Study the parametric effect of abrasive water jet machining on surface roughness of Inconel 718 using RSM-BBD techniques

References

• Uthayakumar, M.; Adam Khan, M.; Thirumalai Kumaran, S.; Slota, A.; Zajac, J. Machinability of Nickel-Based Superalloy by Abrasive Water Jet Machining. Mater. Manuf. Processes 2015, 31(13), 1733–1739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, A.; Anandita, S.; Gangopadhyay, S. Microstructural Analysis and Multiresponse Optimization during ECM of Inconel 825 using Hybrid Approach. Mater. Manuf. Processes 2015, 30(7), 842–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ay, M.; Caydas, U.; Hascalik, A. Effect of Traverse Speed on Abrasive Water Jet Machining of Age Hardened Inconel 718 Nickel-Based Superalloy. Mater. Manuf. Processes 2010, 25(10), 1160–1165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arola, D.; Ramula, M. Material Removal in Abrasive Water Jet Machining of Metals Surface Integrity and Texture. Wear 1997, 210, 50–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashish, M. A Modeling Study of Metal Cutting with Abrasive Water Jets. J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 1984, 106, 88–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulekci, M. K. Processes and Apparatus Developments in Industrial Water Jet Applications. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2002, 42, 1297–1306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L.; Siores, E.; Wong, W.C. K. Kerf Characteristics in Abrasive Water Jet Cutting of Ceramic Materials. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 1996, 36(11), 1201–1206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, D.; Huang, C.; Wang, J.; Zhu, H.; Yao, P.; Liu, Z. W. Modeling and Optimization of Operating Parameters for Abrasive Water Jet Turning Alumina Ceramics using Response Surface Methodology Combined with Box–Behnken Design. Ceram. Int. 2014, 40, 7899–7908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babu, M. K.; Chetty, O. V. K. A Study on the use of Single Mesh Size Abrasives in Abrasive Water Jet Machining. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2006, 29(5), 532–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jegaraj, J. J. R.; Babu, N. R. A Strategy for Efficient and Quality Cutting of Materials with Abrasive Water Jet Considering the Variation in Orifice. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2005, 45, 1443–1450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caydas, U.; Hascalik, A. A Study on Surface Roughness in Abrasive Water Jet Machining Process using Artificial Neural Network and Regression Analysis Method. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2008, 202, 574–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aultrin, K. S. J.; Anand, M. D. Experiment Framework and Study of AWJM Process for an Aluminum 6061 Alloy using RSM. International Conference on Control, Instrumentation, Communication and Computational Technology (IEEE), Noorul Islam University, Kumaracoil, Thuckalay, Kanya Kumari District, Tamilnadu, India, 2014; pp 1432–1440.
   Google Scholar
• Aultrin, K. S. J.; Anand, M. D. Optimization of Machining Parameters in AWJM Process for a Copper Iron Alloy using RSM and Regression Analysis. Int. J. Emerg. Eng. Res. Technol. 2014, 2(5), 19–34.
   Google Scholar
• Yuvraj, N.; Kumar, M. P. Multiresponse Optimization of Abrasive Water Jet Cutting Process Parameters using TOPSIS Approach. Mater. Manuf. Processes 2015, 30(7), 882–889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natarajan, Y.; Murugasen, P. K. Surface Integrity Studies on Abrasive Water Jet Cutting of AISI D2 Steel. Mater. Manuf. Processes 2016, 32(2), 162–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2016.1221093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuvaraj, N.; Kumar, M. P. Investigation of Process Parameters Influence in AWJ Cutting of D2 Steel. Mater. Manuf. Process 2016, 32(2), 121–161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2016.1176183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuvraj, N.; Kumar, M. P. Study and Evaluation of Abrasive Water Jet Cutting Performance on AA5083-H32 Aluminum Alloy by Varying the Jet Impingement Angles with Different Abrasive Mesh Sizes. Mach. Sci. Technol. 2017, 21(3), 385–415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10910344.2017.1283958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramulu, M.; Arola, D. The Influence of Abrasive Water Jet Cutting Conditions on the Surface Quality of Graphite/Epoxy Laminates. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 1994, 34(3), 295–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azmir, M. A.; Ahsan, A. K. A Study of Abrasive Water Jet Machining Process on Glass/Epoxy Composite Laminate. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2009, 209, 6168–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J.; Guo, D. M. A Predictive Depth of Penetration Model for Abrasive Water Jet Cutting of Polymer Matrix Composites. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2002, 121, 390–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babu, M. N.; Muthukrishnan, N. Investigation on Surface Roughness in Abrasive Water Jet Machining by the Response Surface Method. Mater. Manuf. Processes 2014, 29(11–12), 1422–1428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemma, E.; Chen, L.; Siores, E. Optimizing the AWJ Cutting Process of Ductile Materials using Nozzle Oscillation Technique. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2002, 42, 781–789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J.; Wong, W. C. K. A Study of Abrasive Water Jet Cutting of Metallic Coated Sheet Steels. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 1999, 39(6), 855–870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santhanakumar, M.; Adalarasan, R.; Rajmohan, M. Experimental Modeling and Analysis in Abrasive Water Jet Cutting of Ceramic Tiles using Grey Based Response Surface Methodology. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2015, 40(11), 3299–3311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, A.; Kumar V.; Kumar, J. Multi-Response Optimization of Process Parameters Based on Response Surface Methodology for Pure Titanium using WEDM Process. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2013, 68, 2645–2668,
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohal, S.; Kumar, H. Parametric Optimization of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube-Assisted Electric Discharge Machining of Al-10% SiCp Metal Matrix Composite by Response Surface Methodology. Mater. Manuf. Processes 2017, 32, 263–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar