Experimental investigation on boring of HSLA ASTM A36 steel under dry, wet, and cryogenic environments

References

• Kumar, S.; Dvivedi, A. On Machining of Hard and Brittle Materials Using Rotary Tool Micro-ultrasonic Drilling Process. Mater. Manuf. Processes. 2019, 34(7), 736–748. DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2019.1594255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakeel Ahmed, L.; Pradeep Kumar, M. Investigation of Cryogenic Cooling Effect in Reaming Ti-6Al-4V Alloy. Mater. Manuf. Processes. 2017, 32(9), 970–978. DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2016.1221088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korkut, I.; Kucuk, Y. Experimental Analysis of the Deviation from Circularity of Bored Hole Based on the Taguchi Method. Stroj. Vestn. J. Mech. E. 2010, 56(5), 340–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S.; Harshit Dave, K.; Keyur Desai, P. Experimental Investigation on Performance on Performance of Different Tool Movement Strategies in EDM Process for Boring Operation. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. 2016, 87(5–8), 1609–1620. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-016-8443-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manimaran, G.; Pradeep Kumar, M. Effect of Cryogenic Cooling and Sol-gel Alumina Wheel on Grinding Performance of AISI 316 Stainless Steel. Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 2013, 13(3), 304–312. DOI: 10.1016/j.acme.2013.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shokrani, A.; Dhokia, V.; Munoz Escalona, P.; Newman, S. T. State of the Art Cryogenic Machining and Processing. Int. J. Comput. Integ. M. 2013, 26(7), 616–648. DOI: 10.1080/0951192X.2012.749531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulutan, D.; Özel, T. Multiobjective Optimization of Experimental and Simulated Residual Stresses in Turning of Nickel-Alloy IN100. Mater. Manuf. Processes. 2013, 28(7), 835–841. DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2012.718474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avila, R. F.; Abrao, A. M. The Effect of Cutting Fluids on the Machining of Hardened AISI 4340 Steel. J. Mater. Process. Tech. 2001, 119(1–3), 21–26. DOI: 10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00891-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milton Shaw, C.;. Metal Cutting Principles, 2nd ed.; Oxford University Press: New York, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Ravi, S.; Pradeep Kumar, M. Experimental Investigation of Cryogenic Cooling in Milling of AISI D3 Tool Steel. Mater. Manuf. Processes. 2012, 27(10), 1017–1021. DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2011.654157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natasha, A. R.; Ghani, J. A.; Haron, C. H. C.; Syarif, J. The Effect of Cryogenic Application on Surface Integrity in Manufacturing Process: A Review. J. Appl. Sci. Res. 2012, 8(9), 4880–4890.
   Google Scholar
• Dhananchezian, M.; Pradeep Kumar, M.; Sornakumar, T. Cryogenic Turning of AISI 304 Stainless Steel with Modified Tungsten Carbide Tool Inserts. Mater. Manuf. Processes. 2011, 26(5), 781–785. DOI: 10.1080/10426911003720821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakeel Ahmed, L.; Pradeep Kumar, M. Cryogenic Drilling of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy under Liquid Nitrogen Cooling. Mater. Manuf. Processes. 2015, 31(7), 951–959. DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2015.1048475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cajner, F.; Leskovsek, V.; Landek, D.; Cajner, H. Effect of Deep-Cryogenic Treatment on High Speed Steel Properties. Mater. Manuf. Processes. 2009, 24(7–8), 743–746. DOI: 10.1080/10426910902809743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C. L.;. Use of Taguchi Method and Grey Relational Analysis to Optimize Turning Operations with Multiple Performance Characteristics. Mater. Manuf. Processes. 2004, 19(2), 209–220. DOI: 10.1081/AMP-120029852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, P. J.;. Taguchi Techniques for Quality Engineering; McGraw Hill: New York, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Y.-C.; Cheng, C.-H.; Su, B.-L.; Hwang, L.-R. Machining Characteristics and Optimization of Machining Parameters of SKH 57 High-speed Steel Using Electrical-discharge Machining Based on Taguchi Method. Mater. Manuf. Processes. 2007, 21(8), 922–929. DOI: 10.1080/03602550600728133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dang, J.; Liu, G.; Chen, Y.; An, Q.; Ming, W.; Chen, M. Experimental Investigation on Machinability of DMLS Ti6Al4V under Dry Drilling Process. Mater. Manuf. Processes. 2019, 34(7), 749–758. DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2019.1594254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, N.; Ishfaq, K.; Rafaqat, M.; Pervaiz, S.; Anwar, S.; Salah, B. EDM of Ti-6Al-4V: Electrode and Polarity Selection for Minimum Tool Wear Rate and Overcut. Mater. Manuf. Processes. 2019, 34(7), 769–778. DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2019.1594278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, E.; Kaya, G. G.; Deveci, H. Removal of Methylene Blue Dye from Aqueous Solution by Semi‐interpenetrating Polymer Network Hybrid Hydrogel: Optimization through Taguchi Method. J. Polym. Sci. Pol. Chem. 2019, 57(10), 1070–1078. DOI: 10.1002/pola.29361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perumal, A.; Azhagurajan, A.; Baskaram, S.; Prithivirajan, R.; Narayansamy, P. Statistical Evaluation and Performance Analysis of Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) Characteristics of Hard Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo Alloy. Mat. Res. Express. 2019, 6(5), 1–27. DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/ab06da.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuvaraj, N.; Pradeep Kumar, M. Mutliresponse Optimization of Abrasive Water Jet Cutting Process Parameters Using TOPSIS Approach. Mater. Manuf. Processes. 2015, 30(7), 882–889. DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2014.994763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manimaran, G.; Pradeep Kumar, M. Multiresponse Optimization of Grinding AISI 316 Stainless Steel Using Grey Relational Analysis. Mater. Manuf. Processes. 2013, 28(4), 418–423. DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2012.709347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakhjavani, O. B.; Ghoreishi, M. Multi Criteria Optimization of Laser Percussion Drilling Process Using Artificial Neural Network Model Combined with Genetic Algorithm. Mater. Manuf. Processes. 2006, 21(1), 11–18. DOI: 10.1081/AMP-200060402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra, T.; Pettersson, F.; Saxen, H.; Chakraborti, N. Blast Furnace Charging Optimization Using Multi-objective Evolutionary and Genetic Algorithms. Mater. Manuf. Processes. 2017, 32(10), 1179–1188. DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2016.1257133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dang, X.-P.;. Constrained Multi-objective Optimization of EDM Process Parameters Using Kriging Model and Particle Swarm Algorithm. Mater. Manuf. Processes. 2017, 33(4), 397–404. DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2017.1292037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miettinen, K.;. Using Interactive Multiobjective Optimization in Continuous Casting of Steel. Mater. Manuf. Processes. 2007, 22(5), 585–593. DOI: 10.1080/10426910701322468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arunramnath, R.; Thyla, P. R.; Mahendrakumar, N.; Ramesh, M.; Siddeshwaran, A. Multi-attribute Optimization of End Milling Epoxy Granite Composites Using TOPSIS. Mater. Manuf. Processes. 2019, 34(5), 530–543. DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2019.1566960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sameer, M. D.; Birru, A. K. Optimization and Characterization of Dissimilar Friction Stir Welded DP600 Dual Phase Steel and AA6082-T6 Aluminium Alloy Sheets Using TOPSIS and Grey Relational Analysis. Mater. Res. Express. 2019, 6(5), 1–43. DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/aafba4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L.; Wang, H.; Xu, Z.; Ren, Z. The Interval‐valued Hesitant Pythagorean Fuzzy Set and Its Applications with Extended TOPSIS and Choquet Integral‐based Method. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2019, 34(6), 1063–1085. DOI: 10.1002/int.22086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayabalakrishnan, D.; Balasubramanian, M. Friction Stir Weave Welding (FSWW) of AA6061 Aluminium Alloy with a Novel Tool-path Pattern. Aust. J. Mech. Eng. 2019, 17(2), 133–144. DOI: 10.1080/14484846.2017.1373584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karthik, S.; Soorya Prakash, K.; Gopal, P. M.; Joshi, S. Influence of Materials and Machining Parameters on WEDM of Al/AlCoCrFeNiMo0.5 MMC. Mater. Manuf. Processes. 2019, 34(7), 759–768. DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2019.1594250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abeens, M.; Muruganandhan, R.; Thirumavalavan, K.; Kalainathan, S. Surface Modification of AA7075 T651 by Laser Shock Peening to Improve the Wear Characteristics. Mater. Res. Express. 2019, 6(6), 1–27. DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/ab0b0e.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saini, S.; Ahuja, I. S.; Vishal Sharma, S. Residual Stresses, Surface Roughness and Tool Wear in Hard Turning: A Comprehensive Review. Mater. Manuf. Processes. 2012, 27(6), 583–598. DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2011.585505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandrasekhara Sastry, C.; Hariharan, P.; Pradeep Kumar, M. Experimental Investigation of Dry, Wet and Cryogenic Boring of AA 7075 Alloy. Mater. Manuf. Processes. 2019, 34(7), 814–831. DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2019.1605174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hua, J.; Shivpuri, R.; Chenga, X.; Bedekara, V.; Matsumoto, Y.; Hashmito, F.; Watkin, T. R. Effect of Feed Rate, Workpiece Hardness and Cutting Edge on Subsurface and Residual Stress in the Hard Turning of Bearing Steel Using Chamfer and Hone Cutting Edge Geometry. Mat. Sci. Eng. A. 2005, 394(1–2), 238–248. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2004.11.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alabdullah, M.; Polishetty, A.; Nomani, J.; Littlefair, G. An Investigation on Machinability Assessment of Al-6XN and AISI 316 Alloys: An Assessment Study of Machining. Mach. Sci. Technol. 2019, 23(2), 171–217. DOI: 10.1080/10910344.2018.1486415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rae, W.;. Thermo-metallo-mechanical Modelling of Heat Treatment Induced Residual Stress in Ti-6Al-4V Alloy. Mater. Sci. Tech. Lond. 2019, 35(7), 747–766. DOI: 10.1080/02670836.2019.1591031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guochao, L.; Xu, H.; Zhou, H.; Jing, X.; Sun, Y. Experimental Study of Residual Stresses of Cam Produced by Heat Treatment and Grinding Processes. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. 2019, 100(5–8), 1355–1362. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-018-2756-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X.; Chen, Y. L.; Niu, G. The Study on Corrosion Resistance of High-strength Spring Steel. Corros. Eng. Sci. Techn. 2018, 53(1), 54–64. DOI: 10.1080/1478422X.2017.1384628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, C.; Guo, M.; Han, W.; Wang, Z.; Wang, C. Study of Corrosion Evolution of Carbon Steel Exposed to an Industrial Atmosphere. Corros. Eng. Sci. Techn. 2019, 54(3), 241–248. DOI: 10.1080/1478422X.2019.1574955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, R.; Li, J.; Gu, J. Effect of Nitrogen on Microstructure and Corrosion Resistance of Cr15 Super Martensitic Stainless Steel. Corros. Eng. Sci. Techn. 2019, 54(3), 225–232. DOI: 10.1080/1478422X.2019.1567028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boven, G. V.; Chen, W.; Rogge, R. The Role of Residual Stress in Neutral pH Stress Corrosion Cracking of Pipeline Steels, Part I: Pitting and Cracking Occurrence. Acta. Mater. 2006, 55(1), 29–42. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, X.; Situm, A.; Burke Barlow, C.; Guo, B.; Ian Burgess, J.; Andrew Grosvenor, P. Soft X‐ray Spectromicroscopy Studies of Pitting Corrosion of Reinforcing Steel Bar. Surf. Inteface. Anal. 2019, 51(6), 681–691. DOI: 10.1002/sia.6640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, T.; Bai, Q.; Ru, X.; Xia, S.; Zhong, X.; Lu, Y.; Shoji, T. Grain Boundary Engineering for Improving Stress Corrosion Cracking of 304 Stainless Steel. Mater. Sci. Tech. Lond. 2019, 35(4), 477–487. DOI: 10.1080/02670836.2019.1570661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar