Determination of Anisotropic Yield Coefficients by a Data-Driven Multiobjective Evolutionary and Genetic Algorithm

REFERENCES

• Banabic, D.; Barlat, F.; Cazacu, O.; Kuwabara, T. Advances in anisotropy and formability. International Journal of Material Forming 2010, 3 (3), 165–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hariharan, K.; Prakash, R.V. Integrating effect of forming in fatigue life prediction: review of present scenario and challenges. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture 2012, 226 (6), 967–979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, R. A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 1948, 193 (1033), 281–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banabic, D. Sheet metal forming processes. Sheet Metal Forming Processes. 2010: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, N.-T.; Lee, M.-G.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, H.Y. A practical constitutive model for AZ31B Mg alloy sheets with unusual stress–strain response. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 2013, 76 (0), 39–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J.; Lee, J.-Y.; Barlat, F.; Wagoner, R.H.; Chung, K.; Lee, M.-G. Extension of quasi-plastic–elastic approach to incorporate complex plastic flow behavior – application to springback of advanced high-strength steels. International Journal of Plasticity 2013, 45 (0), 140–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, J.W.; Barlat, F.; Dick, R.E.; Karabin, M.E. Prediction of six or eight ears in a drawn cup based on a new anisotropic yield function. International Journal of Plasticity 2006, 22 (1), 174–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cazacu, O.; Plunkett, B.; Barlat, F. Orthotropic yield criterion for hexagonal closed packed metals. International Journal of Plasticity 2006, 22 (7), 1171–1194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlat, F.; Brem, J.C.; Yoon, J.W.; Chung, K.; Dick, R.E.; Lege, D.J.; Pourboghrat, F.; Choi, S.H.; Chu, E. Plane stress yield function for aluminum alloy sheets—part 1: theory. International Journal of Plasticity 2003, 19 (9), 1297–1319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aretz, H.; Barlat, F. New convex yield functions for orthotropic metal plasticity. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics 2013, 51 (0), 97–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hariharan, K.; Prakash, R.V.; Sathya Prasad, M. Influence of yield criteria in the prediction of strain distribution and residual stress distribution in sheet metal formability analysis for a commercial steel. Materials and Manufacturing Processes 2010, 25 (8), 828–836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y.Q.; Wang, J.C.; Hu, P. The numerical analysis of anisotropic sheet metals in deep-drawing processes. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 2002, 120 (1–3), 45–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banabic, D.; Sester, M. Influence of material models on the accuracy of the sheet forming simulation. Materials and Manufacturing Processes 2011, 27 (3), 273–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banabic, D.; Aretz, H.; Comsa, D.S.; Paraianu, L. An improved analytical description of orthotropy in metallic sheets. International Journal of Plasticity 2005, 21 (3), 493–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattiasson, K.; Sigvant, M. An evaluation of some recent yield criteria for industrial simulations of sheet forming processes. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 2008, 50 (4), 774–787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paszkowicz, W. Genetic algorithms, a nature-inspired tool: a survey of applications in materials science and related fields: part II. Materials and Manufacturing Processes 2013, 28 (7), 708–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta, S.; Chattopadhyay, P.P. Soft computing techniques in advancement of structural metals. International Materials Reviews 2013, 58 (8), 475–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborti, N. Critical assessment: The unique contributions of multi-objective evolutionary and genetic algorithms in materials research. Materials Science and Technology. doi:10.1179/1743284714Y.0000000578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaparro, B.M.; Thuillier, S.; Menezes, L.F.; Manach, P.Y.; Fernandes, J.V. Material parameters identification: Gradient-based, genetic and hybrid optimization algorithms. Computational Materials Science 2008, 44 (2), 339–346.
   Google Scholar
• Jackiewicz, J. Assessing coefficients of the barlat yield criterion for anisotropic aluminum alloy sheets by means of the evolutionary strategy. Materials and Manufacturing Processes 2009, 24 (3), 375–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hariharan, K.; Chakraborti, N.; Barlat, F.; Lee, M.-G. A novel multi-objective genetic algorithms-based calculation of Hill's coefficients. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A 2014, 45 (6), 2704–2707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlat, F.; Lian, K. Plastic behavior and stretchability of sheet metals. Part I: A yield function for orthotropic sheets under plane stress conditions. International Journal of Plasticity 1989, 5 (1), 51–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuwabara, T.; Ikeda, S.; Kuroda, K. Measurement and analysis of differential work hardening in cold-rolled steel sheet under biaxial tension. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 1998, 80–81 (0), 517–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuwabara, T.; Kuroda, M.; Tvergaard, V.; Nomura, K. Use of abrupt strain path change for determining subsequent yield surface: experimental study with metal sheets. Acta Materialia 2000, 48 (9), 2071–2079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoughton, T.B.; Shi, M.F.; Huang, G.; Yoon, J.W. Material characterizations for Benchmark 1 and Benchmark 2. AIP Conference Proceedings 2013, 1567 (1), 9–14.
   Google Scholar
• Miettinen, K. Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Norwell, MA, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Chakraborti, N. Chapter 5 - Evolutionary data-driven modeling. In: Rajan, K. eds.; Informatics for Materials Science and Engineering, Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, 2013; pp. 71–95.
   Google Scholar
• Pettersson, F.; Chakraborti, N.; Saxén, H. A genetic algorithms based multi-objective neural net applied to noisy blast furnace data. Applied Soft Computing 2007, 7 (1), 387–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X. A Real-Coded Predator-Prey Genetic Algorithm for Multiobjective Optimization, in Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization; C. Fonseca, et al., Eds.; Springer: Berlin Heidelberg, 2003; pp. 207–221.
   Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, S.; Dulikravich, G. Improvements to single-objective constrained predator–prey evolutionary optimization algorithm. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 2010, 41 (4), 541–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deb, K. Multi-Objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms; John Wiley & Sons: Sussex, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Mattiasson, K.; Sigvant, M. On the influence of the yield locus shape in the simulation of sheet stretch forming. AIP Conference Proceedings 2005, 778 (1), 395–400.
   Google Scholar
• Hariharan, K.; Prakash, R.; Sathya Prasad, M.; Madhusudhan Reddy, G. Evaluation of yield criteria for forming simulations based on residual stress measurement. International Journal of Material Forming 2010, 3 (4), 291–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L.; Lee, T.C. The effect of yield criteria on the forming limit curve prediction and the deep drawing process simulation. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 2006, 46 (9), 988–995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hariharan, K.; Balaji, C. Material optimization: a case study using sheet metal-forming analysis. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 2009, 209 (1), 324–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd, B.; Caddell, R.M. On the anomalous behaviour of anisotropic sheet metals. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 1984, 26 (2), 113–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, R.W.; Hosford, W.F. Upper-bound anisotropic yield locus calculations assuming ⟨111⟩-pencil glide. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 1980, 22 (7), 419–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlat, F.; Aretz, H.; Yoon, J.W.; Karabin, M.E.; Brem, J.C.; Dick, R.E. Linear transfomation-based anisotropic yield functions. International Journal of Plasticity 2005, 21 (5), 1009–1039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comsa, D.-S.; Banabic, D. Plane-stress yield criterion for highly-anisotropic sheet metals. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference and Workshop on Numerical Simulation of 3D Sheet Metal Forming Processes, NUMISHEET, ETH Zurich, Switzerland, September 1–5, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, P.; Tuninetti, V.; Gilles, G.; Gonry, P.; Duchêne, L.; Habraken, A.M. Accurate stress computation in plane strain tensile tests for sheet metal using experimental data. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 2010, 210 (13), 1772–1779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, Q.; Zillmann, B.; Suttner, S.; Gerstein, G.; Biasutti, M.; Tekkaya, A.E.; Wagner, M.F.X.; Merklein, M.; Schaper, M.; Halle, T.; Brosius, A. An experimental and numerical investigation of different shear test configurations for sheet metal characterization. International Journal of Solids and Structures 2014, 51 (5), 1066–1074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giri, B.K.; Hakanen, J.; Miettinen, K.; Chakraborti, N. Genetic programming through bi-objective genetic algorithms with a study of a simulated moving bed process involving multiple objectives. Applied Soft Computing 2013, 13 (5), 2613–2623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondal, D.N.; Sarangi, K.; Pettersson, F.; Sen, P.K.; Saxén, H.; Chakraborti, N. Cu―Zn separation by supported liquid membrane analyzed through multi-objective genetic algorithms. Hydrometallurgy 2011, 107 (3–4), 112–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, A.; Pettersson, F.; Singh, A.; Kong, C.S.; Saxén, H.; Rajan, K.; Iwata, S.; Chakraborti, N. Identification and optimization of AB2 phases using principal component analysis, evolutionary neural nets, and multiobjective genetic algorithms. Materials and Manufacturing Processes 2009, 24 (3), 274–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, A.; Tewary, U.; Pettersson, F.; Das, S.; Saxén, H.; Chakraborti, N. Analysing blast furnace data using evolutionary neural network and multiobjective genetic algorithms. Ironmaking & Steelmaking 2010, 37 (5), 353–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta, S.; Pettersson, F.; Ganguly, S.; Saxen, H.; Chakraborti, N. Designing high strength multi-phase steel for improved strength-ductility balance using neural networks and multi-objective genetic algorithms. ISIJ International 2007, 47 (8), 1195–1203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta, S.; Pettersson, F.; Ganguly, S.; Saxén, H.; Chakraborti, N. Identification of factors governing mechanical properties of TRIP-aided steel using genetic algorithms and neural networks. Materials and Manufacturing Processes 2008, 23 (2), 130–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govindan, D.; Chakraborty, S.; Chakraborti, N. Analyzing the fluid flow in continuous casting through evolutionary neural nets and multi-objective genetic algorithms. Steel Research International 2010, 81 (3), 197–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hariharan, K.; Nguyen, N.-T.; Chakraborti, N.; Lee, M.G.; Barlat, F. Multi-objective genetic algorithm to optimize variable drawbead geometry for tailor welded blanks made of dissimilar steels. Steel Research International 2014, doi:10.1002/srin.201300471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersson, F.; Biswas, A.; Sen, P.K.; Saxén, H.; Chakraborti, N. Analyzing leaching data for low-grade manganese ore using neural nets and multiobjective genetic algorithms. Materials and Manufacturing Processes 2009, 24 (3), 320–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jha, R.; Sen, P.K.; Chakraborti, N. Multi-objective genetic algorithms and genetic programming models for minimizing input carbon rates in a blast furnace compared with a conventional analytic approach. Steel Research International 2014, 85 (2), 219–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coello, C.A.C.; Lamont, G.B.; Van Veldhuisen, D.A. Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems, 2nd Ed., Springer: New York, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Chakraborti, N. Genetic algorithms in materials design and processing. International Materials Reviews 2004, 49 (3–1), 246–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, P.D.; Jain, M.; Savoie, J.; MacEwen, S.R.; Tuğcu, P.; Neale, K.W. Evaluation of anisotropic yield functions for aluminum sheets. International Journal of Plasticity 2003, 19 (1), 121–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lademo, O.G.; Hopperstad, O.S.; Langseth, M. An evaluation of yield criteria and flow rules for aluminium alloys. International Journal of Plasticity 1999, 15 (2), 191–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J.-W.; Lee, M.-G.; Barlat, F. Finite element modeling using homogeneous anisotropic hardening and application to spring-back prediction. International Journal of Plasticity 2012, 29, 13–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar