1,129
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

How People Process Different Types of Health Misinformation: Roles of Content Falsity and Evidence Type

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Barthel, M., Mitchell, A., & Holcomb, J. (2016). Many Americans Believe Fake News is Sowing Confusion. Pew Research Center. https://www.journalism.org/2016/12/15/many-americans-believe-fake-news-is-sowing-confusion/
  • Betsch, C., Ulshöfer, C., Renkewitz, F., & Betsch, T. (2011). The influence of narrative vs. statistical information on perceiving vaccination risks. Medical Decision Making, 31(5), 742–753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X11400419
  • Boudewyns, V., Southwell, B. G., Betts, K. R., Gupta, C. S., Paquin, R. S., O’donoghue, A. C., & Vazquez, N. (2018). Awareness of misinformation in health-related advertising: A narrative review of the literature. In B. G. Southwell, E. A. Thorson & L. Sheble (Eds.), Misinformation and mass audiences (pp. 35–50). University of Texas Press.
  • Brennen, J. S., Simon, F. M., Howard, P. N., & Nielsen, R. K. (2020). Types, sources, and claims of COVID-19 misinformation (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oxford).
  • Caulfield, M. (2019). SIFT (The Four Moves). Hapgood. https://hapgood.us/2019/06/19/sift-the-four-moves/
  • Chen, M., Bell, R., & Taylor, L. (2016). Narrator point of view and persuasion in health narratives: The role of protagonist–reader similarity, identification, and self-referencing. Journal of Health Communication, 21(8), 908–918. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2016.1177147
  • Chou, W. Y., Gaysynsky, A., & Cappella, J. N. (2020). Where we go from here: Health misinformation on social media. American Journal of Public Health, 110(S3), S273–275. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305905
  • Chowdhury, N., Khalid, A., & Turin, T. (2021). Understanding misinformation infodemic during public health emergencies due to large-scale disease outbreaks: A rapid review. Journal of Public Health, 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-021-01565-3
  • Chuai, Y., & Zhao, J. (2020). Anger makes fake news viral online. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.10399. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03212-3
  • Duffy, A., Tandoc, E., & Ling, R. (2020). Too good to be true, too good not to share: The social utility of fake news. Information, Communication & Society, 23(13), 1965–1979. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1623904
  • Dunlop, S., Wakefield, M., & Kashima, Y. (2010). Pathways to persuasion: Cognitive and experiential responses to health-promoting mass media messages. Communication Research, 37(1), 133–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209351912
  • Ecker, U., Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Schmid, P., Fazio, L., Brashier, N., Kendeou, P., Vraga, E., & Amazeen, M. (2022). The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-021-00006-y
  • Edgerly, S., Mourão, R. R., Thorson, E., & Tham, S. M. (2020). When do audiences verify? How perceptions about message and source influence audience verification of news headlines. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 97(1), 52–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699019864680
  • Feeley, T., Marshall, H., & Reinhart, A. (2006). Reactions to narrative and statistical written messages promoting organ donation. Communication Reports, 19(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934210600918758
  • Festinger, L. (1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
  • Green, M. (2006). Narratives and cancer communication. Journal of Communication, 56(suppl_1), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00288.x
  • Green, M., & Brock, T. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701
  • Greene, K., & Brinn, L. (2003). Messages influencing college women’s tanning bed use: Statistical versus narrative evidence format and a self-assessment to increase perceived susceptibility. Journal of Health Communication, 8(5), 443–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/713852118
  • Hameleers, M., Humprecht, E., Möller, J., & Lühring, J. (2021). Degrees of deception: The effects of different types of COVID-19 misinformation and the effectiveness of corrective information in crisis times. Information, Communication & Society, 1, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.2021270
  • Hart, P. S., Chinn, S., & Soroka, S. (2020). Politicization and polarization in COVID-19 news coverage. Science Communication, 42(5), 679–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020950735
  • Heley, K., Gaysynsky, A., & King, A. J. (2022). Missing the bigger picture: The need for more research on visual health misinformation. Science Communication, 44(4), 514–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470221113833
  • Jin, K. (2020). Keeping people safe and informed about the coronavirus. https://about.fb.com/news/2020/12/coronavirus/
  • Jones-Jang, S. M., & Noland, C. (2022). The politicization of health and science: Role of political cues in shaping the beliefs of the vaccine-autism link. Health Communication, 37(5), 608–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1859723
  • King, A. J., & Lazard, A. J. (2020). Advancing visual health communication research to improve infodemic response. Health Communication, 35(14), 1723–1728. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1838094
  • Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2015). Choice and preference in media use: Advances in selective exposure theory and research. Routledge.
  • Kreuter, M. W., Green, M. C., Cappella, J., Slater, M., Wise, M., Storey, D., Clark, E. M., O’keefe, D. J., Erwin, D. O., Holmes, K., Hinyard, L. J., Houston, T., & Woolley, S. (2007). Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: A framework to guide research and application. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 33(3), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02879904
  • Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Schmid, P., Holford, D., Finn, A., Leask, J., Thomson, A., Lombardi, D., Al-Rawi, A., Amazeen, M., Anderson, E., Armaos, K., Betsch, C., Bruns, H., Ecker, U., Gavaruzzi, T., Hahn, U., Herzog, S., Juanchich, M., Vraga, E. K. (2021). The COVID-19 vaccine communication handbook: A practical guide for improving vaccine communication and fighting misinformation. https://sks.to/c19vax
  • Lu, X., Vijaykumar, S., Jin, Y., & Rogerson, D. (2022). Think before you share: Beliefs and emotions that shaped COVID-19 (mis)information vetting and sharing intentions among WhatsApp users in the United Kingdom. Telematics and Informatics, 67, 101750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101750
  • Ma, L., Lee, C. S., & Goh, D. H. L. (2011). That’s news to me: The influence of perceived gratifications andpersonal experience on news sharing in social media. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (pp. 141–144). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1998076.1998103
  • Marsh, E. J., & Yang, B. W. (2018). Believing things that are not true: A cognitive science perspective on misinformation. In B. G. Southwell, E. A. Thorson & L. Sheble (Eds.), Misinformation and mass audiences (pp. 15–34). University of Texas Press.
  • Paquin, R. S., Boudewyns, V., Betts, K. R., Johnson, M., O’donoghue, A. C., & Southwell, B. G. (2022). An empirical procedure to evaluate misinformation rejection and deception in mediated communication contexts. Communication Theory, 32(1), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtab011
  • Peng, W., Lim, S., & Meng, J. (2022). Persuasive strategies in online health misinformation: A systematic review. Information, Communication & Society, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2085615
  • Petty, R., & Cacioppo, J. (1984). The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.1.69
  • Petty, R., Ostrom, T., & Brock, T. (2014). Cognitive responses in persuasion. Psychology Press.
  • Research Center, P. (2020). Americans immersed in COVID-19 news; Most think media are doing fairly well covering it. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2020/03/18/americans-immersed-in-covid-19-news-most-think-media-are-doing-fairly-well-covering-it/
  • Reynolds-Tylus, T., Bigsby, E., & Quick, B. (2021). A comparison of three approaches for measuring negative cognitions for psychological reactance. Communication Methods and Measures, 15(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1810647
  • Scherer, L. D., & Pennycook, G. (2020). Who is susceptible to online health misinformation? American Journal of Public Health, 110(S3), S276–277. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305908
  • Shen, F., Sheer, V., & Li, R. (2015). Impact of narratives on persuasion in health communication: A meta-analysis. Journal of Advertising, 44(2), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2015.1018467
  • Southwell, B. G., Brennen, J. S. B., Paquin, R., Boudewyns, V., & Zeng, J. (2022). Defining and measuring scientific misinformation. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 700(1), 98–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162221084709
  • Southwell, B. G., Niederdeppe, J., Cappella, J. N., Gaysynsky, A., Kelley, D. E., Oh, A., Peterson, E. B., & Chou, W. -Y.S. (2019). Misinformation as a misunderstood challenge to public health. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 57(2), 282–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2019.03.009
  • Tandoc, E., Jr., Lim, Z., & Ling, R. (2018). Defining “fake news”: A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143
  • Tsang, S. (2022). Biased, not lazy: Assessing the effect of COVID-19 misinformation tactics on perceptions of inaccuracy and fakeness. Online Media and Global Communication, 1(3), 469–496. https://doi.org/10.1515/omgc-2022-0037
  • van der Meer, T., & Jin, Y. (2020). Seeking formula for misinformation treatment in public health crises: The effects of corrective information type and source. Health Communication, 35(5), 560–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1573295
  • Vijaykumar, S., Jin, Y., Rogerson, D., Lu, X., Sharma, S., Maughan, A., Fadel, B., de Oliveira Costa, M., Pagliari, C., & Morris, D. (2021). How shades of truth and age affect responses to COVID-19 (mis)information: Randomized survey experiment among WhatsApp users in UK and Brazil. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00752-7
  • Vraga, E., & Bode, L. (2018). I do not believe you: How providing a source corrects health misperceptions across social media platforms. Information, Communication & Society, 21(10), 1337–1353. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1313883
  • Vraga, E., & Bode, L. (2020). Defining misinformation and understanding its bounded nature: Using expertise and evidence for describing misinformation. Political Communication, 37(1), 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1716500
  • Walter, N., Brooks, J., Saucier, C., & Suresh, S. (2021). Evaluating the impact of attempts to correct health misinformation on social media: A meta-analysis. Health Communication, 36(13), 1776–1784. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1794553
  • Wang, Y., McKee, M., Torbica, A., & Stuckler, D. (2019). Systematic literature review on the spread of health-related misinformation on social media. Social Science & Medicine, 240, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112552
  • Weeks, B., & Holbert, R. (2013). Predicting dissemination of news content in social media: A focus on reception, friending, and partisanship. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90(2), 212–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699013482906
  • Winterbottom, A., Bekker, H., Conner, M., & Mooney, A. (2008). Does narrative information bias individual’s decision making? A systematic review. Social Science & Medicine, 67(12), 2079–2088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.037
  • Young, D. G. (2018). Can satire and irony constitute misinformation? In B. G. Southwell, E. A. Thorson & L. Sheble (Eds.), Misinformation and mass audiences (pp. 124–139). University of Texas Press.
  • Zebregs, S., van den Putte, B., Neijens, P., & de Graaf, A. (2015). The differential impact of statistical and narrative evidence on beliefs, attitude, and intention: A meta-analysis. Health Communication, 30(3), 282–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2013.842528
  • Zhao, X., Ma, Z., Xu, S., & Austin, L. (2022). How information repertoire affects vaccine hesitancy: Processes of information verification and cognitive elaboration. Health Communication, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2022.2154017
  • Zhao, X., & Tsang, S. (2021). Self-protection by fact-checking: How pandemic information seeking and verifying affect preventive behaviors. Journal of Contingency and Crisis Management, 30(2), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12372

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.