103
Views
36
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article: Clinical

F-18-fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography in the assessment of peripheral T-cell lymphomas

, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 1531-1538 | Received 27 Oct 2006, Accepted 17 Mar 2007, Published online: 01 Jul 2009

References

  • The Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Classification Project. A clinical evaluation of the International Lymphoma Study Group classification of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Blood 1997; 89: 3909–3918
  • Mature T and NK cell neoplasms, E SRE Jaffe. IARC Press, Lyon 2001
  • Armitage J O, Vose J M, Weisenburger D D. Towards understanding the peripheral T-cell lymphomas. Ann Oncol 2004; 15: 1447–1449
  • Evens A M, Gartenhaus R B. Treatment of T-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2004; 5: 289–303
  • Juweid M E, Stroobants S, Hoekstra O S, Mottaghy F M, Dietlein M, Guermazi A, Wiseman G A, Kostakoglu L, Scheidhauer K, Buck A, et al. Use of positron emission tomography for response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in Lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 571–578
  • Elstrom R, Guan L, Baker G, Nakhoda K, Vergilio J A, Zhuang H, et al. Utility of FDG-PET scanning in lymphoma by WHO classification. Blood 2003; 101: 3875–3876
  • Israel O, Keidar Z, Bar-Shalom R. Positron emission tomography in the evaluation of lymphoma. Semin Nucl Med 2004; 34: 166–179
  • Willemze R, Jaffe E S, Burg G, Cerroni L, Berti E, Swerdlow S H, et al. WHO-EORTC classification for cutaneous lymphomas. Blood 2005; 105: 3768–3785
  • Armitage J O. Staging non-Hodgkin lymphoma. CA Cancer J Clin 2005; 55: 368–376
  • Lamberg S I, Bunn P A, Jr. Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas. Summary of the Mycosis Fungoides Cooperative Group-National Cancer Institute Workshop. Arch Dermatol 1979; 115: 1103–1105
  • Delbeke D CR, Guiberteau M J, Brown M L, Royal H D, Seigel B A, Townsend D W, et al. Procedure guideline for tumor imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT 1.0. Society of Nuclear Medicine Procedure Guidelines. 2006
  • Miller E, Metser U, Avrahami G, Dvir R, Valdman D, Sira L B, et al. Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in staging and follow-up of lymphoma in pediatric and young adult patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2006; 30: 689–694
  • Buchmann I, Reinhardt M, Elsner K, Bunjes D, Altehoefer C, Finke J, et al. 2-(Fluorine-18)fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography in the detection and staging of malignant lymphoma. A bicenter trial. Cancer 2001; 91: 889–899
  • Tatsumi M, Cohade C, Nakamoto Y, Fishman E K, Wahl R L. Direct comparison of FDG PET and CT findings in patients with lymphoma: initial experience. Radiology 2005; 237: 1038–1045
  • Kostakoglu L, Leonard J P, Kuji I, Coleman M, Vallabhajosula S, Goldsmith S J. Comparison of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and Ga-67 scintigraphy in evaluation of lymphoma. Cancer 2002; 94: 879–888
  • Rizvi M A, Evens A M, Tallman M S, Nelson B P, Rosen S T. T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 2006; 107: 1255–1264
  • Kumar R, Xiu Y, Zhuang H M, Alavi A. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in evaluation of primary cutaneous lymphoma. Br J Dermatol 2006; 155: 357–363
  • Tsai E Y, Taur A, Espinosa L, Quon A, Johnson D, Dick S, et al. Staging accuracy in mycosis fungoides and sezary syndrome using integrated positron emission tomography and computed tomography. Arch Dermatol 2006; 142: 577–584
  • Valencak J, Becherer A, Der-Petrossian M, Trautinger F, Raderer M, Hoffmann M. Positron emission tomography with [18F] 2-fluoro-d-2-deoxyglucose in primary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas. Haematologica 2004; 89: 115–116
  • Howlett D C, Wong W L, Smith N P, Ayers A B. Computed tomography in the evaluation of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Eur J Radiol 1995; 20: 39–42
  • Bass J C, Korobkin M T, Cooper K D, Kane N M, Platt J F. Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: CT in evaluation and staging. Radiology 1993; 186: 273–278
  • Miketic L M, Chambers T P, Lembersky B C. Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: value of CT in staging and determining prognosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 160: 1129–1132
  • Kulin P A, Marglin S I, Shuman W P, Chew D E, Olerud J E. Diagnostic imaging in the initial staging of mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome. Arch Dermatol 1990; 126: 914–918
  • Wohrer S, Chott A, Drach J, Puspok A, Hejna M, Hoffmann M, et al. Chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide, vincristine and prednisone (CHOEP) is not effective in patients with enteropathy-type intestinal T-cell lymphoma. Ann Oncol 2004; 15: 1680–1683
  • Hoffmann M, Vogelsang H, Kletter K, Zettinig G, Chott A, Raderer M. 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) for assessment of enteropathy-type T cell lymphoma. Gut 2003; 52: 347–351
  • Hadithi M, Mallant M, Oudejans J, van Waesberghe J H, Mulder C J, Comans E F. 18F-FDG PET versus CT for the detection of enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma in refractory celiac disease. J Nucl Med 2006; 47: 1622–1627
  • Spaepen K, Stroobants S, Dupont P, Van Steenweghen S, Thomas J, Vandenberghe P, et al. Prognostic value of positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) after first-line chemotherapy in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: is [18F]FDG-PET a valid alternative to conventional diagnostic methods?. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 414–419
  • Spaepen K, Stroobants S, Dupont P, Vandenberghe P, Thomas J, de Groot T, et al. Early restaging positron emission tomography with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose predicts outcome in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Ann Oncol 2002; 13: 1356–1363
  • Shapiro M, Yun M, Junkins-Hopkins J M, Vittorio C C, Schulman N, Saidman B H, et al. Assessment of tumor burden and treatment response by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose injection and positron emission tomography in patients with cutaneous T- and B-cell lymphomas. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002; 47: 623–628
  • Meignan M, Haioun C, Itti E, Rahmouni A, Reyes F. Value of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in managing patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma 2006; 6: 306–313

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.