Experimental approach to measure the restraining force in deep drawing by means of a versatile draw bead simulator

References

• Singh, C. P.; Agnihotri, G. Study of Deep Drawing Process Parameters: A Review. Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ. 2015, 5, 1–15. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/cf95/92cdb0d434cb55bb6e28978acb4c54140c67.pdf?_ga=2.248391621.39281799.1549896558-356794861.1549896558 (accessed Feb 11, 2019)
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. R. D.; Hsu, T.-C.; Huang, X.-B. A Realistic Friction Model for Computer Simulation of Sheet Metal Forming Processes. J. Eng. Ind. 1995, 117(2), 202–209. DOI: 10.1115/1.2803295.
   Google Scholar
• Angasu, G.; Srinivasulu Reddy, K. Deep Drawing Process Parameters: A Review. Int J Current Eng and Technol. 2016, 6(4), 1204–1215. DOI: 10.14741/Ijcet/22774106/6.4.2016.20.
   Google Scholar
• Djavanroodi, F.; Abbasnejad, D. S.; Nezami, E. H. Deep Drawing of Aluminum Alloys Using a Novel Hydroforming Tooling. Mater. Manuf. Proces. 2011, 26(5), 796–801. DOI: 10.1080/10426911003720722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trzepieciński, T.; Bazan, A.; Lemu, H. G. Frictional Characteristics of Steel Sheets Used in Automotive Industry. Int. J. Automot. Technol. 2015, 16, 849–863. DOI: 10.1007/s12239-015-0087-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallance, D. W.; Matlock, O. K. Application of the Bending-Under-Tension Friction Test to Coated Sheet Steels. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 1992, 1, 685–693. DOI: 10.1007/BF02649250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trzepiecinski, T.; Lemu, H. G. Effect of Activation Function and Post Synaptic Potential on Response of Artificial Neural Network to Predict Frictional Resistance of Aluminium Alloy Sheets. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017, 269, 012041. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/269/1/012041 https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/269/1/012041 (accessed Apr 29, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, J.; Shabel, B.; Filho, J. A Tensile Strip Test for Evaluating Friction in Sheet Metal Forming. SAE Technical Paper. 1978, Article Id: 780391. DOI: 10.4271/780391.
   Google Scholar
• Nine, H. D.;. The Applicability of Coulomb’s Friction Law to Drawbeads in Sheet Metal Forming. J. Appl. Metal Work. 1982, 2, 200–210. DOI: 10.1007/BF02834038.
   Google Scholar
• Trzepieciński, T.; Fejkiel, R.; Kubit, A. Experimental Evaluation of Draw Bead Coefficient of Friction. Acta Metallurgica Slovaca. 2017, 23, 337–344. doi:10.12776/ams.v23i4.1008 http://www.qip-journal.eu/index.php/ams/article/view/1008 (accessed Feb 27, 2019).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanayakkara, N. K. B. M. P.; Manjula, N.; Hodgson, P. Determination of Drawbead Contacts with Variable Bead Penetration. Comp. Method. Mater. Sc. 2006, 6, 188–194. http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30004084 (accessed Feb 15, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Green, D. E.;. An Experimental Technique to Determine the Behavior of Sheet Metal in a Drawbead. SAE Technical Paper. 2001, (2001–01–1136). DOI: 10.4271/2001-01-1136.
   Google Scholar
• Ceron, E.; Bay, N. Determination of Friction in Sheet Metal Forming by Means of Simulative Tribo-Tests. Key Eng. Mater. 2013, 549, 415–422. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.549.415.
   Google Scholar
• Murali, G.; Gopal, M.; Rajadurai, A. Effect of Circular and Rectangular Drawbeads in Hemispherical Cup Forming: Finite Element Analysis and Experimental Validation. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 1701–1709, 2012, 37DOI: 10.1007/s13369-012-0276-4.
   Google Scholar
• Thipprakmas, S.;. Effect of Part Geometry on Wall Features in Rectangular Deep-Drawing Processes Using Finite Element Method. Key Eng. Mater. 2009, 410–411, 579–585. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.410-411.579.
   Google Scholar
• Thipprakmas, S.;. Effect of Draw Bead Height on Wall Features in Rectangular Deep-Drawing Process Using Finite Element Method. Adv. Mat. Res. 2011, 264–265, 1580–1585. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.264-265.1580.
   Google Scholar
• Phanitwong, W.; Thipprakmas, S. Analysis of Draw Bead Geometry on Wall Thinning and Concave/Convex Feature in Rectangular Deep Drawn Parts. Adv. Mat. Res. 2011, 189–193, 2704–2707. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.189-193.2704.
   Google Scholar
• Jansson, T.; Andersson, A.; Nilsson, L. Optimization of Draw-In for an Automotive Sheet Metal Part an Evaluation Using Surrogate Models and Response Surfaces. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2005, 159, 426–434. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.06.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michler, J. R.; Weinmann, K. J.; Kashani, A. R.; Majlessi, S. A. A Strip-Drawing Simulator with Computer-Controlled Drawbead Penetration and Blankholder Pressure. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 1994, 43, 177–194. DOI: 10.1016/0924-0136(94)90020-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuel, M.;. Influence of Drawbead Geometry on Sheet Metal Forming. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2002, 122, 94–103. DOI: 10.1016/S0924-0136(01)01233-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L. M.; Zhou, Y. J.; Zhou, D. J.; Du, C.; Wanintrudal, C. A New Experimental Test Apparatus for Angle Binder Draw Bead Simulations. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2009, 209, 4942–4948. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.01.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djordjević, M.; Aleksandrović, S.; Nikolić, R. R.; Lazić, V.; Arsić, D.; Hadzima, B. Experimental Apparatus for Investigations of Draw Bead Influence in Deep Drawing Process. Proceedings of 7th International Conference Manufacturing Technology – PILSEN, At University of West Bohemia, Pilsen, Czech Republic, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, H.; Suttner, S.; Merklein. An Incremental Analysis of a Deep Drawing Steel’s Material Behaviour Undergoing the Predeformation Using Drawbeads. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 2017, 896(012010), 6. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/896/1/012010.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, H.; Merklein, M. Effect on the Mechanical Properties of Sheet Metals after the Use of Drawbeads in Deep Drawing. (ICNFT 2018). MATEC Web of Conferences. 2018, 190, 05001. doi:10.1051/matecconf/201819005001 https://www.matec-conferences.org/articles/matecconf/pdf/2018/49/matecconf_icnft2018_05001.pdf (accessed Feb 27, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Xu, W.; Gao, X.; Zhang, B.; Yang, L.; Du, C.; Zhou, D.; Rawy, B.; Szymanski, M. Study on Frictional Behavior of AA 6XXX with Three Lube Conditions in Sheet Metal Forming. SAE Technical Paper. 2018, No. 2018–01-0810. DOI: 10.4271/2018-01-0810.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, W.; Huang, Y.-X.; Yu, H.-M. Data Mining of Deep Drawing Simulation Results Based on CART Decision Tree Theory. Gongcheng Kexue Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Engineering. 2018, 40, 1373–1379. DOI: 10.13374/j.issn2095-9389.2018.11.011.
   Google Scholar
• Tonini Button, S.;. Numerical and Experimental Analysis of Lubrication in Strip Cold Rolling. J. Of the Braz. Soc. Of Mech. Sci. & Eng. 2011, XXXIII, 189–196. DOI: 10.1590/S1678-58782011000200010.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM E8/E8M-16a. Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, 2016. DOI:10.1520/E0008_E0008M-16A.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, M.;. Computational Characterization of drawbeads_A Basic Modeling Method for Data Generation. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2009, 209, 376–386. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.02.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez Krahmer, D.; Polvorosa, R.; López de Lacalle, L. N.; Alonso-Pinillos, U.; Abate, G.; Riu, F. Alternatives for Specimen Manufacturing in Tensile Testing of Steel Plates. Exp. Tech. 2016, 40, 1555–1565. DOI: 10.1007/s40799-016-0134-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GöĞÜŞ, M. T.; CabiroğLu, A.; Ekmekyapar, T.; ÖZakçA, M. Effect of Specimen Preparation Methods for Tension Test on Design of Cold-Formed Steel Members. In: Proc. of the Second Intl. Conf. on Advances In Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering - ACSEE 2014. Institute of Research Engineers and Doctors, USA, 2014, pp. 126–130. ISBN: 978-1-63248-030-9 doi: 10.15224/978-1-63248-030-9-26.
   Google Scholar
• Courvoisier, L.; Martiny, M.; Ferron, G. Analytical Modelling of Drawbeads in Sheet Metal Forming. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2003, 133, 359–370. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(02)01124-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar