 32(5), 298–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass, I., & Sullivan, L. ( Hosts). (2018, November 9). But that’s what happened (No. 661). [ Audio podcast episode]. In This American life. WBEZ Chicago. https://www.thisamericanlife.org/661/but-thats-what-happened
   Google Scholar
• Goedken, J. (2005). Pelvic examinations under anesthesia: An important teaching tool. Journal of Health Care Law & Policy, 8(2), 232–239.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hammoud, M. M., Spector-Bagdady, K., O’Reilly, M., Major, C., & Baecher-Lind, L. (2019). Consent for the pelvic examination under anesthesia by medical students. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 134(6), 1303–1307. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003560
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendricks, P., & Seybold, S. (2022). Unauthorized pelvic exams are sexual assault. The New Bioethics, 28(4), 1–9. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/20502877.2022.2102132
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hill, J. (2003). Consent for teaching procedures. The Lancet, 362(9387), 924. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14328-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hinojosa Hernandez, L., & De Los Santos Upton, S. (2020). Insider/Outsiders, reproductive (in)justice, and the U.S.-Mexico border. Health Communication, 35(8), 1046–1050. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1602819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, P. (2018, May 14). Pelvic exams on anesthetized women without consent: A troubling and outdated practice. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/paulhsieh/2018/05/14/pelvic-exams-on-anesthetized-women-without-consent-a-troubling-and-outdated-practice/?sh=107501167846
   Google Scholar
• Iwashyna, T. J., Curlin, F. A., & Christakis, N. A. (2002). Racial, ethnic, and affluence differences in elderly patients’ use of teaching hospitals. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 17(9), 696–703. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.01155.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judd, B. (2013). The researcher discovers Anarcha, Betsey, Lucy. Meridians, 11(2), 238–239. https://doi.org/10.2979/meridians.11.2.238
   Google Scholar
• Kaur, K., Salwi, S., McNew, K., Kumar, N., Millimet, H., Ravichandran, N., Tytus, K., Zhang, A. Y., Garrett Wood, A., Grimm, B., & Fairbrother, E. L. (2022). Medical student perspectives on the ethics of pelvic exams under anesthesia: A multi-institutional study. Journal of Surgical Education, 79(6), 1413–1421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.05.015
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lucke, J. C. (2012). Reproductive autonomy is an illusion. The American Journal of Bioethics, 12(6), 44–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2012.671893
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClurg, A. B., Arora, K. S., Schiff, L. D., Carey, E. T., & Neal-Perry, G. S. (2022). Dismantling structural barriers: Resident clinics refocused on equity. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 140(5), 739–742. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004920
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peitzmeier, S. M., & Potter, J. (2017). Patients and their bodies: The physical exam. In K. L. Eckstrand & J. Potter (Eds.), Trauma, resilience, and health promotion in LGBT patients: What every healthcare provider should know (pp. 191–202). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. E. (2017). Killing the Black body: Race, reproduction, and the meaning of liberty (2nd ed.). Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, L. (2017). Conceptualizing reproductive justice theory: A manifesto for activism. In L. Ross, L. Roberts, E. Derkas, W. Peoples & P. B. Toure (Eds.), Radical reproductive justice: Foundations, theory, practice, critique (pp. 170–232). Feminist Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, D., & Subramaniam, B. (2016). Matter in the shadows: Feminist new materialism and the practices of colonialism. In V. Pitts-Taylor (Ed.), Mattering: Feminism, science, and materialism (pp. 23–42). New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sastry, S., & Dutta, M. J. (2013). Global health interventions and the “common sense” of neoliberalism: A dialectical analysis of PEPFAR. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 6(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2012.740682
   Google Scholar
• Sexton, C. (2020, July 19). Florida’s new pelvic exam law causes uncertainty. WUSF Public Media. https://wusfnews.wusf.usf.edu/health-news-florida/2020-07-19/floridas-new-pelvic-exam-law-causes-uncertainty
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (2005). Beyond pro-choice versus pro-life: Women of color and reproductive justice. NWSA Journal, 17(1), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.2979/NWS.2005.17.1.119
   Google Scholar
• Tedeschi, B. (2018, January 25). Why do hospitals bare butts when there are better gowns around? STAT. https://www.statnews.com/2018/01/25/hospital-gowns-design/
   Google Scholar
• Tillman, S. (2020). Consent in pelvic care. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 65(6), 749–758. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towle, S. (2022). ‘Poorly relaxed women’: A situational analysis of pelvic examination learning materials for medical students. Medical Education, 56(7), 716–723. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14737
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsevat, R. K. M., Sinha, A. A. M., Gutierrez, K. J. M., & DasGupta, S. M. (2015). Bringing home the health humanities: Narrative humility, structural competency, and engaged pedagogy. Academic Medicine, 90(11), 1462–1465. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ubel, P. A., Jepson, C., & Silver-Isenstadt, A. (2003). Don’t ask, don’t tell: A change in medical student attitudes after obstetrics/gynecology clerkships toward seeking consent for pelvic examinations on an anesthetized patient. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 188(2), 575–579. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2003.85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wainberg, S., Wrigley, H., Fair, J., & Ross, S. (2010). Teaching pelvic examinations under anaesthesia: What do women think? Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 32(1), 49–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34404-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Washington, H. A. (2008). Medical apartheid: The dark history of medical experimentation on Black Americans from colonial times to the present. First Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Winfield, A. S. (2020). Body, blood, and brilliance: A Black woman’s battle for loud healing and strength. Health Communication, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1826656
   Google Scholar
• Woody Collins, J. (2019). Fluid materiality in health communication. Health Communication, 34(11), 1377–1379. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1481908
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, D., Fenwick, J., Stephenson, P., & Monterosso, L. (2005). Speculum “self-insertion”: A pilot study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 14(9), 1098–1111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01205.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar