The Impact of Siblings During Talent Development: A Longitudinal Examination in Sport

REFERENCES

• Abbott, A., Button, C., Pepping, G. J., & Collins, D. (2005). Unnatural selection: Talent identification and development in sport. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 9, 61–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arksey, H., & Knight, P. Y. (1999). Interviewing for social scientists: An introductory resource with examples. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, R., Collins, D., Ford, P. A., Macnamara, Á., Toms, M. R., & Pearce, G. (2010). Participant development in sport: An academic review. Retrieved from https://www.sportscoachuk.org/sites/default/files/Participant-Development-Lit-Review.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13, 544–559.
   Google Scholar
• Beilock, S. L., & Carr, T. H. (2001). On the fragility of skilled performance: What governs choking under pressure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 701–725. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.4.701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blazo, J. A., Czech, D. R., Carson, S., & Dees, W. (2014). A qualitative investigation of the sibling sport achievement experience. The Sport Psychologist, 28, 36–47. doi:10.1123/tsp.2012-0089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blazo, J. A., & Smith, A. L. (2017). A systematic review of siblings and physical activity experiences. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/1750984X.2016.1229355.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Buekers, M., Borry, P., & Rowe, P. (2015). Talent in sports. Some reflections about the search for future champions. Movement & Sports Sciences, 88, 3–12. doi:10.1051/sm/2014002.
   Google Scholar
• Burwitz, L., Moore, P. M., & Wilkinson, D. M. (1994). Future directions for performance-related sports science research: An interdisciplinary approach. Journal of Sports Sciences, 12, 93–109. doi:10.1080/02640419408732159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carduff, E., Murray, S. A., & Kendall, M. (2015). Methodological developments in qualitative longitudinal research: The advantages and challenges of regular telephone contact with participants in a qualitative longitudinal interview study. BMC Research Notes, 8, 142–152. doi:10.1186/s13104-015-1107-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Christensen, W., Sutton, J., & McIlwain, D. J. F. (2016). Cognition in skilled action: Meshed control and the varieties of skill experience. Mind & Language, 31, 37–66. doi:10.1111/mila.12094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, D., Bailey, R., Ford, P. A., MacNamara, Á., Toms, M., & Pearce, G. (2012). Three worlds: New directions in participant development in sport and physical activity. Sport, Education and Society, 17, 225–243. doi:10.1080/13573322.2011.607951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, D., Burke, V., Martindale, A., & Cruickshank, A. (2015). The illusion of competency versus the desirability of expertise: Seeking a common standard for support professions in sport. Sports Medicine, 45, 1–7. doi:10.1007/s40279-014-0251-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, D., & MacNamara, A. (2012). The rocky road to the top: Why talent needs trauma. Sports Medicine, 42, 907–914. doi:10.1007/BF03262302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conger, K. J., & Kramer, L. (2010). Introduction to the special section: Perspectives on sibling relationships: Advancing child development research. Child Development Perspectives, 4, 69–71. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2010.00120.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Côté, J. (1999). The influence of the family in the development of talent in sport. The Sport Psychologist, 13, 395–417. doi:10.1123/tsp.13.4.395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, N. W., & Meyer, B. B. (2008). When sibling becomes competitor: A qualitative investigation of same-sex sibling competition in elite sport. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 20, 220–235. doi:10.1080/10413200701864817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D. (1985). Children's perceptions of the personal relationships in their social networks. Developmental Psychology, 21, 1016–1024. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.21.6.1016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, M. J., Farrow, D., MacMahon, C., & Baker, J. (2015). Sibling dynamics and sport expertise. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 25, 724–733. doi:10.1111/sms.12387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, N., & Recchia, H. (2014). Introduction to special issue on the sibling relationship as a context for learning and development. Early Education and Development, 25, 155–159. doi:10.1080/10409289.2014.857562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(3), 5–14. doi:10.1007/BF02296434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jowett, S., & Timson-Katchis, M. (2005). Social networks in sport: Parental influence on the coach-athlete relationship. The Sport Psychologist, 19, 267–287. doi:10.1123/tsp.19.3.267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, N., & Horrocks, C. (2010). Interviews in qualitative research. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Krane, V., Andersen, M. B., Strean, W. B. (1997). Issues of qualitative research methods and presentations. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 19, 213–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martindale, A., & Collins, D. (2005). Professional judgement and decision making: The role of intention for impact.. The Sport Psychologist, 19, 303–317. doi:10.1123/tsp.19.3.303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, T. (2011). Social research: Issues, methods and process. Maidenhead, UK: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• McHale, S. M., Updegraff, K. A., & Whiteman, S. D. (2012). Sibling relationships and influences in childhood and adolescence. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 913–930. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.01011.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, H., & Rubin, I. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2003). Longitudinal qualitative research: Analyzing change through time. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, S. G., & Einstein, W. O. (2001). Strategic performance appraisal in team-based organizations: One size does not fit all. The Academy of Management Executive, 15, 107–116. doi:10.5465/AME.2001.4614990.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. (Chairman). (1986). Report of the research briefing panel on decision making and problem solving. In Research briefings 1986. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences. Retrieved from https://www.nap.edu/read/911/chapter/3#36
   Google Scholar
• Sparkes, A. (1998). Validity in qualitative inquiry and problems of criteria: Implications for sport psychology. The Sport Psychologist, 12, 363–386. doi:10.1123/tsp.12.4.363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenling, A., Ivarsson, A., & Lindwall, M. (2017). The only constant is change: Analysing and understanding change in sport and exercise psychology research. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 10, 230–251. doi:10.1080/1750984X.2016.1216150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swann, C., Moran, A., & Piggott, D. (2015). Defining elite athletes: Issues in the study of expert performance in sport psychology. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 16, 3–14. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. D., & Collins, D. (2015). Reviewing the family as a stakeholder in talent development: Is it undervalued? Quest, 67, 330–343. doi:10.1080/00336297.2015.1050747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. D., Collins, D., & Carson, H. J. (2017). Sibling interaction as a facilitator for talent development in sport. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 12(2), 219–230. doi:10.1177/1747954117694926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Till, K., Cobley, S., O' Hara, J., Cooke, C., & Chapman, C. (2014). Considering maturation status and relative age in the longitudinal evaluation of junior rugby league players. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 24(3), 569–576. doi:10.1111/sms.12033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trussell, D. (2014). Contradictory aspects of organized youth sport: Challenging and fostering sibling relationships and participation experiences. Youth & Society, 46, 801–818. doi:10.1177/0044118X12453058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volling, B. (2003). Sibling relationships. In M. Bornstein, L. Davidson, C. Keyes, & K. Moore (Eds.), Well-being: Positive development across the life course (pp. 205–220). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2014). Case study research design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar