Investigation on the effect of process parameters in atmospheric pressure plasma treatment on carbon fiber reinforced polymer surfaces for bonding

References

• Adams, R. D.;. Adhesive Bonding: Science, Technology and Applications; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Pizzi, A.; Mittal, K. L. Hnadbook of Adhesive Technology; CRC Press: Boca Raton, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Budhe, S.; Banea, M. D.; De Barros, S.; Da Silva, L. F. An Updated Review of Adhesively Bonded Joints in Composite Materials. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2017, 72, 30–42. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S. Y.; Choi, W. J.; Choi, H. S.; Kwon, H.; Kim, S. H. Recent Trends in Surface Treatment Technologies for Airframe Adhesive Bonding Processing: A Review (1995–2008). J. Adhes. 2010, 86(2), 192–221. DOI: 10.1080/00218460903418345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, D. M.;. Surface Modification Technologies X Edited by T. S. Sudarshan, K. A. Khor, and M. Jeandin. Mater. Manuf. Processes. 1998, 13(5), 788–790. DOI: 10.1080/10426919808935302.
   Google Scholar
• Kusano, Y.;. Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Processing for Polymer Adhesion: A Review. J. Adhes. 2014, 90(9), 755–777. DOI: 10.1080/00218464.2013.804407+4321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penkov, O. V.; Khadem, M.; Lim, W. S.; Kim, D. E. A Review of Recent Applications of Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Jets for Materials Processing. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 2015, 12(2), 225–235. DOI: 10.1007/s11998-014-9638-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, T. S. Surface Modification by Atmospheric Pressure Plasma for Improved Bonding. Ph.D thesis, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Wingfield, J. R. J.;. Treatment of Composite Surfaces for Adhesive Bonding. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 1993, 13, 151–156. DOI: 10.1016/0143-7496(93)90036-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chartosias, M. Argon-Oxygen Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Treatment on Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer for Improved Bonding. M.S. Thesis, California State University of Long Beach, Long Beach, CA, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Zaldivar, R.; Nokes, J.; Steckel, G. Effect of Processing Parameter Changes on the Adhesion of Plasma-Treated Carbon Fiber Reinforced Epoxy Composites. J. Compos. Mater. 2009, 44(12), 1435–1453. DOI: 10.1177/0021998309345343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaldivar, R. J.; Steckel, G. L.; Morgan, B. A.; Nokes, J. P.; Kim, H. I. Bonding Optimization on Composite Surfaces Using Atmospheric Plasma Treatment. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2012, 26, 381–401. DOI: 10.1163/016942411X576554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yung, K. C.; Liem, H.; Choy, H. S.; Zheng, H. F.; Yue, T. M. Multiresponse Optimization of Surface Plasma Treatment Using Taguchi Method. Mater. Manuf. Processes. 2010, 25(9), 1001–1011. DOI: 10.1080/10426910903365794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krushnamurty, K.; Srikanth, I.; Subrahmanyam, C. Effect of Plasma Etched CNFs on Toughness and Mechanical Properties of Epoxy Composites. Mater. Manuf. Processes. 2015, 30(3), 387–392. DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2014.930960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrov, S. V.; Saakov, A. G. Technology and Equipment for Plasma Surface Hardening of Heavy-Duty Parts. Mater. Manuf. Processes. 2002, 17(3), 363–378. DOI: 10.1081/AMP-120005382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utracki, L. A.;. Plasma Deposition, Treatment, and Etching of Polymers Edited by R. D’Agostino Academic Press, Inc. Mater. Manuf. Processes. 1990, 8(3), 385–390. DOI: 10.1080/10426919308934842.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, E.; Barankin, M. D.; Guschl, P. C.; Hicks, R. F. Remote Atmospheric-Pressure Plasma Activation of the Surfaces of Polyethylene Terephthalate and Polyethylene. Langmuir. 2008, 24(21), 12636–12643. DOI: 10.1021/la802296c.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lommatzsch, U.; Pasedag, D.; Baalmann, A.; Ellinghorst, G.; Hans-Erich Wagner, H. E. Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Jet Treatment of Polyethylene Surfaces for Adhesion Improvement. J. Plasma Processes Polym. 2007, 4, 1041–1045. DOI: 10.1002/ppap.200732402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cytec Eng. Materials, Cycom 5320-1 Datasheet. https://www.cytec.com/sites/default/files/files/CYT_12000_COLLECT_BROCH-CYCOM_5320-1.pdf (accessed Feb 6, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D5946-09, Standard Test Method for Corona-Treated Polymer Films Using Water Contact Angle Measurements. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, 2009. www.astm.org (accessed Feb 6, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D5528-13, Standard Test Method for Mode I Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, 2013. www.astm.org (accessed February 6 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Myers, R. H.; Montgomery, D. C.; Anderson-Cook, C. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, 3rd ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, 2009; pp 135–173.
   Google Scholar
• Mendenhall, W.; Beaver, R. J.; Beaver, B. M. Introduction to Probability and Statistics, 13th ed.; Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole,Cengage Learning, 2009; pp 447–459.
   Google Scholar