517
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Clinical significance of complex karyotype at diagnosis in pediatric and adult patients with de novo acute promyelocytic leukemia treated with ATRA and chemotherapy

, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 1146-1155 | Received 14 Jul 2018, Accepted 03 Sep 2018, Published online: 11 Dec 2018

References

  • Grimwade D, Howe K, Langabeer S, et al. Establishing the presence of the t(15;17) in suspected acute promyelocytic leukaemia: cytogenetic, molecular and PML immunofluorescence assessment of patients entered into the M.R.C. ATRA trial. M.R.C. Adult Leukaemia Working Party. Br J Haematol. 1996;94:557–573.
  • Slack JL, Arthur DC, Lawrence D, et al. Secondary cytogenetic changes in acute promyelocytic leukemia–prognostic importance in patients treated with chemotherapy alone and association with the intron 3 breakpoint of the PML gene: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:1786–1795.
  • Schoch C, Haase D, Haferlach T, et al. Incidence and implication of additional chromosome aberrations in acute promyelocytic leukaemia with translocation t(15;17)(q22;q21): a report on 50 patients. Br J Haematol. 1996;94:493–500.
  • De Botton S, Chevret S, Sanz M, et al. Additional chromosomal abnormalities in patients with acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL) do not confer poor prognosis: results of APL 93 trial. Br J Haematol. 2000;111:801–806.
  • Hernandez JM, Martin G, Gutierrez NC, et al. Additional cytogenetic changes do not influence the outcome of patients with newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia treated with an ATRA plus anthracyclin based protocol. A report of the Spanish group PETHEMA. Haematologica. 2001;86:807–813.
  • Pantic M, Novak A, Marisavljevic D, et al. Additional chromosome aberrations in acute promyelocytic leukemia: characteristics and prognostic influence. Med Oncol. 2000;17:307–313.
  • Wan TS, Ma SK, Au WY, Liu HS, Chan JC, Chan LC. Trisomy 21 and other chromosomal abnormalities in acute promyelocytic leukemia. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2003;140:170–173.
  • Hiorns LR, Swansbury GJ, Mehta J, et al. Additional chromosome abnormalities confer worse prognosis in acute promyelocytic leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 1997;96:314–321.
  • Xu L, Zhao WL, Xiong SM, et al. Molecular cytogenetic characterization and clinical relevance of additional, complex and/or variant chromosome abnormalities in acute promyelocytic leukemia. Leukemia. 2001;15:1359–1368.
  • Lu J, Jiang H, Jiang Q, et al. Effect of additional chromosome abnormalities on the outcome of newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia treated with red arsenic sulfide and all trans-retinoic acid plus anthracyclin based protocol. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2008;88:2254–2257.
  • Cervera J, Montesinos P, Hernandez-Rivas JM, et al. Additional chromosome abnormalities in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia treated with all-trans retinoic acid and chemotherapy. Haematologica. 2010;95:424–431.
  • Ono T, Takeshita A, Iwanaga M, Asou N, Naoe T, Ohno R. Impact of additional chromosomal abnormalities in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia: 10-year results of the Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group APL97 study. Haematologica. 2011;96:174–176.
  • Wiernik PH, Sun Z, Gundacker H, et al. Prognostic implications of additional chromosome abnormalities among patients with de novo acute promyelocytic leukemia with t(15;17). Med Oncol. 2012;29:2095–2101.
  • Lou Y, Suo S, Tong H, et al. Characteristics and prognosis analysis of additional chromosome abnormalities in newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia treated with arsenic trioxide as the front-line therapy. Leuk Res. 2013;37:1451–1456.
  • Poire X, Moser BK, Gallagher RE, et al. Arsenic trioxide in front-line therapy of acute promyelocytic leukemia (C9710): prognostic significance of FLT3 mutations and complex karyotype. Leuk Lymphoma. 2014;55:1523–1532.
  • Schlenk RF, Germing U, Hartmann F, et al. High-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone in consolidation therapy for acute promyelocytic leukemia. Leukemia. 2005;19:978–983.
  • Lo-Coco F, Avvisati G, Vignetti M, et al. Retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide for acute promyelocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:111–121.
  • Burnett AK, Russell NH, Hills RK, et al. Arsenic trioxide and all-trans retinoic acid treatment for acute promyelocytic leukaemia in all risk groups (AML17): results of a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:1295–1305.
  • Ravandi F. “It's effective therapy, stupid!”. Leuk Res. 2013;37:1434–1435.
  • Sanz MA, Martin G, Rayon C, et al. A modified AIDA protocol with anthracycline-based consolidation results in high antileukemic efficacy and reduced toxicity in newly diagnosed PML/RARalpha-positive acute promyelocytic leukemia. PETHEMA group. Blood. 1999;94:3015–3021.
  • Sanz MA, Martin G, Gonzalez M, et al. Risk-adapted treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia with all-trans-retinoic acid and anthracycline monochemotherapy: a multicenter study by the PETHEMA group. Blood. 2004;103:1237–1243.
  • Sanz MA, Montesinos P, Rayon C, et al. Risk-adapted treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia based on all-trans retinoic acid and anthracycline with addition of cytarabine in consolidation therapy for high-risk patients: further improvements in treatment outcome. Blood. 2010;115:5137–5146.
  • Sanz MA, Montesinos P, Vellenga E, et al. Risk-adapted treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia with all-trans retinoic acid and anthracycline monochemotherapy: long-term outcome of the LPA 99 multicenter study by the PETHEMA Group. Blood. 2008;112:3130–3134.
  • McGowan-Jordan J, Simons A, Schmid M., editors. ISCN 2016: An International System for Human Cytogenomic Nomenclature (2016). Basel, Switzerland: Karger; 2016.
  • Cheson BD, Bennett JM, Kopecky KJ, et al. Revised recommendations of the International Working Group for Diagnosis, Standardization of Response Criteria, Treatment Outcomes, and Reporting Standards for Therapeutic Trials in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:4642–4649.
  • Sanz MA, Lo Coco F, Martin G, et al. Definition of relapse risk and role of nonanthracycline drugs for consolidation in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia: a joint study of the PETHEMA and GIMEMA cooperative groups. Blood. 2000;96:1247–1253.
  • Kaplan EL, Meier P. Non parametric estimations from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457–481.
  • Mantel N. Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep. 1966;50:163–170.
  • Gray RJ. A class of K-sample test for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk. Ann Stat. 1988;16:1141–1154.
  • Pepe MS, Mori M. Kaplan-Meier, marginal or conditional probability curves in summarizing competing risks failure time data? Stat Med. 1993;12:737–751.
  • Fine J, Gray RJ. A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc. 1999;94:496–509.
  • Gale RE, Hills R, Pizzey AR, et al. Relationship between FLT3 mutation status, biologic characteristics, and response to targeted therapy in acute promyelocytic leukemia. Blood. 2005;106:3768–3776.
  • Akagi T, Shih LY, Kato M, et al. Hidden abnormalities and novel classification of t(15;17) acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) based on genomic alterations. Blood. 2009;113:1741–1748.
  • Grimwade D, Hills RK, Moorman AV, et al. Refinement of cytogenetic classification in acute myeloid leukemia: determination of prognostic significance of rare recurring chromosomal abnormalities among 5876 younger adult patients treated in the United Kingdom Medical Research Council trials. Blood. 2010;116:354–365.
  • Dillon R, Grimwade D. Prognostic significance of additional cytogenetic abnormalities and FLT3 mutations in acute promyelocytic leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2014;55:1444–1446.
  • Sanz MA, Grimwade D, Tallman MS, et al. Management of acute promyelocytic leukemia: recommendations from an expert panel on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet. Blood. 2009;113:1875–1891.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.