When Modes Collide: A Daily Diary Study of Mixed-Media Use and Conflict Behavior in Romantic Relationships

References

• Barki, H., & Hartwick, J. (2004). Conceptualizing the construct of interpersonal conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 15(3), 216–244. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan, J. L. (2017). Romantic jealousy in face-to-face and technologically-mediated interactions: A communicative interdependence perspective. Western Journal of Communication, 81(4), 466–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2017.1283048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caughlin, J. P., Basinger, E. D., & Sharabi, L. L. (2017). The connections between communication technologies and relational conflict: A multiple goals and communication interdependence perspective. In J. A. Samp (Ed.), Communicating interpersonal conflict in close relationships: Contexts, challenges and opportunities (pp. 57–72). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Caughlin, J. P., & Sharabi, L. L. (2013). A communicative interdependence perspective of close relationships: The connections between mediated and unmediated interactions matter. Journal of Communication, 63(5), 873‒893. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caughlin, J. P., Vangelisti, A. L., & Mikucki-Enyart, S. (2013). Conflict in dating and maritalrelationships. In J. G. Oetzel & S. Ting-Toomey (Eds.), Sage handbook of conflict communication: Integrating theory, research, and practice (2nd ed., pp. 161–186). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, P., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, R., Bybee, B. T., Frost, J. K., Harvey, A. J., & Navarro, M. (2017). That’s Not What I Meant. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 36(2), 188–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X16662968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. H. (1999). Conflict in marriage: Implications for working with couples. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 47–77. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottman, J. M. (1999). The marriage clinic: A scientifically-based marital therapy. WW Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Gottman, J. M. (2011). The science of trust: Emotional attunement for couples. WW Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Hinkle, Dennis E., Wiersma, William., & Stephen, Jurs G. 2003. Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences(5th ed., Vol. 663, pp.756). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Hocker, J. L., & Wilmot, W. W. (1985). Interpersonal conflict. WCB/McGraw- Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, S. N., McClure, M. J., & Bolger, N. (2019). Exploring how exchange orientation affects conflict and intimacy in the daily life of romantic couples. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, 36(11–12), 3575–3587. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407519826743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. L., & Roloff, M. E. (1998). Serial arguing and relational quality. Communication Research, 25(3), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365098025003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jovanović, V., & Lazić, M. (2020). Is longer always better? A comparison of the validity of single-item versus multiple-item measures of life satisfaction. Applied Research Quality Life, 15(3), 675–692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-018-9680-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashian, N. (2021). The impact of media use on the spillover and crossover effect of couple conflict. New Media & Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211014841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kees, J., Berry, C., Burton, S., & Sheehan, K. (2017). An analysis of data quality: Professional panels, student subject pools, and Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2016.1269304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Newton, T. L. (2001). Marriage and health: His and hers. Psychological Bulletin, 127(4), 472–503. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.4.472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurenceau, J. P., & Bolger, N. (2005). Using diary methods to study marital and family processes. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(1), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.19.1.86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenhart, A., & Duggan, M. (2014, February 11). Couples, the internet, and social media. http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/02/11/couples-the-internet-and-social-media/
   Google Scholar
• Nadel Harony, T., Einav, G., & Galily, Y. (2021). Let’s WhatsApp! Generation X couples’ online and offline relationship patterns in the digital age. New Media & Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211043192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oggins J., Veroff J., & Leber, D. (1993). Perceptions of marital interaction among Black and White newlyweds. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(3), 494–511. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.3.494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overall, N. C., & McNulty, J. K. (2017). What type of communication during conflict is beneficial for intimate relationships? Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, M. R. (2017). Embracing the challenges and opportunities of mixed‐media relationships. Human Communication Research, 43(4), 505–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, M. S., & Werner-Wilson, R. J. (2011). Couples and computer-mediated communication: A closer look at the affordances and use of the channel. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 40(2), 120–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-3934.2011.02099.x
   Google Scholar
• Pollmann, M. M., Crockett, E. E., Vanden Abeele, M. M., & Schouten, A. P. (2020). Does attachment style moderate the effect of computer‐mediated versus face‐to‐face conflict discussions? Personal Relationships, 27(4), 939–955. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pusateri, K. B., Roaché, D. J., & Wang, N. (2015). The role of communication technologies in serial arguments: A communicative interdependence perspective. Argumentation & Advocacy, 52(1), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2015.11821860
   Google Scholar
• Roaché, D., Caughlin, J., Wang, N., & Pusateri, K. (2020). The presence of a mobile phone does not (necessarily) change the fundamental processes of face-to-face relational conflict. Human Communication & Technology, 1(2), 36–59. https://doi.org/10.17161/hct.v1i2.13308
   Google Scholar
• Ruppel, E. K., Cherney, M. R., Quinn, S. F., & Richards, R. J. (2021). Effects of mediated communication on conflict behavior, resolution, and affect in romantic couples. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, 38(12), 3633–3645. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211040806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5(4), 357–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scissors, L. E., & Gergle, D. (2013). Back and forth, back and forth. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work – CSCW (pp. 237–247). https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441804
   Google Scholar
• Sharabi, L. L., & Dorrance-Hall, E. (2021). Conceptualizing and measuring communication interdependence: The technology and face-to-face integration scale. Communication Methods and Measures, 15(3), 222–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2021.1894325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sillars, A. L. (1980). Attributions and communication in roommate conflicts. Communication Monographs, 47(3), 180–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758009376031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, A. A., Kessler, R. C., & Haythomthwatte, J. A. (1991). Measuring daily events and experiences: Decisions for the researcher. Journal of Personality, 59(3), 575–607. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1991.tb00260.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streiner, D. L. (2003). Being inconsistent about consistency: When coefficient alpha does and doesn’t matter. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(3), 217–222. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8003_01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trapp, R., & Hoff, N. (1985). A model of serial argument in interpersonal relationships. The Journal of the American Forensic Association, 22(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.1985.11951297
   Google Scholar
• Vuchinich, S. (1987). Starting and stopping spontaneous family conflicts. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49(3), 591. https://doi.org/10.2307/352204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodin, E. M. (2011). A two-dimensional approach to relationship conflict: Meta-analytic findings. Journal of Family Psychology, 25(3), 325–335. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023791
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar