The Communication Patterns of Highly Effective Lie Detectors

References

• Aamodt, M. G., & Custer, H. (2006). Who can best catch a liar. Forensic Examiner, 15(1),, 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, J. P., Levine, T. R., & Shaw, A. J. (2010). Content in context improves deception detection accuracy. Human Communication Research, 36(3), 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01382.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, C. F., Jr., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 214–234. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buller, D. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1996). Interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory, 6, 203–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1996.tb00127.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunbar, N. E., Jensen, M. L., Burgoon, J. K., Kelly, K. M., Harrison, K. J., Adame, B. J., & Bernard, D. R. (2015). Effects of veracity, modality, and sanctioning on credibility assessment during mediated and unmediated interviews. Communication Research, 42(5), 649–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213480175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, T. R. (2013). DOJ funded cheating tape interviews. Michigan State University.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, T. R. (2014). Truth-default theory (TDT): A theory of human deception and deception detection. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(4), 378–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X14535916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, T. R. (2015). New and improved accuracy findings in deception detection research. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, T. R. (2017). Ecological validity and deception detection research design. Communication Methods and Measures, 12(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1411471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, T. R. (2020). Duped: Truth-default theory and the social science of lying and deception. University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, T. R. (2022a). Content, context, cues, and demeanor in deception detection. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.988040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, T. R. (2022b). Truth-default theory and the psychology of lying and deception detection. Current Opinion in Psychology, 47, 101380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, T. R., Blair, J. P., & Clare, D. (2014). Diagnostic utility: Experimental demonstrations and replications of powerful question effects and smaller question by experience interactions in high stake deception detection. Human Communication Research, 40(2), 262–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, T. R., Clare, D., Blair, J. P., McCornack, S. A., Morrison, K., & Park, H. S. (2014). Expertise in deception detection involves actively prompting diagnostic information rather than passive behavioral observation. Human Communication Research, 40(4), 442–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, T. R., Kim, R. K., & Hamel, L. M. (2010). People lie for a reason: An experimental test of the principle of veracity. Communication Research Reports, 27(4), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2010.496334
   Google Scholar
• Levine, T. R., Shulman, H. C., Carpenter, C. J., DeAndrea, D. C., & Blair, J. P. (2013). The impact of accusatory, non-accusatory, bait, and false evidence questioning on deception detection. Communication Research Reports, 30(2), 169–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2012.762905
   Google Scholar
• Park, H. S., Levine, T. R., McCornack, S. A., Morrison, K., & Ferrara, M. (2002). How people really detect lies. Communication Monographs, 69(2), 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/714041710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Meissner, C. A., & Kassin, S. M. (2015). Problems in expert deception detection and the risk of false confessions: No proof to the contrary in Levine et al. (2014). Psychology, Crime, & Law, 21(9), 901–909. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2015.1054389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar