Adam Mansplains Everything: White-Hipster Masculinity as Covert Hegemony

References

• Anderson, E. (2016). Inclusive masculinities. In C. J. Pascoe & T. Bridges (Eds.), Exploring masculinities: Identity, inequality, continuity, and change (pp. 178–187). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, E., & McCormack, M. (2018). Inclusive masculinity theory: Overview, reflection and refinement. Journal of Gender Studies, 27, 547–561. doi:10.1080/09589236.2016.1245605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, K. J., & Leaper, C. (1998). Meta-analyses of gender effects on conversational interruption: Who, what, when, where, and how. Sex Roles, 39, 225–252. doi:10.1023/A:1018802521676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, C., Brown, J. R., & Baxter, L. A. (1994). Disciplining the feminine. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 80, 383–409. doi:10.1080/00335639409384084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridges, T., & Pascoe, C. J. (2014). Hybrid masculinities: New directions in the sociology of men and masculinities. Sociology Compass, 8, 246–258. doi:10.1111/soc4.v8.3
   Google Scholar
• Bridges, T., & Pascoe, C. J. (2016). Historicizing, multiplying, navigating, and dislocating: Looking at the future of gender theory. In C. J. Pascoe & T. Bridges (Eds.), Exploring masculinities: Identity, inequality, continuity, and change (pp. 425–430). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bridges, T., & Pascoe, C. J. (2018). On the elasticity of gender hegemony: Why hybrid masculinities fail to undermine gender and sexual inequality. In J. W. Messerschmidt, P. Y. Martin, M. A. Messner, & R. Connell (Eds.), Gender reckonings: New social theory and research (pp. 254–274). New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buerkle, C. W. (2011). Masters of their domain: Seinfeld and the discipline of mediated men’s sexual economy. In E. Watson & M. E. Shaw (Eds.), Performing American masculinities: The 21st-century man in popular culture (pp. 9–36). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caro, R. A. (1982). The path to power: The years of Lyndon Johnson (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J, Conover, C, Griffin, S, & Reich, S. (Producers) (2017). Adam ruins everything [Television series]. Atlanta, GA: truTV.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, T. H. (2009). Tort Bench and Jury Trials in State Courts, 2005. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved from https://www.prisonpolicy.org/scans/bjs/tbjtsc05.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Colley, A., & Todd, Z. (2002). Gender-linked differences in the style and content of e-mails to friends. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21, 380–392. doi:10.1177/026192702237955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• C-SPAN (2018, March 7). British Prime Minister Theresa May: “I think that’s what’s called mansplaining.” Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G6yZmnxjUAs
   Google Scholar
• de Boise, S. (2015). I’m not homophobic, “I’ve got gay friends”: Evaluating the validity of inclusive masculinity. Men and Masculinities, 18, 318–339. doi:10.1177/1097184X14554951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, S. J. (2010). The rise of enlightened sexism: How pop culture took us from girl power to girls gone wild. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dow, B. J. (2006). The traffic in men and the Fatal Attraction of postfeminist masculinity. Women’s Studies in Communication, 29, 113–131. doi:10.1080/07491409.2006.10757630
   Google Scholar
• Duncanson, C. (2015). Hegemonic masculinity and the possibility of change in gender relations. Men and Masculinities, 18, 231–248. doi:10.1177/1097184X15584912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (1992). Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21(1), 461–488. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, R., & Hamilton, M. A. (2004). You need to understand my gender role: An empirical test of Tannen’s model of gender and communication. Sex Roles, 50, 491–504. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000023069.93583.8b
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality: An introduction (Vol. I). Trans. Robert Hurley. New York, NY: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1997). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York, NY: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, J. (Producer). (1997). Girls gone wild [Video series]. (Available from GGW Brands LLC,  601 Cloverfield Boulevard,Santa Monica, CA 90404)
   Google Scholar
• Freed, A. (1993). We understand perfectly: A critique of Tannen’s view of cross-sex communication. In K. Hall, M. Buchholz, & B. Moonwomon (Eds.), Locating power: Proceedings of the second berkeley women and language conference (Vol. 1, pp. 144–152). Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, R. (2007). Gender and the media. Malden, MA: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
   Google Scholar
• Gilson, D. (2016). Buddy Holly glasses, tube socks, and angst: Hipster boyhoods in Moonrise kingdom. Quarterly Review of Film and Video, 33, 83–95. doi:10.1080/10509208.2015.1094363
   Google Scholar
• Gilson, D. (2017). The revolution in our pants: Hipsters, race and American fashion. International Journal of Fashion Studies, 4, 35–49. doi:10.1386/infs.4.1.35_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (2001). Foucault: Power, knowledge and discourse. In M. Wetherell, M. Taylor, & S. Yates (Eds.), Discourse, theory, and practice: A reader (pp. 72–81). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hartelius, E. J. (2010). Wikipedia and the emergence of dialogic expertise. Southern Communication Journal, 75, 505–526. doi:10.1080/10417940903377169
   Google Scholar
• Herbert-Cheshire, L., & Higgins, V. (2004). From risky to responsible: Expert knowledge and the governing of community-led rural development. Journal of Rural Studies, 20, 289–302. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2003.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, W. (2016). Hipster aesthetics: Creatives with no alternative. Electronic Melbourne Art Journal, 9, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Hipster. (n.d.). Oxford living dictionaries. Retrieved from https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/hipster
   Google Scholar
• Hipsterism. (n.d.). Merriam-Webster. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/news-trend-watch/hipsterism-2016-01-05
   Google Scholar
• Houston, M. (1995). Women and the language of race and ethnicity. Women and Language, 13(1), 1.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irvin, C. (2017). Constructing hybridized authenticities in the gourmet food truck scene. Symbolic Interaction, 40, 43–62. doi:10.1002/symb.2017.40.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, R. (2009). In but not of, of but not in: On taste, hipness, and white embodiment. Contemporary Aesthetics, Special Vol. 2. Retrieved from https://www.contempaesthetics.org/newvolume/pages/article.php?articleID=549
   Google Scholar
• Jordan-Jackson, F. F., & Davis, K. A. (2005). Men talk: An exploratory study of communication patterns and communication apprehension of Black and White males. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 13, 347–367. doi:10.3149/jms.1303.347
   Google Scholar
• Leaper, C., & Ayres, M. M. (2007). A meta-analytic review of gender variations in adults’ language use: Talkativeness, affiliative speech, and assertive speech. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 328–363. doi:10.1177/1088868307302221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leaper, C., & Robnett, R. D. (2011). Women are more likely than men to use tentative language, aren’t they? A meta-analysis testing for gender differences and moderators. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 129–142. doi:10.1177/0361684310392728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, A. (2006). Female chauvinist pigs: Women and the rise of raunch culture. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, H. (2014, July 4). Mansplainers anonymous: Men explain things to Me by Rebecca Solnit. New Statesman. Retrieved from https://www.newstatesman.com/culture/2014/06/mansplainers-anonymous-men-explain-things-me-rebecca-solnit
   Google Scholar
• Ling, P. M., Lee, Y. O., Hong, J., Neilands, T. B., Jordan, J. W., & Glantz, S. A. (2014). Social branding to decrease smoking among young adults in bars. American Journal of Public Health, 104, 751–760. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2013.301666
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mailer, N. (2007, June 20). The white negro. Dissent. Retrieved from https://www.dissentmagazine.org/online_articles/the-white-negro-fall-1957 ( Original work published 1957)
   Google Scholar
• Maly, I., & Varis, P. (2016). The 21st-century hipster: On micro-populations in times of superdiversity. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 19, 637–653. doi:10.1177/1367549415597920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansplain. (n.d.). Merriam-Webster. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/mansplain
   Google Scholar
• Mast, M. S. (2001). Gender differences and similarities in dominance hierarchies in same-gender groups based on speaking time. Sex Roles, 44, 537–556. doi:10.1023/A:1012239024732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClintock, E. A. (2016, March 31). The psychology of mansplaining. Psychology Today. Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/it-s-man-s-and-woman-s-world/201603/the-psychology-mansplaining
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C. (1969). A summary of experimental research on the effects of evidence in persuasive communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 55, 169–176. doi:10.1080/00335636909382942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael, J. (2015). It’s really not hip to be a hipster: Negotiating trends and authenticity in the cultural field. Journal of Consumer Culture, 15, 163–182. doi:10.1177/1469540513493206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel, K. (1994). Conversation on-line: Girls’ rapport talk and boys’ report talk. Women and Language, 17, 30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, L. C., Cooke, L., Tsang, J., & Morgan, F. (1992). Should I brag? Nature and impact of positive and boastful disclosures for women and men. Human Communication Research, 18, 364–399. doi:10.1111/hcre.1992.18.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E., & Rudman, L. A. (2010). When men break the gender rules: Status incongruity and backlash against modest men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 11, 140–151. doi:10.1037/a0018093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, R. (2015). Whither critical masculinity studies? Notes on inclusive masculinity theory, postfeminism, and sexual politics. Men and Masculinities, 18, 100–120. doi:10.1177/1097184X14553056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palczewski, C. H., DeFrancisco, V. P., & McGeough, D. D. (2018). Gender in communication: A critical introduction. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pitcher, K. C. (2006). The staging of agency in Girls Gone Wild. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 23, 200–218. doi:10.1080/07393180600800759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pornpitakpan, C. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 243–281. doi:10.1111/jasp.2004.34.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reagle, J. (2016). The obligation to know: From FAQ to feminism 101. New Media & Society, 18, 691–707. doi:10.1177/1461444814545840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinard, J. C. (1988). The empirical study of the persuasive effects of evidence the status after fifty years of research. Human Communication Research, 15, 3–59. doi:10.1111/hcre.1988.15.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman, L. (2012, November 1). A cultural history of mansplaining. Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/2012/11/a-cultural-history-of-mansplaining/264380/
   Google Scholar
• Rudman, L. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 629–645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiermer, B. (2014). Late-modern hipsters: New tendencies in popular culture. Acta sociologica, 57, 167–181. doi:10.1177/0001699313498263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz, R. M., & Haltom, T. M. (2017). “I wanted to raise my hand and say I’m not a feminist”: College men’s use of hybrid masculinities to negotiate attachments to feminism and gender studies. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 25, 278–297. doi:10.1177/1060826516676841
   Google Scholar
• Scott, M. (2017). ‘Hipster capitalism’ in the age of austerity? Polanyi meets Bourdieu’s new petite bourgeoisie. Cultural Sociology, 11, 60–76. doi:10.1177/1749975516681226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solnit, R. (2012) Men explain things to me. TomDispatch. Retrieved from http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/175584/rebecca_solnit_the_archipelago_of_ignorance ( Original work published 2008)
   Google Scholar
• Stormer, N. (2002). My life as a lacuna. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 3, 15–23.
   Google Scholar
• Styhre, A., & Tienari, J. (2013). Self-reflexivity scrutinized: (Pro-)feminist men learning that gender matters. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: an International Journal, 32, 195–210. doi:10.1108/02610151311324415
   Google Scholar
• Tannen, D. (1990). You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar