Trunk asymmetry and handedness in 8245 school children

References

• Goldberg CJ, Moore DP, Fogarty EE, Dowling FE. The relation between minor asymmetry and early idiopathic scoliosis. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2002; 88: 17–19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Agadir M, Sevastik B, Sevastik JA, Persson A, Isberg B. Induction of scoliosis in the growing rabbit by unilateral rib-growth stimulation. Spine 1988; 13: 1065–1069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal GP. Mechanism of production of scoliosis: A hypothesis. Spine 1991; 16: 288–292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes IAF, Dansereau J, Moreland MS. Rib cage asymmetry in idiopathic scoliosis. Combined meeting of Scoliosis Research Society and European Spinal Deformities Society, Amsterdam 17–22 September, 1989
   Google Scholar
• Grivas TB, Burwell RG, Purdue M, Webb JK, Moulton A. The rib-cage deformity in infantile idiopathic scoliosis-the funnel-shaped upper chest in relation to specific rotation as a prognostic factor. An evaluation of thoracic shape in progressive scoliosis and control children during growth. Proceedings of VIth International Symposium on Surface Topography and Spinal Deformity, Lisbon, 19–20 September, 1990, A Alberti, In: Alberty A, Drerup B, Hierholzer E, editors. Surface topography and spinal deformity VI. Stuttgart, Jena, New York: Gustav Fischer Verlag; 1992. pp 93–109
   Google Scholar
• Grivas TB, Burwell RG, Purdue M, Webb JK. A segmental analysis of thoracic shape in chest radiographs of children. Changes related to spinal level age sex side and significance for scoliosis. Journal of Anatomy 1991; 178: 21–38
   Google Scholar
• Grivas TB, Burwell RG, Purdue M, Webb JK, Moulton A. Segmental patterns of rib-vertebra angles in chest radiographs of children. Changes related to rib level, age, sex, side and significance for scoliosis. Clinical Anatomy 1992; 5: 272–288
   Google Scholar
• Grivas TB, Daggas S, Polyzois BD, Samelis P. The double rib contour sign (DRCS) in lateral spinal radiographs. Aetiologic implications for scoliosis. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2002; 88: 38–43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sevastik JA, Agadir M, Sevastik B. Effects on the rib elongation on the spine. II Correction of scoliosis in the rabit. Spine 1990; 15: 826–829
   Google Scholar
• Sevastik JA, Aaro S, Lindholm ST, Dalhborn M. Experimental scoliosis in growing rabbits by operations on the rib cage. Clinical Orthopaedics 1987; 136: 282–286
   Google Scholar
• Upadhyay SS, Burwell RG, Webb JK. Hump changes on forward flexion on the lumbar spine patients with idiopathic scoliosis: A study using ISIS and the scoliometer in two standard positions. Spine 1988; 13: 146–151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grivas TB, Vasiliadis E, Chatziargiropoulos T, Polyzois VD, Gatos K. The effect of a modified Boston brace with antirotatory blades on the progression of curves in idiopathic scoliosis. Aetiologic implications. Pediatric Rehabilitation 2003; 6: 237–242
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Badii M, Shin S, Torreggiani WC, Jankovic B, Gustafson P, Munk PL, Esdaile JM. Pelvic bone asymmetry in 323 study participants receiving abdominal CT scans. Spine 2003; 28: 1335–1339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papaioannou T, Stokes I, Kenwright J. Scoliosis associated with limb-length inequality. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery 1982; 64A: 59–62
   Google Scholar
• Walker AP, Dickson RA. School screening and pelvic tilt scoliosis. Lancet 1984; 2: 152–153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triggs WJ, Calvanio R, Levine M, Heaton RK, Heilman KM. Predicting hand preference with performance on motor tasks. Cortex 2000; 36: 679–689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burwell RG. Aetiology of idiopathic scoliosis: Current concepts. Pediatric Rehabilitation 2003; 6: 137–170
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kertesz A, Polk M, Black SE, Howell J. Anatomical asymmetries and functional laterality. Brain 1992; 115: 589–605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keane AM. Motor control of the hands: The effect of familial sinistrality. International Journal of Neuroscience 2001; 110: 25–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebner HR, Limmer C, Peinemann A, Drzezga A, Bloem BR, Schwaiger M, Conrad B. Long-term consequences of switching handedness: A positron emission tomography study on handwriting in ‘converted’ left-handers. Journal of Neuroscience 2002; 22: 2816–2825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg C, Dowling FE. Handedness and scoliosis convexity: A reappraisal. Spine 1990; 15: 61–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor TKF. Curve configuration and handedness in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Proceedings of the Spine Society of Australia, QueenstownNew Zealand, 1998
   Google Scholar
• Weiss HR. Imbalance of electromyographicactivity and physical rehabilitation of patients with idiopathic scoliosis. European Spine Journal 1993; 1: 240–243
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burwell RG, James NJ, Johnson F, Webb JK, Wilson YG. Standardised trunk asymmetry scores. A study of back contour in healthy schoolchildren. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery 1983; 65B: 452–463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg C, Dowling FE. Idiopathic scoliosis and asymmetry of form and function. Spine 1991; 16: 84–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunnell PW. An objective criterion for scoliosis screening. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery 1984; 66A: 1381–1387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitecloud TS, 3rd, Brinker MR, Barrack RL, Burke SW, Roberts JM. Vibratory response in congenital scoliosis. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics 1989; 9: 422–426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinker MR, Willis JK, Cook SD, Whitecloud TS, 3rd, Bennett JT, Barrack RL, Ellman MG. Neurologic testing with somatosensory evoked potentials in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1992; 17: 277–279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruder GE. Dichotic listening: New developments and applications in clinical research. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1991; 620: 217–232
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldberg CJ, Dowling FE, Fogarty EE, Moore DP. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and cerebral asymmetry: An examination of a nonspinal sensory system. Spine 1995; 20: 1685–1691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan U, Akgun A. Contributions of the right and left brains to manual asymmetry in hand skill in right-handed normal subjects. International Journal of Neuroscience 1992; 65: 11–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin F, Niemitz C. ‘Right-trunkers’ and ‘left-trunkers’: Side preferences of trunk movements in wild Asian elephants (Elephas maximus). Journal of Computational Psychology 2003; 117: 371–379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs GG, Nebes RD. Patterns of hand preference in a student population. Cortex 1975; 11: 230–238
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971; 9: 97–113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vercauteren M, Van Beneden M, Verplaetse R, Croene P, Uyttendaele D, Verdonk R. Trunk asymmetries in a Belgian school population. Spine 1982; 7: 555–562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazebroek-Kampschreur AA, Hofman A, van Dijk AP, van Linge B. Prevalence of trunk abnormalities in eleven-year-old schoolchildren in Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics. 1992; 12: 480–484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissinen M, Heliovaara M, Ylikoski M, Poussa M. Trunk asymmetry and screening for scoliosis: A longitudinal cohort study of pubertal schoolchildren. Acta Paediatrica Scandinavica 1993; 82: 77–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissinen M, Heliovaara M, Seitsamo J, Poussa M. Trunk asymmetry, posture, growth, and risk of scoliosis. A three-year follow-up of Finnish prepubertal school children. Spine 1993; 18: 8–13
   Google Scholar
• Grivas TB, Nakos B, Kouvaras J, Kalamakis N, Polyzois D. Study of the natural history of the back trunk shape by the use of scoliometer, in children aged 5-12 years. Research into spinal deformities 2, IAF Stokes. IOS Press, Amsterdam 1999; 223–226
   Google Scholar
• Nissinen M, Heliovaara M, Seitsamo J, Kononen M, Hurmerinta K, Poussa M. Development of trunk asymmetry in a cohort of children ages 11 to 22 years. Spine 2000; 25: 570–574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amendt LE, Ause-Ellias KL, Eybers JL, Wadsworth CT, Nielsen DH, Weinstein SL. Validity and reliability testing of the scoliometer. Physical Therapy 1990; 70: 108–117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murrell GA, Coonrad RW, Moorman CT, III, Fitch RD. An assessment of the reliability of the scoliometer. Spine 1993; 18: 709–712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes IA, Armstrong JG, Moreland MS. Spinal deformity and back surface asymmetry in idiopathic scoliosis. Journal of Orthopedic Research 1988; 6: 129–137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaremko JL, Poncet P, Ronsky J, Harder J, Dansereau J, Labelle H, Zernicke RF. Indices of torso asymmetry related to spinal deformity in scoliosis. Clinical Biomechanic (Bristol, Avon) 2002; 17: 559–568
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelsson L, Noren L. Trunk rotation in scoliosis. The influence of curve type and direction in 150 children. Acta Orthopedica Scandinavica 1997; 68: 273–276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scutt ND, Dangerfield PH, Dorgan JC. The relationship between surface and radiological deformity in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Effect of change in body position. European Spine Journal 1996; 5: 85–90
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Griffet J, Leroux MA, Badeaux J, Coillard C, Zabjek KF, Rivard CH. Relationship between gibbosity and Cobb angle during treatment of idiopathic scoliosis with the SpineCor brace. European Spine Journal 2000; 9: 516–522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapkas G, Papagelopoulos PJ, Kateros K, Koundis GL, Boscainos PJ, Koukou UI, Katonis P. Prediction of Cobb angle in idiopathic adolescent scoliosis. Clinical Orthopedics & Related Research 2003; 411: 32–39
   Google Scholar
• Korovessis PG, Stamatakis MV. Prediction of scoliotic Cobb angle with the use of the scoliometer. Spine 1996; 21: 1661–1666
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upadhyay SS, Burwell RG, Nicholson UJL, Webb JK. The integrated shape imaging system (ISIS) and the scoliometer for recording back shape in scoliosis. A reliability and comparative study revealing positional changes in back contour (hump dynamics), I Stokes, J Pekelsky, S Moreland. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart, New York 1987; 233–248, Surface topography and spinal deformity IV
   Google Scholar
• Pruijs JEH, Keessen W, van der Meer R, van Wieringen JC, Hageman MAPE. Scoolsreening for scoliosis. Methodological considerations. Spine 1992; 17: 431–436, Part 1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mubarek SJ, Wyatt MP, Leach J. Evaluation of the intra-examiner and inter-examiner reliability of the scoliometer in measuring trunk rotation. Proceedings of the Scoliosis Research Society, 19th annual meeting, Orlando, Florida, 19–22 September, 1984, 66
   Google Scholar
• Stokes IA. Three-dimensional terminology of spinal deformity. A report presented to the Scoliosis Research Society by the Scoliosis Research Society Working Group on 3-D terminology of spinal deformity. Spine 1994; 19: 236–248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soucacos PN, Zacharis K, Gelalis J, Soultanis K, Kalos N, Beris A, Xenakis T, Johnson EO. Assessment of curve progression in idiopathic scoliosis. European Spine Journal 1998; 7: 270–277
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soucacos NP, Soucacos KP, Zacharis KC, Beris AE, Xenakis TA. School-screening for scoliosis. A prospective epidemiological study in Northwestern and central Greece. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery 1997; 79: 1498–1503
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karachalios T, Sofianos J, Roidis N, Sapkas G, Korres D, Nikolopoulos K. Ten year follow up evaluation of a school-screening program for scoliosis. Is the forward bending test an accurate diagnostic criterion for the screening of scoliosis? Spine 1999; 24: 2318–2324
