Health Risk Communication During COVID-19 Emergency in Italy: The Impact of Medical Experts’ Debate on Twitter

References

• Alaszewski, A., & Brown, P. (2007). Risk, uncertainty and knowledge. Health, Risk and Society, 9(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570601183033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albaek, E., Christiansen, P. M., & Togeby, L. (2003). Experts in the mass media: Researchers as sources in Danish daily newspapers, 1961–2001. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(4), 937–948. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900308000412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, D. (2014). Actors, patients and agency: A recent history. Sociology of Health and Illness, 36(2), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autorità per le garanzie nelle comunicazioni-AGCOM. (2020). Communication markets monitoring system (Report No. 3). https://www.agcom.it/documents/10179/20440899/Allegato+16-10-2020/a7fb0d05-7630-471b-aeef-66da1b755b7c?version=1.0
   Google Scholar
• Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science: Advanced Materials and Devices, 348(6239), 1130–1132. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U., Bonss, W., & Lau, C. (2003). The theory of reflexive modernization. Theory, Culture and Society, 20(2), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276403020002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (Eds.). (1994). Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y., Faris, R., & Roberts, H. (2018). Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190923624.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Del Vicario, M., Puliga, M., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., Uzzi, B., &, and Quattrociocchi, W. (2016). Users polarization on Facebook and Youtube. PloS One, 11(8), Article e0159641. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blendon, R. J., Benson, J. M., & Hero, J. O. (2014). Public trust in physicians. U.S. medicine in international perspective. New England Journal of Medicine, 371(17), 1570–1572. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1407373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blok, A., Jensen, M., & Kaltoft, P. (2008). Social identities and risk: Expert and lay imaginations on pesticide use. Public Understanding of Science, 17(2), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506070176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bongelli, R., Riccioni, I., Burro, R., & Zuczkowski, A. (2019). Writers’ uncertainty in scientific and popular biomedical articles. A comparative analysis of the British medical journal and discover magazine. PLoS One, 14(9), Article e0221933. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bongelli, R., Riccioni, I., & Fermani, A. (2020). Demonstrative questions and epistemic authority management in medium-sitter interactions: Some examples from an Italian “public mediumship demonstration”. Language and Dialogue, 10(2), 215–240. https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00067.bon
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bongelli, R., Riccioni, I., Fermani, A., & Philip, G. (2020). Hypothetical questions in everyday Italian conversations. Lingua, 246, Article 102951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botsman, R. (2017). Who can you trust? How technology brought us together and why it could drive us apart. Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bracciale, R., & Martella, A. (2017). Define the populist political communication style: The case of Italian political leaders on Twitter. Information, Communication and Society, 20(9), 1310–1329. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodie, M., Weltzien, E., Altman, D., Blendon, R., & Benson, J. M. (2006). Experience of Hurricane Katrina evacuees in Houston shelters: Implications for future planning. American Journal of Public Health, 96(8), 1402–1408. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2005.084475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromme, R., Thomm, E., & Wolf, V. (2015). From understanding to deference: Laypersons’ and medical students’ views on conflicts within medicine. International Journal of Science Education, 5(1), 68–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2013.849017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownell, S. E., Price, J. V., & Steinman, L. (2013). Science communication to the general public: Why we need to teach undergraduate and graduate students this skill as part of their formal scientific training. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education: JUNE: A Publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience, 12(1), E6–E10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bucchi, M. (2014). Changing contexts for science and society interaction: From deficit to dialogue, from dialogue to participation – and beyond? In P. Wehling, W. Viehöver & S. Koenen (Eds.), The public shaping of medical research (pp. 211–225). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bucchi, M., & Mazzolini, R. G. (2003). Big science, little news: Science coverage in the Italian daily press, 1946-1997. Public Understanding of Science, 12(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662503012001413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caffi, C. (2007). Mitigation, studies in pragmatics. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00392-8
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis (1st ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Long, J., Jun, J., Kim, S. H., Zain, A., & Piacentine, C. (2023). Anti-intellectualism amid the COVID-19 pandemic: The discursive elements and sources of anti-Fauci tweets. Public Understanding of Science, Article 9636625221146269. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625221146269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chew, C., & Eysenbach, G. (2010). Pandemics in the age of Twitter: Content analysis of tweets during the 2009 H1N1 outbreak. PloS One, 5(11), Article e14118. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coombs, W. T. (1999). Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2007). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153
   Google Scholar
• Côté, I. M., & Darling, E. S. (2018). Scientists on Twitter: Preaching to the choir or singing from the rooftops? Facets, 3(1), 682–694. https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2018-0002
   Google Scholar
• Covello, V. T. (1992). Risk communication: An emerging area of health communication research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 15(1), 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1992.11678816
   Google Scholar
• Covello, V. T. (2003). Best practices in public health risk and crisis communication. Journal of Health Communication, 8(S1), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/713851971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlgren, P. (2018). Media, knowledge and trust: The deepening epistemic crisis of democracy. Javnost the Public, 25(1–2), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2018.1418819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontaine, G., Lavallée, A., Maheu-Cadotte, M., Bouix, J., & Bourbonnais, A. (2018). Health science communication strategies used by researchers with the public in the digital and social media ecosystem: A systematic scoping review protocol. British Medical Journal Open, 8(1), Article e019833. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019833
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontaine, G., Maheu-Cadotte, M. A., Lavallée, A., Mailhot, T., Rouleau, G., Bouix-Picasso, J., & Bourbonnais, A. (2019). Communicating science in the digital and social media ecosystem: Scoping review and typology of strategies used by health scientists. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 5(3), Article e14447. https://doi.org/10.2196/14447
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forsyth, D. R. (2020). Group-level resistance to health mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic: A groupthink approach. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research & Practice, 24(3), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1991). The consequences of modernity. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gierth, L., & Bromme, R. (2020). Attacking science on social media: How user comments affect perceived trustworthiness and credibility. Public Understanding of Science, 29(2), 230–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519889275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glik, D. (2007). Risk communication for public health emergencies. Annual Review of Public Health, 28(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guidry, J., Meganck, S. L., Lovari, A., Messner, M., Medina-Messner, V., Sherman, S., & Adams, J. (2020). Tweeting about #Diseases and #Publichealth: Communicating global health issues across nations. Health Communication, 35(9), 1137–1145. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1620089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafson, A., & Rice, R. E. (2019). The effects of uncertainty frames in three science communication topics. Science Communication, 41(6), 679–706. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547019870811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamm, M. P., Chisholm, A., Shulhan, J., Milne, A., Scott, S. D., Klassen, T. P., & Hartling, L. (2013). Social media use by health care professionals and trainees: A scoping review. Academic Medicine, 88(9), 1376–1383. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31829eb91c
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2011). Territories of knowledge, territories of experience: Emphatic moments in interaction. In T. Stivers, L. Mondada & J. Steesing (Eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation (pp. 159–183). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2012a). The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 30–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2012b). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1), 15–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himelboim, I., McCreery, S., & Smith, M. (2013). Birds of a feather tweet together: Integrating network and content analyses to examine cross-ideology exposure on Twitter. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 18(2), 154–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson-West, P. (2003). Understanding vaccination resistance: Moving beyond risk. Health, Risk and Society, 5(3), 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570310001606978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, E. C. H., Pu, C., Chou, Y. J., & Huang, N. (2018). Public trust in physician-Health care commodification as a possible deteriorating factor: Cross-sectional analysis of 23 countries. Inquiry, 55(5), Article 0046958018759174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0046958018759174
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (1990). The fifth branch: Science advisers as policymakers. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kata, A. (2010). A postmodern Pandora’s box: Anti-vaccination misinformation on the Internet. Vaccine, 28(7), 1709–1716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kata, A. (2012). Anti-vaccine activists, web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm. An overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement. Vaccine, 30(25), 3778–3789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. N. (2018). Digital networked information society and public health: Problems and promises of networked health communication of lay publics. Health Communication, 33(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1242039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (Vol. 5). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonzi, S., Ciofalo, G., Ugolini, L., & Ciammella, F. (2020). From family doctor to healthentainment: Health topics in the Italian public service from neo-television to post-television. VIEW Journal of European Television History and Culture, 9(18), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.18146/view.219
   Google Scholar
• Maasen, S., & Weingart, P. (2005). Democratization of expertise? Exploring novel forms of scientific advice in political decision-making. Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3754-6
   Google Scholar
• Mazur, A. (1985). Bias in risk-benefit analysis. Technology in Society, 7(1), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-791X(85)90014-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, S., Ward, P., Coveney, J., & Rogers, W. (2008). Trust in the health system: An analysis and extension of the social theories of Giddens and Luhmann. Health Sociology Review, 17(2), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.5172/hesr.451.17.2.177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihelj, S., Kondor, K., & Štětka, V. (2022). Establishing trust in experts during a crisis: Expert trustworthiness and media use during the COVID-19 pandemic. Science Communication, 44(3), 292–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470221100558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motta, M., Callaghan, T., & Sylvester, S. (2018). Knowing less but presuming more: Dunning-Kruger effects and the endorsement of anti-vaccine policy attitudes. Social Science and Medicine, 211, 274–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.06.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paek, H. J. (2016). Effective risk governance requires risk communication experts. Epidemiology and Health, 38, Article e2016055. https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2016055
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Page, B. I., Shapiro, R. Y., & Dempsey, G. R. (1987). What moves public opinion? American Political Science Review, 81(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.2307/1960777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavolini, E., Kuhlmann, E., Agartan, T. I., Burau, V., Mannion, R., & Speed, E. (2018). Healthcare governance, professions and populism: Is there a relationship? An explorative comparison of five European countries. Health Policy, 122(10), 1140–1148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.08.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, H. P. (1995). The interaction of journalists and scientific experts: Co-operation and conflict between two professional cultures. Media, Culture and Society, 17(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344395017001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, H. P. (2008). Scientists as public experts. In M. Bucchi & B. Trench (Eds.), Handbook of public communication of science and technology (pp. 131–146). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, R. G., Covello, V. T., & McCallum, D. B. (1997). The determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication: An empirical study. Risk Analysis, 17(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00842.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petts, J., Horlick-Jones, T., & Murdock, G. (2001). Social amplification of risk: The media and the public. HSE Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pollard, W. E. (2003). Public perceptions of information sources concerning bioterrorism before and after anthrax attacks: An analysis of national survey data. Journal of Health Communication, 8(S1), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/713851974
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prior, L. (2003). Belief, knowledge and expertise: The emergence of the lay expert in medical sociology. Sociology of Health and Illness, 25(3), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.00339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, B., & Seeger, M. W. (2005). Crisis and emergency risk communication as an integrative model. Journal of Health Communication, 10(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730590904571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, C. T., & Poorisat, T. (2019). The rise and development of public health communication. Health Communication, 35(13), 1666–1677. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1654180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, N. (2015). Scientists in the Twitterverse. Cell, 162(2), 233–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seçkin, G. (2020). Expansion of Parson’s sick role into cyberspace: Patient information consumerism and subjective health in a representative sample of U.S. internet users. Social Science and Medicine, 247, Article 112733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmel, G. (1990). The philosophy of money. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, L. (2002). The allegedly simple structure of experts’ risk perception: An urban legend in risk research. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 27(4), 443–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224302236176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D. (2007). Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Communication Theory, 17(3), 281–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00296.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science: Advanced Materials and Devices, 236(4799), 280–285. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3563507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, B. D., Tanielian, T. L., Eisenman, D. P., Keyser, D. J., Burnam, M. A., & Pincus, H. A. (2004). Emotional and behavioral consequences of bioterrorism: Planning a public health response. The Milbank Quarterly, 82(3), 413–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00317.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trench, B. (2012). Vital and vulnerable: Science communication as a university subject. In B. Schiele, M. Claessen & S. Shi (Eds.), Science communication in the world: Practices, theories and trends (pp. 241–258). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Urquhart, J., Potter, C., Barnett, J., Fellenor, J., Mumford, J. D., & Quine, C. (2017). Expert risk perceptions and the social amplification of risk: A case study in invasive tree pests and diseases. Environmental Science and Policy, 77, 172–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.08.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaccari, C., Valeriani, A., Barberá, P., Bonneau, R., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. A. (2015). Political expression and action on social media: Exploring the relationship between lower- and higher-threshold political activities among Twitter users in Italy. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(2), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijck, J., & Alinejad, D. (2020). Social media and trust in scientific expertise: Debating the covid-19 pandemic in the Netherlands. Social Media & Society, 6(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120981057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijck, J., & Poell, T. (2013). Understanding social media logic. Media and Communication, 1(1), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v1i1.70
   Google Scholar
• Van Eperen, L., & Marincola, F. M. (2011). How scientists use social media to communicate their research. Journal of Translational Medicine, 9(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-9-199
   Google Scholar
• Van Noorden, R. (2014). Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network. Nature News, 512(7513), 126–129. https://doi.org/10.1038/512126a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, M., Gurr, G., & Siemon, M. (2019). Voices in health communication — experts and expert-roles in the German news coverage of multi resistant pathogens. JCOM-Journal of Science Communication, 18(6), Article A03. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.18060203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willems, J. (1995). The biologist as a source of information for the press. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 15(1), 21–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/027046769501500107
   Google Scholar
• Zuczkowski, A., Bongelli, R., & Riccioni, I. (2017). Epistemic stance in dialogue. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.29
   Google Scholar