1,275
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Framing COVID-19 Preprint Research as Uncertain: A Mixed-Method Study of Public Reactions

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Abdool Karim, S. S. (2022). Public understanding of science: Communicating in the midst of a pandemic. Public Understanding of Science, 31(3), 282–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625221089391
  • Associated Press. (2020). The associated press stylebook (55th ed.). Basic Books.
  • Berg, J. M., Bhalla, N., Bourne, P. E., Chalfie, M., Drubin, D. G., Fraser, J. S., Greider, C. W., Hendricks, M., Jones, C., Kiley, R., King, S., Kirschner, M. W., Krumholz, H. M., Lehmann, R., Leptin, M., Pulverer, B., Rosenzweig, B., Spiro, J. E., Stebbins, M., & Wolberger, C. (2016). Preprints for the life sciences. Science, 352(6288), 899–901. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf9133
  • Brierley, L., Nanni, F., Polka, J. K., Dey, G., Pálfy, M., Fraser, N., Coates, J. A., & Dirnagl, U. (2022). Tracking changes between preprint posting and journal publication during a pandemic. PLoS Biology, 20(2), e3001285. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001285
  • Caulfield, T., Bubela, T., Kimmelman, J., Ravitsky, V., & Blais, J. M. (2021). Let’s do better: Public representations of COVID-19 science. FACETS, 6(1), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2021-0018
  • Charters, E., & McKay, R. A. (2020). The history of science and medicine in the context of COVID-19. Centaurus, 62(2), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/1600-0498.12311
  • Chiarelli, A., Johnson, R., Pinfield, S., & Richens, E. (2019). Preprints and scholarly communication: An exploratory qualitative study of adoption, practices, drivers and barriers. F1000Research, 8(971), 1–78. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.19619.2
  • Cohen, J. (1992). Statistical power analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(3), 98–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783
  • Cyr, C., Cataldo, T. T., Brannon, B., Buhler, A., Faniel, I., Silipigni Connaway, L., Kasman Valenza, J., Elrod, R., & Putnam, S. (2021). Backgrounds and behaviors: Which students successfully identify online resources in the face of container collapse. First Monday, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v26i3.10871
  • Drzymalla, E., Yu, W., Khoury, M. J., & Gwinn, M. (2022). COVID-19-related manuscripts: Lag from preprint to publication. BMC Research Notes, 15(1), 1–5. Article 340. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06231-9
  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
  • Figdor, C. (2017). (When) is science reporting ethical? The case for recognizing shared epistemic responsibility in science journalism. Frontiers in Communication, 2. Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2017.00003
  • Fleerackers, A., Moorhead, L. L., Maggio, L. A., Fagan, K., Alperin, J. P., & González Brambila, C. N. (2022). Science in motion: A qualitative analysis of journalists’ use and perception of preprints. Plos One, 17(11), e0277769. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277769
  • Fleerackers, A., Riedlinger, M., Moorhead, L., Ahmed, R., & Alperin, J. P. (2022). Communicating scientific uncertainty in an age of COVID-19: An investigation into the use of preprints by digital media outlets. Health Communication, 37(6), 726–738. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1864892
  • Fraser, N., Brierley, L., Dey, G., Polka, J. K., Pálfy, M., Nanni, F., Coates, J. A., & Dirnagl, U. (2021). The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape. PLoS Biology, 19(4), e3000959. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000959
  • Gerretsen, P., Kim, J., Caravaggio, F., Quilty, L., Sanches, M., Wells, S., Brown, E. E., Agic, B., Pollock, B. G., Graff-Guerrero, A., & Inbaraj, L. R. (2021). Individual determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Plos One, 16(11), e0258462. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258462
  • Gustafson, A., & Rice, R. E. (2020). A review of the effects of uncertainty in public science communication. Public Understanding of Science, 29(6), 614–633. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520942122
  • Han, P. K. J., Scharnetzki, E., Scherer, A. M., Thorpe, A., Lary, C., Waterston, L. B., Fagerlin, A., & Dieckmann, N. F. (2021). Communicating scientific uncertainty about the COVID-19 pandemic: Online experimental study of an uncertainty-normalizing strategy. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(4), e27832. https://doi.org/10.2196/27832
  • Han, P. K. J., Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., Duarte, C. W., Knaus, M., Black, A., Scherer, A. M., & Fagerlin, A. (2018). Communication of scientific uncertainty about a novel pandemic health threat: Ambiguity aversion and its mechanisms. Journal of Health Communication, 23(5), 435–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2018.1461961
  • Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
  • Hendriks, F., & Jucks, R. (2020). Does scientific uncertainty in news articles affect readers’ trust and decision-making? Media and Communication, 8(2), 401–412. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.2824
  • Hodson, J., Reid, D., Veletsianos, G., Houlden, S., & Thompson, C. (2022). Heuristic responses to pandemic uncertainty: Practicable communication strategies of “reasoned transparency” to aid public reception of changing science. Public Understanding of Science, 09636625221135425. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625221135425
  • Hyland, K. (1996). Talking to the academy: Forms of hedging in science research articles. Written Communication, 13(2), 251–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088396013002004
  • Janssen, I., Hendriks, F., & Jucks, R. (2021). Face masks might protect you from COVID-19: The communication of scientific uncertainty by scientists versus politicians in the context of policy in the making. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 40(5–6), 602–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X211044512
  • Jensen, J. D. (2008). Scientific uncertainty in news coverage of cancer research: Effects of hedging on scientists’ and journalists’ credibility. Human Communication Research, 34(3), 347–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00324.x
  • Jensen, J. D., Pokharel, M., Scherr, C. L., King, A. J., Brown, N., & Jones, C. (2017). Communicating uncertain science to the public: How amount and source of uncertainty impact fatalism, backlash, and overload. Risk Analysis, 37(1), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12600
  • Kelp, N. C., Witt, J. K., & Sivakumar, G. (2022). To vaccinate or not? The role played by uncertainty communication on public understanding and behavior regarding COVID-19. Science Communication, 44(2), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470211063628
  • Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2012). Exploring laypeople’s epistemic beliefs about medicine – a factor-analytic survey study. BMC Public Health, 12(1), Article 759. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-759
  • Koffman, J., Gross, J., Etkind, S. N., & Selman, L. (2020). Uncertainty and COVID-19: How are we to respond? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 113(6), 211–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0141076820930665
  • Kreps, S. E., & Kriner, D. L. (2020). Model uncertainty, political contestation, and public trust in science: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic. Science Advances, 6(43), Article eabd4563. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd4563
  • Lurie, N., Saville, M., Hatchett, R., & Halton, J. (2020). Developing Covid-19 vaccines at pandemic speed. The New England Journal of Medicine, 382(21), 1969–1973. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2005630
  • Massarani, L., & Neves, L. F. F. (2022). Reporting COVID-19 preprints: Fast science in newspapers in the United States, the United Kingdom and Brazil. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 27(3), 957–968. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232022273.20512021
  • Massarani, L., Neves, L. F. F., Entradas, M., Lougheed, T., & Bauer, M. W. (2021). Perceptions of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the work of science journalists: Global perspectives. Journal of Science Communication, 20(7), A06. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.20070206
  • McCroskey, J. C., & Teven, J. J. (1999). Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement. Communication Monographs, 66(1), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759909376464
  • Medvecky, F., & Leach, J. (2019). An ethics of science communication. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32116-1
  • Nagler, R. H., Vogel, R. I., Gollust, S. E., Rothman, A. J., Fowler, E. F., Yzer, M. C., & Liu, S. Y. (2020). Public perceptions of conflicting information surrounding COVID-19: Results from a nationally representative survey of US adults. Plos One, 15(10), e0240776. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240776
  • Nanayakkara, P., & Hullman, J. (2020, March 20–21). Toward better communication of uncertainty in science journalism [Conference presentation]. Computation + Journalism Symposium, Boston, MA.
  • Nelson, L., Ye, H., Schwenn, A., Lee, S., Arabi, S., & Hutchins, B. I. (2022). Robustness of evidence reported in preprints during peer review. The Lancet Global Health, 10(11), e1684–1687. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00368-0
  • Oliveira, T., Araujo, R. F., Cerqueira, R. C., & Pedri, P. (2021). Politização de controvérsias científicas pela mídia brasileira em tempos de pandemia: A circulação de preprints sobre COVID-19 e seus reflexos [The politicization of scientific controversies by the Brazilian media in times of pandemic: The circulation of preprints on COVID-19 and its reflexes]. Revista Brasileira de História da Mídia, 10(1), 30–52. https://doi.org/10.26664/issn.2238-5126.101202111810
  • Ordway, D. M. (2020, April 2). Covering biomedical research preprints amid the coronavirus: Six things to know. The Journalist’s Resource: Informing the News. https://journalistsresource.org/health/medical-research-preprints-coronavirus/
  • Paek, H. J., & Hove, T. (2020). Communicating uncertainties during the COVID-19 outbreak. Health Communication, 35(14), 1729–1731. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1838092
  • Post, S., Bienzeisler, N., & Lohöfener, M. (2021). A desire for authoritative science? How citizens’ informational needs and epistemic beliefs shaped their views of science, news, and policymaking in the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Understanding of Science, 30(5), 496–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625211005334
  • Ratcliff, C. L., Jensen, J. D., Christy, K., Crossley, K., & Krakow, M. (2018). News coverage of cancer research: Does disclosure of scientific uncertainty enhance credibility? In H. D. O’Hair (Ed.), Risk and health communication in an evolving media environment (pp. 156–175). Routledge.
  • Ratcliff, C. L., & Wicke, R. (2022). How the public evaluates media representations of uncertain science: An integrated explanatory framework. Public Understanding of Science, 096366252211229. Online ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625221122960
  • Ratcliff, C. L., Wicke, R., & Harvill, B. (2022). Communicating uncertainty to the public during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review of the literature. Annals of the International Communication Association, 1–30. Online ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2022.2085136
  • Ratcliff, C. L., Wong, B., Jensen, J. D., & Kaphingst, K. A. (2021). The impact of communicating uncertainty on public responses to precision medicine research. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 55(11), 1048–1061. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaab050
  • Rutjens, B. T., Sengupta, N., Der Lee, R. V., van Koningsbruggen, G. M., Martens, J. P., Rabelo, A., & Sutton, R. M. (2022). Science skepticism across 24 countries. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(1), 102–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211001329
  • Saitz, R., & Schwitzer, G. (2020). Communicating science in the time of a pandemic. JAMA, 324(5), 443. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.12535
  • Sheldon, T. (2018). Preprints could promote confusion and distortion. Nature, 559(7714), 445. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-05789-4
  • Simonovic, N., & Taber, J. M. (2022). Psychological impact of ambiguous health messages about COVID-19. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 45(2), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-021-00266-2
  • Steijaert, M. J., Schaap, G., & van’t Riet, J. (2021). Two-sided science: Communicating scientific uncertainty increases trust in scientists and donation intention by decreasing attribution of communicator bias. Communications, 46(2), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2019-0123
  • Sutherland, S. (2021, April 1). If you don’t have covid vaccine side effects, are you still protected? Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/if-you-dont-have-covid-vaccine-side-effects-are-you-still-protected/
  • Tentori, K., Passerini, A., Timberlake, B., & Pighin, S. (2021). The misunderstanding of vaccine efficacy. Social Science & Medicine, 289, 114273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114273
  • van der Bles, A. M., van der Linden, S., Freeman, A. L. J., & Spiegelhalter, D. J. (2020). The effects of communicating uncertainty on public trust in facts and numbers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(14), 7672–7683. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1913678117
  • van Schalkwyk, F., & Dudek, J. (2022). Reporting preprints in the media during the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Understanding of Science, 31(5), 608–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625221077392
  • Wegwarth, O., Wagner, G. G., Spies, C., & Hertwig, R. (2020). Assessment of German public attitudes toward health communications with varying degrees of scientific uncertainty regarding COVID-19. JAMA Network Open, 3(12), e2032335. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.32335
  • WHO. (2021, March 31). Side effects of COVID-19 vaccines. Retrieved November 3, 2022, from https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/side-effects-of-covid-19-vaccines
  • Wingen, T., Berkessel, J. B., & Dohle, S. (2022). Caution, preprint! Brief explanations allow nonscientists to differentiate between preprints and peer-reviewed journal articles. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 5(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459211070559
  • Xu, Y., Margolin, D., & Niederdeppe, J. (2021). Testing strategies to increase source credibility through strategic message design in the context of vaccination and vaccine hesitancy. Health Communication, 36(11), 1354–1367. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1751400
  • Yale, R. N., Jensen, J. D., Carcioppolo, N., Sun, Y., & Liu, M. (2015). Examining first- and second-order factor structures for news credibility. Communication Methods and Measures, 9(3), 152–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2015.1061652

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.