   Google Scholar
• Koukourakis I, Giaourakis G, Kouvidis G, Kivernitakis E, Blazos J, Koukourakis M. Screening school children for scoliosis on the island of Crete. Journal of Spinal Disorders 1997; 10: 527–531
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grivas TB, Koukos K, Koukou U, Maziotou CH, Polyzois BD. The incidence of idiopathic scoliosis in Greece. Analysis of domestic school screening programs. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2002; 91: 71–75
   Google Scholar
• Burwell RG, Dangerfield PH, James NJ. Anthropometric studies of normal and scoliotic children. Axial and appendicular skeletal asymmetry, sexual dimorphism and age related changes. Pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis, Proceedings of an international conference. 1984, RR Jacobs. Scoliosis Research Society, Chicago, 27–44
   Google Scholar
• Burwell RG, Dangerfield PH, Vernon CL. Anthropometry and scoliosis. Spinal deformities. 2nd, R Roaf. Pitman Medical, London 1980; 259–280
   Google Scholar
• Burwell RG, Dangerfield PH. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Hypothesis and causation. Spine: State of the Art Reviews 2000; 14: 319–333
   Google Scholar
• Cole AA, Burwell RG, Dangerfield PH, Grivas TB, Webb JK, Moulton A. Anthropometry. Spine: State of the Art Reviews 2000; 14: 411–421
   Google Scholar
• Burwell RG, Kirby AS, Cole AA, Moulton A, Pratt RK, Webb JK. Torsion in lower limb bones of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated surgically. Research into spinal deformities 1, JA Sevastic, KM Diab. IOS Press, Amsterdam 1997; 123–126
   Google Scholar
• Burwell RG, Cole AA, Cook TA, Grivas TB, Kiel AW, Moulton A, Thirwall AS, Upadhyay SS, Webb JK, Wemyss-Holden SA, et al. Pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis. The Nottingham concept. Acta Orthopedica Belgica 1992; 58(suppl I)33–58
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wemyss-Holden SA, Butcher CA, Burwell RG, Webb JK, Moulton A. Segmental evaluation of rotational (torsional) deformity in scoliosis: clinicoanatomical observations and surgical significance. Clinical Anatomy 1990; 4: 387, Proceedings of British Association of Clinical Anatomists
   Google Scholar
• Wemyss-Holden SA, Burwell RG, Cook TA, Binch C, Webb JK, Moulton A. A spiral ‘composite muscle trunk rotator’ in man? Relevance to gait, idiopathic and sportsman's scoliosis and stroke. Clinical Anatomy 1990; 4: 386, Proceedings of British Association of Clinical Anatomists
   Google Scholar
• Benninghoff A. Anatomie. 14th. Herausgegeben von J Stoubesand. Urban & Schwarzenberger, Munchen, Wien, Baltimore 1985, Band 1
   Google Scholar
• Burwell RG, Dangerfield PH. Pathogenesis and assessment of scoliosis. Surgery of the spine, G Findlay, R Owen. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford 1992; 365–408, Section 5, Spinal deformity: Chapter 19, Pathogenesis and assessment of scoliosis
   Google Scholar
• Ingelmark BE, Lindstrom J. Asymmetries of the lower extremities and pelvis and their relations to lumbar scoliosis. Acta Morphologica Neerlando Scandinavica 1963; 5: 221–234
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rush WA, Steiner HA. A study of lower extremity length inequality. American Journal of Roentgenology 1946; 56: 616–623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols PJR, Bailey NTJ. The accuracy of measuring leg-length differences. British Medical Journal, 4950: 1247–1248
   Google Scholar
• Fisk JW, Baigent ML. Clinical and radiological assessment of leg length. New Zealand Medical Journal 1975; 81: 477–480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grivas TB, Needoff M, Kastrisios M, Burwell RG, Prince HG, Wallace WA. Study of the stance phase of gait by the use of Musgrave plate in children aged 6–12 years. Acta Orthopedica Hellenica 1992; 2: 40–53
   Google Scholar
• Marsk A. Studies on weight-distribution upon the lower extremities in individuals working in a standing position: Assessing the results of the measurements of load-pressure differences against the background of handedness and some clinical observations. Acta Orthopedica Scandinavica 1958; 27(Suppl 31)1–64
   Google Scholar