Persuasive Effects of Temporal Framing in Health Messaging: A Meta-Analysis

References

• References marked with an asterisk (*) indicate studies included in the meta-analysis
   Google Scholar
• Akl, E. A., Oxman, A. D., Herrin, J., Vist, G. E., Terrenato, I., Sperati, F., Costiniuk, C., Blank, D., & Schünemann, H. (2011). Framing of health information messages. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 12. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006777.pub2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assink, M., & Wibbelink, C. J. M. (2016). Fitting three-level meta-analytic models in R: A step-by-step tutorial. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 12(3), 154–174. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.12.3.p154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Berezowska, A., Fischer, A. R., & van Trijp, H. C. (2018). The interplay between regulatory focus and temporal distance in the health context. British Journal of Health Psychology, 23(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Bernstein, M. H., Wood, M. D., & Erickson, L. R. (2016). The effectiveness of message framing and temporal context on college student alcohol use and problems: A selective e-mail intervention. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 51(1), 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agv091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, C. J. (2015). A meta-analysis of the ELM’s argument quality × processing type predictions. Human Communication Research, 41(4), 501–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Chandran, S., & Menon, G. (2004). When a day means more than a year: Effects of temporal framing on judgments of health risk. The Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 375–389. https://doi.org/10.1086/422116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, G. B. (1996). Temporal discounting and utility for health and money. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(3), 771. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.22.3.771
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Cheetham, I., & Ogden, J. (2016). Enhancing sun safety in young women: The relative impact of format and temporal framing on beliefs and behaviour. Cogent Psychology, 3(1), 1210069. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2016.1210069
   Google Scholar
• *Churchill, S., Good, A., & Pavey, L. (2014). Promoting the avoidance of high-calorie snacks. The role of temporal message framing and eating self-efficacy. Appetite, 80, 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2014.05.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *de Bruijn, G. J., & Budding, J. (2016). Temporal consequences, message framing, and consideration of future consequences: Persuasion effects on adult fruit intake intention and resolve. Journal of Health Communication, 21(8), 944–953. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2016.1179366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, H., Liu, F., & Wang, L. (2017). A Bayesian “fill-in” method for correcting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 22(4), 799. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. The Journal of Communication, 43, 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyal, T., Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Walther, E. (2004). The pros and cons of temporally near and distant action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(6), 781. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funder, D. C., & Ozer, D. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847202
   Google Scholar
• *Gerend, M. A., & Cullen, M. (2008). Effects of message framing and temporal context on college student drinking behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(4), 1167–1173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta‐analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38002-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, T., Ji, L. J., Spina, R., & Zhang, Z. (2012). Culture, temporal focus, and values of the past and the future. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(8), 1030–1040. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212443895
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardisty, D. J., & Weber, E. U. (2009). Discounting future green: Money versus the environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 138(3), 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016433
   Google Scholar
• Huedo-Medina, T. B., Sánchez-Meca, J., Marín-Martínez, F., & Botella, J. (2006). Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index? Psychological Methods, 11(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.11.2.193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kees, J. (2006). Consideration of future consequences as a moderator of temporal framing and regulatory focus in a health domain (Order No. 3262980) [ Doctoral dissertation]. University of Arkansas]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. https://search.proquest.com/docview/305351767?accountid=14696
   Google Scholar
• *Kees, J. (2010). Temporal framing in health advertising: The role of risk and future orientation. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 32(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2010.10505273
   Google Scholar
• Kees, J. (2011). Advertising framing effects and consideration of future consequences. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 45(1), 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2010.01190.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kim, J. (2015). Moderated serial multiple mediation model of message framing: The effect of severity, temporal outcome, and response efficacy on health-related decisions (Order No. 10679138) [ Doctoral dissertation]. University of Florida]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1992367212?accountid=14696
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K., & Kim, H. S. (2018). Time matters: Framing antismoking messages using current smokers’ preexisting perceptions of temporal distance to smoking-related health risks. Health Communication, 33(3), 338–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1266579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., & Nan, X. (2016). Effects of consideration of future consequences and temporal framing on acceptance of the HPV vaccine among young adults. Health Communication, 31(9), 1089–1096. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2015.1038774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kim, J., & Nan, X. (2019). Temporal framing effects differ for narrative versus non-narrative messages: The case of promoting HPV vaccination. Communication Research, 46(3), 401–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215626980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• *Lo, S. H., Smith, S. G., Taylor, M., Good, A., & von Wagner, C. (2012). The effect of temporal framing on behavioral intentions, expectations, and behavior: The case of healthy eating. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research, 17(3), 202–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9861.2012.00085.x
   Google Scholar
• Marquart, F. (2017). Publication bias. In J. Matthes (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of communication research methods (pp. 1–2). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0192
   Google Scholar
• *Mollen, S., Engelen, S., Kessels, L. T., & van den Putte, B. (2017). Short and sweet: The persuasive effects of message framing and temporal context in antismoking warning labels. Journal of Health Communication, 22(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2016.1247484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, L., & Dockray, S. (2018). The consideration of future consequences and health behaviour: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 12(4), 357–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2018.1489298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Myers, R. E. (2010). Moderating the effectiveness of messages to promote physical activity in Type 2 diabetes [ Doctoral Dissertation]. University of South Florida]. Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/1719
   Google Scholar
• Nabi, R. L., Walter, N., Oshidary, N., Endacott, C. G., Love-Nichols, J., Lew, Z. J., & Aune, A. (2019). Can emotions capture the elusive gain-loss framing effect? A meta-analysis. Communication Research, 47(8), 1107–1130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219861256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nan, X. (2007). Social distance, framing, and judgment: A construal level perspective. Human Communication Research, 33(4), 489–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00309.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Nan, X., Zhao, X., Yang, B., & Iles, I. (2015). Effectiveness of cigarette warning labels: Examining the impact of graphics, message framing, and temporal framing. Health Communication, 30(1), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2013.841531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noar, S. M., Hall, M. G., Francis, D. B., Ribisl, K. M., Pepper, J. K., & Brewer, N. T. (2016). Pictorial cigarette pack warnings: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Tobacco Control, 25(3), 341–354. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051978
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurmi, J. -E. (2005). Thinking about and acting upon the future: Development of future orientation across the life span. In A. Strathman & J. Joireman (Eds.), Understanding behavior in the context of time: Theory, research, and application (pp. 31–57). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• O’keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2007). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed loss-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Health Communication, 12(7), 623–644. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730701615198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2009). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease detection behaviors: A meta-analytic review. The Journal of Communication, 59(2), 296–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01417.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’keefe, D. J., & Nan, X. (2012). The relative persuasiveness of gain- and loss-framed messages for promoting vaccination: A meta-analytic review. Health Communication, 27(8), 776–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.640974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orbell, S., Perugini, M., & Rakow, T. (2004). Individual differences in sensitivity to health communications: Consideration of future consequences. Health Psychology, 23(4), 388–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.23.4.388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• *Roh, S. (2015). Time for change: How temporal frames shape judgments and decisions about health, wealth, and the environment (Order No. 3710522). [ Doctoral dissertation], Cornell University, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1698487824?accountid=14696
   Google Scholar
• Rojas-Mendez, J. I., & Davies, G. (2005). Avoiding television advertising: Some explanations from time allocation theory. Journal of Advertising Research, 45(1), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021849905050154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R., & DiMatteo, M. R. (2001). Meta-Analysis: Recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1982). A simple, general purpose display of magnitude of experimental effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(2), 166. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.74.2.166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (Eds.). (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Sedgwick, P. (2013). Meta-analyses: How to read a funnel plot. The BMJ, 346(mar01 2), f1342-f1342. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f1342.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, F., Sheer, V. C., & Li, R. (2015). Impact of narratives on persuasion in health communication: A meta-analysis. Journal of Advertising, 44(2), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2015.1018467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spears, N., Lin, X., & Mowen, J. C. (2000). Time orientation in the United States, China, and Mexico: Measurement and insights for promotional strategy. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 13(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1300/J046v13n01_05
   Google Scholar
• Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., & Edwards, C. S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(4), 742–752. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suka, M., Yamauchi, T., & Yanagisawa, H. (2020). Persuasive messages can be more effective when repeated: A comparative survey assessing a message to seek help for depression among Japanese adults. Patient Education and Counseling, 103(4), 811–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2019.11.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney, A. M., & Culcea, I. (2017). Does a future-oriented temporal perspective relate to body mass index, eating, and exercise? A meta-analysis. Appetite, 112, 272–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tangari, A. H., & Smith, R. J. (2012). How the temporal framing of energy savings influences consumer product evaluations and choice. Psychology & Marketing, 29(4), 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, N., & Murphy, S. T. (2018). How to unring the bell: A meta-analytic approach to correction of misinformation. Communication monographs, 85(3), 423–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2018.1467564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wen, N., & Shen, F. (2016). Communicating to young Chinese about human papillomavirus vaccination: Examining the impact of message framing and temporal distance. Asian Journal of Communication, 26(4), 387–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2016.1162821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte, K., & Allen, M. (2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education & Behavior, 27(5), 591–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019810002700506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Zhao, X., Nan, X., Iles, I. A., & Yang, B. (2015). Temporal framing and consideration of future consequences: Effects on smokers’ and at-risk nonsmokers’ responses to cigarette health warnings. Health Communication, 30(2), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.974122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Zhao, X., & Peterson, E. (2017). Effects of temporal framing on response to antismoking messages: The mediating role of perceived relevance. Journal of Health Communication, 22(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2016.1250844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar