Effect of machining parameters in turning under different cooling conditions

References

• Sivaiah, P.; Chakradhar, D. The Effectiveness of a Novel Cryogenic Cooling Approach on Turning Performance Characteristics During Machining of 17-4 PH Stainless Steel Material. Silicon. 2018, 11(1), 25–38. DOI: 10.1007/s12633-018-9875-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohsan, A. U. H.; Liu, Z.; Ren, X.; Liu, W. Influences of Cutting Fluid Conditions and Cutting Parameters on Surface Integrity of Inconel 718 Under High Pressure Jet–Assisted Machining (HPJAM). Lub. Sci. 2018, 30(6), 269–284. DOI: 10.1002/ls.1418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivaiah, P.; Chakradhar, D. Identifying the Effectiveness of Manner of Cryogenic Coolant Supply in Different Cryogenic Cooling Techniques in Turning Process—A Review. Mach. Sci. Technol. 2020, 24(6), 948–999. DOI: 10.1080/10910344.2020.1815039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yıldırım, Ç. V.; Kivak, T.; Erzincanli, F. Influence of Different Cooling Methods on Tool Life, Wear Mechanisms and Surface Roughness in the Milling of Nickel-Based Waspaloy with WC Tools. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2019, 44, 7979–7995. DOI: 10.1007/s13369-019-03963-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mou, W.; Zhu, S. Vibration, Tool Wear and Surface Roughness Characteristics in Turning of Inconel 718 Alloy with Ceramic Insert Under LN2 Machining. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 2020, 42(7), 369. DOI: 10.1007/s40430-020-02438-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jovicic, G.; Milosevic, A.; Kanovic, Z.; Sokac, M.; Simunovic, G.; Savkovic, B.; Vukelic, D. Optimization of Dry Turning of Inconel 601 Alloy Based on Surface Roughness, Tool Wear, and Material Removal Rate. Metals. 2023, 13(6), 1068. DOI: 10.3390/met13061068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okafor, A. C.; Jasra, P. M. Effects of Milling Methods and Cooling Strategies on Tool Wear, Chip Morphology and Surface Roughness in High-Speed End-Milling of Inconel-718. Int. J. Mach. Mach. Mater. 2019, 21(1–2), 3–42. DOI: 10.1504/IJMMM.2019.098065.
   Google Scholar
• Dai, L.; Zheng, J.; Dong, D.; Sun, S.; Liu, G. Effect of Insert Micro-Texture Types on the Cutting Force and Temperature Under Various Cooling Conditions. Int. J. Mechatron. Manuf. Syst. 2021, 14(3–4), 228–239. DOI: 10.1504/IJMMS.2021.121240.
   Google Scholar
• Vijayakumar, S.; Parthiban, V.; Sakthivel, M. Performance Analysis of Untreated Tungsten Carbide Tool and Cryogenically Treated with Oil Quenched Tungsten Carbide Tool While Turning of Inconel 713C. Int. J. Rapid. Manuf. 2020, 9(4), 341–360. DOI: 10.1504/IJRAPIDM.2020.110779.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, X.; Zhou, Q.; Mahalingam, S.; Nagarajan, L.; Kumar, P. G.; Sivalingam, V. Performance Assessment of Different Cooling Conditions in the Sustainable Machining of Hastelloy X Alloy. Proc. I. Mech. Eng. Part E. J. Pro. Mech. Eng. 2023. DOI: 10.1177/09544089231197858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saravana Kumar, M.; Shafeer, P. K.; Sworna Ross, N.; Ishfaq, K.; Adediran, A. A.; Adewale Akinwande, A. A Comprehensive Machinability Comparison During Milling of AISI 52100 Steel Under Dry and Cryogenic Cutting Conditions. Pro. I. Mech. Eng Part B: J. Eng. Manuf. 2023, 237(3), 364–376. DOI: 10.1177/09544054221101749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, A.; Chaudhari, A.; Yusufzai, M. Z. K.; Vashista, M. Effectiveness of Using Liquid Nitrogen Cryogen in Grinding to Enhance the Grinding Performance of Hard Steel. Pro. I. Mech. Eng Part B: J. Eng. Manuf. 2023, 238(1–2), 315–327. DOI: 10.1177/09544054221147622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramana, M. V.; Rao, G. K. M.; Sagar, B.; Panthangi, R. K.; Kumar, B. R. R. Optimization of Surface Roughness and Tool Wear in Sustainable Dry Turning of Iron Based Nickel A286 Alloy Using Taguchi’s Method. Cleaner. Eng. Tech. 2021, 2, 100034. DOI: 10.1016/j.clet.2020.100034.
   Google Scholar
• Babu, M. N.; Anandan, V.; Babu, M. D. Performance of Ionic Liquid as a Lubricant in Turning Inconel 825 via Minimum Quantity Lubrication Method. J. Manuf. Process. 2021, 64, 793–804. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.02.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoier, P.; Malakizadi, A.; Stuppa, P.; Cedergren, S.; Klement, U. Microstructural Characteristics of Alloy 718 and Waspaloy and Their Influence on Flank Wear During Turning. Wear. 2018, 400, 184–193. DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2018.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, P.; Wang, S.; Lin, Z.; Liu, Z.; Liu, J.; Mai, Q.; Yue, X. Corrosion Mechanism and Machinability of 7075T6 Aluminum Alloy in High Speed Cutting: With and without Cryogenic Treatment. Mater. Corros. 2023, 74(6), 872–886. DOI: 10.1002/maco.202213515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naresh Babu, M.; Vetrivel Sezhian, M.; Anandan, V.; Dinesh Babu, M. Effect of Ionic Liquid as Lubricants in Turning H 13 Tool Steel-An Experimental Study. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2022, 37(16), 1812–1822. DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2022.2065004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greer, A. J.; Jacquemin, J.; Hardacre, C. Industrial applications of ionic liquids. Molecules. 2020, 25(21), 5207. DOI: 10.3390/molecules25215207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, C.; Cheng, Z. Thermal Stability of Ionic Liquids: Current Status and Prospects for Future Development. Processes. 2021, 9(2), 337. DOI: 10.3390/pr9020337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padhan, S.; Wagri, N. K.; Dash, L.; Das, A.; Das, S. R.; Rafighi, M.; Sharma, P. Investigation on Surface Integrity in Hard Turning of AISI 4140 Steel with SPPP-AltisiN Coated Carbide Insert Under Nano-MQL. Lubricants. 2023, 11(2), 49. DOI: 10.3390/lubricants11020049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, A.; Gautam, A.; Panda, A.; Das, S. R.; Debnath, K.; Ramakrishna, C.; Patel, S. K. Comparative Performance Evaluation Between Uncoated and TiAlN+ AlCrN Coated Carbide Tools in Hard Turning of AISI H11 Steel. Pro. I. Mech. Eng Part B: J. Mech. Eng. 2022, 095440542211118. DOI: 10.1177/09544089221110430.
   Google Scholar
• Mahapatra, S.; Das, A.; Jena, P. C.; Das, S. R. Turning of Hardened AISI H13 Steel with Recently Developed S3P-AltisiN Coated Carbide Tool Using MWCNT Mixed Nanofluid Under Minimum Quantity Lubrication. Pro. I. Mech. Eng Part B: J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2023, 237(4), 843–864. DOI: 10.1177/09544062221126357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Silva, R. B.; Machado, Á. R.; Ezugwu, E. O.; Bonney, J.; Sales, W. F. Tool Life and Wear Mechanisms in High-Speed Machining of Ti–6Al–4V Alloy with PCD Tools Under Various Coolant Pressures. J. Mater. Proc. Tech. 2013, 213(8), 1459–1464. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganesan, K.; Naresh Babu, M.; Santhanakumar, M.; Muthukrishnan, N. Experimental investigation of copper nanofluid based minimum quantity lubrication in turning of H 11 steel. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 2018, 40(3), 1–17. DOI: 10.1007/s40430-018-1093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildirim, Ç. V.; Kivak, T.; Sarikaya, M.; Şirin, Ş. Evaluation of Tool Wear, Surface Roughness/Topography and Chip Morphology When Machining of Ni-Based Alloy 625 Under MQL, Cryogenic Cooling and CryoMQL. J. Mater. Rese. Tech. 2020, 9(2), 2079–2092. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.12.069.
   Google Scholar
• Naresh Babu, M.; Anandan, V.; Dinesh Babu, M.; Muthukrishnan, N. Turning SKD 11 Steel Using Silver Nanofluids with Minimum Quantity Lubrication. Int. J. Manuf. Mat. Mech Eng. 2021, 11(3), 74–95. DOI: 10.4018/IJMMME.2021070105.
   Google Scholar
• Amrita, M.; Srikant, R. R.; Sitaramaraju, A. V. Performance Evaluation of Nanographite-Based Cutting Fluid in Machining Process. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2014, 29(5), 600–605. DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2014.893060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padmini, R.; Krishna, P. V.; Mohana Rao, G. K. Experimental Evaluation of Nano-Molybdenum Disulphide and Nano-Boric Acid Suspensions in Vegetable Oils as Prospective Cutting Fluids During Turning of AISI 1040 Steel. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J J. Eng. Tribol. 2016, 230(5), 493–505. DOI: 10.1177/1350650115601694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nimel Sworna Ross, K.; Manimaran, G.; Saqib Anwar, M.; Rahman, A.; Korkmaz, M. E.; Gupta, M. K.; Abdullah Alfaify, A.; Mia, M. Investigation of Surface Modification and Tool Wear on Milling Nimonic 80A Under Hybrid Lubrication. Tribol. Int. 2021, 155, 106762. DOI: 10.1016/J.triboint.2020.106762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, A.; Venkatesh, A.; Marthandam, V.; Ghosh, A. Tensile Deformation of a Nickel-Base Alloy at Elevated Temperatures. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2008, 17, 607–611. DOI: 10.1007/s11665-007-9189-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opricovic, S.; Tzeng, G. H. Multi-Criteria Planning of Post-Earthquake Sustainable Reconstruction. Comput- Aided Civ. Inf. 2002, 17(3), 211–220. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8667.00269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, Y.; Kou, G.; Wang, G.; Shi, Y. FAMCDM: A Fusion Approach of MCDM Methods to Rank Multiclass Classification Algorithms. Omega. 2011, 39(6), 677–689. DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2011.01.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opricovic, S.; Tzeng, G. H. Compromise Solution by MCDM Methods: A Comparative Analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur. J. Of Oper. Res. 2004, 156(2), 445–455. DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallahpour, A. R.; Moghassem, A. R. Evaluating Applicability of VIKOR Method of Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Parameters Selection Problem in Rotor Spinning. Fibers. Polym. 2012, 13(6), 802–808. DOI: 10.1007/s12221-012-0802-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar