365
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Agency Cues in Online Comments: Exploring Their Relationship with Anonymity and Frequency of Helpful Posts

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 183-195 | Received 11 Jun 2018, Accepted 16 Feb 2019, Published online: 19 Mar 2019

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Chicago: Dorsey Press.
  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Austin, L., Liu, B. F., & Jin, Y. (2012). How audiences seek out crisis information: Exploring the social‐mediated crisis communication model. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 20(2), 188–207. doi:10.1080/00909882.2012.654498
  • Cialdini, R. B. (2001). Influence: Science and practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2008). Digital media and youth: Unparalleled opportunity and unprecedented responsibility. In M. J. Metzger & A. J. Flanagan (Eds.), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 5–27). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Flanagin, A. J., Metzger, M. J., Pure, R., & Markov, A. (2011, January). User-generated ratings and the evaluation of credibility and product quality in ecommerce transactions. System Sciences (HICSS), 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference (pp. 1–10). IEEE. doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2011.474
  • Glaser, M. (2008, January 16). Traditional media ready to elevate the conversation online—With moderation. Mediashift: Your Guide to the Digital Media Revolution. Retrieved from http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/
  • Hall, J. A., Pennington, N., & Lueders, A. (2014). Impression management and formation on Facebook: A lens model approach. New Media & Society, 16(6), 958–982. doi:10.1177/1461444813495166
  • Hlavach, L., & Freivogel, W. H. (2011). Ethical implications of anonymous comments posted to online news stories. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 26(1), 21–37. doi:10.1080/08900523.2011.525190
  • Houston, J. B., Hansen, G. J., & Nisbett, G. S. (2011). Influence of user comments on perceptions of media bias and third-person effect in online news. Electronic News, 5(2), 79–92. doi:10.1177/1931243111407618
  • Kim, K. J., Park, E., & Shyam Sundar, S. (2013). Caregiving role in human–Robot interaction: A study of the mediating effects of perceived benefit and social presence. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1799–1806. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.009
  • Ksiazek, T. B., Peer, L., & Zivic, A. (2015). Discussing the news. Digital Journalism, 3(6), 850–870. doi:10.1080/21670811.2014.972079
  • Kwon, K. H., & Cho, D. (2017). Swearing effects on citizen-to-citizen commenting online: A large-scale exploration of political versus nonpolitical online news sites. Social Science Computer Review, 35(1), 84–102. doi:10.1177/0894439315602664
  • Lachlan, K. A., Spence, P. R., Lin, X., Del Greco, M., & Najarian, K. (2014). Twitter use during a weather event: Comparing content associated with localized and nonlocalized hashtags. Communication Studies, 65, 519–534. doi:10.1080/10510974.2014.956940
  • Lachlan, K. A., Spence, P. R., Lin, X., Najarian, K., & Del Greco, M. (2016). Social media and crisis management: CERC, search strategies, and Twitter content. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 647–652. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.027
  • Lachlan, K. A., Spence, P. R., Omillion-Hodges, L., Rice, R. G., & Brink, A. (2018). Responding to campus shootings: Two studies exploring the effects of sex and placement strategy on knowledge acquisition and organizational reputation. Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research, 1(1), 83–110. doi:10.30658/jicrcr.1.1.5
  • Lee, J. G., & Park, J. (2014). The effects of endorsement strength and celebrity-product match on the evaluation of a sports-related product: The role of product involvement. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 16(1), 50–69. doi:10.1108/IJSMS-16-01-2014-B005
  • Lin, X., & Spence, P. R. (2018). Identity on social networks as a cue: Identity, retweets, and credibility. Communication Studies, 69(5), 461–482. doi:10.1080/10510974.2018.1489295
  • Lin, X., Spence, P. R., & Lachlan, K. A. (2016). Social media and credibility indicators: The effect of influence cues. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 264–271. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.002
  • Liu, B. F., Austin, L., & Jin, Y. (2011). How publics respond to crisis communication strategies: The interplay of information form and source. Public Relations Review, 37(4), 345–353. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.09.010
  • McCroskey, J. C., & Teven, J. J. (1999). Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement. Communication Monographs, 66, 90–103. doi:10.1080/03637759909376464
  • Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Medders, R. B. (2010). Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication, 60, 413–439. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01488.x
  • Meyer, P. (1988). Defining and measuring credibility of newspapers. Journalism Quarterly, 65(3), 567–588. doi:10.1177/107769908806500301
  • Mitchell, A., Gottfried, J., Barthel, M., & Shearer, E. (2016). News use across social media platforms 2017. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from: http://www.journalism.org/2016/07/07/pathways-to-news/
  • Nowak, K. L. (2013). Choosing buddy icons that look like me or represent my personality: Using buddy icons for social presence. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1456–1464. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.027
  • O’Sullivan, P. B., & Carr, C. (2017). Masspersonal communication: A model bridging the mass- interpersonal divide. New Media & Society, 20(3), 1161–1180. doi:10.1177/1461444816686104
  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown Company.
  • Prochazka, F., Weber, P., & Schweiger, W. (2018). Effects of civility and reasoning in user comments on perceived journalistic quality. Journalism Studies, 19(1), 62–78. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2016.1161497
  • Rollins, B., & Bhutada, N. (2014). Impact of celebrity endorsements in disease-specific direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertisements: An elaboration likelihood model approach. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing, 8(2), 164–177. doi:10.1108/IJPHM-05-2013-0024
  • Ryu, Y., & Kim, S. (2014). Testing the heuristic/systematic information-processing model (HSM) on the perception of risk after the Fukushima nuclear accidents. Journal of Risk Research, 1–20.
  • Spence, P. R., Lachlan, K. A., Edwards, A., & Edwards, C. (2016). Tweeting fast matters, but only if I think about it: Information updates on social media. Communication Quarterly, 64(1), 55–71. doi:10.1080/01463373.2015.1100644
  • Spence, P. R., Lachlan, K. A., Lin, X., & Del Greco, M. (2015). Variability in Twitter content across the stages of a natural disaster: Implications for crisis communication. Communication Quarterly, 63(2), 171–186. doi:10.1080/01463373.2015.1012219
  • Springer, N., Engelmann, I., & Pfaffinger, C. (2015). User comments: Motives and inhibitors to write and read. Information, Communication & Society, 18, 798–815. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.997268
  • Sundar, S. S. (2008). The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In M. J. Metzger & A. J. Flanagin (Eds.), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 73–100). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. doi:10.1162/dmal.9780262562324.073
  • Trumbo, C. W., & McComas, K. A. (2003). The function of credibility in information processing for risk perception. Risk Analysis, 23(2), 343–353. doi:10.1111/1539-6924.00313
  • van der Nagel, E., & Frith, J. (2015). Anonymity, pseudonymity, and the agency of online identity: Examining the social practices of r/Gonewild. First Monday, 20(3), 1. doi:10.5210/fm.v20i3.5615
  • Vijay, T. S., Prashar, S., & Gupta, S. (2018). Intention to provide online reviews: An expectation confirmation model with review involvement. Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(2).
  • Wallsten, K., & Tarsi, M. (2016). Persuasion from below? Journalism Practice, 10(8), 1019–1040. doi:10.1080/17512786.2015.1102607
  • Walther, J. B., DeAndrea, D., Kim, J., & Anthony, J. C. (2010). The influence of online comments on perceptions of antimarijuana public service announcements on YouTube. Human Communication Research, 36(4), 469–492. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01384.x
  • Weber, P. (2014). Discussions in the comments section: Factors influencing participation and interactivity in online newspapers’ reader comments. New Media & Society, 16(6), 941–957. doi:10.1177/1461444813495165
  • Weber, P., Prochazka, F., & Schweiger, W. (2017). Why user comments affect the perceived quality of journalistic content. Journal of Media Psychology. doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000217
  • Westerman, D., Spence, P. R., & Van Der Heide, B. (2012). A social network as information: The effect of system generated reports of connectedness on credibility on Twitter. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 199–206. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.09.001
  • Westerman, D., Spence, P. R., & Van Der Heide, B. (2014). Social media as information source: Recency of updates and credibility of information. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(2), 171–183. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12041
  • Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back in fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs, 59(4), 329–349. doi:10.1080/03637759209376276
  • Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985). Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 341–352. doi:10.1086/jcr.1985.12.issue-3
  • Zamith, R., & Lewis, S. C. (2014). From public spaces to public sphere: Rethinking systems for reader comments on online news sites. Digital Journalism, 2(4), 558–574. doi:10.1080/21670811.2014.882066
  • Ziegele, M., Springer, N., Jost, P., & Wright, S. (2018). Online user comments across news and other content formats: Multidisciplinary perspectives, new directions. SCM Studies in Communication and Media, 6(4), 315–332. doi:10.1086/208520

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.